Risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection in surgical patients hospitalized in a tertiary hospital in Belgrade, Serbia: a case–control study

During the current century the epidemiology of Clostridium difficile (C.difficile) infections (CDI) has changed rapidly, with increases noted in the incidence of diseases internationally, and in the reports of CDI outbreaks within healthcare institutions in the USA, Canada and Europe. The increase of CDI incidence was partly associated with the epidemic emergence of a new C. difficile ribotype 027, which was also described to cause more severe infections [1]. CDI became one of the most common healthcare-associated (HA) infections in modern medicine. CDI results in a wide spectrum of clinical conditions, including an asymptomatic carrier state; mild, self-limited diarrhea; pseudomembranous colitis; and fulminant colitis. It is associated with the increased morbidity, in-hospital mortality, prolonged hospitalization, and increased costs. The main risk factors for CDI include the administration of antibiotics, patients older than 65 years, multiple co-morbid conditions, previous hospitalization, medical procedures, and long stay in hospitals [2‐4]. The reported incidence of HA CDI varies according to the country, the size of institution and ward location, the type of population studied [5‐11]. Patients undergoing surgical procedures are at risk of the postoperative HA CDI development. Most studies of risk factors (RFs) for CDI in surgical patients have been conducted in the USA or Western European countries, which are characterized by the well-developed healthcare systems [8‐10, 12]. In contrast, the burden of CDI in Serbia, a country in socioeconomic transition and with a resource-limited healthcare system, is less well studied [3, 11]. The burden of CDI in surgical patients in Serbia is unclear.

The aim of this study was to investigate independent RFs associated with HA CDI in surgical patients, its frequency per surgical wards and in-hospital-mortality in a tertiary healthcare centre in Serbia.

During 2011–2012 in the MMA 29033 surgical patients were treated during 255431 patient-days. A total of 67 surgical patients with CDI were registered (IR: 2.6 per 10000 patient-days or 2.3 per 1000 patients, TR: 8.5 per 10000 patient-days) (Table 1).

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients in the case and control groups according to ULRA are shown in Table 2. MLRA identified three independent RFs associated with CDI in surgical patients: the previous administration of carbapenems (P = 0.007, OR:10.62, 95% CI:1.93–58.4), the 3rd generation of cephalosporins (P = 0.014, OR:2.27, 95% CI:1.18–4.39) and admission to the ICU (P = 0.004, OR:3.00, 95% CI:1.41–6.40). According to the ULRA, PPIs usage was a significant RF for HA CDI (P = 0.05), but it was not a significant independent RF according to MLRA (P = 0.051, OR:2.7, 95% CI:1.00–7.19).

In hospital-mortality was significantly higher by 9-fold in HA CDI compared to control (12% vs 1.5%, P: 0.007; OR: 8.95; 95% CI: 1.84–43.43). Of 8 deaths in the case group, 6 or 75% were in the older than 65.

Most of epidemiological data about CDI in surgical patients have been limited to North America and West Europe [8‐10, 12]. This study provides data about IR, RF and in-hospital-mortality of HA CDI in surgical patients admitted to the tertiary healthcare centre in the South East Europe.

The overall IR of HA CDI was 2.6 per 10000 patient-days, varied by different wards from 0 in Neurosurgery to more than 6 per 10000 patient-days in Orthopedics/Traumatology and Cardio Surgery. The overall TR was 8.5 per 10000 patient-days varied by different wards from 2.0 in Otorhinolaryngology to 16.9 per 10000 patient-days in Vascular Surgery. Our results of IR were similar to data reported by a coordinating laboratory for Portugal (2.9 for 2011–2012 and 3.0 for 2012–2013), but lower than mean IR of 7.0 of HA CDI (country range 0.7–28.7) in a European, multicentre, prospective, biannual point-prevalence study of CDI in hospitalized patients with diarrhea (EUCLID) (4). In our hospital we have the practice of routine testing of all submitted diarrheal inpatient samples, but our TR in surgical patients in the two-year period was far lower than mean TR in European hospitals (65.8 tests, country range 4.6–223.3) (4).

An association between female gender and CDI has been reported by previous population-based studies from the USA [5]. Similarly to the report of Rodrigues et al. [9], our results showed no significant association between gender and CDI. Advance age is an independent RF for CDI in many studies [5, 9, 10]. RFs specific to older adults are frequent interactions with healthcare systems and age-related changes in physiology, including immune senescence and changes of the gut microbiome [13]. In our study majority of CDI occurred in patients older than 40 years and half in patients older than 65 years. We did not analyze age and sex in the model of MLRA because cases and controls were matched according to those variables.

