Robotic approach does not eliminate first assistant in bariatric surgery compared to laparoscopy
- 21.04.2025
Erschienen in:
- Verfasst von
- Luis Pina
- Conor M. Eufemio
- James Dove
- G. Craig Wood
- Mark Mahan
- Alexandra Falvo
- Ryan Horsley
- Benefsha Mohammad
- Vladan Obradovic
- Anthony T. Petrick
- David M. Parker
- Erschienen in
- Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 6/2025
Abstract
Introduction
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) constitute the most commonly performed bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) procedures in the USA. The number of robotic-assisted BMS cases remains low, primarily due to the increased cost and extended operative time associated with this technology. Our primary objective is to assess whether robotic platform reduces the need for a surgical first assistant (FA). Our secondary objective is to compare the utilization of skilled surgical assistants.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of the MBSAQIP Participant Use File cohort spanning from 2015 to 2019 to determine the prevalence of Attending Surgeon involvement in robotic-assisted, laparoscopic RYGB, and SG procedures, in comparison to non-physician surgical First Assistants. Cases involving medical trainees (residents and fellows) were excluded from the analysis. For each bariatric procedure, we established two distinct groups and employed propensity score matching to ensure patient comparability. A “good match” was defined as a standardized mean difference (SMD) of less than 0.10. All statistical analyses were two-sided, with a significance level set at P < 0.05.
Results
A total of 113,682 patients underwent LRYGB, with 12,480 undergoing robotic RYGB (RRYGB). After a 1:1 match, attending-level FAs were involved in 25.9% of LRYGB cases, mid-level FAs in 55.6%, and no assistants in 18.5%. In contrast, RRYGB cases utilized attending-level FAs in 13.7% of cases, mid-level FAs in 68.4%, and had no assistants in 17.9% of cases (P < 0.0001).
In LSG, attending-level FAs were present in 28.1% of cases, mid-level FAs in 51.6%, and no assistants in 20.3%. In comparison, robotic SG (RSG) cases had attending-level FAs in 16.1%, mid-level FAs in 55.6%, and no assistants in 28.3% of cases (P < 0.0001).
Conclusion
The robotic platform failed to show a reduction in the need for an assistant in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) procedures but did lead to a decrease in the number of assistants required in sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Mid-level assistance was necessary for the majority of robotic and laparoscopic bariatric metabolic cases. The robotic platform was associated with an approximate 12% reduction in the requirement for attending-level assistance in robotic procedures.
Anzeige
- Titel
- Robotic approach does not eliminate first assistant in bariatric surgery compared to laparoscopy
- Verfasst von
-
Luis Pina
Conor M. Eufemio
James Dove
G. Craig Wood
Mark Mahan
Alexandra Falvo
Ryan Horsley
Benefsha Mohammad
Vladan Obradovic
Anthony T. Petrick
David M. Parker
- Publikationsdatum
- 21.04.2025
- Verlag
- Springer US
- Erschienen in
-
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 6/2025
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218 - DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11719-z
Dieser Inhalt ist nur sichtbar, wenn du eingeloggt bist und die entsprechende Berechtigung hast.
