Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 1/2018

26.07.2017 | Original Scientific Report

Risk Factors for Early Postoperative Small Bowel Obstruction After Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

verfasst von: Katsuhito Suwa, Takuro Ushigome, Masamichi Ohtsu, Satoshi Narihiro, Shunjin Ryu, Yuya Shimoyama, Tomoyoshi Okamoto, Katsuhiko Yanaga

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study was to evaluate risk factors for small bowel obstruction (SBO) in early postoperative period after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Methods

Patients who underwent anterior resection (AR) [high AR (HAR) or low AR (LAR)] for rectal cancer between January 2009 and April 2016 were enrolled into the study after fulfilling selection criteria. In included patients, risk factors for early postoperative SBO (EPSBO) were analyzed by means of univariate and multivariate analysis. Cases with perioperative major complications other than intestinal obstruction and with simultaneous resection of other organs were excluded. The same analyses were also performed for cases of redo surgery due to EPSBO. EPSBO was defined as clinically and radiologically confirmed SBO that developed after resuming oral intake within 30 days following surgery. The logistic regression method was used for statistical analyses.

Results

In enrolled 180 patients, EPSBO occurred in 23 (12.8%). In univariate analysis, male sex [odds ratio (OR) = 2.17, 95% CI = 0.82–6.84, p < 0.0001], previous abdominal surgery (OR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.03–0.73, p = 0.0117), low tumor (OR = 3.26, 95% CI = 1.28–8.13, p = 0.0140), LAR (OR = 17.25, 95% CI = 3.49–312.55, p < 0.0001), D3 node dissection (OR = 13.61, 95% CI = 2.75–246.69, p = 0.0002), defunctioning ileostomy (DI) formation (OR = 9.88, 95% = 3.80–29.14, p < 0.0001), and prolonged operation time (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00–1.01, p = 0.0122) were significantly related to EPSBO. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that D3 node dissection (OR = 10.93, 95% CI = 1.94–208.23, p = 0.0038) and DI formation (OR = 5.82, 95% CI = 1.55–25.31, p = 0.0083) were independent risk factors for EPSBO. Four cases (17.4%) with EPSBO required re-operation because conservative therapies failed; all were laparoscopic DI formation cases. In three of those four cases, stenosis of stoma at the level of the posterior sheath of rectus abdominis muscle was the reason of SBO, and in one case it was kinking of the stomal limb.

Conclusions

D3 lymph node dissection and DI formation are independent risk factors for EPSBO in AR.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Alvarez-Downing M, Klaassen Z, Orringer R et al (2011) Incidence of small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colon resection. Am J Surg 201:411–415CrossRefPubMed Alvarez-Downing M, Klaassen Z, Orringer R et al (2011) Incidence of small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colon resection. Am J Surg 201:411–415CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Indar AA, Efron JE, Young-Fadok TM (2009) Laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis reduces abdominal and pelvic adhesions. Surg Endosc 23:174–477CrossRefPubMed Indar AA, Efron JE, Young-Fadok TM (2009) Laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis reduces abdominal and pelvic adhesions. Surg Endosc 23:174–477CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Parikh JA, Ko CY, Maggard MA et al (2008) What is the rate of small bowel obstruction after colectomy? Am Surg 74:1001–1005PubMed Parikh JA, Ko CY, Maggard MA et al (2008) What is the rate of small bowel obstruction after colectomy? Am Surg 74:1001–1005PubMed
5.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart RM, Page CP, Brender J et al (1987) The incidence and risk of early postoperative small bowel obstruction: a cohort study. Am J Surg 154:643–647CrossRefPubMed Stewart RM, Page CP, Brender J et al (1987) The incidence and risk of early postoperative small bowel obstruction: a cohort study. Am J Surg 154:643–647CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sykes PA, Schofield PF (1974) Early postoperative small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 61:594–600CrossRefPubMed Sykes PA, Schofield PF (1974) Early postoperative small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 61:594–600CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Frykberg ER, Phillips JW (1989) Obstruction of the small bowel in the early postoperative period. South Med J 82:169–173CrossRefPubMed Frykberg ER, Phillips JW (1989) Obstruction of the small bowel in the early postoperative period. South Med J 82:169–173CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellozy SH, Harris MT, Bauer JJ et al (2002) Early postoperative small-bowel obstruction: a prospective evaluation of 242 consecutive abdominal operations. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1214–1217CrossRefPubMed Ellozy SH, Harris MT, Bauer JJ et al (2002) Early postoperative small-bowel obstruction: a prospective evaluation of 242 consecutive abdominal operations. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1214–1217CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Siporkin K, Hiatt JR, Treiman RL (1993) Small bowel obstruction after abdominal aortic surgery. Am Surg 59:846–849 Siporkin K, Hiatt JR, Treiman RL (1993) Small bowel obstruction after abdominal aortic surgery. Am Surg 59:846–849
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sajja SBS, Schein M (2004) Early postoperative small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 91:683–691CrossRefPubMed Sajja SBS, Schein M (2004) Early postoperative small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 91:683–691CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Poon JTC, Law WL, Chu KW (2004) Small bowel obstruction following low anterior resection: the impact of diversion ileostomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:250–255CrossRefPubMed Poon JTC, Law WL, Chu KW (2004) Small bowel obstruction following low anterior resection: the impact of diversion ileostomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:250–255CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller G, Boman J, Shrier I et al (2002) Readmission for small-bowel obstruction in the early postoperative period: etiology and outcome. Can J Surg 45:255–258PubMedPubMedCentral Miller G, Boman J, Shrier I et al (2002) Readmission for small-bowel obstruction in the early postoperative period: etiology and outcome. Can J Surg 45:255–258PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller G, Boman J, Shrier I et al (2000) Natural history of patients with adhesive small-bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 87:1240–1247CrossRefPubMed Miller G, Boman J, Shrier I et al (2000) Natural history of patients with adhesive small-bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 87:1240–1247CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nieuwenhuijzen M, Reijnen MMPJ, Kuijpers JHC et al (1998) Small bowel obstruction after total colectomy or subtotal colectomy: a 10-year retrospective review. Br J Surg 85:1242–1245CrossRefPubMed Nieuwenhuijzen M, Reijnen MMPJ, Kuijpers JHC et al (1998) Small bowel obstruction after total colectomy or subtotal colectomy: a 10-year retrospective review. Br J Surg 85:1242–1245CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujii T, Morita H, Sutoh T et al (2015) Outlet obstruction of temporary loop diverting ileostomy. Hepatogastroenterology 62:602–605PubMed Fujii T, Morita H, Sutoh T et al (2015) Outlet obstruction of temporary loop diverting ileostomy. Hepatogastroenterology 62:602–605PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng KH, Ng DC, Cheung HY et al (2008) Obstructive complications of laparoscopically created defunctioning ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1664–1668CrossRefPubMed Ng KH, Ng DC, Cheung HY et al (2008) Obstructive complications of laparoscopically created defunctioning ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1664–1668CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ono C, Yoshinaga K, Enomoto M et al (2002) Discontinuous rectal cancer spread in the mesorectum and the optimal distal clearance margin in situ. Dis Colon Rectum 45:744–749CrossRefPubMed Ono C, Yoshinaga K, Enomoto M et al (2002) Discontinuous rectal cancer spread in the mesorectum and the optimal distal clearance margin in situ. Dis Colon Rectum 45:744–749CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jørgensen T et al (2010) On behalf of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors. Br J Surg 12:37–43 Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jørgensen T et al (2010) On behalf of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors. Br J Surg 12:37–43
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Holdsworth PJ et al (1991) Risk of peritonitis and fatal septicemia and the need to defunction the low anastomosis. Br J Surg 78:196–198CrossRefPubMed Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Holdsworth PJ et al (1991) Risk of peritonitis and fatal septicemia and the need to defunction the low anastomosis. Br J Surg 78:196–198CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMed Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ha GW, Lee MR, Kim JH (2016) Adhesive small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 212:527–536CrossRefPubMed Ha GW, Lee MR, Kim JH (2016) Adhesive small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 212:527–536CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Reshef A, Hull TL, Kiran RP (2013) Risk of adhesive obstruction after colorectal surgery: the benefits of the minimally invasive approach may extend well beyond the perioperative period. Surg Endosc 27:1717–1720CrossRefPubMed Reshef A, Hull TL, Kiran RP (2013) Risk of adhesive obstruction after colorectal surgery: the benefits of the minimally invasive approach may extend well beyond the perioperative period. Surg Endosc 27:1717–1720CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor GW, Jayne DG, Brown SR et al (2010) Adhesions and incisional hernias following laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the CLASICC trial. Br J Surg 97:70–78CrossRefPubMed Taylor GW, Jayne DG, Brown SR et al (2010) Adhesions and incisional hernias following laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the CLASICC trial. Br J Surg 97:70–78CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Saklani AP, Naguib N, Shah PR et al (2013) Adhesive intestinal obstruction in laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection. Colorectal Dis 15:80–84CrossRefPubMed Saklani AP, Naguib N, Shah PR et al (2013) Adhesive intestinal obstruction in laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection. Colorectal Dis 15:80–84CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Neudecker J, Klein F, Bittner R et al (2009) Short-term outcomes from a prospectively randomised trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:1458–1467CrossRefPubMed Neudecker J, Klein F, Bittner R et al (2009) Short-term outcomes from a prospectively randomised trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:1458–1467CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalff JC, Schraut WH, Simmons RL et al (1998) Surgical manipulation of the gut elicits an intestinal muscularis inflammatory response resulting in postsurgical ileus. Ann Surg 228:652–663CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kalff JC, Schraut WH, Simmons RL et al (1998) Surgical manipulation of the gut elicits an intestinal muscularis inflammatory response resulting in postsurgical ileus. Ann Surg 228:652–663CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Eto K, Kosuge M, Ohkuma M et al (2016) Comparison of transumbilical and conventional defunctioning ileostomy in laparoscopic anterior resections for rectal cancer. Anticancer Res 36:4139–4144PubMed Eto K, Kosuge M, Ohkuma M et al (2016) Comparison of transumbilical and conventional defunctioning ileostomy in laparoscopic anterior resections for rectal cancer. Anticancer Res 36:4139–4144PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Anson BJ, McVay CB (1971) Abdominal wall. Surgical anatomy. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 461–545 Anson BJ, McVay CB (1971) Abdominal wall. Surgical anatomy. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 461–545
Metadaten
Titel
Risk Factors for Early Postoperative Small Bowel Obstruction After Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
verfasst von
Katsuhito Suwa
Takuro Ushigome
Masamichi Ohtsu
Satoshi Narihiro
Shunjin Ryu
Yuya Shimoyama
Tomoyoshi Okamoto
Katsuhiko Yanaga
Publikationsdatum
26.07.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4152-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

World Journal of Surgery 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.