Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 3/2019

07.12.2018 | Hip Arthroplasty

Return to activity following revision total hip arthroplasty

verfasst von: Gareth S. Turnbull, Chloe E. H. Scott, Deborah J. MacDonald, Steffen J. Breusch

Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Demand for revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA) continues to grow worldwide and is expected to more than double within the next 1–2 decades. The primary aim of this study was to examine return to function following revision THA in a UK population.

Patients and methods

We assessed 118 patients (132 RTHAs, mean age 65 years SD 13, range 23–88) at a mean follow-up of 7.9 years (SD 4.4) postoperatively. Preoperative age, gender, BMI, social deprivation, operative indication, comorbidities, activity level (UCLA score) and Oxford Hip Scores (OHS) were recorded. Postoperative UCLA score, OHS, EQ-5D, satisfaction levels and performance in activities of daily living (ADLs) were obtained and univariate and multivariate analysis performed.

Results

Mean UCLA activity score improved following RTHA (p < 0.001): UCLA activity score improved in 37% and was unchanged in 50%; 49% of patients engaged in at least moderate level activities (UCLA score ≥ 6). Patient BMI, gender, age and reason for revision did not influence levels of pain, stiffness or activity at follow-up. Preoperative UCLA activity scores (p < 0.001) independently predicted long-term UCLA scores. Independent predictors (p < 0.05) of poor hip-specific function (OHS) following revision included social deprivation, revision for periprosthetic fracture and lower preoperative OHS. Difficulties with ADLs were associated with increasing deprivation, ≥ 3 comorbidities, and revision for periprosthetic fracture or infection (p < 0.05). Overall, 79% of patients remained satisfied or very satisfied following revision THA. Following RTHA, 10% suffered a dislocation and 13% required reoperation for complications.

