Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 5/2005

01.09.2005 | Original Article

Risk factors influencing the early outcome results after laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer and their predictive value

verfasst von: Raimundas Lunevicius, Matas Morkevicius

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2005

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and aims

Clear patient selection criteria and indications for laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers are necessary. The aims of our study are to report the early outcome results after operation and to define the predictive values of risk factors influencing conversion rate and genesis of suture leakage.

Patients/methods

Sixty nonrandomly selected patients operated on laparoscopically in a tertiary care academic center between October 1996 and May 2004 for perforated duodenal ulcers were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome measures included the duration of symptoms, shock, underlying medical illness, ulcer size, age, Boey score, and the collective predictive value of these variables for conversion and suture leakage rates.

Results

Laparoscopic repair was completed in 46 patients (76.7%). Fourteen patients (23.3%) underwent conversion to open repair. Eight patients (13.3%) had postoperative complications. Suture leakage was confirmed in four patients (6.7%). Hospital stay was 7.8±5.3 days. There was no mortality. Patients with an ulcer perforation size of >8 mm had a significantly increased risk for conversion to open repair (p<0.05): positive predictive value (PPV) 75%, sensitivity 27%, specificity 98%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 85%. The significance of ulcer perforation size was confirmed by a stepwise logistic regression test (p=0.0201). All patients who developed suture leakage had acute symptoms for >9 h preoperatively (p<0.001): PPV 31%, specificity 84%, sensitivity 100%, and NPV 100%. Conversions happened with surgeons whose previous experience involved 1.8±2.3 cases compared to 3.9±2.9 cases in successful laparoscopic repair (p=0.039, t test).

