Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgery Today 3/2021

04.08.2020 | Original Article

Risk factors for outlet obstruction after laparoscopic surgery and diverting ileostomy for rectal cancer

verfasst von: Shigemasa Sasaki, Toshiya Nagasaki, Koji Oba, Takashi Akiyoshi, Toshiki Mukai, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Yosuke Fukunaga, Yoshiya Fujimoto

Erschienen in: Surgery Today | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Outlet obstruction is defined as bowel obstruction at the stoma opening. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for outlet obstruction in patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic surgery and diverting ileostomy.

Methods

Among consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic curative resection for primary rectal cancer between 2013 and 2015, 261 patients with diverting ileostomy were included in the analysis. The thickness of the abdominal wall, including the thickness of the rectus abdominis muscle, was measured using preoperative computed tomography. The clinicopathological factors were compared between the patients with and without outlet obstruction.

Results

Fourteen (5.4%) patients were diagnosed with outlet obstruction, but reoperation was not required. The rectus abdominis muscle was significantly thicker in male patients with outlet obstruction compared to those without outlet obstruction, but not in females. In a multivariate analysis, a rectus abdominis muscle thickness of 10 mm or more was determined to be an independent risk factor for outlet obstruction (odds ratio, 7.0482; p = 0.0061).

Conclusions

The thickness of the rectus abdominis muscle may be used to predict the occurrence of outlet obstruction in male patients with rectal cancer who undergo laparoscopic surgery and diverting ileostomy.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y, et al. Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Surgery. 2009;146(3):483–9.CrossRef Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y, et al. Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Surgery. 2009;146(3):483–9.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1569–80.CrossRef Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1569–80.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, Fukunaga Y, Nagayama S, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 2011;202(3):259–64.CrossRef Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, Fukunaga Y, Nagayama S, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 2011;202(3):259–64.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jorgensen T, Harling H. Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(1):37–433.CrossRef Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jorgensen T, Harling H. Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(1):37–433.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1998;85(3):355–8.CrossRef Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1998;85(3):355–8.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Graffner H, Fredlund P, Olsson SA, Oscarson J, Petersson BG. Protective colostomy in low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling instrument. A randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1983;26(2):87–90.CrossRef Graffner H, Fredlund P, Olsson SA, Oscarson J, Petersson BG. Protective colostomy in low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling instrument. A randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1983;26(2):87–90.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246(2):207–14.CrossRef Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246(2):207–14.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chude GG, Rayate NV, Patris V, Koshariya M, Jagad R, Kawamoto J, et al. Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55(86–87):1562–7.PubMed Chude GG, Rayate NV, Patris V, Koshariya M, Jagad R, Kawamoto J, et al. Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55(86–87):1562–7.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rullier E, Le Toux N, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Parneix M, Saric J. Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg. 2001;25(3):274–7.CrossRef Rullier E, Le Toux N, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Parneix M, Saric J. Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg. 2001;25(3):274–7.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Klink CD, Lioupis K, Binnebosel M, Kaemmer D, Kozubek I, Grommes J, et al. Diversion stoma after colorectal surgery: loop colostomy or ileostomy? Int J Colorectal Dis. 2001;26(4):431–6.CrossRef Klink CD, Lioupis K, Binnebosel M, Kaemmer D, Kozubek I, Grommes J, et al. Diversion stoma after colorectal surgery: loop colostomy or ileostomy? Int J Colorectal Dis. 2001;26(4):431–6.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Law WL, Chu KW, Choi HK. Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg. 2002;89(6):704–8.CrossRef Law WL, Chu KW, Choi HK. Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg. 2002;89(6):704–8.