Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 6/2017

15.02.2017 | Original Article

Right versus left laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: does side make any difference?

verfasst von: Juan P. Campana, Pablo A. Pellegrini, Gustavo L. Rossi, Guillermo Ojea Quintana, Ricardo E. Mentz, Carlos A. Vaccaro

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between right laparoscopic colectomy (RLC) and left laparoscopic colectomy (LLC) for colon cancer.

Method

Patients who underwent elective RLC or LLC for colon cancer between January 2004 and December 2014 were identified and elected for a retrospective analysis. Primary outcomes were technical difficulty (including operative time, intraoperative complications, and conversion rate) and postoperative outcome (including postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, reinterventions, readmissions, and mortality).

Results

A total of 547 patients (mean age: 68.5 years old; 48.4% males) were analyzed. The RLC group had a higher mean age (71 vs 65; p < 0.001), ASA 3/4 grade (36 vs 26%; p = 0.02), and comorbidity rate (61 vs 48%, p = 0.003). Regarding technical difficulty, no difference was found between the groups in intraoperative complications (4.1 vs 5.9%; p = 0.34) or conversion rate (6.2 vs 3.9%, p = 0.24). Mean operative time was significantly shorter for RLC (162 vs 185 min, p < 0.001). Regarding postoperative outcome, the RLC group had a higher overall morbidity (20.5 vs 13.3%, p = 0.03), ileus (10.6 vs 2.4%, p < 0.001), and a longer hospital stay (4.7 vs 3.9 days, p = 0.003), with no differences regarding reoperations, readmissions, or mortality. The multivariate analysis showed that RLC were independently associated with a longer operative time and postoperative ileus.

