Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2018

19.07.2017

Robotic gastric bypass may lead to fewer complications compared with laparoscopy

verfasst von: Dimitrios Stefanidis, Savannah B. Bailey, Timothy Kuwada, Connie Simms, Keith Gersin

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Robotic technology leads to improved visualization and precision over laparoscopy but also higher cost of care. The benefits of this technology to patient outcomes are controversial. Our objective was to assess whether the application of robotic surgery to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) would lead to improved patient outcomes.

Methods

A prospectively collected database at a bariatric center of excellence was reviewed for all RYGB procedures performed by one surgeon between 2007 and 2015. Procedures performed laparoscopically (transoral circular stapling technique) versus robotically (hand-sewn anastomosis) were compared; the transition in technique occurred in 2011. Patient demographics, baseline weight, BMI, operation duration, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (LOS), morbidity and mortality, and percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1-year follow-up were compared between groups. Morbidity up to 1-year postop was assessed using the Clavien–Dindo classification.

Results

Of 246 patients, 125 underwent robotic and 121 laparoscopic RYGB. Patients in the robotic group were older and heavier but achieved similar  %EWL to the laparoscopic group. The operative duration was longer but the mean patient LOS was shorter with the robotic approach. There were no leaks and no mortality. Based on the Clavien–Dindo classification, fewer overall and fewer severe complications occurred in the robotic compared with the laparoscopic approach.

