Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 6/2019

13.06.2019 | Review Article

Rising Cesarean Rates: Are Primary Sections Overused?

verfasst von: Kalpana Mahadik

Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Ausgabe 6/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Doubling of C-section rates from year 2000 to 2015 globally was declared an eye-opener on October 13, 2018, in FIGO World Congress. Rapid increase in rates without clear evidence of concomitant decrease in maternal or neonatal morbidity or mortality raises significant concern that cesarean delivery is overused. This review addresses issues related to exponentially rising rates, reasons for it, and strategies to reduce. Previous cesarean delivery has main contribution to rising rates as per evidence from the literature search in last 5 years. Focus on optimizing indications of primary C-section resulted in making us rethink modifiable indications like labor dystocia, indeterminate fetal heart rate tracing, suspected fetal macrosomia, malposition, risk-adapted obstetrics, litigation fears, on demand cesarean in literate women and overuse of labor induction. Use of uniform classification system (Robson/WHO classification) with recommendations of WHO, FIGO and annual audits with cloud-based anonymous registry will streamline decisions for cesarean in nullipara and help to control the situation.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Boema T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341.CrossRef Boema T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gregory KD, Jackson S, Korst L, et al. Caesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol. 2012;29:7–18.CrossRef Gregory KD, Jackson S, Korst L, et al. Caesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol. 2012;29:7–18.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: World Health Organisation. 2015. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: World Health Organisation. 2015.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, et al. Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:36e1–5.CrossRef Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, et al. Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:36e1–5.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Editorial. Stemming the global caesarean section epidemic. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155): 1279.CrossRef Editorial. Stemming the global caesarean section epidemic. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155): 1279.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) 2015-16. International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) 2015-16. International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh P, Hashmi G, Swain PK. High prevalence of cesarean section births in private sector health facilities- analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:613.CrossRef Singh P, Hashmi G, Swain PK. High prevalence of cesarean section births in private sector health facilities- analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:613.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Farine D, Shepherd D. Classification of Caesarean Sections in Canada: the modified Robson Criteria. A Comm Opin Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34(10):976–9.CrossRef Farine D, Shepherd D. Classification of Caesarean Sections in Canada: the modified Robson Criteria. A Comm Opin Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34(10):976–9.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacob KJ, Jayaprakash M, Hibina KP. TMC (Thrissur Medical College) modified Robson criteria for caesarean sections. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6:5038–43.CrossRef Jacob KJ, Jayaprakash M, Hibina KP. TMC (Thrissur Medical College) modified Robson criteria for caesarean sections. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6:5038–43.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Voge JP, Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N, et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis on behalf of the WHO Multi-Country Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health Research Network. Lancet. 2015;3(5):e260–70. Voge JP, Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N, et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis on behalf of the WHO Multi-Country Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health Research Network. Lancet. 2015;3(5):e260–70.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Souza JP, Betran AP, Dumont A, et al. A global reference for caesarean section rates (:c-model) a multicountry cross-sectional study. BJOG. 2016;123:427–36.CrossRef Souza JP, Betran AP, Dumont A, et al. A global reference for caesarean section rates (:c-model) a multicountry cross-sectional study. BJOG. 2016;123:427–36.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, et al. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low- risk planned caesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. CMAJ. 2007;176:455–60.CrossRef Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, et al. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low- risk planned caesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. CMAJ. 2007;176:455–60.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rajbhandary S, Shrivastava VR. Study of Indications and post-operative complications of primary caesarean section in tertiary care hospital in Nepal. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(3):835–40.CrossRef Rajbhandary S, Shrivastava VR. Study of Indications and post-operative complications of primary caesarean section in tertiary care hospital in Nepal. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(3):835–40.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhowmik J, Kyal A, Das I, et al. Pregnancy with previous caesarean section: an overview of adverse of fetomaternal sequelae. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(5):1817–21.CrossRef Bhowmik J, Kyal A, Das I, et al. Pregnancy with previous caesarean section: an overview of adverse of fetomaternal sequelae. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(5):1817–21.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise J-M, et al. Safe prevention of the primary caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;201(3):179–93.CrossRef Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise J-M, et al. Safe prevention of the primary caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;201(3):179–93.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang J, Landy H, Branch W, et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1281–7.CrossRef Zhang J, Landy H, Branch W, et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1281–7.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom K, et al. Preventing the first Cesarean delivery; summary of a Joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute Of Child Health And Human Development, Society For Maternal- Fetal Medicine, and American College Of Obstetrician And Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:1181–93.PubMedPubMedCentral Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom K, et al. Preventing the first Cesarean delivery; summary of a Joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute Of Child Health And Human Development, Society For Maternal- Fetal Medicine, and American College Of Obstetrician And Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:1181–93.PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson K, Sartwelle T, Rouse D. Electronic fetal monitoring, cerebral palsy, and caesareans: assumptions versus evidence. BMJ. 2016;355:16405. Nelson K, Sartwelle T, Rouse D. Electronic fetal monitoring, cerebral palsy, and caesareans: assumptions versus evidence. BMJ. 2016;355:16405.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Obstetric Care Consensus ACOG number 1, March 2014. Obstetric Care Consensus ACOG number 1, March 2014.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiklund I, Malata M, Cheung NF, Cadee F. Appropriate use of caesarean section globally requires a different approach. Lancet. 2018;392:1288–9.CrossRef Wiklund I, Malata M, Cheung NF, Cadee F. Appropriate use of caesarean section globally requires a different approach. Lancet. 2018;392:1288–9.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Rising Cesarean Rates: Are Primary Sections Overused?
verfasst von
Kalpana Mahadik
Publikationsdatum
13.06.2019
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Elektronische ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-019-01246-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2019

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 6/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.