Conclusion

Revision THA facilitates long-term return to preoperative levels of physical activity in the majority of patients, though activity levels increase in one-third only. Overall over three-quarters are satisfied with their outcome, but revision for periprosthetic fracture or dislocation gives the worse overall outcomes and lower satisfaction levels.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bozic KJ et al (2015) comparative epidemiology of revision arthroplasty: failed THA poses greater clinical and economic burdens than failed TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(6):2131–2138CrossRefPubMed Bozic KJ et al (2015) comparative epidemiology of revision arthroplasty: failed THA poses greater clinical and economic burdens than failed TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(6):2131–2138CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurtz S et al (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):780–785PubMed Kurtz S et al (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):780–785PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Registry NJ (2017) National joint registry 14th annual report, 2016 Registry NJ (2017) National joint registry 14th annual report, 2016
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pivec R et al (2015) Incidence and future projections of periprosthetic femoral fracture following primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of international registry data. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 25(4):269–275CrossRefPubMed Pivec R et al (2015) Incidence and future projections of periprosthetic femoral fracture following primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of international registry data. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 25(4):269–275CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Postler AE et al (2017) Patient-reported outcomes after revision surgery compared to primary total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 27(2):180–186CrossRefPubMed Postler AE et al (2017) Patient-reported outcomes after revision surgery compared to primary total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 27(2):180–186CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Vanhegan IS et al (2012) A financial analysis of revision hip arthroplasty: the economic burden in relation to the national tariff. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94(5):619–623CrossRefPubMed Vanhegan IS et al (2012) A financial analysis of revision hip arthroplasty: the economic burden in relation to the national tariff. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94(5):619–623CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Farrar NG, Aker M, Duckett S (2015) A cost analysis of elective hip revision arthroplasty versus periprosthetic hip fracture management in a district general hospital. 97:26–29 Farrar NG, Aker M, Duckett S (2015) A cost analysis of elective hip revision arthroplasty versus periprosthetic hip fracture management in a district general hospital. 97:26–29
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Crowe JF, Sculco TP, Kahn B (2003) Revision total hip arthroplasty: hospital cost and reimbursement analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 413:175–182CrossRef Crowe JF, Sculco TP, Kahn B (2003) Revision total hip arthroplasty: hospital cost and reimbursement analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 413:175–182CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Antonio JA, Capello WN, Naughton M (2012) Ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty have high survivorship at 10 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(2):373–381CrossRefPubMed D’Antonio JA, Capello WN, Naughton M (2012) Ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty have high survivorship at 10 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(2):373–381CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gwam CU et al (2017) Current epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States: national inpatient sample 2009 to 2013. J Arthroplasty Gwam CU et al (2017) Current epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States: national inpatient sample 2009 to 2013. J Arthroplasty
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh JA, Lewallen D (2009) Age, gender, obesity, and depression are associated with patient-related pain and function outcome after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Rheumatol 28(12):1419–1430CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Singh JA, Lewallen D (2009) Age, gender, obesity, and depression are associated with patient-related pain and function outcome after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Rheumatol 28(12):1419–1430CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisler T et al. Patient expectation and satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 17(4): 457–462 Eisler T et al. Patient expectation and satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 17(4): 457–462
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Barrack RL et al (2006) Revision total hip arthroplasty: the patient’s perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:173–177CrossRefPubMed Barrack RL et al (2006) Revision total hip arthroplasty: the patient’s perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:173–177CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Haddad FS et al. The expectations of patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 16(1):87–91 Haddad FS et al. The expectations of patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 16(1):87–91
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dawson J et al (1996) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(2):185–190CrossRefPubMed Dawson J et al (1996) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(2):185–190CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M (2009) Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(4):958–965CrossRefPubMed Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M (2009) Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(4):958–965CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Zahiri CA et al (1998) Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty 13(8):890–895CrossRefPubMed Zahiri CA et al (1998) Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty 13(8):890–895CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat EuroQol (1990) A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16(3):199–208 EuroQol (1990) A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16(3):199–208
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kievit AJ et al (2014) A reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire to score the impact of knee complaints on work following total knee arthroplasty: the WORQ. J Arthroplasty 29(6):1169–1175 (e2) CrossRefPubMed Kievit AJ et al (2014) A reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire to score the impact of knee complaints on work following total knee arthroplasty: the WORQ. J Arthroplasty 29(6):1169–1175 (e2) CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Biring GS et al (2007) Predictors of quality of life outcomes after revision total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(11):1446–1451CrossRefPubMed Biring GS et al (2007) Predictors of quality of life outcomes after revision total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(11):1446–1451CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Bourne RB et al (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(1):57–63CrossRefPubMed Bourne RB et al (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(1):57–63CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott CE et al (2010) Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(9):1253–1258CrossRefPubMed Scott CE et al (2010) Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(9):1253–1258CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Von Keudell A et al (2014) Patient satisfaction after primary total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an age-dependent analysis. Knee 21(1):180–184CrossRef Von Keudell A et al (2014) Patient satisfaction after primary total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an age-dependent analysis. Knee 21(1):180–184CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Saleh KJ et al (2003) Functional outcome after revision hip arthroplasty: a metaanalysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:254–264 Saleh KJ et al (2003) Functional outcome after revision hip arthroplasty: a metaanalysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:254–264
28.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Jain R, Schemitsch EH, Waddell JP (2000) Functional outcome after acetabular revision with roof reinforcement rings. Can J Surg 43(4):276–282PubMedPubMedCentral Jain R, Schemitsch EH, Waddell JP (2000) Functional outcome after acetabular revision with roof reinforcement rings. Can J Surg 43(4):276–282PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat MacWilliam CH et al (1996) Patient-related risk factors that predict poor outcome after total hip replacement. Health Serv Res 31(5):623–638PubMedPubMedCentral MacWilliam CH et al (1996) Patient-related risk factors that predict poor outcome after total hip replacement. Health Serv Res 31(5):623–638PubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis AM et al (2006) Predictors of functional outcome two years following revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(4):685–691PubMed Davis AM et al (2006) Predictors of functional outcome two years following revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(4):685–691PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Watts CD et al (2016) Morbidly obese vs non-obese aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty: surprisingly similar outcomes. J Arthroplasty 31(4):842–845CrossRefPubMed Watts CD et al (2016) Morbidly obese vs non-obese aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty: surprisingly similar outcomes. J Arthroplasty 31(4):842–845CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher DA et al (2007) Looks good but feels bad: factors that contribute to poor results after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22(6 Suppl 2):39–42CrossRefPubMed Fisher DA et al (2007) Looks good but feels bad: factors that contribute to poor results after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22(6 Suppl 2):39–42CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Houdek MT et al (2015) Morbid obesity: a significant risk factor for failure of two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty for infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(4):326–332CrossRefPubMed Houdek MT et al (2015) Morbid obesity: a significant risk factor for failure of two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty for infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(4):326–332CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomasson E et al (2001) Perioperative complications in revision hip surgery. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 3(1):38–40PubMed Thomasson E et al (2001) Perioperative complications in revision hip surgery. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 3(1):38–40PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Clement ND et al (2013) Socioeconomic status affects the Oxford knee score and short-form 12 score following total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 95-B(1):52–58CrossRefPubMed Clement ND et al (2013) Socioeconomic status affects the Oxford knee score and short-form 12 score following total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 95-B(1):52–58CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Clement ND et al (2011) Socioeconomic status affects the early outcome of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(4):464–469CrossRefPubMed Clement ND et al (2011) Socioeconomic status affects the early outcome of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(4):464–469CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Neuburger J et al (2013) Socioeconomic differences in patient-reported outcomes after a hip or knee replacement in the English National Health Service. J Public Health 35(1):115–124CrossRef Neuburger J et al (2013) Socioeconomic differences in patient-reported outcomes after a hip or knee replacement in the English National Health Service. J Public Health 35(1):115–124CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Springer BD et al (2017) Infection burden in total hip and knee arthroplasties: an international registry-based perspective. Arthroplasty Today 3(2):137–140CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Springer BD et al (2017) Infection burden in total hip and knee arthroplasties: an international registry-based perspective. Arthroplasty Today 3(2):137–140CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh JA, Lewallen DG (2013) Operative diagnosis for revision total hip arthroplasty is associated with patient-reported outcomes (PROs). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14(1):210CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Singh JA, Lewallen DG (2013) Operative diagnosis for revision total hip arthroplasty is associated with patient-reported outcomes (PROs). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14(1):210CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis AM et al (2008) Waiting for hip revision surgery: the impact on patient disability. Can J Surg 51(2):92–96PubMedPubMedCentral Davis AM et al (2008) Waiting for hip revision surgery: the impact on patient disability. Can J Surg 51(2):92–96PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Return to activity following revision total hip arthroplasty
verfasst von
Gareth S. Turnbull
Chloe E. H. Scott
Deborah J. MacDonald
Steffen J. Breusch
Publikationsdatum
07.12.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-3090-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.