Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 2/2017

Open Access 28.11.2016 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Risk factors for complications after adrenalectomy: results from a comprehensive national database

verfasst von: Lo Hallin Thompson, Erik Nordenström, Martin Almquist, Helene Jacobsson, Anders Bergenfelz

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2017

Abstract

Purpose

Most knowledge regarding outcome after adrenal surgery stems from retrospective studies reported by highly specialized centres. The aim of this study was to report a national experience of adrenalectomy with particular attention to predictive factors for postoperative complications, conversion from endoscopic to open surgery and length of hospital stay.

Methods

Adrenalectomies reported in the Scandinavian Quality Register for Thyroid, Parathyroid and Adrenal Surgery (SQRTPA) 2009–2014 were included. Risk factors for complications, conversion and hospital stay >3 days were assessed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results

There were 659 operations. Endoscopic adrenalectomy was performed in 513 (77.8%) operations and almost half of these were robotic assisted. The median length of hospital stay was 3 (range 1–30) days. There was no 30-day mortality. In 43 (6.6%) patients, at least one complication was registered. The only factor associated with complications in multivariable analysis was conversion to open surgery odds ratio (OR) 3.61 (95% confidence interval 1.07 to 12.12). The risk for conversion was associated with tumour size OR 1.03 (1.00 to 1.06) and with malignancy on histopathology OR 8.33 (2.12 to 32.07). Length of hospital stay increased in patients with operation of bilateral tumours OR 3.13, left-sided tumours OR 1.98, hyper secretion of catecholamines OR 2.32, conversion to open surgery OR 42.05 and open surgery OR 115.18.

Conclusions

The present study shows that endoscopic surgery is widely used. Complications were associated with conversion and the risk for conversion was associated with tumour size and malignant tumour. Hospital stay was short.
Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1007/​s00423-016-1535-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Introduction

Adrenalectomies are becoming more frequent worldwide. Contemporary imaging techniques with an increased detection of adrenal incidentalomas and new surgical techniques with reduction of morbidity and mortality with endoscopic methods [1, 2] have contributed to the increase in operations. In 1992, Gagner et al. were among the first to describe laparoscopic adrenalectomy [3]. Since then, several studies have evaluated minimally invasive surgery for adrenal lesions, which has become the standard technique for surgical treatment of adrenal tumours [4, 5]. Previous studies have compared laparoscopic with open adrenalectomy for complications, hospital stay, morbidity and mortality [2, 6, 7]. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is widely used in both university hospitals and smaller units. Studies have evaluated risk factors for complications associated with surgical technique, surgeon volume and patient-related risk factors. Most of the studies are single-centre studies [810], although a few national studies that included specific hospitals or patient groups are available [1113].
Adrenalectomies in Sweden have been registered in the Scandinavian Quality Register for Thyroid, Parathyroid and Adrenal Surgery (SQRTPA) as of 2009. All hospitals that perform adrenal surgery are participating in the registry. The aim of the present study was to evaluate a national experience of adrenal surgery over 6 years and to determine risk factors for complications, conversion from endoscopic to open surgery and prolonged hospital stay.

Material and methods

Register background

The SQRTPA was established 2004. In 2009, a module for adrenal surgery was added. The register is an online database and is recognized by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare as the national registry within the field.
Patients who underwent adrenal surgery and were reported in the registry 2009–2014 were included in the study. All procedures were performed by endocrine surgeons. Follow-up was performed at 4–6 weeks postoperatively.

