Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2018

29.01.2018 | Original Article

Road to recovery after transvaginal surgery for urethral mesh perforation: evaluation of outcomes and subsequent procedures

verfasst von: Casey G. Kowalik, Joshua A. Cohn, Andrea Kakos, Patrick Lang, W. Stuart Reynolds, Melissa R. Kaufman, Mickey M. Karram, Roger R. Dmochowski

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Urethral injury resulting from transvaginal mesh slings is a rare complication with an estimated incidence of <1%. Our objective was to review the surgical management and functional outcomes of women presenting with urethral mesh perforation following midurethral sling (MUS) placement.

Methods

This was a retrospective multicenter review of women who from January 2011 to March 2016 at two institutions underwent mesh sling excision for urethral perforation with Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery fellowship-trained surgeons. Data comprising preoperative symptoms, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected by telephone (n 13) or based on their last follow-up appointment.

Results obtained

Nineteen women underwent transvaginal sling excision for urethral mesh perforation. Eight (42%) patients had undergone previous sling revision surgery. Sixty percent of women had resolution of their pelvic pain postoperatively. At follow-up, 92% reported urinary incontinence (UI), and three had undergone five additional procedures for vaginal prolapse mesh exposure (n 1), incontinence (onabotulinum toxin injection n 1, rectus fascia autologous sling n 1), prolapse (colpopexy n 1), and pain (trigger-point injection n 1). Patient global impression of improvement data was available for 13 patients, of whom seven (54%) rated their postoperative condition as Very much better or Much better.