Conclusion

In our experience, the use of robotic technology for the creation of gastric bypass led to longer operative times, similar %EWL but decreased LOS and number and severity of complications compared with the laparoscopic approach. Since our findings may have been influenced by the type of anastomotic technique used with each approach they need confirmation by a controlled trial.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Menifield CE, Doty N, Fletcher A (2008) Obesity in America. ABNF J 19:83–88PubMed Menifield CE, Doty N, Fletcher A (2008) Obesity in America. ABNF J 19:83–88PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bailey JG, Hayden JA, Davis PJ, Liu RY, Haardt D, Ellsmere J (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in obese adults ages 18-65 years: a systematic review and economic analysis. Surg Endosc 28:414–426CrossRefPubMed Bailey JG, Hayden JA, Davis PJ, Liu RY, Haardt D, Ellsmere J (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in obese adults ages 18-65 years: a systematic review and economic analysis. Surg Endosc 28:414–426CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Pi-Sunyer FX (1999) Comorbidities of overweight and obesity: current evidence and research issues. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31(11):S602–S608CrossRefPubMed Pi-Sunyer FX (1999) Comorbidities of overweight and obesity: current evidence and research issues. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31(11):S602–S608CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen MD, Pories W, Fahrbach K, Schoelles K (2004) Bariatric Surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 292(14):1724–1737CrossRefPubMed Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen MD, Pories W, Fahrbach K, Schoelles K (2004) Bariatric Surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 292(14):1724–1737CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pories WJ, Caro JF, Flickinger EG, Meelheim HD, Swanson MS (1987) The control of diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) in the morbidly obese with the greenville gastric bypass. Ann Surg 206:316–323CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pories WJ, Caro JF, Flickinger EG, Meelheim HD, Swanson MS (1987) The control of diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) in the morbidly obese with the greenville gastric bypass. Ann Surg 206:316–323CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat McGuire MT, Wing RR, Klem ML, Seagle HM, Hill JO (1998) Long-term maintenance of weight loss: do people who lose weight through various weight loss methods use different behaviors to maintain their weight? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 22:572–577CrossRefPubMed McGuire MT, Wing RR, Klem ML, Seagle HM, Hill JO (1998) Long-term maintenance of weight loss: do people who lose weight through various weight loss methods use different behaviors to maintain their weight? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 22:572–577CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Agaba EA, Rainville H, Ikedilo O, Vemulapali P (2014) Incidence of port-site incisional hernia after single-incision laparoscopic surgery. JSLS 18:204–210CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Agaba EA, Rainville H, Ikedilo O, Vemulapali P (2014) Incidence of port-site incisional hernia after single-incision laparoscopic surgery. JSLS 18:204–210CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Reoch J, Mottillo S, Shimon A (2011) Safety of laparoscopic vs. open bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Surg 146:1314–1322CrossRefPubMed Reoch J, Mottillo S, Shimon A (2011) Safety of laparoscopic vs. open bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Surg 146:1314–1322CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez R, Lin E, Venkatesh KR (2003) Gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic gastric bypass: analysis of 3 techniques. Arch Surg 138:181–184CrossRefPubMed Gonzalez R, Lin E, Venkatesh KR (2003) Gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic gastric bypass: analysis of 3 techniques. Arch Surg 138:181–184CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobsen G, Berger R, Horgan S (2003) The role of robotic surgery in morbid obesity. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg TechA 13:279–283CrossRef Jacobsen G, Berger R, Horgan S (2003) The role of robotic surgery in morbid obesity. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg TechA 13:279–283CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchs NC, Azagury DE, Pugin F, Jung MK, Huber O, Chassot G, Morel P (2016) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for super obese patients: what approach? Int J Med Robot 12(2):276–282CrossRefPubMed Buchs NC, Azagury DE, Pugin F, Jung MK, Huber O, Chassot G, Morel P (2016) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for super obese patients: what approach? Int J Med Robot 12(2):276–282CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Fourman MM, Saber AA (2012) Robotic bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 8(4):483–488CrossRefPubMed Fourman MM, Saber AA (2012) Robotic bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 8(4):483–488CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Economopoulos KP, Theocharidis V, McKenzie TJ, Sergentanis TN, Psaltopoulou T (2015) Robotic vs. laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 25:2180–2189CrossRefPubMed Economopoulos KP, Theocharidis V, McKenzie TJ, Sergentanis TN, Psaltopoulou T (2015) Robotic vs. laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 25:2180–2189CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins RM, Frelich MJ, Bosler ME, Gould JC (2017) Cost analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery procedures. Surg Endosc 31(1):185–192CrossRefPubMed Higgins RM, Frelich MJ, Bosler ME, Gould JC (2017) Cost analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery procedures. Surg Endosc 31(1):185–192CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Strosberg DS, Nguyen MC, Muscarella P 2nd, Narula VK (2017) A retrospective comparison of robotic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operative outcomes and cost analysis. Surg Endosc 31(3):1436–1441CrossRefPubMed Strosberg DS, Nguyen MC, Muscarella P 2nd, Narula VK (2017) A retrospective comparison of robotic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operative outcomes and cost analysis. Surg Endosc 31(3):1436–1441CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmad A, Carleton JD, Ahmad ZF, Agarwala A (2016) Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a retrospective, single center study of early perioperative outcomes at a community hospital. Surg Endosc 30:3792–3796CrossRefPubMed Ahmad A, Carleton JD, Ahmad ZF, Agarwala A (2016) Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a retrospective, single center study of early perioperative outcomes at a community hospital. Surg Endosc 30:3792–3796CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchs NC, Morel P, Azagury DE, Jung M, Chassot G, Huber O, Hagen ME, Pugin F (2014) Laparoscopic versus robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: lessons and long-term follow-up learned from a large prospective monocentric study. Obes Surg 24:2031–2039CrossRefPubMed Buchs NC, Morel P, Azagury DE, Jung M, Chassot G, Huber O, Hagen ME, Pugin F (2014) Laparoscopic versus robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: lessons and long-term follow-up learned from a large prospective monocentric study. Obes Surg 24:2031–2039CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon RC, Gutierrez JC, Royall NA, Teixeira AF, Jawad MA (2016) Robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, is it safer than laparoscopic bypass? Obes Surg 26:1016–1020CrossRefPubMed Moon RC, Gutierrez JC, Royall NA, Teixeira AF, Jawad MA (2016) Robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, is it safer than laparoscopic bypass? Obes Surg 26:1016–1020CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyn-Sue JR, Winder JS, Kotch S, Colello J, Docimo S (2016) Laparoscopic gastric bypass to robotic gastric bypass: time and cost commitment involved in training and transitioning an academic surgical practice. J Robot Surg 10:111–115CrossRefPubMed Lyn-Sue JR, Winder JS, Kotch S, Colello J, Docimo S (2016) Laparoscopic gastric bypass to robotic gastric bypass: time and cost commitment involved in training and transitioning an academic surgical practice. J Robot Surg 10:111–115CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Lois AW, Frelich MJ, Goldblatt MI, Wallace JR, Gould JC (2015) Gastrojejunostomy technique and anastomotic complications in laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 11:808–813CrossRefPubMed Lois AW, Frelich MJ, Goldblatt MI, Wallace JR, Gould JC (2015) Gastrojejunostomy technique and anastomotic complications in laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 11:808–813CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Rashidi L, Neighorn C, Bastawrous A (2017) Outcome comparisons between high-volume robotic and laparoscopic surgeons in a large healthcare system. Am J Surg 213(5):901–905CrossRefPubMed Rashidi L, Neighorn C, Bastawrous A (2017) Outcome comparisons between high-volume robotic and laparoscopic surgeons in a large healthcare system. Am J Surg 213(5):901–905CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Robotic gastric bypass may lead to fewer complications compared with laparoscopy
verfasst von
Dimitrios Stefanidis
Savannah B. Bailey
Timothy Kuwada
Connie Simms
Keith Gersin
Publikationsdatum
19.07.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5710-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.