Data variables

Data were collected for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, radiographic tumour size (largest diameter measured on adrenal-CT or MRI), side for adrenal tumour, indication for surgery, surgical technique, histopathology, conversion rate from endoscopic to open surgery, complications (bleeding with transfusion, laceration of viscus, pneumothorax, local infection/abscess and re-operation), postoperative length of stay and 30-day mortality.
Surgical techniques were grouped for the analysis. Endoscopic adrenalectomy included laparoscopic adrenalectomy (posterior and transabdominal) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy (posterior and transabdominal). Open adrenalectomy included laparotomy, thoracoabdominal approach and open retroperitoneal operations. The technique used was determined by the surgeon on the basis of preoperative findings, availability of equipment and surgical experience.
The primary outcomes were risk factors affecting conversion rate, complication rate and postoperative length of stay (LOS).
The secondary outcomes were variables associated with a surgical technique, laparoscopic, versus robot-assisted adrenalectomy and endoscopic versus open adrenalectomy.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics are presented as number with valid per cent or median with minimum and maximum values. Binary logistic regression was used to analyse the association between outcome variables and predictors. Analysed outcome variables were complication (defined as bleeding with transfusion, laceration of viscus, pneumothorax, local infection or abscess and re-operation (no or yes)), re-operation (no or yes), conversion (no or yes), postoperative days before discharge (1–3 and 4–30), technique (endoscopic, open) and technique (laparoscopic, robotic). The predictors that were assessed were age, sex, BMI (less than 25 or 25 and higher), adrenal tumour side (right or left or bilateral), largest tumour size, surgical technique (laparoscopic, robotic, open), clinical syndrome of hormonal excess (none, cathecholamines, cortisol and subclinical Cushing syndrome, aldosterone), histopathology (malignant, phaeochromocytoma, other benign lesions) and conversion from endoscopic to open surgery (no or yes). Univariable analyses were conducted, and each outcome variable was assessed with each predictor. Forward multiple linear regression analyses were performed to identify models with significant predictors for each outcome variable, except for re-operation due to small numbers of events. The results from the binary logistic regressions are shown as numbers, odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p values.
All analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 22 for Windows (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). We considered p values below 0.05 as statistically significant.

Results

Some 659 patients underwent adrenalectomy under the 6-year period in ten surgical departments. The distribution between centres is shown in Table 1. Preoperative characteristics of the cohort are summarized in Table 2.
Table 1
Distribution of patients between medical centres
 
n = 659 (%)
Open
Laparoscopic
Robot
University hospital
 1
235 (35.7)
8
55
172
 2
179 (27.2)
30
72
77
 3
143 (21.7)
33
109
1
 4
62 (9.4)
16
46
0
 5
20 (3.0)
4
16
0
County hospital
 6
12 (1.8)
1
11
0
 7
4 (0.6)
3
1
0
 8
2 (0.3)
0
2
0
 9
1 (0.15)
0
1
0
 10
1 (0.15)
1
0
0
Valid percent
n number
Table 2
Results of preoperative clinical variables for the patients included in the study
  
n = 659
Percent
Age (median, year)
59 (8–89)
  
Female
 
372
(56.4)
BMI ≥ 25
 
373
(64.1)
Hypertension
 
215
(32.6)
Tumour side
   
 Left
 
375
(56.9)
 Right
 
254
(38.5)
 Bilateral
 
30
(4.6)
Tumour size (median, mm)
35 (1–200)
  
Operation indication
   
 Clinical syndrome of hormonal excess
 
399
(60.5)
 Suspected malignancy on radiology
 
215
(32.6)
 Suspected malignancy on cytology
 
27
(4.1)
 Metastasis
 
32
(4.9)
 Size only (≥40 mm)
 
75
(11.4)
Valid percent. Median (min-max)
BMI body mass index, n number
The median age was 59 (range 8–89) years, and 372 (56.4%) patients were women. Some 215 (32.6%) patients had hypertension defined as blood pressure >140/90 mmHg. On radiological examination, the median size of the tumour was 35 mm (range 1–200).
Indication for operation could be one or several. The most common indication was a clinical syndrome of hormonal excess; 161 (24.4%) patients had hormonal excess of aldosterone, 113 (17.1%) patients had hypersecretion of cathecholamines, and 118 (17.9%) patients had hypercortisolism. In 215 (32.6%) patients, malignancy was suspected on the basis of radiological examination (CT or MRI). Some 32 (4.9%) patients had preoperatively diagnosed metastases and 75 (11.4%) patients underwent surgery because of a tumour size larger than 40 mm.
Perioperative characteristics are shown in Table 3. Final pathologic diagnosis was, among others, adrenal cortical adenoma in 262 (49.6%) patients and phaeochromocytoma in 100 (18.9%) patients. In total, 71 (13.3%) patients had a diagnosis of malignancy.
Table 3
Results of intra- and postoperative variables for the patients included in the study
  
n = 659
Percent
Surgical technique
   
 Laparoscopic
 
263
(39.9)
 Robotic
 
250
(37.9)
 Open
 
146
(22.2)
Histopathology (n = 528)
   
 Malignant
 
71
(13.4)
 Phaeochromocytoma
 
100
(18.9)
 Other benign
 
357
(67.6)
Conversion
 
37
(5.6)
Complication
   
 Bleeding with transfusion
 
17
(2.6)
 Local infection/abscess
 
8
(1.2)
 Pneumothorax
 
3
(0.5)
 Laceration of viscus
 
5
(0.8)
 Re-operation
 
10
(1.5)
30-day mortality
 
0
(0)
Length of hospital stay (median, days)
3 (1–30)
  
Valid percent. Median (min-max)
n number
Endoscopic adrenalectomy was performed in 513 (77.8%) patients and almost half of these operations were robotically assisted. In total, 146 (22.2%) patients were operated with open procedures and in 37 (5.6%) patients, conversion was performed from endoscopic to open surgery.
Some 43 (6.5%) patients had a complication and the most common was bleeding with transfusion. The 30-day mortality rate was nil. Median LOS was 3 (range 1–30) days.

