Symptom recurrence after initial surgical management of esophageal achalasia occurs in 10–25% of patients. The aim of this study was to analyze safety and efficacy of revisional therapy after failed Heller myotomy (HM).
Methods
A retrospective review of a prospective database was performed searching for patients with recurrent symptoms after primary surgical therapy for achalasia. Patients with previously failed HM were considered for the final analysis. The Foregut questionnaire, and the Atkinson and Eckardt scales were used to assess severity of symptoms. Objective investigations routinely included upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and barium swallow study. Redo treatments consisted of endoscopic pneumatic dilation (PD), laparoscopic HM, hybrid Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, or stapled cardioplasty. A yearly clinical and endoscopic follow-up was scheduled in all patients.
Results
Over a 20-year period, 26 patients with a median age of 66 years (IQR 19.5) underwent revisional therapy after failed HM for achalasia at a tertiary-care university hospital. The median time after index procedure was 10 years (IQR 21). Revisional therapy consisted of endoscopic pneumatic dilation (n=13), laparoscopic HM and fundoplication (n=10), esophagectomy (n=2), and stapled cardioplasty and fundoplication (n=1). Nine (34.6%) of these patients required further endoscopic or surgical treatments. There was no mortality, and the overall complication rate was 7.7%. At a median follow-up of 42 months (range 10–149), a significant decrease of dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain, respiratory symptoms, and median Eckardt score (p<0.05) was noted.
Conclusion
In specialized and multidisciplinary centers, revisional therapy for achalasia is feasible, safe, and effective.
Hinweise
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Introduction
Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder characterized by impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter and loss of esophageal body peristalsis. Available palliative treatments are directed to alleviate symptoms and improve quality of life through reduction of sphincter resistance.1 Initial treatment options include surgical Heller myotomy (HM) with anterior Dor fundoplication, endoscopic pneumatic dilation (PD), and, less often, endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin. More recently, per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been introduced as a promising therapeutic alternative.2
Currently, treatment failure rates are estimated in the range of 20–25% after endoscopic PD and 10–20% after laparoscopic HM.3‐7 Symptom recurrence after PD is related to lack of uniform protocols, operator’s experience, and patient related factors. Recognized causes of surgical failure are an incomplete distal myotomy, twisting or mediastinal herniation of the fundoplication, reflux esophagitis, late fibrosis at the myotomy site, and dolichomegaesophagus. When symptoms persist or recur after the initial therapeutic approach, additional treatment may be required to restore a satisfactory quality of life. The main purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes of revisional surgery after prior failed Heller myotomy.
Anzeige
Patients and Methods
Demographic and clinical data of patients diagnosed with achalasia at our tertiary-care referral hospital and esophageal center were retrieved from a prospectively collected electronic database. After internal review board approval, a retrospective study was conducted on all patients undergoing revisional procedures for persistent or recurrent symptoms after primary HM with or without fundoplication. Collected data consisted of demographics, symptoms before index treatment and at baseline, objective endoscopic and radiologic findings, esophageal manometry and pH data if available, intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and long-term clinical outcomes.
Pre-operative Work-up
The Foregut questionnaire, the GERD-HRQL questionnaire, and the Atkinson and Eckardt scales were used to assess symptoms severity and frequency. Pre-treatment work-up routinely included upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and barium swallow study. Esophageal manometry and pH-impedance monitoring was performed in selected patients mainly complaining of reflux symptoms. Chest CT scan was performed in elderly individuals to rule out malignancy.
