Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 4/2015

01.07.2015 | Original Article

Risk Factors for Macrosomia

verfasst von: Elie Nkwabong, Guilherme Roger Nzalli Tangho

Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To identify risk factors for macrosomic babies.

Methods

This cross-sectional analytical study was carried out in the University Teaching Hospital and the Central Hospital of Yaoundé (Cameroon) from October 1st, 2012 to March 31st, 2013. Women who gave birth to ≥4,000 or 3,000–3,499 g babies were recruited. Variables recorded were fetal sex and birth weight, gestational age, maternal age, parity, mother’s body mass index (BMI), weight gain during pregnancy, previous macrosomia, and father’s BMI. Fisher exact test and student t-test were used for comparison. Level of significance was P < 0.05.

Results

Main risk factors for macrosomia are delivery of a previous macrosomic baby (OR 13.1), maternal weight gain ≥16 kg (OR 10.2), parity ≥3 (OR 4.8), father’s BMI ≥30 (OR 3.7), male sex (OR 2.2), and post-term (OR 1.9).

Conclusion

Father’s obesity should be added among the known risk factors for macrosomia.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jolly MC, Sebire NJ, Harris JP, et al. Risk factors for macrosomia and its clinical consequences: a study of 350,311 pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;111(1):9–14.PubMedCrossRef Jolly MC, Sebire NJ, Harris JP, et al. Risk factors for macrosomia and its clinical consequences: a study of 350,311 pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;111(1):9–14.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Chauhan SP, Grobman WA, Gherman RA, et al. Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(2):332–46.PubMedCrossRef Chauhan SP, Grobman WA, Gherman RA, et al. Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(2):332–46.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Stotland NE, Caughey AB, Breed EM, et al. Risk factors and obstetric complications associated with macrosomia. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2004;87(3):220–6.CrossRef Stotland NE, Caughey AB, Breed EM, et al. Risk factors and obstetric complications associated with macrosomia. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2004;87(3):220–6.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonen R, Spiegel D, Abend M. Is macrosomia predictable, and are shoulder dystocia and birth trauma preventable? Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88(4):526–9.PubMedCrossRef Gonen R, Spiegel D, Abend M. Is macrosomia predictable, and are shoulder dystocia and birth trauma preventable? Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88(4):526–9.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ojule JD, Fiebai PO, Okongwu C. Perinatal outcome of macrosomic births in Port Harcourt. Niger J Med. 2010;19(4):436–40.PubMedCrossRef Ojule JD, Fiebai PO, Okongwu C. Perinatal outcome of macrosomic births in Port Harcourt. Niger J Med. 2010;19(4):436–40.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Abena Obama MT, Shasha VW, et al. Perinatal outcome of macrosomic births in Port Harcourt. W Afr Med J. 1995;14(4):249–54. Abena Obama MT, Shasha VW, et al. Perinatal outcome of macrosomic births in Port Harcourt. W Afr Med J. 1995;14(4):249–54.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ezegwui HU, Ikeako LC, Egbuji CC. Fetal macrosomia: obstetric outcome of 311 cases in UNTH, Enugu, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2011;14:322–6.PubMedCrossRef Ezegwui HU, Ikeako LC, Egbuji CC. Fetal macrosomia: obstetric outcome of 311 cases in UNTH, Enugu, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2011;14:322–6.PubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bérard J, Dufour P, Vinatier D, et al. Fetal macrosomia: risk factors and outcome: a study of the outcome concerning 100 cases >4500 g. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;77(1):51–9.PubMedCrossRef Bérard J, Dufour P, Vinatier D, et al. Fetal macrosomia: risk factors and outcome: a study of the outcome concerning 100 cases >4500 g. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;77(1):51–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nassar AH, Usta IM, Khalil AM, et al. Fetal Macrosomia (4500 g): perinatal Outcome of 231 Cases According to the Mode of Delivery. J Perinatol. 2003;23:136–41.PubMedCrossRef Nassar AH, Usta IM, Khalil AM, et al. Fetal Macrosomia (4500 g): perinatal Outcome of 231 Cases According to the Mode of Delivery. J Perinatol. 2003;23:136–41.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Overland EA, Vatten LJ, Eskild A. Risk of shoulder dystocia: associations with parity and offspring birth weight. A population study of 1,914,544 deliveries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(4):483–8.PubMedCrossRef Overland EA, Vatten LJ, Eskild A. Risk of shoulder dystocia: associations with parity and offspring birth weight. A population study of 1,914,544 deliveries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(4):483–8.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Boulet SL, Alexander GR, Salihu HM, et al. Macrosomic births in the united states: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(5):1372–8.PubMedCrossRef Boulet SL, Alexander GR, Salihu HM, et al. Macrosomic births in the united states: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(5):1372–8.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergmann RL, Richter R, Bergmann KE, et al. Secular trends in neonatal macrosomia in Berlin: influences of potential determinants. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2003;17(3):244–9.PubMedCrossRef Bergmann RL, Richter R, Bergmann KE, et al. Secular trends in neonatal macrosomia in Berlin: influences of potential determinants. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2003;17(3):244–9.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamanu CI, Onwere S, Chigbu B, et al. Fetal macrosomia in African women: a study of 249 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;279:857–61.PubMedCrossRef Kamanu CI, Onwere S, Chigbu B, et al. Fetal macrosomia in African women: a study of 249 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;279:857–61.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Risk Factors for Macrosomia
verfasst von
Elie Nkwabong
Guilherme Roger Nzalli Tangho
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2015
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Elektronische ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0586-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 4/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.