Analysis of primary outcomes

Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed for the primary outcomes. Predictive factors for complications, conversion and LOS are presented in Tables 4, 5 and 6, respectively.
Table 4
Uni- and multivariable regression analysis of risk factors for complication after adrenalectomy
 
Univariable logistic regression
Multivariable logistic regression
 
n
OR (95% CI)
p
n
OR (95% CI)
p
Age
658
1.02 (1.00–1.04)
0.109
   
Sex
      
 Female
371
Ref
    
 Male
287
1.38 (0.75–2.53)
0.295
   
BMI
      
 <25
209
Ref.
    
 ≥25
372
0.73 (0.39–138)
0.336
   
Tumour side
  
0.603
   
 Right
254
Ref.
    
 Left
374
1.39 (0.73–2.64)
0.315
   
 Bilateral
30
0.00 (0.00-.)
0.998
   
Largest tumour size
657
1.01 (1.01–1.02)
<0.001
   
Surgical technique
  
0.001
  
0.112
 Laparoscopic
262
Ref.
 
212
Ref.
 
 Robotic
250
0.69 (0.30–1.56)
0.368
171
0.79 (0.33–1.92)
0.604
 Open
146
2.61 (1.29–5.28)
0.007
84
2.03 (0.85–4.84)
0.109
Clinical syndrome of hormonal excess
  
0.157
   
 None
260
Ref.
    
 Cathecholamines
113
0.44 (0.16–1.17)
0.098
   
 Cortisol
117
0.42 (0.16–1.13)
0.084
   
 Aldosterone
161
0.62 (0.29–1.33)
0.222
   
Histopathology
  
0.178
   
 Other benign
357
Ref.
    
 Malignant
71
1.84 (0.79–4.31)
0.157
   
 Phaeochromocytoma
100
0.61 (0.2–1.79)
0.364
   
Conversion
      
 No
621
Ref.
 
449
Ref.
 
 Yes
37
2.89 (1.14–7.34)
0.026
18
3.61 (1.07–12.12)
0.038
Complications that were analysed were bleeding with transfusion, laceration of viscus, pneumothorax, local infection or abscess and re-operation analysed together
BMI body mass index, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, Ref. referent
Table 5
Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analysis of risk factors for conversion from endoscopic to open surgery
 
Univariable logistic regression
Multivariable logistic regression
 
n
OR (95% CI)
p value
n
OR (95% CI)
p value
Age
659
1.01 (0.99–1.04)
0.274
   
Sex
      
 Female
372
Ref.
    
 Male
287
1.11 (0.57–2.16)
0.762
   
BMI
      
 <25
209
Ref.
    
 ≥25
373
1.07 (0.49–2.34)
0.869
   
Tumour side
  
0.387
   
 Right
254
Ref.
    
 Left
375
0.62 (0.31–1.23)
0.174
   
 Bilateral
30
0.94 (0.21–4.25)
0.932
   
Largest tumour size
658
1.00 (0.99–1.01)
0.482
383
1.03 (1.00–1.06)
0.026
Surgical technique
      
 Laparoscopic
263
Ref.
    
 Robotic
250
5.14 (1.46–18.11)
0.011
   
Clinical syndrome of hormonal excess
  
0.030
   
 None
260
Ref.
    
 Cathecholamines
113
0.38 (0.13–1.12)
0.079
   
 Cortisol
118
0.65 (0.27–1.56)
0.335
   
 Aldosterone
161
0.20 (0.06–0.66)
0.009
   
Histopathology
  
0.208
  
0.005
 Other benign
357
Ref.
 
291
Ref.
 
 Malignant
71
2.44 (0.9–6.66)
0.081
24
8.33 (2.12–32.07)
0.002
 Phaeochromocytoma
100
1.10 (0.35–3.46)
0.87
68
0.67 (0.08–5.73)
0.718
BMI body mass index, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, Ref. referent
Table 6
Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analysis of variables associated with postoperative length of stay
 
Univariable logistic regression
Multivariable logistic regression
 
n
OR (95% CI)
p
n
OR (95% CI)
p
Age
652
1.02 (1.01–1.03)
0.003
   
Sex
      
 Female
368
Ref
    
 Male
284
1.13 (0.82–1.55)
0.461
   
BMI
      
 <25
208
Ref.
    