Conclusions

RLC for colon cancer was independently associated with a shorter operative time, an increased risk of ileus, and a longer hospital stay than left laparoscopic colectomy in high-volume centers.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Yasunaga H, Matsuyama Y, Ohe K, Japan Surgical S (2009) Effects of hospital and surgeon volumes on operating times, postoperative complications, and length of stay following laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Today 39(11):955–961. doi:10.1007/s00595-008-4052-8 CrossRefPubMed Yasunaga H, Matsuyama Y, Ohe K, Japan Surgical S (2009) Effects of hospital and surgeon volumes on operating times, postoperative complications, and length of stay following laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Today 39(11):955–961. doi:10.​1007/​s00595-008-4052-8 CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat van Erning FN, van Steenbergen LN, van den Broek WT, Rutten HJ, Lemmens VE (2013) No difference between lowest and highest volume hospitals in outcome after colorectal cancer surgery in the southern Netherlands. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(11):1199–1206. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2013.08.020 CrossRefPubMed van Erning FN, van Steenbergen LN, van den Broek WT, Rutten HJ, Lemmens VE (2013) No difference between lowest and highest volume hospitals in outcome after colorectal cancer surgery in the southern Netherlands. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(11):1199–1206. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejso.​2013.​08.​020 CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Benedix F, Kube R, Meyer F, Schmidt U, Gastinger I, Lippert H, Colon/Rectum Carcinomas Study G (2010) Comparison of 17,641 patients with right- and left-sided colon cancer: differences in epidemiology, perioperative course, histology, and survival. Dis Colon rectum 53(1):57–64. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181c703a4 Benedix F, Kube R, Meyer F, Schmidt U, Gastinger I, Lippert H, Colon/Rectum Carcinomas Study G (2010) Comparison of 17,641 patients with right- and left-sided colon cancer: differences in epidemiology, perioperative course, histology, and survival. Dis Colon rectum 53(1):57–64. doi:10.​1007/​DCR.​0b013e3181c703a4​
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwaan MR, Al-Refaie WB, Parsons HM, Chow CJ, Rothenberger DA, Habermann EB (2013) Are right-sided colectomy outcomes different from left-sided colectomy outcomes?: study of patients with colon cancer in the ACS NSQIP database. JAMA Surg 148(6):504–510. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1205 CrossRefPubMed Kwaan MR, Al-Refaie WB, Parsons HM, Chow CJ, Rothenberger DA, Habermann EB (2013) Are right-sided colectomy outcomes different from left-sided colectomy outcomes?: study of patients with colon cancer in the ACS NSQIP database. JAMA Surg 148(6):504–510. doi:10.​1001/​jamasurg.​2013.​1205 CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hinojosa MW, Konyalian VR, Murrell ZA, Varela JE, Stamos MJ, Nguyen NT (2007) Outcomes of right and left colectomy at academic centers. Am Surg 73(10):945–948PubMed Hinojosa MW, Konyalian VR, Murrell ZA, Varela JE, Stamos MJ, Nguyen NT (2007) Outcomes of right and left colectomy at academic centers. Am Surg 73(10):945–948PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaccaro CA, Vaccarezza H, Rossi GL, Mentz R, Im VM, Quintana GO, Peralta N, Soriano ER (2012) Body surface area: a new predictor factor for conversion and prolonged operative time in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon rectum 55(11):1153–1159. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182686230 Vaccaro CA, Vaccarezza H, Rossi GL, Mentz R, Im VM, Quintana GO, Peralta N, Soriano ER (2012) Body surface area: a new predictor factor for conversion and prolonged operative time in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon rectum 55(11):1153–1159. doi:10.​1097/​DCR.​0b013e3182686230​
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2 CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e3181b13ca2​ CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaccaro CA, Rossi GL, Quintana GO, Soriano ER, Vaccarezza H, Rubinstein F (2014) Laparoscopic colorectal resections: a simple predictor model and a stratification risk for conversion to open surgery. Dis Colon rectum 57(7):869–874. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000137 Vaccaro CA, Rossi GL, Quintana GO, Soriano ER, Vaccarezza H, Rubinstein F (2014) Laparoscopic colorectal resections: a simple predictor model and a stratification risk for conversion to open surgery. Dis Colon rectum 57(7):869–874. doi:10.​1097/​DCR.​0000000000000137​
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Turrado-Rodriguez V, Targarona Soler E, Bollo Rodriguez JM, Balague Ponz C, Hernandez Casanovas P, Martinez C, Trias Folch M (2015) Are there differences between right and left colectomies when performed by laparoscopy? Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4345-0 PubMed Turrado-Rodriguez V, Targarona Soler E, Bollo Rodriguez JM, Balague Ponz C, Hernandez Casanovas P, Martinez C, Trias Folch M (2015) Are there differences between right and left colectomies when performed by laparoscopy? Surg Endosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-015-4345-0 PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Veyrie N, Ata T, Muscari F, Couchard AC, Msika S, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Dziri C, French Associations for Surgical R (2007) Anastomotic leakage after elective right versus left colectomy for cancer: prevalence and independent risk factors. J Am Coll Surg 205 (6):785–793. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.284 Veyrie N, Ata T, Muscari F, Couchard AC, Msika S, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Dziri C, French Associations for Surgical R (2007) Anastomotic leakage after elective right versus left colectomy for cancer: prevalence and independent risk factors. J Am Coll Surg 205 (6):785–793. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jamcollsurg.​2007.​06.​284
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Masoomi H, Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Mills S, Carmichael JC, Pigazzi A, Stamos MJ (2015) Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic colorectal surgery to open surgery: does conversion worsen outcome? World J Surg 39(5):1240–1247. doi:10.1007/s00268-015-2958-z CrossRefPubMed Masoomi H, Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Mills S, Carmichael JC, Pigazzi A, Stamos MJ (2015) Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic colorectal surgery to open surgery: does conversion worsen outcome? World J Surg 39(5):1240–1247. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-015-2958-z CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gouvas N, Gogos-Pappas G, Tsimogiannis K, Agalianos C, Tsimoyiannis E, Dervenis C, Xynos E (2014) Impact of splenic flexure mobilization on short-term outcomes after laparoscopic left colectomy for colorectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24(5):470–474. doi:10.1097/SLE.0b013e31829ce62a CrossRefPubMed Gouvas N, Gogos-Pappas G, Tsimogiannis K, Agalianos C, Tsimoyiannis E, Dervenis C, Xynos E (2014) Impact of splenic flexure mobilization on short-term outcomes after laparoscopic left colectomy for colorectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24(5):470–474. doi:10.​1097/​SLE.​0b013e31829ce62a​ CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Feroci F, Lenzi E, Garzi A, Vannucchi A, Cantafio S, Scatizzi M (2013) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Color Dis 28(9):1177–1186. doi:10.1007/s00384-013-1651-7 CrossRef Feroci F, Lenzi E, Garzi A, Vannucchi A, Cantafio S, Scatizzi M (2013) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Color Dis 28(9):1177–1186. doi:10.​1007/​s00384-013-1651-7 CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Simillis C, Purkayastha S, Yamamoto T, Strong SA, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP (2007) A meta-analysis comparing conventional end-to-end anastomosis vs. other anastomotic configurations after resection in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon rectum 50(10):1674–1687. doi:10.1007/s10350-007-9011-8 Simillis C, Purkayastha S, Yamamoto T, Strong SA, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP (2007) A meta-analysis comparing conventional end-to-end anastomosis vs. other anastomotic configurations after resection in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon rectum 50(10):1674–1687. doi:10.​1007/​s10350-007-9011-8
Metadaten
Titel
Right versus left laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: does side make any difference?
verfasst von
Juan P. Campana
Pablo A. Pellegrini
Gustavo L. Rossi
Guillermo Ojea Quintana
Ricardo E. Mentz
Carlos A. Vaccaro
Publikationsdatum
15.02.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2776-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 6/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.