Among the main findings of this study are the identification of significant independent RFs for CDI in surgical patients, including carbapenems, admission to ICU and the 3rd generation of cephalosporins. The disruption of the normal flora caused by antibiotics allows C. difficile to colonize and overgrow within the gastrointestinal tract. Nearly all antibiotics have been implicated in CDI, but certain classes seem to cause higher risk for CDI. Stojanović confirmed in his study that all the groups of antibiotics, except for tetracycline, and trimetoprim- sulfamethoxazole, were statistically significant RFs for CDI [3]. The administration of quinolones emerged as the most important RF for CID in Quebec during an epidemic caused by a hipervirulent strain of C. difficile [14]. A recent study from England showed that restricting quinolones prescribing was associated with a decline in incidence of CDI [15]. The majority of patients in our study received at least one class of antibiotic. The third-generation cephalosporins were the most commonly used antibiotics in both groups and an independent RF for CDI. The study of Korean authors showed that the use of cephalosporins increased the risk for CDI [4]. Also, the use of carbapenems, in addition to having the higher frequency in the case group, was an independent RF for CDI in our study. The study of Metzger et al. showed that carbapenems usage was associated with CDI in ULRA, but didn't retain significance as an independent RF in MLRA [16].

The admission to ICU was significantly associated with CDI in our patients as reported before [4, 9]. Critically ill patients in ICU share many of the RFs for developing CDI such as: severe underlying diseases, antibiotic exposure, gastric acid suppression with H2RAs or PPIs, the use of mechanical ventilation, and nasogastric tubes [17].

However, in a meta-analysis, Kwok et al. demonstrated the possible association between the PPI use and the incident and recurrent CDI. This risk was further increased by concomitant use of antibiotics and PPI, whereas H2RAs may be less harmful [18]. In our study, according to ULRA, both groups of patients received H2RAs (59.7% of cases and 46.2% controls) more frequently than PPIs (19.4% and 5.9%), but only PPIs significantly increased the risk of CDI without being a significant independent RF. Also, mice model demonstrated that PPIs administration can increase the severity of CDI induced by an antibiotic cocktail [19]. Medications that suppress gastric acid have been associated with the alteration of gastrointestinal flora and the increased susceptibility to gastrointestinal infections [20].

The mortality rate in patients with CDI in this study was 12.1% and significantly higher than in the control group. Also, it is higher than it was reported in Veterans Health Administration (12.1% vs 5.3%) [8]. This difference is explained by the different levels of healthcare and treatment of patients in hospitals in Serbia and the USA.

Of 8 deaths in the case group, 6 or 75% were in the older than 65. CDI was not the primary cause of death but it was mentioned in the clinical chart information. A systematic review of unfavorable outcomes of CDI (68 studies), based on publications from 1978 until 2013, showed that mortality was associated with age, co-morbidities, hypo-albuminemia, leucocytosis, acute renal failure, and infection with ribotype 027 [21].

Last data from a European, multicentre, prospective, biannual point-prevalence study of CDI showed that overall prevalence of ribotype 027 has risen more than three-fold (from 5% to 18%) and high endemicity of ribotype 027 has shifted from the UK and Ireland in 2008, to Germany and Eastern Europe in 2012–13 [6, 7]. The study of Rupnik et al. analyzed PCR ribotype distribution of 249 C. difficile isolates received for typing from six hospital settings from South Europe (the MMA was not included) in time period from 2008 to 2015 and showed that PCR ribotype 027 and related ribotype 176 were detected in outbreaks in Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia [22]. Some PCR ribotypes are more often associated with severe diseases and/or are easily transmitted and linked to outbreaks. In our study we did not know if all those cases were from the outbreak because of the inability of laboratory pathogen isolation and the impossibility of determining its ribotype.

Important limitation of this study is that CDI testing was based on toxin A/B enzyme immunoassay (EIA) as the only diagnostic procedure in laboratory (no EIA detecting glutamate dehydrogenase, no nucleic acid amplification tests, no isolation of C. difficile and detection of toxigenic isolates). This procedure has shown poor sensitivity of less than 50% in studies of Shin [23] and Swindells [24]. The meta-analysis of Crobach et al. showed that no single test can be used as a stand-alone test for diagnosed CDI as a result of inadequate positive predictive values at low CDI prevalence [25]. C. difficile toxins can degrade at room temperature and the quality of CDI diagnostic also depends on transport time of the samples in the respective settings of the MMA. Both, the low rate of test performance in general and limitations of diagnostic test system, which we used, make it very likely that the actual incidence of CDI in our study was markedly higher.

Another limitation is the possibility of confounding variables that were not examined in our study. Although confounding variables were chosen after an exhaustive search of the literature, the potential for oversight and exclusion does exist. We tried to find all of the data in order to gain an understanding of the RF; we did not include some parameters, namely the diagnosis upon admission, all comorbidities, durations of the hospital stays, PPIs exposure in previous 30 days, the duration of PPIs and H2RA use, and outpatient antibiotic use, and analyzing these factors could have enhanced the relevance of our results. Furthermore, we did not evaluate the CDI cases and the controls in relation to the sex, age and wards in which they had undergone treatment, because CDI cases and controls were matched according to them.

Another limitation is that we performed case–control study and that we have small sample size.

The strengths of our study include its setting in a teaching hospital, and its 2-year duration. ULRA and MLRA strengthened the evidence.

The results of the present study are valuable in documenting the relations between RFs and CDI in patients undergoing surgery and contribute to improve quality of health care. CDI is an important HA infection in population of surgical patients and this study emphasizes the importance of the wise use of antibiotics, and other infection control strategies to prevent HA CDI, decrease incidence and in- hospital mortality rate.