nach oben

Erschienen in:

11.07.2016

Risk of Preeclampsia in Pregnancies After Assisted Reproductive Technology and Ovarian Stimulation

Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Ausgabe 10/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective To compare the risk of preeclampsia among spontaneously conceived pregnancies to those after hyperestrogenic ovarian stimulation (hyperestrogenic OS) with and without assisted reproductive technology (ART), and stimulation with non-hyperestrogenic aromatase inhibitor stimulation (non-hyperestrogenic OS). Methods Live-born singleton deliveries among women 20–49 years were identified in the 2004–2012 Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Databases using ICD-9 and CPT codes. Maternal characteristics were compared using Chi squared and Fisher exact tests. We performed multilevel multivariable logistic regression, controlling for maternal age, parity, comorbid conditions, and region of delivery, and calculated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95 % confidence intervals for mild and severe preeclampsia. Results 1,014,526 spontaneously conceived, 6881 hyperestrogenic OS with ART, 27,516 hyperestrogenic OS without ART, and 2117 non-hyperestrogenic OS pregnancies were identified. The adjusted odds of developing preeclampsia were increased for deliveries after hyperestrogenic OS with ART (mild preeclampsia aOR 1.42, 1.24–1.62; severe preeclampsia aOR 1.83, 1.59–2.11) and without ART (mild preeclampsia aOR 1.32, 1.24–1.42; severe preeclampsia aOR 1.53, 1.41–1.66). Adjusted odds of preeclampsia were similar between spontaneously conceived and non-hyperestrogenic OS pregnancies. Conclusions for Practice Risk of preeclampsia after ART may in part be related to supraphysiologic estrogen associated with hyperestrogenic OS.

National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Reproductive Health (2013). Assisted Reproductive Technology National Summary Report. http://www.cdc.gov/art/artdata/index.html. Accessed 15 June 2015.

Albrecht, E. D., Bonagura, T. W., Burleigh, D. W., Enders, A. C., Aberdeen, G. W., & Pepe, G. J. (2006). Suppression of extravillous trophoblast invasion of uterine spiral arteries by estrogen during early baboon pregnancy. Placenta, 27(4–5), 483–490. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2005.04.005.CrossRefPubMed

Apantaku, O., Chandrasekaran, I., & Bentick, B. (2008). Obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies achieved with in vitro fertilisation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: Experience from a district general hospital. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 28(4), 398–402. doi:10.1080/01443610802091792.CrossRefPubMed

Conde-Agudelo, A., Althabe, F., Belizan, J. M., & Kafury-Goeta, A. C. (1999). Cigarette smoking during pregnancy and risk of preeclampsia: a systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 181(4), 1026–1035.CrossRefPubMed

Creanga, A. A., Berg, C. J., Syverson, C., Seed, K., Bruce, F. C., & Callaghan, W. M. (2015). Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 2006–2010. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 125(1), 5–12. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000564.CrossRefPubMed

Fisher, S. J. (2015). Why is placentation abnormal in preeclampsia? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 213(4 Suppl), S115–S122. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.042.CrossRefPubMed

Ghulmiyyah, L., & Sibai, B. (2012). Maternal mortality from preeclampsia/eclampsia. Seminars in Perinatology, 36(1), 56–59. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2011.09.011.CrossRefPubMed

Henningsen, A. A., Wennerholm, U. B., Gissler, M., Romundstad, L. B., Nygren, K. G., Tiitinen, A., et al. (2014). Risk of stillbirth and infant deaths after assisted reproductive technology: A Nordic study from the CoNARTaS group. Human Reproduction, 29(5), 1090–1096. doi:10.1093/humrep/deu031.CrossRefPubMed

Imudia, A. N., Awonuga, A. O., Doyle, J. O., Kaimal, A. J., Wright, D. L., Toth, T. L., et al. (2012). Peak serum estradiol level during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation is associated with increased risk of small for gestational age and preeclampsia in singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility, 97(6), 1374–1379. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.028.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Kim, Y. J. (2013). Pathogenesis and promising non-invasive markers for preeclampsia. Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 56(1), 2–7. doi:10.5468/ogs.2013.56.1.2.CrossRef

11.