Conclusions

Ulcer perforation size of >8 mm is a significant risk factor influencing the conversion rate. An increase in the suture leakage rate is predicted by delayed presentation of >9 h.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lau WY, Leow CK (1997) History of perforated duodenal and gastric ulcers. World J Surg 21(8):890–896PubMed Lau WY, Leow CK (1997) History of perforated duodenal and gastric ulcers. World J Surg 21(8):890–896PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mouret P, Francois Y, Vignal J, Barth X, Lombard-Platet R (1990) Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 77(9):1006PubMed Mouret P, Francois Y, Vignal J, Barth X, Lombard-Platet R (1990) Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 77(9):1006PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nathanson LK, Easter DW, Cuschieri A (1990) Laparoscopic repair/peritoneal toilet of perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc 4(4):232–233PubMed Nathanson LK, Easter DW, Cuschieri A (1990) Laparoscopic repair/peritoneal toilet of perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc 4(4):232–233PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BK, Chau CH, Li AC, Fung KH et al (2002) Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 235(3):313–319PubMed Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BK, Chau CH, Li AC, Fung KH et al (2002) Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 235(3):313–319PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lau WY, Leung KL, Kwong KH, Davey IC, Robertson C, Dawson JJ et al (1996) A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique. Ann Surg 224(2):131–138PubMed Lau WY, Leung KL, Kwong KH, Davey IC, Robertson C, Dawson JJ et al (1996) A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique. Ann Surg 224(2):131–138PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Seelig MH, Seelig SK, Behr C, Schonleben K (2003) Comparison between open and laparoscopic technique in the management of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers. J Clin Gastroenterol 37(3):201PubMed Seelig MH, Seelig SK, Behr C, Schonleben K (2003) Comparison between open and laparoscopic technique in the management of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers. J Clin Gastroenterol 37(3):201PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehendale VG, Shenoy SN, Joshi AM, Chaudhari NC (2002) Laparoscopic versus open surgical closure of perforated duodenal ulcers: a comparative study. Indian J Gastroenterol 21(6):222–224PubMed Mehendale VG, Shenoy SN, Joshi AM, Chaudhari NC (2002) Laparoscopic versus open surgical closure of perforated duodenal ulcers: a comparative study. Indian J Gastroenterol 21(6):222–224PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat So JB, Kum CK, Fernandes ML, Goh P (1996) Comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc 10(11):1060–1063PubMed So JB, Kum CK, Fernandes ML, Goh P (1996) Comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc 10(11):1060–1063PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Robertson GS, Wemyss-Holden SA, Maddern GJ (2000) Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers. The role of laparoscopy in generalised peritonitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82(1):6–10PubMed Robertson GS, Wemyss-Holden SA, Maddern GJ (2000) Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers. The role of laparoscopy in generalised peritonitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82(1):6–10PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergamaschi R, Marvik R, Johnsen G, Thoresen JE, Ystgaard B, Myrvold HE (1999) Open vs. laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Surg Endosc 13(7):679–682PubMed Bergamaschi R, Marvik R, Johnsen G, Thoresen JE, Ystgaard B, Myrvold HE (1999) Open vs. laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Surg Endosc 13(7):679–682PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Michelet I, Agresta F (2000) Perforated peptic ulcer: laparoscopic approach. Eur J Surg 166(5):405–408PubMed Michelet I, Agresta F (2000) Perforated peptic ulcer: laparoscopic approach. Eur J Surg 166(5):405–408PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuda M, Nishiyama M, Hanai T, Saeki S, Watanabe T (1995) Laparoscopic omental patch repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Ann Surg 221(3):236–240PubMed Matsuda M, Nishiyama M, Hanai T, Saeki S, Watanabe T (1995) Laparoscopic omental patch repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Ann Surg 221(3):236–240PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Naesgaard JM, Edwin B, Reiertsen O, Trondsen E, Faerden AE, Rosseland AR (1999) Laparoscopic and open operation in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Eur J Surg 165(3):209–214PubMed Naesgaard JM, Edwin B, Reiertsen O, Trondsen E, Faerden AE, Rosseland AR (1999) Laparoscopic and open operation in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Eur J Surg 165(3):209–214PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lau H (2004) Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 18(7):1013–1016PubMed Lau H (2004) Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 18(7):1013–1016PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Feliciano DV (1992) Do perforated duodenal ulcers need an acid-decreasing surgical procedure now that omeprazole is available? Surg Clin North Am 72(2):369–380PubMed Feliciano DV (1992) Do perforated duodenal ulcers need an acid-decreasing surgical procedure now that omeprazole is available? Surg Clin North Am 72(2):369–380PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lagoo S, McMahon RL, Kakihara M, Pappas TN, Eubanks S (2002) The sixth decision regarding perforated duodenal ulcer. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 6(4):359–368 Lagoo S, McMahon RL, Kakihara M, Pappas TN, Eubanks S (2002) The sixth decision regarding perforated duodenal ulcer. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 6(4):359–368
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee FY, Leung KL, Lai BS, Ng SS, Dexter S, Lau WY (2001) Predicting mortality and morbidity of patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcers. Arch Surg 136(1):90–94PubMed Lee FY, Leung KL, Lai BS, Ng SS, Dexter S, Lau WY (2001) Predicting mortality and morbidity of patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcers. Arch Surg 136(1):90–94PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Agresta F, Michelet I, Coluci G, Bedin N (2000) Emergency laparoscopy: a community hospital experience. Surg Endosc 14(5):484–487PubMed Agresta F, Michelet I, Coluci G, Bedin N (2000) Emergency laparoscopy: a community hospital experience. Surg Endosc 14(5):484–487PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Druart ML, Van Hee R, Etienne J, Cadiere GB, Gigot JF, Legrand M et al (1997) Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer. A prospective multicenter clinical trial. Surg Endosc 11(10):1017–1020PubMed Druart ML, Van Hee R, Etienne J, Cadiere GB, Gigot JF, Legrand M et al (1997) Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer. A prospective multicenter clinical trial. Surg Endosc 11(10):1017–1020PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Mason RJ, Campos GM, Soroushyari A, Berne TV (1999) Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: outcome and efficacy in 30 consecutive patients. Arch Surg 134(8):845–848; discussion 849–850PubMed Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Mason RJ, Campos GM, Soroushyari A, Berne TV (1999) Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: outcome and efficacy in 30 consecutive patients. Arch Surg 134(8):845–848; discussion 849–850PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lau WY, Leung KL, Zhu XL, Lam YH, Chung SC, Li AK (1995) Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 82(6):814–816PubMed Lau WY, Leung KL, Zhu XL, Lam YH, Chung SC, Li AK (1995) Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 82(6):814–816PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Khoursheed M, Fuad M, Safar H, Dashti H, Behbehani A (2000) Laparoscopic closure of perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc 14(1):56–58PubMed Khoursheed M, Fuad M, Safar H, Dashti H, Behbehani A (2000) Laparoscopic closure of perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc 14(1):56–58PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kabashima A, Maehara Y, Hashizume M, Tomoda M, Kakeji Y, Ohno S et al (1998) Laparoscopic repair of a perforated duodenal ulcer in two patients. Surg Today 28(6):633–635PubMed Kabashima A, Maehara Y, Hashizume M, Tomoda M, Kakeji Y, Ohno S et al (1998) Laparoscopic repair of a perforated duodenal ulcer in two patients. Surg Today 28(6):633–635PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee FY, Leung KL, Lai PB, Lau JW (2001) Selection of patients for laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 88(1):133–136PubMed Lee FY, Leung KL, Lai PB, Lau JW (2001) Selection of patients for laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 88(1):133–136PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee KH, Chang HC, Lo CJ (2004) Endoscope-assisted laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers. Am Surg 70(4):352–356PubMed Lee KH, Chang HC, Lo CJ (2004) Endoscope-assisted laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers. Am Surg 70(4):352–356PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Malkov IS, Zaynutdinov AM, Veliyev NA, Tagirov MR, Merrell RC (2004) Laparoscopic and endoscopic management of perforated duodenal ulcers. J Am Coll Surg 198(3):352–355PubMed Malkov IS, Zaynutdinov AM, Veliyev NA, Tagirov MR, Merrell RC (2004) Laparoscopic and endoscopic management of perforated duodenal ulcers. J Am Coll Surg 198(3):352–355PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Pescatore P, Halkic N, Calmes JM, Blum A, Gillet M (1998) Combined laparoscopic–endoscopic method using an omental plug for therapy of gastroduodenal ulcer perforation. Gastrointest Endosc 48(4):411–414PubMed Pescatore P, Halkic N, Calmes JM, Blum A, Gillet M (1998) Combined laparoscopic–endoscopic method using an omental plug for therapy of gastroduodenal ulcer perforation. Gastrointest Endosc 48(4):411–414PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Halkic N, Pescatore P, Gillet M (1999) Laparoscopic–endoscopic management of perforated pyloroduodenal ulcer. Endoscopy 31(9):S64–S65 Halkic N, Pescatore P, Gillet M (1999) Laparoscopic–endoscopic management of perforated pyloroduodenal ulcer. Endoscopy 31(9):S64–S65
Metadaten
Titel
Risk factors influencing the early outcome results after laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer and their predictive value
verfasst von
Raimundas Lunevicius
Matas Morkevicius
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2005
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2005
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0569-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2005

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 5/2005 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.