 ≥25
367
0.96 (0.68–1.35)
0.799
   
Tumour side
  
0.299
  
0.021
 Right
253
Ref.
 
177
Ref.
 
 Left
370
1.06 (00.76–1.47)
0.733
264
1.98 (1.14–3.43)
0.016
 Bilateral
29
1.84 (0.85–3.99)
0.120
23
3.13 (1.08–9.06)
0.035
Largest tumour size
651
1.03 (1.03–1.04)
<0.001
   
Surgical technique
  
<0.001
  
<0.001
 Laparoscopic
261
Ref.
 
211
Ref.
 
 Robotic
250
1.72 (1.13–2.60)
0.011
171
1.56 (0.95–2.56)
0.081
 Open
141
46.51 (23.84–90.72)
<0.001
82
115.18(32.94–402.67)
<0.001
Clinical syndrome of hormonal excess
  
<0.001
  
0.012
 None
255
Ref.
 
162
Ref.
 
 Cathecholamines
113
1.03 (0.66–1.61)
0.884
84
2.32 (1.18–4.59)
0.015
 Cortisol
116
1.06 (0.68–1.64)
0.805
86
1.56 (0.77–3.18)
0.219
 Aldosterone
161
0.25 (0.16–0.41)
<0.001
132
0.78 (0.40–1.51)
0.458
Histopathology
  
<0.001
   
 Other benign
356
Ref.
<0.001
   
 Malignant
70
5.09 (2.94–8.81)
0.006
   
 Phaeochromocytoma
99
1.91 (1.21–3.03)
    
Conversion
      
 No
617
Ref.
 
447
Ref.
 
 Yes
35
14.18 (4.94–40.71)
<0.001
17
42.05 (5.02–352.40)
0.001
Postoperative days before discharge, 1–3 (ref.) versus 4–30
BMI body mass index, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, Ref. referent
Univariable analysis showed that open surgery, large tumour size and conversion to open surgery were associated with an increased risk of complications. However, in the multivariable analysis, conversion from endoscopic to open surgery was the only independent predictive factor for postoperative complications, OR 3.61 (CI 1.07–12.12). Open surgery was also a risk factor when the surgical techniques were grouped as endoscopic versus open technique, OR 2.26 (CI 1.03–4.93), but when the operations were divided into laparoscopic, robotic and open surgery, the significance was lost (Table 4).
The risk for conversion was increased in robotic-assisted surgery, OR 5.14 (CI 1.46–18.11), in the univariable analysis. However, in the multivariable analysis, only tumour size, OR 1.03 (CI 1.00–1.06), and malignant histopathology, OR 8.33 (CI 2.12–32.07), remained predictive (Table 5).
In the multivariable analysis of LOS, tumour on the left side, OR 1.98 (CI 1.14–3.43), bilateral tumours, OR 3.13 (CI 1.08–9.06), open surgery, OR 115.18 (CI 32.94–402.67), excess of cathecholamines, OR 2.32 (CI 1.18–4.59), and conversion to open surgery, OR 42.05 (5.02–352.40), were independent predictive factors for longer hospital stay (Table 6).

Secondary outcomes

In the univariable analysis of patient characteristics and variables depending on the technique used, older age, large tumour size, malignant histopathology and phaeochromocytoma were positively associated with open surgery when compared with endoscopic surgery. A body mass index of 25 or higher, left-sided tumours, and hypercortisolism or aldosteronism were negatively associated with open surgery.
In multivariable logistic regression analysis, larger tumour size OR 1.06 (CI 1.04–1.07) and malignant histopathology OR 11.13 (CI 4.82–25.70) were positive predictive factors for open surgery. (Suppl. Table 1 for the web).
When comparing robotic-assisted and laparoscopic adrenalectomy, older age and larger tumour size were associated with robotic-assisted adrenalectomy in the univariable analysis. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, older age, OR 1.02 (CI 1.00–1.03), was borderline significant and larger tumour size, OR 1.02 (CI 1.01–1.03), remained the predictive factor for robotic-assisted surgery. (Suppl. Table 2 for the web).