Kovo, M., Schreiber, L., Ben-Haroush, A., Gold, E., Golan, A., & Bar, J. (2012). The placental component in early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia in relation to fetal growth restriction. Prenatal Diagnosis, 32(7), 632–637. doi:10.1002/pd.3872.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Lisonkova, S., & Joseph, K. S. (2013). Incidence of preeclampsia: risk factors and outcomes associated with early- versus late-onset disease. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 209(6), 544.e1–544.e12. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.019.CrossRef

13.

Maman, E., Lunenfeld, E., Levy, A., Vardi, H., & Potashnik, G. (1998). Obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization and ovulation induction compared with those conceived spontaneously. Fertility and Sterility, 70(2), 240–245.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Nelson, D. B., Ziadie, M. S., McIntire, D. D., Rogers, B. B., & Leveno, K. J. (2014). Placental pathology suggesting that preeclampsia is more than one disease. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 210(1), 66.e61–66.e67. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.010.CrossRef

15.

Ogge, G., Chaiworapongsa, T., Romero, R., Hussein, Y., Kusanovic, J. P., Yeo, L., et al. (2011). Placental lesions associated with maternal underperfusion are more frequent in early-onset than in late-onset preeclampsia. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 39(6), 641–652. doi:10.1515/jpm.2011.098.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Olivennes, F., Rufat, P., Andre, B., Pourade, A., Quiros, M. C., & Frydman, R. (1993). The increased risk of complication observed in singleton pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization (IVF) does not seem to be related to the IVF method itself. Human Reproduction, 8(8), 1297–1300.PubMed

17.

Pandey, S., Shetty, A., Hamilton, M., Bhattacharya, S., & Maheshwari, A. (2012). Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update, 18(5), 485–503. doi:10.1093/humupd/dms018.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Redman, C. W., & Sargent, I. L. (2000). Placental debris, oxidative stress and pre-eclampsia. Placenta, 21(7), 597–602. doi:10.1053/plac.2000.0560.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Schieve, L. A., Cohen, B., Nannini, A., Ferre, C., Reynolds, M. A., Zhang, Z., et al. (2007). A population-based study of maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology in Massachusetts. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 11(6), 517–525. doi:10.1007/s10995-007-0202-7.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Silberstein, T., Levy, A., Harlev, A., Saphier, O., & Sheiner, E. (2013). Perinatal outcome of pregnancies following in vitro fertilization and ovulation induction. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine,. doi:10.3109/14767058.2013.856415.

21.

Thomopoulos, C., Tsioufis, C., Michalopoulou, H., Makris, T., Papademetriou, V., & Stefanadis, C. (2013). Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy-related hypertensive complications: A systematic review. Journal of Human Hypertension, 27(3), 148–157. doi:10.1038/jhh.2012.13.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Verlaenen, H., Cammu, H., Derde, M. P., & Amy, J. J. (1995). Singleton pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: Expectations and outcome. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 86(6), 906–910. doi:10.1016/0029-7844(95)00322-i.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Wallis, A. B., Saftlas, A. F., Hsia, J., & Atrash, H. K. (2008). Secular trends in the rates of preeclampsia, eclampsia, and gestational hypertension, United States, 1987–2004. American Journal of Hypertension, 21(5), 521–526. doi:10.1038/ajh.2008.20.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Yasmeen, S., Romano, P. S., Schembri, M. E., Keyzer, J. M., & Gilbert, W. M. (2006). Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 194(4), 992–1001. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.058.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Risk of Preeclampsia in Pregnancies After Assisted Reproductive Technology and Ovarian Stimulation
Publikationsdatum: 11.07.2016
Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal / Ausgabe 10/2016
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2067-0

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2016

The Influence of Infant Feeding Practices on Infant Mortality in Southern Africa

The Effectiveness of a Physical Activity Educational Campaign in a Rural Obstetrics and Gynecology Office

The Obstetric Hemorrhage Initiative (OHI) in Florida: The Role of Intervention Characteristics in Influencing Implementation Experiences among Multidisciplinary Hospital Staff

Children’s Media Use and Self-Regulation Behavior: Longitudinal Associations in a Nationwide Japanese Study

Relationship Between Common Mental Disorder Symptoms During Pregnancy and Preterm Birth Among Chinese Women in Wuhan

Prevalence of Ethanol Use Among Pregnant Women in Southwestern Uganda