Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Der Chirurg 1/2017

05.07.2016 | Leitthema

Robot-assisted gastrectomy for cancer

verfasst von: S. Amore Bonapasta, F. Guerra, C. Linari, M. Annecchiarico, B. Boffi, M. Calistri, A. Coratti

Erschienen in: Die Chirurgie | Sonderheft 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer is commonly considered a challenging procedure. The technical drawbacks of laparoscopy have been addressed by robotic technology, which can facilitate demanding reconstructions and fine dissection. These features confer potential advantages in the execution of lymphadenectomy.

Objectives

Here, we illustrate our technique of robotic gastrectomy and discuss advantages and drawbacks by reviewing the current literature.

Materials and methods

We describe our technique for robot-assisted distal and total gastrectomy for cancer and assess the current literature dealing with short-term outcomes, immediate oncologic measures, and long-term oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted gastrectomy, in comparison with conventional laparoscopic and open surgery.

Results

The robotic procedure seems to be as safe and effective as conventional gastrectomy for gastric cancer, with a longer operative time and decreased blood loss in comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Conclusion

The technical advantages offered by robotics could help to standardize minimally invasive D2 lymphadenectomy and enable surgeons to perform this procedure routinely. Despite the scarcity of long-term data on survival, immediate oncological measures (lymph node yield and margin status) are encouraging. Further studies investigating the long-term oncological outcomes are required.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Chuan L, Yan S, Pei-Wu Y (2015) Meta-analysis of the short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted compared to laparoscopic gastrectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 24(3):127–134. doi:10.3109/13645706.2014.98568CrossRefPubMed Chuan L, Yan S, Pei-Wu Y (2015) Meta-analysis of the short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted compared to laparoscopic gastrectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 24(3):127–134. doi:10.3109/13645706.2014.98568CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Coratti A, Annecchiarico M, Di Marino M et al (2013) Robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: current status and technical considerations. World J Surg 37:2771–2281. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2100-zCrossRefPubMed Coratti A, Annecchiarico M, Di Marino M et al (2013) Robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: current status and technical considerations. World J Surg 37:2771–2281. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2100-zCrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Coratti A, Fernandes E, Lombardi A, Di Marino M, Annecchiarico M, Felicioni L, Giulianotti PC (2015) Robot-assisted surgery for gastric carcinoma: five years follow-up and beyond: A single western center experience and long-term oncological outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 41(8):1106–1113. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2015.01.014.CrossRefPubMed Coratti A, Fernandes E, Lombardi A, Di Marino M, Annecchiarico M, Felicioni L, Giulianotti PC (2015) Robot-assisted surgery for gastric carcinoma: five years follow-up and beyond: A single western center experience and long-term oncological outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 41(8):1106–1113. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2015.01.014.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Annibale A, Pende V, Pernazza G et al (2010) Full robotic gastrectomy with extended (D2) lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: surgical technique and preliminary results. J Surg Res 166:113–120. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2010.11.881CrossRef D’Annibale A, Pende V, Pernazza G et al (2010) Full robotic gastrectomy with extended (D2) lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: surgical technique and preliminary results. J Surg Res 166:113–120. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2010.11.881CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Diana M, Marescaux J (2015) Robotic surgery. Br J Surg 102(2):15–28. doi:10.1002/bjs.9711CrossRef Diana M, Marescaux J (2015) Robotic surgery. Br J Surg 102(2):15–28. doi:10.1002/bjs.9711CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784CrossRefPubMed Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hashizume M, Sugimachi K (2003) Robot-assisted gastric surgery. Surg Clin North Am 83:1429–1444CrossRefPubMed Hashizume M, Sugimachi K (2003) Robot-assisted gastric surgery. Surg Clin North Am 83:1429–1444CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang KH, Lan YT, Fang WL, Chen JH, Lo SS et al (2014) Comparison of the operative outcomes and learning curves between laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. PLoS ONE 9(10):e111499 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111499CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huang KH, Lan YT, Fang WL, Chen JH, Lo SS et al (2014) Comparison of the operative outcomes and learning curves between laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. PLoS ONE 9(10):e111499 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111499CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hur H, Kim JY, Cho YK, Han SU (2010) Technical feasibility of robot-sewn anastomosis in robotic surgery for gastric cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:693–697. doi:10.1089/lap.2010.0246CrossRefPubMed Hur H, Kim JY, Cho YK, Han SU (2010) Technical feasibility of robot-sewn anastomosis in robotic surgery for gastric cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:693–697. doi:10.1089/lap.2010.0246CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hyun MH, Lee CH, Kim HJ et al (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic and open resections for gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg 100:1566–1578. doi:10.1002/bjs.9242CrossRefPubMed Hyun MH, Lee CH, Kim HJ et al (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic and open resections for gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg 100:1566–1578. doi:10.1002/bjs.9242CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hyun MH, Lee CH, Kwon YJ et al (2013) Robot versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer by an experienced surgeon: comparisons of surgery, complications, and surgical stress. Ann Surg Oncol 20:1258–1265. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2679-6CrossRefPubMed Hyun MH, Lee CH, Kwon YJ et al (2013) Robot versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer by an experienced surgeon: comparisons of surgery, complications, and surgical stress. Ann Surg Oncol 20:1258–1265. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2679-6CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Junfeng Z, Yan S, Bo T, Yingxue H, Dongzhu Z, Yongliang Z, Feng Q, Peiwu Y (2011) Robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer:comparison of surgical performance and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 28(6):1779–1787. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3385-6CrossRef Junfeng Z, Yan S, Bo T, Yingxue H, Dongzhu Z, Yongliang Z, Feng Q, Peiwu Y (2011) Robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer:comparison of surgical performance and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 28(6):1779–1787. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3385-6CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim KM, An JY, Kim HI et al (2012) Major early complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy. Br J Surg 99:1681–1687. doi:10.1002/bjs.8924CrossRefPubMed Kim KM, An JY, Kim HI et al (2012) Major early complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy. Br J Surg 99:1681–1687. doi:10.1002/bjs.8924CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Surgimachi K (1994) Laparoscopy assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:146–148PubMed Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Surgimachi K (1994) Laparoscopy assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:146–148PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Fujii K, Yasuda K, Inomata M, Adachi Y (2002) A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report. Surgery 131:306–S311CrossRef Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Fujii K, Yasuda K, Inomata M, Adachi Y (2002) A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report. Surgery 131:306–S311CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee J, Kim YM, Woo Y, Obama K, Noh SH, Hyung WJ (2015) Robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer patients with high body mass index: comparison with conventional laparoscopic distal subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. Surg Endosc 29:3251–3260. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4069-1CrossRefPubMed Lee J, Kim YM, Woo Y, Obama K, Noh SH, Hyung WJ (2015) Robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer patients with high body mass index: comparison with conventional laparoscopic distal subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. Surg Endosc 29:3251–3260. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4069-1CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu XX, Jiang ZW, Chen P, Zhao Y, Pan HF, Li JS (2013) Full robot-assisted gastrectomy with intracorporeal robot-sewn anastomosis produces satisfying outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 19(38):6427–6437. doi:10.3748/wjg.v19.i38.6427CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu XX, Jiang ZW, Chen P, Zhao Y, Pan HF, Li JS (2013) Full robot-assisted gastrectomy with intracorporeal robot-sewn anastomosis produces satisfying outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 19(38):6427–6437. doi:10.3748/wjg.v19.i38.6427CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Moisan F, Norero E, Slako M, Varas J, Palominos G, Crovari F, Ibañez L, Pérez G, Pimentel F, Guzmán S, Jarufe N, Boza C, Escalona A, Funke R (2012) Completely laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for early and advanced gastric cancer: a matched cohort study. Surg Endosc 26:661–672. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1933-5CrossRefPubMed Moisan F, Norero E, Slako M, Varas J, Palominos G, Crovari F, Ibañez L, Pérez G, Pimentel F, Guzmán S, Jarufe N, Boza C, Escalona A, Funke R (2012) Completely laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for early and advanced gastric cancer: a matched cohort study. Surg Endosc 26:661–672. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1933-5CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bellochi R, Bartoli A, Spaziani A, Di Zitti L, Casciola L (2008) Robot-assisted laparoscopic total and partial gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 22:2753–2760. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-0129-0CrossRefPubMed Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bellochi R, Bartoli A, Spaziani A, Di Zitti L, Casciola L (2008) Robot-assisted laparoscopic total and partial gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 22:2753–2760. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-0129-0CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pugliese R, Maggioni D, Sansonna F et al (2010) Subtotal gastrectomy with D2 dissection by minimally invasive surgery for distal adenocarcinoma of the stomach: results and 5‑year survival. Surg Endosc 24:2594–2602. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1014-1CrossRefPubMed Pugliese R, Maggioni D, Sansonna F et al (2010) Subtotal gastrectomy with D2 dissection by minimally invasive surgery for distal adenocarcinoma of the stomach: results and 5‑year survival. Surg Endosc 24:2594–2602. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1014-1CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen WS, Xi HQ, Chen L, Wei B (2014) A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 28(10):2795–2802. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3547-1CrossRefPubMed Shen WS, Xi HQ, Chen L, Wei B (2014) A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 28(10):2795–2802. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3547-1CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Son T, Lee JH, Kim YM, Kim HI, Noh SH, Hyung WJ (2014) Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopic procedure. Surg Endosc 28(9):2606–2615. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3511-0CrossRefPubMed Son T, Lee JH, Kim YM, Kim HI, Noh SH, Hyung WJ (2014) Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopic procedure. Surg Endosc 28(9):2606–2615. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3511-0CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Song J, Kang WH, Oh SJ, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH (2009) Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 23:1204–1211. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0351-4CrossRefPubMed Song J, Kang WH, Oh SJ, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH (2009) Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 23:1204–1211. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0351-4CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH et al (2009) Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 249:927–932. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000351688.64999.73CrossRefPubMed Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH et al (2009) Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 249:927–932. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000351688.64999.73CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Suda K, Man-I M, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, Satoh S, Uyama I (2015) Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study. Surg Endosc 29(3):673–685. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3718-0CrossRefPubMed Suda K, Man-I M, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, Satoh S, Uyama I (2015) Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study. Surg Endosc 29(3):673–685. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3718-0CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Terashima M, Tokunaga M, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, Kawamura T, Miki Y, Makuuchi R, Honda S, Tatsubayashi T, Takagi W, Omori H, Hirata F (2015) Robotic surgery for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 18:449–457. doi:10.1007/s10120-015-0501-4CrossRefPubMed Terashima M, Tokunaga M, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, Kawamura T, Miki Y, Makuuchi R, Honda S, Tatsubayashi T, Takagi W, Omori H, Hirata F (2015) Robotic surgery for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 18:449–457. doi:10.1007/s10120-015-0501-4CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Woo Y, Hyung WJ, Pak KH, Inaba K, Obama K, Choi SH, Noh SH (2011) Robotic gastrectomy as an oncologically sound alternative to laparoscopic resections for the treatment of early-stage gastric cancers. Arch Surg 146:1086–1092. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.114CrossRefPubMed Woo Y, Hyung WJ, Pak KH, Inaba K, Obama K, Choi SH, Noh SH (2011) Robotic gastrectomy as an oncologically sound alternative to laparoscopic resections for the treatment of early-stage gastric cancers. Arch Surg 146:1086–1092. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.114CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiong B, Ma L, Zhang C (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of short outcomes. Surg Oncol 21:274–280. doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2012.05.004CrossRefPubMed Xiong B, Ma L, Zhang C (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of short outcomes. Surg Oncol 21:274–280. doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2012.05.004CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou J, Shi Y, Qian F, Tang B, Hao Y, Zhao Y, Yu P (2015) Cumulative summation analysis of learning curve for robot-assisted gastrectomy in gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 111(6):760–767. doi:10.1002/jso.23876CrossRefPubMed Zhou J, Shi Y, Qian F, Tang B, Hao Y, Zhao Y, Yu P (2015) Cumulative summation analysis of learning curve for robot-assisted gastrectomy in gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 111(6):760–767. doi:10.1002/jso.23876CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Zong L, Seto Y et al (2014) Efficacy evaluation of subtotal and total gastrectomies in robotic surgery for gastric cancer compared with that in open and laparoscopic resections: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9(7):e103312 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103312CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zong L, Seto Y et al (2014) Efficacy evaluation of subtotal and total gastrectomies in robotic surgery for gastric cancer compared with that in open and laparoscopic resections: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9(7):e103312 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103312CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Robot-assisted gastrectomy for cancer
verfasst von
S. Amore Bonapasta
F. Guerra
C. Linari
M. Annecchiarico
B. Boffi
M. Calistri
A. Coratti
Publikationsdatum
05.07.2016
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Die Chirurgie / Ausgabe Sonderheft 1/2017
Print ISSN: 2731-6971
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-698X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-016-0209-y

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2017

Der Chirurg 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.