Discussion

In this national cohort of 659 patients undergoing adrenalectomy, some 5.1% patients had at least one complication and 1.5% required re-operation. The only predictive factor associated with complications was conversion from endoscopic to open surgery. In total, 5.6% of the procedures were converted from endoscopic to open surgery and the risk for conversion was related to larger tumour size and malignant tumours. There were no in-hospital deaths and the 30-day mortality was nil. Factors affecting LOS were left-sided tumour, bilateral tumours, open surgery, excess of cathecholamines and conversion to open surgery.
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the standard treatment for adrenal tumours [4]. The technique has a low rate of complications, less postoperative pain, shorter LOS and lower morbidity compared with open surgery [7, 1416]. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is therefore cost-effective. There has been an increase in adrenalectomy due to routine imaging and surgical techniques. Benign disease or tumours of unclear significance account for most of the increase [17]. The laparoscopic technique has evolved from transabdominal to posterior endoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery. Current studies recommend open surgery in malignant or large tumours (>100 mm) but some recent studies show equivalent results for laparoscopic surgery regarding morbidity and mortality, providing oncological principles are adhered to [1821]. In very large or locally invasive tumours, an open surgical approach is recommended to facilitate en bloc excision of the tumour [22]. It has therefore been recommended that these patients should be treated in specialized centres in order to improve outcomes [23, 24].
There are earlier reports concerning complications in adrenalectomy. Most of them compare outcomes following laparoscopic versus open procedures and most of them are single institution studies from tertiary centres. A lack of standardized definition of complications influences the ability to compare results. Eichhorn-Warry et al. used the Clavien-Dindo classification [25] and found that laparoscopic adrenalectomy decreased the use of intensive care for complications when compared with open procedures [7]. There are only few retrospective, national investigations and none of them included all hospitals that perform adrenalectomies [6, 1113]. It is therefore interesting that the incidence of reported complications in the literature in general is similar to what was shown in the present study [1, 10, 11, 13, 26, 27]. In the present investigation, conversion to open surgery was the only independent risk factor for complication. Although this could partly be due to bias with larger tumours being at higher risk for conversion, it could be of importance to consider when choosing surgical technique for the individual patient. For some patients, an open approach may be preferred to endoscopic adrenalectomy. The proportion of open procedures in the present report, 22.2%, is comparable with earlier studies [6, 7].
Bergamini et al., showed that age, BMI, tumour size and phaeochromocytoma are risk factors for complications but these in general were lower in referral than in non-referral centres [11]. Surgeon volume influences outcome as well and has been shown by Park et al. [28]. Furthermore, comorbidity has been associated with a risk for complications [1, 13]. These variables were not registered in the database used for the present investigation, and therefore, the possible influence of these potential risk factors could not be evaluated.
Considering the well-known effects of hypercortisolism, Cushing’s syndrome was expected as a risk factor for impaired wound healing, bleeding and postoperative infection after adrenalectomy. However, this was not shown in the present study. In contrast, Sommerey et al. found that bilateral adrenalectomy for Cushing’s disease had more severe complications [29].
The conversion rate in the present study, 5.6%, was consistent with previous reports [8, 10]. Bittner et al. collected data retrospectively from 402 patients and found that tumour size >80 mm was a predictive factor for conversion from endoscopic to open surgery [8]. This is comparable to the present results and indicates that laparoscopic adrenalectomy is used for increasingly larger lesions.
Length of hospital stay is similar in many reports and is shorter after laparoscopic than open procedures [6, 8, 9, 13]. Independent predictive factors for risk for longer hospital stay are not well explored. Of interest is that low surgeon volume and some comorbidities are associated with higher LOS [1, 28]. However, these factors were not evaluated in the present study.
Almost half of the endoscopic operations in this cohort, 37.9% in total, were robotic assisted. Robotic-assisted surgery was used in older patients and more importantly in patients with larger tumours. In the univariable analysis, there was a tendency towards a higher conversion rate compared with the standard laparoscopic technique. However, this association was lost in the multivariable analysis. Several retrospective studies on the use of robotic-assisted adrenalectomy have been published during recent years and all reported on small patient groups [30, 31]. In a meta-analysis, some advantages for robotic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery were shown such as shorter hospital stay, less intraoperative blood loss and lower risk for postoperative complications [32]. However, given the scarce data, these results should be interpreted with caution. The benefits of the robotic technique in subtotal and bilateral adrenalectomy have been discussed in a review article by Nomine-Criqui with equivocal conclusions [33].
Hospital stay is one of the largest costs in health care. Reports regarding costs associated with different surgical techniques are scarce and most have small patient groups [34, 35]. Given the higher cost for robotic surgery compared with standard laparoscopy [31, 36], it remains to be proven if the higher number of patients with large tumours that are operated with robotic surgery instead of an open approach could outweigh the increased costs for this new technique.
In the present study, patients with left-sided tumours had a longer hospital stay compared with patients operated for a tumour on the right side. However, the results are not unequivocal. One study found a longer operative time for right-sided tumours subjected to retroperitoneal endoscopic surgery [37]. Other investigations found no differences in outcome but longer operation time [38] and increased risk for surgical complications [10] in patients with left-sided tumours.
There are some limitations to the present study. The study was based on results from a database with predefined data fields, but data was analysed retrospectively. Although the register is designed for the procedure, i.e. adrenalectomy, important variables such as comorbidity, previous abdominal surgery, blood loss and operative time are missing. For non-surgical complications, for instance pneumonia, venous thrombosis and urinary tract infection, a free text field with ICD coding is available in the database. However, it cannot be ruled out that some of these complications were not coded. Finally, the database does not identify outcomes for the individual surgeon, which may affect the results.
The strength of the present study is that it involved one of the largest national series of patients operated with adrenalectomy. All hospitals that perform adrenal surgery in Sweden participate in the registry and valid data are controlled regularly by an extern audit.