Conclusions

The management of urethral mesh perforation is complex. Most women reported resolution of their pelvic pain and a high rate of satisfaction with their postoperative condition despite high rates of incontinence.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunskaar S. A systematic review of overweight and obesity as risk factors and targets for clinical intervention for urinary incontinence in women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27:749–57.CrossRefPubMed Hunskaar S. A systematic review of overweight and obesity as risk factors and targets for clinical intervention for urinary incontinence in women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27:749–57.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, et al. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ Prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:1201–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, et al. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ Prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:1201–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogo-Gupta L, Litwin MS, Saigal CS, et al. Female urology trends in the surgical Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence among Female Medicare Beneficiaries, 2002-2007. Urology. 2013;82:38–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rogo-Gupta L, Litwin MS, Saigal CS, et al. Female urology trends in the surgical Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence among Female Medicare Beneficiaries, 2002-2007. Urology. 2013;82:38–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Blaivas JG, Purohit RS, Benedon MS, et al. Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery. Nat Publ Group. 2015;12:481–509. Blaivas JG, Purohit RS, Benedon MS, et al. Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery. Nat Publ Group. 2015;12:481–509.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, et al. An international urogynecological association (IUGA)/international continence society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic flo. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;30:2–12.CrossRef Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, et al. An international urogynecological association (IUGA)/international continence society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic flo. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;30:2–12.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Deng DY, Rutman M, Raz S, et al. Presentation and management of major complications of midurethral slings: are complications under-reported? Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26:46–52.CrossRefPubMed Deng DY, Rutman M, Raz S, et al. Presentation and management of major complications of midurethral slings: are complications under-reported? Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26:46–52.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, et al. Retropubic versus Transobturator Midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2066–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, et al. Retropubic versus Transobturator Midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2066–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen SA, Goldman HB. Mesh perforation into a Viscus in the setting of pelvic floor surgery—presentation and management. Curr Urol Rep. 2016:1–7. Cohen SA, Goldman HB. Mesh perforation into a Viscus in the setting of pelvic floor surgery—presentation and management. Curr Urol Rep. 2016:1–7.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat United States Food and Drug Administration. Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh: Update on the safety and effectiveness of transvaginal placement for pelvic organ prolapse. 2011. Available at: www.fda.govdownloadsMedicalDevicesSafetyAlertsandNoticesUCM.pdf. United States Food and Drug Administration. Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh: Update on the safety and effectiveness of transvaginal placement for pelvic organ prolapse. 2011. Available at: www.fda.govdownloadsMedicalDevicesSafetyAlertsandNoticesUCM.pdf.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat United States Food and Drug Administration: Considerations about surgical mesh for SUI. 2013. Available at: www.fda.govMedicalDevicesProductsandMedicalProceduresImplantsandProstheticsUroGynSurgicalMeshucm.htm. United States Food and Drug Administration: Considerations about surgical mesh for SUI. 2013. Available at: www.fda.govMedicalDevicesProductsandMedicalProceduresImplantsandProstheticsUroGynSurgicalMeshucm.htm.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kobashi KC, Albo ME, Dmochowski RR, et al. Surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: AUA/SUFU guideline. 2017. 1–33. Kobashi KC, Albo ME, Dmochowski RR, et al. Surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: AUA/SUFU guideline. 2017. 1–33.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rac G, Younger A, Clemens JQ, et al. Stress urinary incontinence surgery trends in academic female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery urology practice in the setting of the food and drug administration public health notifications. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016: Epub ahead of print. Rac G, Younger A, Clemens JQ, et al. Stress urinary incontinence surgery trends in academic female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery urology practice in the setting of the food and drug administration public health notifications. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016: Epub ahead of print.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Andonian S, Chen T, St-Denis B, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing Suprapubic arch sling (SPARC) and tension-free vaginal tape (TVT): one-year results. Eur Urol. 2005;47:537–41.CrossRefPubMed Andonian S, Chen T, St-Denis B, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing Suprapubic arch sling (SPARC) and tension-free vaginal tape (TVT): one-year results. Eur Urol. 2005;47:537–41.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Niknejad K, Plzak LS, Staskin DR, et al. Autologous and synthetic urethral slings for female incontinence. Urol Clin N Am. 2002;29:597–611.CrossRef Niknejad K, Plzak LS, Staskin DR, et al. Autologous and synthetic urethral slings for female incontinence. Urol Clin N Am. 2002;29:597–611.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Osborn DJ, Dmochowski RR, Harris CJ, et al. Analysis of patient and technical factors associated with midurethral sling mesh exposure and perforation. Int J Urol. 2014;21:1167–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Osborn DJ, Dmochowski RR, Harris CJ, et al. Analysis of patient and technical factors associated with midurethral sling mesh exposure and perforation. Int J Urol. 2014;21:1167–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:98–101.CrossRefPubMed Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:98–101.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Danford JM, Osborn DJ, Reynolds WS, et al. Postoperative pain outcomes after transvaginal mesh revision. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:65–9.CrossRefPubMed Danford JM, Osborn DJ, Reynolds WS, et al. Postoperative pain outcomes after transvaginal mesh revision. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:65–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Blaivas JG, Mekel G. Management of urinary fistulas due to midurethral sling surgery. J Urol. 2014;192:1137–42.CrossRefPubMed Blaivas JG, Mekel G. Management of urinary fistulas due to midurethral sling surgery. J Urol. 2014;192:1137–42.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah K, Nikolavsky D, Gilsdorf D, et al. Surgical management of lower urinary mesh perforation after mid-urethral polypropylene mesh sling: mesh excision, urinary tract reconstruction and concomitant pubovaginal sling with autologous rectus fascia. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:2111–7.CrossRefPubMed Shah K, Nikolavsky D, Gilsdorf D, et al. Surgical management of lower urinary mesh perforation after mid-urethral polypropylene mesh sling: mesh excision, urinary tract reconstruction and concomitant pubovaginal sling with autologous rectus fascia. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:2111–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Singla N, Aggarwal H, Foster J, et al. Management of Urinary Incontinence Following Suburethral Sling Removal. J Urol. 2017;198:644–9.CrossRefPubMed Singla N, Aggarwal H, Foster J, et al. Management of Urinary Incontinence Following Suburethral Sling Removal. J Urol. 2017;198:644–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Metadaten
Titel
Road to recovery after transvaginal surgery for urethral mesh perforation: evaluation of outcomes and subsequent procedures
verfasst von
Casey G. Kowalik
Joshua A. Cohn
Andrea Kakos
Patrick Lang
W. Stuart Reynolds
Melissa R. Kaufman
Mickey M. Karram
Roger R. Dmochowski
Publikationsdatum
29.01.2018
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3563-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.