Skip to main content
main-content

13.11.2017 | Original Research Article | Ausgabe 1/2018

Documenta Ophthalmologica 1/2018

Rod- versus cone-driven ERGs at different stimulus sizes in normal subjects and retinitis pigmentosa patients

Zeitschrift:
Documenta Ophthalmologica > Ausgabe 1/2018
Autoren:
Avinash J. Aher, Declan J. McKeefry, Neil R. A. Parry, John Maguire, I. J. Murray, Tina I. Tsai, Cord Huchzermeyer, Jan Kremers

Abstract

Purpose

To study how rod- and cone-driven responses depend on stimulus size in normal subjects and patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), and to show that comparisons between responses to full-field (FF) and smaller stimuli can be useful in diagnosing and monitoring disorders of the peripheral retina without the need for lengthy dark adaptation periods.

Method

The triple silent substitution technique was used to isolate L-cone-, M-cone- and rod-driven ERGs with 19, 18 and 33% photoreceptor contrasts, respectively, under identical mean luminance conditions. Experiments were conducted on five normal subjects and three RP patients. ERGs on control subjects were recorded at nine different temporal frequencies (between 2 and 60 Hz) for five different stimulus sizes: FF, 70°, 60°, 50° and 40° diameter circular stimuli. Experiments on RP patients involved rod- and L-cone-driven ERG measurements with FF and 40° stimuli at 8 and 48 Hz. Response amplitudes were defined as those of the first harmonic component after Fourier analysis.

Results

In normal subjects, rod-driven responses displayed a fundamentally different behavior than cone-driven responses, particularly at low temporal frequencies. At low and intermediate temporal frequencies (≤ 12 Hz), rod-driven signals increased by a factor of about four when measured with smaller stimuli. In contrast, L- and M-cone-driven responses in this frequency region did not change substantially with stimulus size. At high temporal frequencies (≥ 24 Hz), both rod- and cone-driven response amplitudes decreased with decreasing stimulus size. Signals obtained from rod-isolating stimuli under these conditions are likely artefactual. Interestingly, in RP patients, both rod-driven and L-cone-driven ERGs were similar using 40° and FF stimuli.

Conclusion

The increased responses with smaller stimuli in normal subjects to rod-isolating stimuli indicate that a fundamentally different mechanism drives the ERGs in comparison with the cone-driven responses. We propose that the increased responses are caused by stray light stimulating the peripheral retina, thereby allowing peripheral rod-driven function to be studied using the triple silent substitution technique at photopic luminances. The method is effective in studying impaired peripheral rod- and cone- function in RP patients.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de. Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Documenta Ophthalmologica 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

01.08.2019 | Erkrankungen der Hornhaut | CME | Ausgabe 8/2019

Neurotrophe Keratopathie

Grundlagen, Diagnostik und Therapie

22.07.2019 | DFP-Fortbildung | Ausgabe 4/2019 Open Access

Aktuelle Möglichkeiten der visuellen Rehabilitation

28.06.2019 | Neuroradiologie | CME | Ausgabe 7/2019

Neuroradiologie in der Augenheilkunde

19.06.2019 | Leitlinien, Stellungnahmen und Empfehlungen | Ausgabe 8/2019

Bewertung und Qualitätssicherung refraktiv-chirurgischer Eingriffe durch die DOG und den BVA – KRC-Empfehlungen

Stand Februar 2019