Conclusion

Within the context of these limitations, the present study shows a low risk for complications, a low conversion rate from endoscopic to open surgery and a short hospital stay for patients undergoing adrenalectomy in Sweden. The study reinforces the benefits of minimal invasive surgery for adrenal tumours on a national level.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Skåne Regional Research and Development Fund, Skåne University Hospital Foundation, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University.
The following departments have contributed with patients to the register for this study: Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg; Department of Surgery, Karlstad Hospital, Karlstad; Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund; Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna; and Department of Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala.

Author’s contributions

L. H. T in study conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting of manuscript; E. N in study conception and design and critical revision of manuscript. M. A in critical revision of manuscript. H. J in analysis and interpretation of data and drafting of part of manuscript (statistical analysis); A. B in study conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data and critical revision of manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

This study was funded by Skåne Regional Research and Development Fund, Skåne University Hospital Foundation, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Quality control and analysis of complications were performed according to Swedish legislations for health care providers, and ethical approval was therefore accordingly void.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

Die Chirurgie

Print-Titel

Das Abo mit mehr Tiefe

Mit der Zeitschrift Die Chirurgie erhalten Sie zusätzlich Online-Zugriff auf weitere 43 chirurgische Fachzeitschriften, CME-Fortbildungen, Webinare, Vorbereitungskursen zur Facharztprüfung und die digitale Enzyklopädie e.Medpedia.

Bis 30. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr nur 199 € zahlen!