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, Lagaay MB, Gooszen HG. Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. Br J Surg. 1998;85(1):76–9.CrossRef Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, Lagaay MB, Gooszen HG. Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. Br J Surg. 1998;85(1):76–9.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Okada S, Hata K, Emoto S, Murono K, Kaneko M, Sasaki K, et al. Elevated risk of stoma outlet obstruction following colorectal surgery in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Today. 2018;48(12):1060–7.CrossRef Okada S, Hata K, Emoto S, Murono K, Kaneko M, Sasaki K, et al. Elevated risk of stoma outlet obstruction following colorectal surgery in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Today. 2018;48(12):1060–7.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamura K, Matsuda K, Yokoyama S, Iwamoto H, Mizumoto Y, Murakami D, et al. Defunctioning loop ileostomy for rectal anastomoses: predictors of stoma outlet obstruction. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019;34(6):1141–5.CrossRef Tamura K, Matsuda K, Yokoyama S, Iwamoto H, Mizumoto Y, Murakami D, et al. Defunctioning loop ileostomy for rectal anastomoses: predictors of stoma outlet obstruction. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019;34(6):1141–5.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohira G, Miyauchi H, Hayano K, Kagaya A, Imanishi S, Tochigi T, et al. Incidence and risk factor of outlet obstruction after construction of ileostomy. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2018;2(1):25–30.CrossRef Ohira G, Miyauchi H, Hayano K, Kagaya A, Imanishi S, Tochigi T, et al. Incidence and risk factor of outlet obstruction after construction of ileostomy. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2018;2(1):25–30.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Okita Y, Araki T, Kondo S, Fujikawa H, Yoshiyama S, Hiro J, et al. Clinical characteristics of stoma-related obstruction after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(3):554–9.CrossRef Okita Y, Araki T, Kondo S, Fujikawa H, Yoshiyama S, Hiro J, et al. Clinical characteristics of stoma-related obstruction after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(3):554–9.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujii T, Morita H, Sutoh T, Yajima R, Tsutsumi S, Asao T, et al. Outlet obstruction of temporary loop diverting ileostomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2015;62(139):602–5.PubMed Fujii T, Morita H, Sutoh T, Yajima R, Tsutsumi S, Asao T, et al. Outlet obstruction of temporary loop diverting ileostomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2015;62(139):602–5.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Ueno M, Fujimoto Y, Yamaguchi T, Muto T. Standardized technique of laparoscopic intracorporeal rectal transection and anastomosis for low anterior resection. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(2):557–61.CrossRef Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Ueno M, Fujimoto Y, Yamaguchi T, Muto T. Standardized technique of laparoscopic intracorporeal rectal transection and anastomosis for low anterior resection. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(2):557–61.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y, et al. Safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer with preoperative chemoradiation therapy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(3):521–5.CrossRef Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y, et al. Safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer with preoperative chemoradiation therapy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(3):521–5.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagasaki T, Akiyoshi T, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, Nagayama S, Fukunaga Y, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy might improve the prognosis of patients with locally advanced low rectal cancer and lateral pelvic lymph node metastases. World J Surg. 2017;41(3):876–83.CrossRef Nagasaki T, Akiyoshi T, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, Nagayama S, Fukunaga Y, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy might improve the prognosis of patients with locally advanced low rectal cancer and lateral pelvic lymph node metastases. World J Surg. 2017;41(3):876–83.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Konishi T, Shinozaki E, Murofushi K, Taguchi S, Fukunaga Y, Nagayama S, et al. Phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and laparoscopic surgery with selective lateral node dissection for poor-risk low rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(8):2507–13.CrossRef Konishi T, Shinozaki E, Murofushi K, Taguchi S, Fukunaga Y, Nagayama S, et al. Phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and laparoscopic surgery with selective lateral node dissection for poor-risk low rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(8):2507–13.