Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2012 | Review | Ausgabe 1/2012 Open Access

World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2012

Robotic thyroidectomy versus endoscopic thyroidectomy: a meta-analysis

Zeitschrift:
World Journal of Surgical Oncology > Ausgabe 1/2012
Autoren:
Shuang Lin, Zhi-Heng Chen, Hong-Gang Jiang, Ji-Ren Yu
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​1477-7819-10-239) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Shuang Lin, Zhi-Heng Chen contributed equally to this work.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

YJR designed the study; CZH and YJR performed the literature search and retrieved data; LS and JHG collected the data; and LS and CZH performed the research and wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Abstract

Background

To conduct a meta-analysis to determine the relative merits of robotic thyroidectomy (RT) and endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET).

Methods

A literature search was performed to identify comparative studies reporting peri-operative outcomes for RT and ET. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated using either a fixed-effects or a random-effects model.

Results

Six studies matched the selection criteria, which reported on 2048 subjects, of whom 978 underwent RT and 1070 underwent ET. Comparing the outcomes of RT with ET, this meta-analysis indicated that RT was associated with more complications (WMD = 1.51, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.94) and greater amount of drainage fluid (WMD = 17.10, 95% CI 5.69 to 28.51). Meanwhile, operating time (WMD = 1.50, 95% CI −39.59 to 42.58), conversion (WMD = 0.63, 95% CI 0.07 to 6.17), post-operative hospital stay (WMD = −0.05; 95% CI −0.18 to 0.08), and the number of lymph nodes harvested (WMD = 0.62, 95% CI −0.29 to 1.53) were similar for both procedures.

Conclusion

The results of this meta-analysis indicated that RT is associated with an increased risk of complications and a greater amount of drainage fluid. Therefore, RT does not appear to have any advantage over ET. Further studies are required to confirm these results.
Zusatzmaterial
Authors’ original file for figure 1
12957_2012_1127_MOESM1_ESM.tiff
Authors’ original file for figure 2
12957_2012_1127_MOESM2_ESM.tiff
Authors’ original file for figure 3
12957_2012_1127_MOESM3_ESM.tiff
Authors’ original file for figure 4
12957_2012_1127_MOESM4_ESM.tiff
Authors’ original file for figure 5
12957_2012_1127_MOESM5_ESM.tiff
Authors’ original file for figure 6
12957_2012_1127_MOESM6_ESM.tiff
Authors’ original file for figure 7
12957_2012_1127_MOESM7_ESM.tiff
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie


 

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Chirurgie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise