Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2018

15.03.2018 | Review

Rippling Following Breast Augmentation or Reconstruction: Aetiology, Emerging Treatment Options and a Novel Classification of Severity

verfasst von: Nicholas M. Pantelides, Jeyaram R. Srinivasan

Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Implant rippling is a frequent complication following breast augmentation or implant-based reconstruction and results in significant patient dissatisfaction. Traditionally, the treatment has been to replace the implant, often placing it in a subpectoral pocket to reduce the risk of recurrence. Other techniques, such as increasing the implant size or tightening the capsule, can also be used. Recently, however, there has been much interest in alternative treatments, including fat grafting or insertion of an acellular dermal matrix.

Methods

We review the evidence base for emerging treatments and propose a classification to grade severity, based on the typical clinical presentation of rippling: Grade 1—MILD—rippling is palpable but not visible: (1a) palpable in the lower outer quadrant, (1b) palpable in the upper inner quadrant (cleavage area); Grade 2—MODERATE—rippling is visible only when the patient bends forward; Grade 3—SEVERE—rippling is visible with the patient upright.

Conclusion

Our proposed classification aims to standardise the clinical description of rippling, which will be valuable in determining the efficacy of new treatments and better characterising long-term complications from breast augmentations or reconstructions.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Busse B, Orbay H, Sahar DE (2014) Sterile acellular dermal collagen as a treatment for rippling deformity of breast. Case Rep Surg 2014:876254PubMedPubMedCentral Busse B, Orbay H, Sahar DE (2014) Sterile acellular dermal collagen as a treatment for rippling deformity of breast. Case Rep Surg 2014:876254PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Codner MA, Mejia JD, Locke MB, Mahoney A, Thiels C, Nahai FR, Hester TR, Nahai F (2011) A 15-year experience with primary breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:1300–1310CrossRefPubMed Codner MA, Mejia JD, Locke MB, Mahoney A, Thiels C, Nahai FR, Hester TR, Nahai F (2011) A 15-year experience with primary breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:1300–1310CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Strasser EJ (2006) Results of subglandular versus subpectoral augmentation over time: one surgeon’s observations. Aesthet Surg J 26:45–50CrossRefPubMed Strasser EJ (2006) Results of subglandular versus subpectoral augmentation over time: one surgeon’s observations. Aesthet Surg J 26:45–50CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J, Jensen JA (2006) A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:757–767CrossRefPubMed Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J, Jensen JA (2006) A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:757–767CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammond DC, Migliori MM, Caplin DA, Garcia ME, Phillips CA (2012) Mentor contour profile gel implants: clinical outcomes at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:1381–1391CrossRefPubMed Hammond DC, Migliori MM, Caplin DA, Garcia ME, Phillips CA (2012) Mentor contour profile gel implants: clinical outcomes at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:1381–1391CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Panettiere P, Marchetti L, Accorsi D (2007) Soft cohesive silicone gel breast prostheses: a comparative prospective study of aesthetic results versus lower cohesivity silicone gel prostheses. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60:482–489CrossRefPubMed Panettiere P, Marchetti L, Accorsi D (2007) Soft cohesive silicone gel breast prostheses: a comparative prospective study of aesthetic results versus lower cohesivity silicone gel prostheses. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60:482–489CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2014) Acellular dermal matrix for reoperative breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:932–938CrossRefPubMed Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2014) Acellular dermal matrix for reoperative breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:932–938CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Duncan DI (2001) Correction of implant rippling using allograft dermis. Aesthet Surg J 21:81–84CrossRefPubMed Duncan DI (2001) Correction of implant rippling using allograft dermis. Aesthet Surg J 21:81–84CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartzell TL, Taghinia AH, Chang J, Lin SJ, Slavin SA (2010) The use of human acellular dermal matrix for the correction of secondary deformities after breast augmentation: results and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:1711–1720CrossRefPubMed Hartzell TL, Taghinia AH, Chang J, Lin SJ, Slavin SA (2010) The use of human acellular dermal matrix for the correction of secondary deformities after breast augmentation: results and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:1711–1720CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2013) Efficacy of acellular dermal matrices in revisionary aesthetic breast surgery: a 6-year experience. Aesthet Surg J 33:389–399CrossRefPubMed Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2013) Efficacy of acellular dermal matrices in revisionary aesthetic breast surgery: a 6-year experience. Aesthet Surg J 33:389–399CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Baxter RA (2003) Intracapsular allogenic dermal grafts for breast implant-related problems. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1692–1696CrossRefPubMed Baxter RA (2003) Intracapsular allogenic dermal grafts for breast implant-related problems. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1692–1696CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nahabedian MY, Spear SL (2011) Acellular dermal matrix for secondary procedures following prosthetic breast reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J 31:38S–50SCrossRefPubMed Nahabedian MY, Spear SL (2011) Acellular dermal matrix for secondary procedures following prosthetic breast reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J 31:38S–50SCrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Spear SL, Sinkin JC, Al-Attar A (2013) Porcine acellular dermal matrix (strattice) in primary and revision cosmetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1140–1148CrossRefPubMed Spear SL, Sinkin JC, Al-Attar A (2013) Porcine acellular dermal matrix (strattice) in primary and revision cosmetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1140–1148CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pozner JN, White JB, Newman MI (2013) Use of porcine acellular dermal matrix in revisionary cosmetic breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 33:681–690CrossRefPubMed Pozner JN, White JB, Newman MI (2013) Use of porcine acellular dermal matrix in revisionary cosmetic breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 33:681–690CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kling RE, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, Young VL, Hume KM, Crotty CA, Rubin JP (2013) Trends in autologous fat grafting to the breast: a national survey of the American society of plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:35–46CrossRefPubMed Kling RE, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, Young VL, Hume KM, Crotty CA, Rubin JP (2013) Trends in autologous fat grafting to the breast: a national survey of the American society of plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:35–46CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanchwala SK, Glatt BS, Conant EF, Bucky LP (2009) Autologous fat grafting to the reconstructed breast: the management of acquired contour deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:409–418CrossRefPubMed Kanchwala SK, Glatt BS, Conant EF, Bucky LP (2009) Autologous fat grafting to the reconstructed breast: the management of acquired contour deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:409–418CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Delay E, Garson S, Tousson G, Sinna R (2009) Fat injection to the breast: technique, results, and indications based on 880 procedures over 10 years. Aesthet Surg J 29:360–376CrossRefPubMed Delay E, Garson S, Tousson G, Sinna R (2009) Fat injection to the breast: technique, results, and indications based on 880 procedures over 10 years. Aesthet Surg J 29:360–376CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Auclair E, Blondeel P, Del Vecchio DA (2013) Composite breast augmentation: soft-tissue planning using implants and fat. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:558–568CrossRefPubMed Auclair E, Blondeel P, Del Vecchio DA (2013) Composite breast augmentation: soft-tissue planning using implants and fat. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:558–568CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammond DC, O’Connor EA, Scheer JR (2015) Total envelope fat grafting: a novel approach in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:691–694CrossRefPubMed Hammond DC, O’Connor EA, Scheer JR (2015) Total envelope fat grafting: a novel approach in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:691–694CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Gargano F, Moloney DM, Arnstein PM (2002) Use of a capsular flap to prevent palpable wrinkling of implants. Br J Plast Surg 55:269CrossRefPubMed Gargano F, Moloney DM, Arnstein PM (2002) Use of a capsular flap to prevent palpable wrinkling of implants. Br J Plast Surg 55:269CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Massiha H (2002) Scar tissue flaps for the correction of post implant breast rippling. Ann Plast Surg 48:505–507CrossRefPubMed Massiha H (2002) Scar tissue flaps for the correction of post implant breast rippling. Ann Plast Surg 48:505–507CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat McGregor JC, Bahia H (2004) A possible new way of managing breast implant rippling using an autogenous fascia lata patch. Br J Plast Surg 57:372–374CrossRefPubMed McGregor JC, Bahia H (2004) A possible new way of managing breast implant rippling using an autogenous fascia lata patch. Br J Plast Surg 57:372–374CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Collis N, Platt AJ, Batchelor AG (2001) Pectoralis major ‘Trapdoor’ flap for silicone breast implant medial knuckle deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:2133–2135CrossRefPubMed Collis N, Platt AJ, Batchelor AG (2001) Pectoralis major ‘Trapdoor’ flap for silicone breast implant medial knuckle deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:2133–2135CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Rippling Following Breast Augmentation or Reconstruction: Aetiology, Emerging Treatment Options and a Novel Classification of Severity
verfasst von
Nicholas M. Pantelides
Jeyaram R. Srinivasan
Publikationsdatum
15.03.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1117-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.