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Anhänge

Electronic supplementary material

Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Barreca M et al (2003) Expectations and outcomes when moving from open to laparoscopic adrenalectomy: multivariate analysis. World J Surg 27(2):223–228PubMed Barreca M et al (2003) Expectations and outcomes when moving from open to laparoscopic adrenalectomy: multivariate analysis. World J Surg 27(2):223–228PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagner M, Lacroix A, Bolté E (1992) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in Cushing’s syndrome and pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 327(14):1033–1033CrossRefPubMed Gagner M, Lacroix A, Bolté E (1992) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in Cushing’s syndrome and pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 327(14):1033–1033CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith CD, Weber CJ, Amerson JR (1999) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: new gold standard. World J Surg 23(4):389–396CrossRefPubMed Smith CD, Weber CJ, Amerson JR (1999) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: new gold standard. World J Surg 23(4):389–396CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Elfenbein DM et al (2013) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy: results from American College of Surgeons-National Surgery Quality Improvement Project. J Surg Res 184(1):216–220CrossRefPubMed Elfenbein DM et al (2013) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy: results from American College of Surgeons-National Surgery Quality Improvement Project. J Surg Res 184(1):216–220CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Eichhorn-Wharry LI, Talpos GB, Rubinfeld I (2012) American Association of Endocrine Surgeon: laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy: another look at outcome using the Clavien classification system. Surgery 152:1090–1095CrossRefPubMed Eichhorn-Wharry LI, Talpos GB, Rubinfeld I (2012) American Association of Endocrine Surgeon: laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy: another look at outcome using the Clavien classification system. Surgery 152:1090–1095CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bittner JG et al (2013) Risk factors affecting operative approach, conversion, and morbidity for adrenalectomy: a single-institution series of 402 patients. Surg Endosc 27(7):2342–2350CrossRefPubMed Bittner JG et al (2013) Risk factors affecting operative approach, conversion, and morbidity for adrenalectomy: a single-institution series of 402 patients. Surg Endosc 27(7):2342–2350CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lachenmayer A et al (2012) Trends in adrenal surgery: institutional review of 528 consecutive adrenalectomies. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397(7):1099–1107CrossRefPubMed Lachenmayer A et al (2012) Trends in adrenal surgery: institutional review of 528 consecutive adrenalectomies. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397(7):1099–1107CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaujoux S et al (2011) Risk factors for conversion and complications after unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Br J Surg 98(10):1392–1399CrossRefPubMed Gaujoux S et al (2011) Risk factors for conversion and complications after unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Br J Surg 98(10):1392–1399CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergamini C et al (2011) Complications in laparoscopic adrenalectomy: the value of experience. Surg Endosc 25(12):3845–3851CrossRefPubMed Bergamini C et al (2011) Complications in laparoscopic adrenalectomy: the value of experience. Surg Endosc 25(12):3845–3851CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Villar del Moral JM et al (2011) Original article: adrenal surgery in Spain: final results of a national survey. Cirugía suprarrenal en España: resultados finales de una encuesta nacional (Spanish; Castilian) 89:663–669CrossRef Villar del Moral JM et al (2011) Original article: adrenal surgery in Spain: final results of a national survey. Cirugía suprarrenal en España: resultados finales de una encuesta nacional (Spanish; Castilian) 89:663–669CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy MM et al (2010) Trends in adrenalectomy: a recent national review. Surg Endosc 24(10):2518–2526CrossRefPubMed Murphy MM et al (2010) Trends in adrenalectomy: a recent national review. Surg Endosc 24(10):2518–2526CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee J et al (2008) Open and laparoscopic adrenalectomy: analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 206(5):953–959CrossRefPubMed Lee J et al (2008) Open and laparoscopic adrenalectomy: analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 206(5):953–959CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Imai T et al (1999) Scientific papers: a case-controlled study of laparoscopic compared with open lateral adrenalectomy. Am J Surg 178:50–53CrossRefPubMed Imai T et al (1999) Scientific papers: a case-controlled study of laparoscopic compared with open lateral adrenalectomy. Am J Surg 178:50–53CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Saunders BD et al (2004) Trends in utilization of adrenalectomy in the United States: have indications changed? World J Surg 28(11):1169–1175CrossRefPubMed Saunders BD et al (2004) Trends in utilization of adrenalectomy in the United States: have indications changed? World J Surg 28(11):1169–1175CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller BS et al (2012) Resection of adrenocortical carcinoma is less complete and local recurrence occurs sooner and more often after laparoscopic adrenalectomy than after open adrenalectomy. Surgery 152(6):1150–1157CrossRefPubMed Miller BS et al (2012) Resection of adrenocortical carcinoma is less complete and local recurrence occurs sooner and more often after laparoscopic adrenalectomy than after open adrenalectomy. Surgery 152(6):1150–1157CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mir MC et al (2013) Comparative outcomes of laparoscopic and open adrenalectomy for adrenocortical carcinoma: single, high-volume center experience. Ann Surg Oncol 20(5):1456–1461CrossRefPubMed Mir MC et al (2013) Comparative outcomes of laparoscopic and open adrenalectomy for adrenocortical carcinoma: single, high-volume center experience. Ann Surg Oncol 20(5):1456–1461CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Donatini G et al (2014) Long-term survival after adrenalectomy for stage I/II adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC): a retrospective comparative cohort study of laparoscopic