Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie 4/2020

05.03.2020 | Surgical Techniques

Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using the in situ referencing technique

verfasst von: Manuel Weißenberger, Nils Petersen, Sebastian Bölch, Dominik Rak, Jörg Arnholdt, Maximilian Rudert, Professor Boris Michael Holzapfel, MD, PhD, FEBOT

Erschienen in: Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with the in situ referencing technique aiming to preserve as much ligament function and epi-metaphyseal bone stock as possible.

Indications

Aseptic loosening, progression of osteoarthritis, periprosthetic fracture, periprosthetic infection, arthrofibrosis, polyethylene wear, malalignment, instability, femoro-tibial impingement.

Contraindications

Unexplained pain, localized or systemic active infection (anywhere).

Surgical technique

Referencing for the tibia and the femur cuts is performed prior to implant removal. The tibial cutting jig and the initial tibial resection level is set in a way that the sawblade just fits under the tibial implant. In case too much bone needs to be removed to achieve flush implant sitting on both the medial and lateral tibia, a step cut needs to be performed to build up the medial defect with an augment. Prior to femoral component removal, rotational alignment is determined and intramedullary referencing for the distal femur osteotomy is performed. Level of constraint and additional tibial stem fixation is chosen according to the amount of bone resected and according to ligament stability.

Postoperative management

Sterile dressings and elastic compression bandaging. No limitation of active/passive range of motion. Full weight-bearing or partial weight-bearing for 2 weeks postoperatively in the presence of bone or soft tissue defects.