Revisional Procedures
Depending on age, comorbidities, and results of objective testing, patients were first offered endoscopic PD, laparoscopic HM and Dor fundoplication, laparoscopic transgastric stapled cardioplasty, or hybrid Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Endoscopic PD was performed after 12 h of fasting, under deep sedation or general anesthesia, depending on patient’s comorbidity and the degree of cooperation, using a 30 or 35 mm Rigiflex™ balloon (Boston Scientific, MA) fully inflated for 60 s, and the balloon inflation was repeated 3 times. Laparoscopic HM was performed after lysis of adhesions between the liver and the phrenoesophageal ligament covering the previous myotomy site which is generally at 12–2 o’clock position; if present, a prior fundoplication was taken down. A mediastinal dissection was performed to enable straightening of a sigmoid esophagus, to reduce a hiatal hernia, or to resect with a linear endostapler an esophageal pseudodiverticulum. Intraoperative endoscopy was selectively used to assist surgical dissection. The HM extended for about 5 cm above the gastroesophageal junction and for 2 cm towards the gastric side, away from the previous myotomy. The most proximal short gastric vessels were divided whenever necessary to relieve tension on the fundic flap, and a 180° anterior fundoplication (Dor) was performed. A posterior crural repair was added whenever necessary, especially when performing a Toupet fundoplication or after reduction of a sigmoid esophagus. Esophagectomy with hybrid Ivor-Lewis approach was reserved to patients with end-stage achalasia and/or multiple prior surgical procedures8 in whom a redo HM was considered futile. A laparoscopic trans-gastric stapled cardioplasty9 combined with Dor fundoplication was considered in patients with contraindications to esophagectomy. All revisional procedures were carried out by a senior expert surgeon, and the likely reason for symptom persistence/recurrence was annotated in the operative report.
Follow-up
Clinical and endoscopic follow-up was scheduled at yearly intervals and included symptoms questionnaires and an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. In patients with persistent/recurrent symptoms during the follow-up, further work-up and revisional treatment was offered depending on patient’s quality of life, previous treatments, and comorbidities. At the latest follow-up, the evolution and change in symptom frequency and severity were analyzed for each patient and compared to baseline.
Anzeige
Statistical Analysis
Categorical data are reported with frequencies and proportions. Continuous data are reported as median and interquartile range (IQR). Comparison of categorical data was performed using chi-square and Fisher exact tests. Continuous variables were compared using non-parametric tests (Mann–Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and Kruskal Wallis test), as appropriate. A p-value lower than 0.050 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Software (SPSS 25.0®).
Results
Between July 1, 2001, and July 31, 2020, among 503 patients treated for achalasia at our institution, 26 (5.2%) presented with persistent/recurrent symptoms after a primary HM. Two (7.7%) of these patients had been previously treated at our center. The median age was 66 years (range 32–87 years), and the median time elapsed between the primary and the revisional procedure was 10 years (range 1–47 years). Among these patients, 22 (84.6%) had a history of trans-abdominal HM, through laparoscopy (n=15) or laparotomy (n=7), and 4 (15.4%) had trans-thoracic HM. At baseline, dysphagia and regurgitation were the main symptom (96.4% and 80.4%, respectively), followed by chest pain (35.7%), nausea and vomiting (26.8%), and heartburn (10%). The median Eckardt score was 4 (IQR 2.3). The baseline characteristics at presentation and the type of the primary procedures in the patient population are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1
Demographic and clinical data of patients who failed prior Heller myotomy (HM) or endoscopic therapy (ET). Values are expressed as median and interquartile range
Failed HM
n=26
Sex, M/F
15/11
Age, years
66 (19.5)
BMI, kg/m2
22.6 (3.0)
Median weight loss, kg
4.1 ± 5.8
Comorbidities,n (%)
