Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2019

27.09.2018 | Original Article

Robotic cholecystectomy: first experience with the new Senhance robotic system

verfasst von: Nathaniel Melling, Justin Barr, Robin Schmitz, Adam Polonski, Jameel Miro, Tarik Ghadban, Karin Wodack, Jakob Izbicki, Sabino Zani, Daniel Perez

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This retrospective study was performed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the new Senhance robotic system (Transenterix) for robotic cholecystectomy. Our series is the first experience with cholecystectomies utilizing this new platform. From May 2017 to August 2017, 20 robotic cholecystectomies were performed using the Senhance robotic system. Patients were between 23 years and 78 years of age, eligible for a laparoscopic procedure with general anesthesia, with no life-threatening co-morbidities that limited the subjects’ life-expectancy to fewer than 12 months. A retrospective chart review was performed for a variety of pre-, peri- and postoperative data including, but not limited to patient demographics, intraoperative complications and postoperative complications. 9 male and 11 female patients were included in this study. Median age was 39.5 years (range 23–78); median BMI was 27.35 kg/m2 (range 22.8–48.3). Median docking time was 10 min (range 2–26), and median operative time was 71.5 min (range 34–197). Conversion to standard laparoscopy occurred in one case for lysis of extensive adhesions. There were no conversions to open technique. There were no intra- or post-operative complications noted. We report the first series of robotic cholecystectomies using the new Senhance system. Docking time and total operative time decreased significantly over the course of this series and did not plateau; console time did not change significantly. This study demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing this platform in performing minimally invasive cholecystectomies.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang CL, Schlich T (2017) Surgical innovation and the multiple meanings of randomized controlled trials: the first RCT on minimally invasive cholecystectomy (1980–2000). J Hist Med Allied Sci 72(2):117–141PubMed Tang CL, Schlich T (2017) Surgical innovation and the multiple meanings of randomized controlled trials: the first RCT on minimally invasive cholecystectomy (1980–2000). J Hist Med Allied Sci 72(2):117–141PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Csikesz NG, Singla A, Murphy MM, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2010) Surgeon volume metrics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci 55(8):2398–2405CrossRefPubMed Csikesz NG, Singla A, Murphy MM, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2010) Surgeon volume metrics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci 55(8):2398–2405CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Alli VV, Yang J, Xu J, Bates AT, Pryor AD, Talamini MA et al (2017) Nineteen-year trends in incidence and indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the NY State experience. Surg Endosc 31(4):1651–1658CrossRefPubMed Alli VV, Yang J, Xu J, Bates AT, Pryor AD, Talamini MA et al (2017) Nineteen-year trends in incidence and indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the NY State experience. Surg Endosc 31(4):1651–1658CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tiwari MM, Reynoso JF, High R, Tsang AW, Oleynikov D (2011) Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 25(4):1127–1135CrossRefPubMed Tiwari MM, Reynoso JF, High R, Tsang AW, Oleynikov D (2011) Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 25(4):1127–1135CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Armijo PR, Pagkratis S, Boilesen E, Tanner T, Oleynikov D (2017) Growth in robotic-assisted procedures is from conversion of laparoscopic procedures and not from open surgeons’ conversion: a study of trends and costs. Surg Endosc 32(4):2106–2113CrossRefPubMed Armijo PR, Pagkratis S, Boilesen E, Tanner T, Oleynikov D (2017) Growth in robotic-assisted procedures is from conversion of laparoscopic procedures and not from open surgeons’ conversion: a study of trends and costs. Surg Endosc 32(4):2106–2113CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Breitenstein S, Nocito A, Puhan M, Held U, Weber M, Clavien P-A (2008) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study. Ann Surg 247(6):987–993CrossRefPubMed Breitenstein S, Nocito A, Puhan M, Held U, Weber M, Clavien P-A (2008) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study. Ann Surg 247(6):987–993CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Heemskerk J, van Dam R, van Gemert WG, Beets GL, Greve JWM, Jacobs MJ et al (2005) First results after introduction of the four-armed da Vinci surgical system in fully robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Surg 22(6):426–431CrossRefPubMed Heemskerk J, van Dam R, van Gemert WG, Beets GL, Greve JWM, Jacobs MJ et al (2005) First results after introduction of the four-armed da Vinci surgical system in fully robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Surg 22(6):426–431CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Strosberg DS, Nguyen MC, Muscarella P, Narula VK (2017) A retrospective comparison of robotic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operative