Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2017

06.08.2016 | Original Article

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: comparison between pediatric and adult patients-Japanese series

verfasst von: Kentaro Mizuno, Yoshiyuki Kojima, Satoshi Kurokawa, Hideyuki Kamisawa, Hidenori Nishio, Yoshinobu Moritoki, Akihiro Nakane, Tetsuji Maruyama, Atsushi Okada, Noriyasu Kawai, Keiichi Tozawa, Kenjiro Kohri, Takahiro Yasui, Yutaro Hayashi

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Robotic-assisted procedures are gaining traction as a viable form of minimally invasive surgery in the field of reconstructive surgery. In this article, the aim is to present our initial experience and clinical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RAL-P). We performed RAL-P in 22 patients for the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction between December 2012 and August 2015. The da Vinci® S surgical system was utilized for all cases. All procedures were performed via a transperitoneal approach. We assessed perioperative outcomes, and furthermore, compared between pediatric and adult patients undergoing this procedure. Dismembered procedures were performed in 19 patients. Three patients underwent Y-V plasty, and two patients who experienced failure during the primary pyeloplasty had to undergo reoperation. Although the console time for pediatric patients was significantly shorter than that of adults (123.1 ± 18.3, 162.4 ± 23.9 min, respectively, p < 0.001), success rate was not significantly different between pediatric and adults (100 vs 90 %, p = 0.512). According to a comparison of surgical outcomes by age, the console time was significantly shorter in pediatric than in adult patients. This finding may be attributable to the differences in intraabdominal fatty tissues. Besides, RAL-P with Y–V plasty was applicable even for cases of failed pyeloplasty. In conclusion, the surgical outcomes of RAL-P were favorable and safe for both pediatric and adult patients, and comparable to findings of previous reports. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a case series of RAL-P in Japan.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sukumar S, Bhandari M, Menon M (2012) The evolution of robotic surgery and its clinical applications. In: Gundeti MS (ed) Pediatric robotic and reconstructive urology: a comprehensive guide. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Chichester, pp 3–9 Sukumar S, Bhandari M, Menon M (2012) The evolution of robotic surgery and its clinical applications. In: Gundeti MS (ed) Pediatric robotic and reconstructive urology: a comprehensive guide. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Chichester, pp 3–9
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Persky L, Krause JR, Boltuch RL (1977) Initial complications and late results in dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 118(1 Pt 2):162–165PubMed Persky L, Krause JR, Boltuch RL (1977) Initial complications and late results in dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 118(1 Pt 2):162–165PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kavoussi LR, Peters CA (1993) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol 150(6):1891–1894PubMed Kavoussi LR, Peters CA (1993) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol 150(6):1891–1894PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM (1993) Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 150(6):1795–1799PubMed Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM (1993) Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 150(6):1795–1799PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters CA, Schlussel RN, Retik AB (1995) Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 153(6):1962–1965CrossRefPubMed Peters CA, Schlussel RN, Retik AB (1995) Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 153(6):1962–1965CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Piaggio LA, Franc-Guimond J, Noh PH et al (2007) Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants and children: comparison with open surgery. J Urol 178(4 Pt 2):1579–1583. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.159 CrossRefPubMed Piaggio LA, Franc-Guimond J, Noh PH et al (2007) Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants and children: comparison with open surgery. J Urol 178(4 Pt 2):1579–1583. doi:10.​1016/​j.​juro.​2007.​03.​159 CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G (2002) A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results. Eur Urol 42(5):453–457 (discussion 457–458) CrossRefPubMed Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G (2002) A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results. Eur Urol 42(5):453–457 (discussion 457–458) CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshida M, Furukawa T, Morikawa Y, Kitagawa Y, Kitajima M (2010) The developments and achievements of endoscopic surgery, robotic surgery and function-preserving surgery. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40(9):863–869. doi:10.1093/jjco/hyq138 CrossRefPubMed Yoshida M, Furukawa T, Morikawa Y, Kitagawa Y, Kitajima M (2010) The developments and achievements of endoscopic surgery, robotic surgery and function-preserving surgery. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40(9):863–869. doi:10.​1093/​jjco/​hyq138 CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lucas SM, Sundaram CP, Wolf JS Jr et al (2012) Factors that impact the outcome of minimally invasive pyeloplasty: results of the Multi-institutional Laparoscopic and Robotic Pyeloplasty Collaborative Group. J Urol 187(2):522–527. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.158 CrossRefPubMed Lucas SM, Sundaram CP, Wolf JS Jr et al (2012) Factors that impact the outcome of minimally invasive pyeloplasty: results of the Multi-institutional Laparoscopic and Robotic Pyeloplasty Collaborative Group. J Urol 187(2):522–527. doi:10.​1016/​j.​juro.​2011.​09.​158 CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Passerotti CC, Passerotti AM, Dall’Oglio MF et al (2009) Comparing the quality of the suture anastomosis and the learning curves associated with performing open, freehand, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in a swine animal model. J Am Coll Surg 208(4):576–586. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.010 CrossRefPubMed Passerotti CC, Passerotti AM, Dall’Oglio MF et al (2009) Comparing the quality of the suture anastomosis and the learning curves associated with performing open, freehand, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in a swine animal model. J Am Coll Surg 208(4):576–586. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jamcollsurg.​2009.​01.​010 CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayashi Y, Mizuno K, Kurokawa S et al (2014) Extravesical robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux: initial experience in Japan with the ureteral advancement technique. Int J Urol. doi:10.1111/iju.12483 Hayashi Y, Mizuno K, Kurokawa S et al (2014) Extravesical robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux: initial experience in Japan with the ureteral advancement technique. Int J Urol. doi:10.​1111/​iju.​12483
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Szydelko T, Kasprzak J, Lewandowski J, Apoznanski W, Dembowski J (2012) Dismembered laparoscopic Anderson–Hynes pyeloplasty versus nondismembered laparoscopic Y–V pyeloplasty in the treatment of patients with primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a prospective study. J Endourol 26(9):1165–1170. doi:10.1089/end.2011.0642 CrossRefPubMed Szydelko T, Kasprzak J, Lewandowski J, Apoznanski W, Dembowski J (2012) Dismembered laparoscopic Anderson–Hynes pyeloplasty versus nondismembered laparoscopic Y–V pyeloplasty in the treatment of patients with primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a prospective study. J Endourol 26(9):1165–1170. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2011.​0642 CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Erdeljan P, Caumartin Y, Warren J et al (2010) Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: follow-up of first Canadian experience with comparison of outcomes between experienced and trainee surgeons. J Endourol 24(9):1447–1450. doi:10.1089/end.2009.0617 CrossRefPubMed Erdeljan P, Caumartin Y, Warren J et al (2010) Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: follow-up of first Canadian experience with comparison of outcomes between experienced and trainee surgeons. J Endourol 24(9):1447–1450. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2009.​0617 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: comparison between pediatric and adult patients-Japanese series
verfasst von
Kentaro Mizuno
Yoshiyuki Kojima
Satoshi Kurokawa
Hideyuki Kamisawa
Hidenori Nishio
Yoshinobu Moritoki
Akihiro Nakane
Tetsuji Maruyama
Atsushi Okada
Noriyasu Kawai
Keiichi Tozawa
Kenjiro Kohri
Takahiro Yasui
Yutaro Hayashi
Publikationsdatum
06.08.2016
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0633-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Letter to the Editor

“Vesica Patavina” (lat.)

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.