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–96.CrossRef Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–96.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolejs S, Kennedy G, Heise CP. Small bowel obstruction following restorative proctocolectomy: affected by a laparoscopic approach? J Surg Res. 2011;170(2):202–8.CrossRef Dolejs S, Kennedy G, Heise CP. Small bowel obstruction following restorative proctocolectomy: affected by a laparoscopic approach? J Surg Res. 2011;170(2):202–8.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Krishnamurty DM, Blatnik J, Mutch M. Stoma complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017;30(3):193–200.CrossRef Krishnamurty DM, Blatnik J, Mutch M. Stoma complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017;30(3):193–200.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Shabbir J, Britton DC. Stoma complications: a literature overview. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(10):958–64.CrossRef Shabbir J, Britton DC. Stoma complications: a literature overview. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(10):958–64.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Takeda M, Takahashi H, Haraguchi N, Miyoshi N, Hata T, Yamamoto H, et al. Factors predictive of high-output ileostomy: a retrospective single-center comparative study. Surg Today. 2019;49(6):482–7.CrossRef Takeda M, Takahashi H, Haraguchi N, Miyoshi N, Hata T, Yamamoto H, et al. Factors predictive of high-output ileostomy: a retrospective single-center comparative study. Surg Today. 2019;49(6):482–7.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker ML, Williams RN, Nightingale JM. Causes and management of a high-output stoma. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(2):191–7.CrossRef Baker ML, Williams RN, Nightingale JM. Causes and management of a high-output stoma. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(2):191–7.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen FC, Mackay JR, Woods RJ. Ileostomy dysfunction with adjuvant chemoradiation for rectal carcinoma requiring in-hospital management: a cause for concern. Aust N Z J Surg. 1996;66(9):641–2.CrossRef Chen FC, Mackay JR, Woods RJ. Ileostomy dysfunction with adjuvant chemoradiation for rectal carcinoma requiring in-hospital management: a cause for concern. Aust N Z J Surg. 1996;66(9):641–2.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Robertson JP, Wells CI, Vather R, Bissett IP. Effect of diversion ileostomy on the occurrence and consequences of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(3):194–200.CrossRef Robertson JP, Wells CI, Vather R, Bissett IP. Effect of diversion ileostomy on the occurrence and consequences of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(3):194–200.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat De Nardi P, Salandini M, Chiari D, Pecorelli N, Cristel G, Damascelli A et al. Changes in body composition during neoadjuvant therapy can affect prognosis in rectal cancer patients: An exploratory study. Curr Probl Cancer. 2019 [Epub ahead of print] De Nardi P, Salandini M, Chiari D, Pecorelli N, Cristel G, Damascelli A et al. Changes in body composition during neoadjuvant therapy can affect prognosis in rectal cancer patients: An exploratory study. Curr Probl Cancer. 2019 [Epub ahead of print]
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Levolger S, van Vledder MG, Alberda WJ, Verhoef C, de Bruin RWF, Ijermans JNM, et al. Muscle wasting and survival following pre-operative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(5):1728–35.CrossRef Levolger S, van Vledder MG, Alberda WJ, Verhoef C, de Bruin RWF, Ijermans JNM, et al. Muscle wasting and survival following pre-operative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(5):1728–35.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Prado CM, Sawyer MB, Ghosh S, Lieffers JR, Esfandiari N, Antoun S, et al. Central tenet of cancer cachexia therapy: do patients with advanced cancer have exploitable anabolic potential? Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(4):1012–9.CrossRef Prado CM, Sawyer MB, Ghosh S, Lieffers JR, Esfandiari N, Antoun S, et al. Central tenet of cancer cachexia therapy: do patients with advanced cancer have exploitable anabolic potential? Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(4):1012–9.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Risk factors for outlet obstruction after laparoscopic surgery and diverting ileostomy for rectal cancer
verfasst von
Shigemasa Sasaki
Toshiya Nagasaki
Koji Oba
Takashi Akiyoshi
Toshiki Mukai
Tomohiro Yamaguchi
Yosuke Fukunaga
Yoshiya Fujimoto
Publikationsdatum
04.08.2020
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Surgery Today / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0941-1291
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-2813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02096-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Surgery Today 3/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.