Results

Between 2008 and 2019, 84 patients underwent revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The mean follow-up was 64 months (range 3–132 months). Implant survival after revision of UKA to TKA was 92% (95% CI = 82–97%) at 5 years of follow-up and 86% (95% CI = 69–93%) at 10 years of follow-up. The mean Oxford knee score was 20.1 (6–39, SD ± 6.5) preoperatively and 30.2 (3–48, SD ± 11.3) postoperatively. The mean visual analogue scale was 6.9 (range 1–10, SD ± 1.8) preoperatively and 3.9 (range 0–9, SD ± 2.6) postoperatively.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Arnholdt J, Holzapfel BM, Sefrin L, Rudert M, Beckmann J, Steinert AF (2017) Individualized unicondylar knee replacement: use of patient-specific implants and instruments. Oper Orthop Traumatol 29(1):31–39CrossRef Arnholdt J, Holzapfel BM, Sefrin L, Rudert M, Beckmann J, Steinert AF (2017) Individualized unicondylar knee replacement: use of patient-specific implants and instruments. Oper Orthop Traumatol 29(1):31–39CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Arno S, Maffei D, Walker PS, Schwarzkopf R, Desai P, Steiner GC (2011) Retrospective analysis of total knee arthroplasty cases for visual, histological, and clinical eligibility of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 26(8):1396–1403CrossRef Arno S, Maffei D, Walker PS, Schwarzkopf R, Desai P, Steiner GC (2011) Retrospective analysis of total knee arthroplasty cases for visual, histological, and clinical eligibility of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 26(8):1396–1403CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergeson AG, Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr., Hurst JM, Morris MJ, Sneller MA (2013) Medial mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early survivorship and analysis of failures in 1000 consecutive cases. J Arthroplasty 28(9 Suppl):172–175CrossRef Bergeson AG, Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr., Hurst JM, Morris MJ, Sneller MA (2013) Medial mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early survivorship and analysis of failures in 1000 consecutive cases. J Arthroplasty 28(9 Suppl):172–175CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Campi S, Tibrewal S, Cuthbert R, Tibrewal SB (2018) Unicompartmental knee replacement—Current perspectives. J Clin Orthop Trauma 9(1):17–23CrossRef Campi S, Tibrewal S, Cuthbert R, Tibrewal SB (2018) Unicompartmental knee replacement—Current perspectives. J Clin Orthop Trauma 9(1):17–23CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown NM, Sheth NP, Davis K, Berend ME, Lombardi AV, Berend KR, Valle DCJ (2012) Total knee arthroplasty has higher postoperative morbidity than unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. J Arthroplasty 27(8 Suppl):86–90CrossRef Brown NM, Sheth NP, Davis K, Berend ME, Lombardi AV, Berend KR, Valle DCJ (2012) Total knee arthroplasty has higher postoperative morbidity than unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. J Arthroplasty 27(8 Suppl):86–90CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher N, Agarwal M, Reuben SF, Johnson DS, Turner PG (2006) Sporting and physical activity following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 13(4):296–300CrossRef Fisher N, Agarwal M, Reuben SF, Johnson DS, Turner PG (2006) Sporting and physical activity following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 13(4):296–300CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC (1991) Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res (273):151–156. (PMID: 1959264) Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC (1991) Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res (273):151–156. (PMID: 1959264)
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Liddle AD, Judge A, Pandit H, Murray DW (2014) Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet 384(9952):1437–1445CrossRef Liddle AD, Judge A, Pandit H, Murray DW (2014) Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet 384(9952):1437–1445CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Murray DW, Liddle AD, Dodd CA, Pandit H (2015) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is the glass half full or half empty? Bone Joint J 97-B(10 Suppl A):3–8CrossRef Murray DW, Liddle AD, Dodd CA, Pandit H (2015) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is the glass half full or half empty? Bone Joint J 97-B(10 Suppl A):3–8CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Furnes O, Espehaug B, Lie SA, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI (2007) Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(3):519–525CrossRef Furnes O, Espehaug B, Lie SA, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI (2007) Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(3):519–525CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Remes V (2007) Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective follow-up study of 1,819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 78(1):128–135CrossRef Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Remes V (2007) Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective follow-up study of 1,819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 78(1):128–135CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Thienpont E (2017) Conversion of a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to a total knee arthroplasty: can we achieve a primary result? Bone Joint J 99-B(1 Supple A):65–69CrossRef Thienpont E (2017) Conversion of a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to a total knee arthroplasty: can we achieve a primary result? Bone Joint J 99-B(1 Supple A):65–69CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Robb CA, Matharu GS, Baloch K, Pynsent PB (2013) Revision surgery for failed unicompartmental knee replacement: technical aspects and clinical outcome. Acta Orthop Belg 79(3):312–317PubMed Robb CA, Matharu GS, Baloch K, Pynsent PB (2013) Revision surgery for failed unicompartmental knee replacement: technical aspects and clinical outcome. Acta Orthop Belg 79(3):312–317PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jarvenpaa J, Kettunen J, Miettinen H, Kroger H (2010) The clinical outcome of revision knee replacement after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty: 8–17 years follow-up study of 49 patients. Int Orthop 34(5):649–653CrossRef Jarvenpaa J, Kettunen J, Miettinen H, Kroger H (2010) The clinical outcome of revision knee replacement after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty: 8–17 years follow-up study of 49 patients. Int Orthop 34(5):649–653CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hang JR, Stanford TE, Graves SE, Davidson DC, de Steiger RN, Miller LN (2010) Outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee replacement. Acta Orthop 81(1):95–98CrossRef Hang JR, Stanford TE, Graves SE, Davidson DC, de Steiger RN, Miller LN (2010) Outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee replacement. Acta Orthop 81(1):95–98CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearse AJ, Hooper GJ, Rothwell A, Frampton C (2010) Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand National Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(4):508–512CrossRef Pearse AJ, Hooper GJ, Rothwell A, Frampton C (2010) Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand National Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(4):508–512CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lunebourg A, Parratte S, Ollivier M, Abdel MP, Argenson JN (2015) Are revisions of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties more like a primary or revision TKA? J Arthroplasty 30(11):1985–1989CrossRef Lunebourg A, Parratte S, Ollivier M, Abdel MP, Argenson JN (2015) Are revisions of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties more like a primary or revision TKA? J Arthroplasty 30(11):1985–1989CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, Bauer TW, Springer BD, Valle DCJ, Garvin KL, Mont MA, Wongworawat MD, Zalavras CG (2011) New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(11):2992–2994CrossRef Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, Bauer TW, Springer BD, Valle DCJ, Garvin KL, Mont MA, Wongworawat MD, Zalavras CG (2011) New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(11):2992–2994CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Della Valle C, Parvizi J, Bauer TW, DiCesare PE, Evans RP, Segreti J, Spangehl M, Watters WC 3rd, Keith M, Turkelson CM, Wies JL, Sluka P, Hitchcock K, American Academy of Orthopaedic S (2011) American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(14):1355–1357CrossRef Della Valle C, Parvizi J, Bauer TW, DiCesare PE, Evans RP, Segreti J, Spangehl M, Watters WC 3rd, Keith M, Turkelson CM, Wies JL, Sluka P, Hitchcock K, American Academy of Orthopaedic S (2011) American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(14):1355–1357CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Horas K, Arnholdt J, Steinert AF, Hoberg M, Rudert M, Holzapfel BM (2017) Acetabular defect classification in times of 3D imaging and patient-specific treatment protocols. Orthopäde 46(2):168–178CrossRef Horas K, Arnholdt J, Steinert AF, Hoberg M, Rudert M, Holzapfel BM (2017) Acetabular defect classification in times of 3D imaging and patient-specific treatment protocols. Orthopäde 46(2):168–178CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Cui WQ, Won YY, Baek MH, Kim KK, Cho JH (2006) Variations of the ‘grand-piano sign’ during total knee replacement. A computer-simulation study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(11):1441–1447CrossRef Cui WQ, Won YY, Baek MH, Kim KK, Cho JH (2006) Variations of the ‘grand-piano sign’ during total knee replacement. A computer-simulation study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(11):1441–1447CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohmori T, Kabata T, Kajino Y, Taga T, Inoue D, Yamamoto T, Takagi T, Yoshitani J, Ueno T, Tsuchiya H (2018) Usefulness of the “grand-piano sign” for determining femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 25(1):15–24CrossRef Ohmori T, Kabata T, Kajino Y, Taga T, Inoue D, Yamamoto T, Takagi T, Yoshitani J, Ueno T, Tsuchiya H (2018) Usefulness of the “grand-piano sign” for determining femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 25(1):15–24CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonas SC, Jermin P, Howells N, Porteous A, Murray J, Robinson J (2019) Outcome of revision UKR to TKR when compared to a matched group of TKR of same total arthroplasty lifespan. Knee 26(2):400–404CrossRef Jonas SC, Jermin P, Howells N, Porteous A, Murray J, Robinson J (2019) Outcome of revision UKR to TKR when compared to a matched group of TKR of same total arthroplasty lifespan. Knee 26(2):400–404CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using the in situ referencing technique
verfasst von
Manuel Weißenberger
Nils Petersen
Sebastian Bölch
Dominik Rak
Jörg Arnholdt
Maximilian Rudert
Professor Boris Michael Holzapfel, MD, PhD, FEBOT
Publikationsdatum
05.03.2020
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0934-6694
Elektronische ISSN: 1439-0981
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-020-00656-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie 4/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.