versus open approach. Ann Surg Oncol 21(1):284–291CrossRefPubMed Donatini G et al (2014) Long-term survival after adrenalectomy for stage I/II adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC): a retrospective comparative cohort study of laparoscopic versus open approach. Ann Surg Oncol 21(1):284–291CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Brix D et al (2010) Adrenals: laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for adrenocortical carcinoma: surgical and oncologic outcome in 152 patients. Eur Urol 58:609–615CrossRefPubMed Brix D et al (2010) Adrenals: laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for adrenocortical carcinoma: surgical and oncologic outcome in 152 patients. Eur Urol 58:609–615CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lebastchi AH, Kunstman JW, Carling T (2012) Adrenocortical carcinoma: current therapeutic state-of-the-art. Journal of Oncology:1–11 Lebastchi AH, Kunstman JW, Carling T (2012) Adrenocortical carcinoma: current therapeutic state-of-the-art. Journal of Oncology:1–11
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Zini L, Porpiglia F, Fassnacht M (2011) Contemporary management of adrenocortical carcinoma. Eur Urol 60(5):1055–1065CrossRefPubMed Zini L, Porpiglia F, Fassnacht M (2011) Contemporary management of adrenocortical carcinoma. Eur Urol 60(5):1055–1065CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Porpiglia F et al (2010) Adrenals: retrospective evaluation of the outcome of open versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy for stage I and II adrenocortical cancer. Eur Urol 57:873–878CrossRefPubMed Porpiglia F et al (2010) Adrenals: retrospective evaluation of the outcome of open versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy for stage I and II adrenocortical cancer. Eur Urol 57:873–878CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Castillo OA et al (2014) Original article: complications associated with laparoscopic adrenalectomy: description and standardized assessment. Descripción y evaluación estandarizada de complicaciones asociadas a adrenalectomía laparoscópica (Spanish; Castilian) 38:445–450 Castillo OA et al (2014) Original article: complications associated with laparoscopic adrenalectomy: description and standardized assessment. Descripción y evaluación estandarizada de complicaciones asociadas a adrenalectomía laparoscópica (Spanish; Castilian) 38:445–450
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Musella M et al (2013) Preoperative workup in the assessment of adrenal incidentalomas: outcome from 282 consecutive laparoscopic adrenalectomies. BMC Surg 13(1):1CrossRef Musella M et al (2013) Preoperative workup in the assessment of adrenal incidentalomas: outcome from 282 consecutive laparoscopic adrenalectomies. BMC Surg 13(1):1CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Park HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA (2009) Outcomes from 3144 adrenalectomies in the United States: which matters more, surgeon volume or specialty? Arch Surg 144(11):1060–1067CrossRefPubMed Park HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA (2009) Outcomes from 3144 adrenalectomies in the United States: which matters more, surgeon volume or specialty? Arch Surg 144(11):1060–1067CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Sommerey S et al (2015) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy—10-year experience at a teaching hospital. Langenbecks ArchSurg 400(3):341–347CrossRef Sommerey S et al (2015) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy—10-year experience at a teaching hospital. Langenbecks ArchSurg 400(3):341–347CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Brunaud L et al (2008) Clinical surgery—international: robotic-assisted adrenalectomy: what advantages compared to lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy? Am J Surg 195:433–438CrossRefPubMed Brunaud L et al (2008) Clinical surgery—international: robotic-assisted adrenalectomy: what advantages compared to lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy? Am J Surg 195:433–438CrossRefPubMed
31.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Brandao LF et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 65(6):1154–1161CrossRefPubMed Brandao LF et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 65(6):1154–1161CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Nomine-Criqui C, et al. 2015 Robotic lateral transabdominal adrenalectomy. J Surg Oncol Nomine-Criqui C, et al. 2015 Robotic lateral transabdominal adrenalectomy. J Surg Oncol
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Ortega J et al (2002) Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic vs open adrenalectomy: small savings in an expensive process. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12(1):1–5CrossRefPubMed Ortega J et al (2002) Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic vs open adrenalectomy: small savings in an expensive process. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12(1):1–5CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Schreinemakers JMJ, Elias SG, Borel Rinkes IHM (2008) Retroperitoneal endoscopic versus conventional open adrenalectomy: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18(5):707–712CrossRefPubMed Schreinemakers JMJ, Elias SG, Borel Rinkes IHM (2008) Retroperitoneal endoscopic versus conventional open adrenalectomy: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18(5):707–712CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Brunaud L et al (2008) American Association of Endocrine Surgeon: prospective evaluation of 100 robotic-assisted unilateral adrenalectomies. Surgery 144:995–1001CrossRefPubMed Brunaud L et al (2008) American Association of Endocrine Surgeon: prospective evaluation of 100 robotic-assisted unilateral adrenalectomies. Surgery 144:995–1001CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiang P-H et al (2013) Original article: is right-sided laparoscopic adrenalectomy truly more challenging than left-sided? The 10-year experience of a single institute. Urological Science 24:117–119CrossRef Chiang P-H et al (2013) Original article: is right-sided laparoscopic adrenalectomy truly more challenging than left-sided? The 10-year experience of a single institute. Urological Science 24:117–119CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Risk factors for complications after adrenalectomy: results from a comprehensive national database
verfasst von
Lo Hallin Thompson
Erik Nordenström
Martin Almquist
Helene Jacobsson
Anders Bergenfelz
Publikationsdatum
28.11.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1535-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.