Cardiovascular
8 (30.8)
Neurologic
1 (3.8)
Respiratory
4 (15.4)
Metabolic
5 (19.2)
Autoimmune
2 (7.7)
Median time after index treatment (years)
10.0 (21)
Previous procedures, n (%)
Botox injection
3 (11.5)
Pneumatic Dilation
9 (34.6)
POEM
0 (0.0)
Heller myotomy alone, trans-abdominal
1 (3.8)
Heller myotomy plus fundoplication
21(80.8)
Heller myotomy plus fundoplication, trans-thoracic
4 (15.4)
Eckardt score
4.0 (2.3)
Eckardt grade
2.5 (1.0)
Symptoms,n (%)
Dysphagia
25 (96.2)
Regurgitation
3 (11.5)
Chest pain
20 (76.9)
Nausea/vomiting
4 (15.4)
Heartburn
8 (30.8)
Abdominal pain
6 (23.0)
History of pneumonia
6 (23.0)
Esophagitis, grade C, n (%)
5 (19.2)
Resting LES pressure, mmHg
11.9 (10.0)
Revisional Procedures
The most common revisional treatments were PD (50%) and HM with fundoplication (38.5%). There were no conversions to laparotomy. Based on intraoperative assessment, possible reasons for recurrence of symptoms after the primary surgical treatment were the following: dense periesophageal fibrosis (n=8), twisted/obstructing fundoplication (n=3), dolicho-megaesophagus (n=3), disrupted fundoplication (n=1), and pseudodiverticulum (n=1, 7.7%). One intraoperative mucosal tear occurred during redo HM, and was immediately recognized, repaired, and covered by the Dor flap. Overall postoperative morbidity rate was 7.7% and consisted of atrial fibrillation responsive to pharmacological cardioversion (n=1) and left pneumothorax requiring drainage (n=1). There was no mortality. The median hospital stay was 3 days (IQR 4). No hospital re-admissions were recorded up to 30 days after discharge (Table 2). Throughout the follow-up time, nine patients (34.6%) required repeat revisional therapy and were treated by PD (n=6), redo HM (n=2), and stapled cardioplasty (n=2) (Figures 1 and 2)
Table 2
Treatment modalities, operative time, morbidity, and length of hospital stay
n=26
Type of revisional treatment, n (%)
Pneumatic dilation
13 (50.0)
Heller-Dor
8 (30.8)
Heller-Toupet
2 (7.7)
Esophagectomy
2 (7.7)
Cardioplasty
1 (3.8)
Associated procedures, n (%)
Crural repair
5 (19.2)
Diverticulectomy
1 (3.8)
Median operative time, min (range)
Pneumatic dilation
25 (15–30)
Heller myotomy+fundoplication
135 (75–225)
Esophagectomy
392 (305–480)
Cardioplasty
118 (0)
Complications grade, n (%)
Clavien-Dindo II
1 (3.8)
Clavien-Dindo IIIb
1 (3.8)
Median hospital stay, days, (IQR)
3.0 (4.0)
Figure 1
Study flow-chart
Figure 2
Estimated cumulative probability of success after revisional therapy for achalasia
×
×
Follow up After Revisional Treatments
The median follow-up was 42 months (range 10–149) (Figure 2). There was a statistically significant decrease of dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain, and respiratory symptoms compared to baseline (p<0.05) (Table 3). The overall rate of occasional (once a week or less) dysphagia was 23.0% for the entire cohort. The median Eckardt score significantly decreased from 4.0 (IQR 2.3) to 1.0 (IQR 2.0) (p<0.05). At the last endoscopic follow-up, 12 (46.2%) of the 26 patients had normal findings, whereas 5 (19.2%) had a dilated esophagus, 4 (15.4%) a tortuous distal esophagus, 2 (7.7%) grade C distal esophagitis, and 1 (3.8%) a pseudodiverticulum.
Table 3
Prevalence and severity of symptoms at baseline and at last follow-up
n=26
Pre
Post
p
Dysphagia
<0.001
Absent
1 (3.8)
20 (76.9)
Occasional
2 (7.7)
6 (23.0)
Every day
17 (65.4)
0 (0.0)
Every meal
6 (23.0)
0 (0.0)
Regurgitation
<0.001
Absent
6 (23.0)
25 (96.2)
Mild
1 (3.8)
1 (3.8)
Moderate
12 (46.0)
0 (0.0)
Severe
7 (26.9
0 (0.0)
Chest pain
0.024
Absent
18 (69.2)
25 (96.2)
Mild
3 (11.5)
1 (3.8)
Moderate
4 (15.4)
0 (0.0)
Severe
1 (3.8)
0 (0.0)
Respiratory symptoms
8 (30.8)
0 (0.0)
0.004
Nausea/vomiting
6 (23.0)
2 (7.7)
0.249
Heartburn
0.609
Absent
23 (88.5)
25 (96.2)
Occasional
1 (3.8)
1 (3.8)
Every day
2 (7.7)
0 (0.0)
Discussion
The main finding of this study is that revisional therapy after failed HM is safe and effective. Half of our patients were successfully treated by PD at first hand, 38.4% required redo HM, and only 7.7% required esophagectomy. However, one-third of the patients required further endoscopic or surgical treatments. The morbidity rate was low, no major complications occurred, and long-term clinical outcomes were satisfactory.