outcomes and cost analysis. Surg Endosc 31(3):1436–1441CrossRefPubMed Strosberg DS, Nguyen MC, Muscarella P, Narula VK (2017) A retrospective comparison of robotic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operative outcomes and cost analysis. Surg Endosc 31(3):1436–1441CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang Y, Chua TC, Maddern GJ, Samra JS (2017) Robotic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Surgery 161(3):628–636CrossRefPubMed Huang Y, Chua TC, Maddern GJ, Samra JS (2017) Robotic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Surgery 161(3):628–636CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gidaro S, Buscarini M, Ruiz E, Stark M, Labruzzo A (2012) Telelap Alf-X: a novel telesurgical system for the 21st century. Surg Technol Int 22:20–25PubMed Gidaro S, Buscarini M, Ruiz E, Stark M, Labruzzo A (2012) Telelap Alf-X: a novel telesurgical system for the 21st century. Surg Technol Int 22:20–25PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gueli Alletti S, Rossitto C, Cianci S, Restaino S, Costantini B, Fanfani F et al (2016) Telelap ALF-X vs standard laparoscopy for the treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer: a single-institution retrospective cohort study. J Minim Invas Gynecol 23(3):378–383CrossRef Gueli Alletti S, Rossitto C, Cianci S, Restaino S, Costantini B, Fanfani F et al (2016) Telelap ALF-X vs standard laparoscopy for the treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer: a single-institution retrospective cohort study. J Minim Invas Gynecol 23(3):378–383CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gueli Alletti S, Rossitto C, Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Costantini B, Gidaro S et al (2015) Telelap Alf-X-assisted laparoscopy for ovarian cyst enucleation: report of the first 10 cases. J Minim Invas Gynecol 22(6):1079–1083CrossRef Gueli Alletti S, Rossitto C, Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Costantini B, Gidaro S et al (2015) Telelap Alf-X-assisted laparoscopy for ovarian cyst enucleation: report of the first 10 cases. J Minim Invas Gynecol 22(6):1079–1083CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fanfani F, Monterossi G, Fagotti A, Rossitto C, Gueli Alletti S, Costantini B et al (2016) The new robotic TELELAP ALF-X in gynecological surgery: single-center experience. Surg Endosc 30(1):215–221CrossRefPubMed Fanfani F, Monterossi G, Fagotti A, Rossitto C, Gueli Alletti S, Costantini B et al (2016) The new robotic TELELAP ALF-X in gynecological surgery: single-center experience. Surg Endosc 30(1):215–221CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fanfani F, Restaino S, Gueli Alletti S, Fagotti A, Monterossi G, Rossitto C et al (2015) TELELAP ALF-X robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: feasibility and perioperative outcomes. J Minim Invas Gynecol 22(6):1011–1017CrossRef Fanfani F, Restaino S, Gueli Alletti S, Fagotti A, Monterossi G, Rossitto C et al (2015) TELELAP ALF-X robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: feasibility and perioperative outcomes. J Minim Invas Gynecol 22(6):1011–1017CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Alleblas CC, de Man AM, van den Haak L, Vierhout ME, Jansen FW, Nieboer TE (2017) Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among surgeons performing minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg 266(6):905–920CrossRefPubMed Alleblas CC, de Man AM, van den Haak L, Vierhout ME, Jansen FW, Nieboer TE (2017) Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among surgeons performing minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg 266(6):905–920CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Iranmanesh P, Morel P, Wagner OJ, Inan I, Pugin F, Hagen ME (2010) Set-up and docking of the da Vinci® surgical system: prospective analysis of initial experience. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 6(1):57–60 Iranmanesh P, Morel P, Wagner OJ, Inan I, Pugin F, Hagen ME (2010) Set-up and docking of the da Vinci® surgical system: prospective analysis of initial experience. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 6(1):57–60
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayaraman S, Davies W, Schlachta CM (2009) Getting started with robotics in general surgery with cholecystectomy: the Canadian experience. Can J Surg 52(5):374–378PubMedPubMedCentral Jayaraman S, Davies W, Schlachta CM (2009) Getting started with robotics in general surgery with cholecystectomy: the Canadian experience. Can J Surg 52(5):374–378PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller DW, Schlinkert RT, Schlinkert DK (2004) Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial mayo clinic Scottsdale experience. Mayo Clin Proc 79(9):1132–1136CrossRef Miller DW, Schlinkert RT, Schlinkert DK (2004) Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial mayo clinic Scottsdale experience. Mayo Clin Proc 79(9):1132–1136CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Robotic cholecystectomy: first experience with the new Senhance robotic system
verfasst von
Nathaniel Melling
Justin Barr
Robin Schmitz
Adam Polonski
Jameel Miro
Tarik Ghadban
Karin Wodack
Jakob Izbicki
Sabino Zani
Daniel Perez
Publikationsdatum
27.09.2018
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0877-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.