It has previously been reported3 that the presence of adhesions, dense fibrosis, and loss of tissue planes secondary to previous HM cause technical difficulties in approaching the gastroesophageal junction and may decrease the chance of symptom relief, especially after multiple prior interventions and in patients with megaesophagus.10 Although laparoscopic surgery after primary HM is considered complex and risky, surgical expertise can minimize conversion rates, provide good clinical outcomes, and allows esophageal preservation.11 A recent case-control study comparing primary and revisional laparoscopic HM showed similar clinical and objective (LES integrated residual pressure<15 mmHg) outcomes in both patient groups.12
In this study, we attempted to identify the reasons for failure of HM. As classically described by Ellis,13 the most frequent causes include an incomplete distal myotomy, sclerosis at the myotomy site, excessively tight fundoplication, reflux esophagitis, or dolichomegaesophagus. Late occurrence of an esophageal pseudodiverticulum, characterized by a blown-out myotomy in the distal esophagus, is an additional cause of persistent bolus retention after HM. This peculiar pattern of failure has recently been defined as >50% increase in esophageal diameter in the area of myotomy above the fundoplication. The Eckardt score and the integrated relaxation pressure are greater in these patients, and type 3 achalasia and HM seem to be the main factors predisposing to a “ballooning” myotomy.14 Overall, we found a pseudodiverticulum in 2 (7.7%) patients. It may be speculated that a posterior and long myotomy possibly sparing the longitudinal muscle layer, which is feasible using POEM, may prevent the occurrence of a symptomatic pseudodiverticulum requiring revision and stapled resection.
Because of the wide variety of causes for surgical failure and treatment options, the choice of revisional therapy is challenging, and a standardized approach with a patient-centered multidisciplinary evaluation is highly desirable.15 A barium swallow study followed by upper endoscopy represents the preferred initial work-up and it has been suggested that outcomes of reoperation can be predicted based solely on this information.16 For the majority of patients, a non-operative approach by PD is a reasonable first choice, and is effective in up to 60% of patients.17, 18 However, redo HM remains the only viable treatment in patients presenting with mechanical complications such as twisted fundoplication, hiatal hernia, or pseudodiverticulum. Laparoscopic stapled cardioplasty with anterior fundoplication is a feasible and effective first- or second-line revisional procedure in selected patients, but it should be combined with an anterior fundoplication to mitigate postoperative reflux.19 Finally, trans-thoracic esophagectomy should be considered the final course of action, and should be reserved to patients with recalcitrant outflow obstruction symptoms and/or preneoplastic mucosal changes after multiple treatment failures.7
Anzeige
Per oral endoscopic myotomy is an attractive option to avoid the anterior scar tissue following HM and to perform an extended myotomy along a posterior anatomical plane. In patients with an intact and anatomically competent anterior fundoplication, and no hiatal hernia or pseudodiverticulum, POEM appears an attractive revisional option because it avoids adhesiolysis, is carried out through a virgin posterior plane of dissection opposite to the initial HM, and may cause less reflux since some patients will benefit from the existing Dor fundoplication. Compared to primary POEM, success rate of POEM after HM is lower, complication rates slightly higher, and operative time longer.2, 20‐26
Study Limitations
This is a retrospective study with a relatively small sample size conducted in a single institution, and these results may not be generalizable. In addition, the majority of patients presented after an initial treatment performed elsewhere, and pre- and post-treatment manometric and pH data were not available for all patients. Post-revisional manometric and pH data were not obtained. However, we used the same symptom scales for dysphagia both pre- and postoperatively and the study encompasses a very long period of time, with a median follow-up of 7 years and range from 1 to 15.5 years.
Conclusion
Revisional endoscopic or surgical treatment for achalasia is feasible, safe, and effective in specialized and multidisciplinary centers, and is associated with minimal postoperative complications and satisfactory long-term outcomes.
Availability of Data and Material
The datasets generated during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Anzeige
Declarations
Ethics Approval
All the procedures described in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the internal review board and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in this study
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Mit e.Med Chirurgie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Chirurgie, den Premium-Inhalten der chirurgischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten chirurgischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.
