Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical and Translational Oncology 11/2014

01.11.2014 | Research Article

Role of 3.0 T multiparametric MRI in local staging in prostate cancer and clinical implications for radiation oncology

verfasst von: F. Couñago, M. Recio, E. del Cerro, L. Cerezo, A. Díaz Gavela, F. J. Marcos, R. Murillo, J. M. Rodriguez Luna, I. J. Thuissard, J. L. R. Martin

Erschienen in: Clinical and Translational Oncology | Ausgabe 11/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (3TmMRI) for local staging of prostate cancer and its influence on the decision to change the clinical target volume (CTV), total dose and hormonal therapy when treating prostate cancer patients with radiotherapy.

Methods

From 2009 to 2013, 150 patients, who had confirmed prostate cancer and underwent a 3TmMRI before treatment with radical prostatectomy or radical radiation therapy, were included. Radiation therapy treatment (CTV, total dose and hormonal therapy) was initially determined on the basis of the clinical information, and radiation therapy plan was reevaluated after 3TmMRI review. The value of preoperative 3TmMRI in local staging and in the decision of radiotherapy treatment according to NCCN risk classification was analyzed.

Results

3TmMRI performed correct, over- and under staging in 78.7 % (37/47), 6.3 % (3/47), 14.8 % patients (7/47), respectively. 3TmMRI identified 6 cT2a, 7 cT2b, 28 cT2c, 3 cT3a, 3 cT3b tumors. At final pathology, 5 tumors were classified as pT2a, 5 as pT2b, 30 as pT2c, 4 as pT3a, 3 as pT3b. After reviewing the MRI reports, the initial radiotherapy and hormonal therapy plan was changed in 33.9 % patients (35/103).

Conclusions

In our group of patients, 3TmMRI has been a reliable technique providing an optimal staging for prostate cancer. Its routine use could induce important changes in radiation therapy treatments in a significant number of such patients. However, more additional studies are needed to clarify this issue.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel R1, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A (2014) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 64:9–29. Siegel R1, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A (2014) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 64:9–29.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. American Join Committee on Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010. Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. American Join Committee on Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Freedland SJ. Screening, risk assessment, and the approach to therapy in patients with prostate cancer. Cancer. 2011;117:1123–35.PubMedCrossRef Freedland SJ. Screening, risk assessment, and the approach to therapy in patients with prostate cancer. Cancer. 2011;117:1123–35.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bostwick DG. Staging prostate cancer 1997: current methods and limitations. Eur Urol. 1997;32:2–14.PubMed Bostwick DG. Staging prostate cancer 1997: current methods and limitations. Eur Urol. 1997;32:2–14.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Spiegelman SS, McNeal JE, Freiha FS, Stamey TA. Rectal examination in volume determination of carcinoma of the prostate: clinical and anatomical correlations. J Urol. 1986;136:1228–30. Spiegelman SS, McNeal JE, Freiha FS, Stamey TA. Rectal examination in volume determination of carcinoma of the prostate: clinical and anatomical correlations. J Urol. 1986;136:1228–30.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith JA Jr, Scardino PT, Resnick MI, Hernandez AD, Rose SC, Egger MJ. Transrectal ultrasound versus digital rectal examination for the staging of carcinoma of the prostate: results of a prospective multi-institutional trial. J Urol. 1997;157:902–6.PubMedCrossRef Smith JA Jr, Scardino PT, Resnick MI, Hernandez AD, Rose SC, Egger MJ. Transrectal ultrasound versus digital rectal examination for the staging of carcinoma of the prostate: results of a prospective multi-institutional trial. J Urol. 1997;157:902–6.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Boonsirikamchai P, Choi S, Frank SJ, Ma J, Elsayes KM, Kaur H, et al. MR imaging of prostate cancer in radiation oncology: what radiologists need to know. Radiographics. 2013;33:741–76.PubMedCrossRef Boonsirikamchai P, Choi S, Frank SJ, Ma J, Elsayes KM, Kaur H, et al. MR imaging of prostate cancer in radiation oncology: what radiologists need to know. Radiographics. 2013;33:741–76.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mullerad M, Hricak H, Kuroiwa K, Pucar D, Chen HN, Kattan MW, et al. Comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging, guided prostate biopsy and digital rectal examination in the preoperative anatomical localization of prostate cancer. J Urol. 2005;174:2158–63.PubMedCrossRef Mullerad M, Hricak H, Kuroiwa K, Pucar D, Chen HN, Kattan MW, et al. Comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging, guided prostate biopsy and digital rectal examination in the preoperative anatomical localization of prostate cancer. J Urol. 2005;174:2158–63.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sala E, Akin O, Moskowitz CS, Eisenberg HF, Kuroiwa K, Ishill NM, et al. Endorectal MR imaging in the evaluation of seminal vesicle invasion: diagnostic accuracy and multivariate feature analysis. Radiology. 2006;238:929–37.PubMedCrossRef Sala E, Akin O, Moskowitz CS, Eisenberg HF, Kuroiwa K, Ishill NM, et al. Endorectal MR imaging in the evaluation of seminal vesicle invasion: diagnostic accuracy and multivariate feature analysis. Radiology. 2006;238:929–37.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang L, Mullerad M, Chen HN, Eberhardt SC, Kattan MW, Scardino PT, et al. Prostate cancer: incremental value of endorectal MRI findings for prediction of extracapsular extension. Radiology. 2004;232:133–9.PubMedCrossRef Wang L, Mullerad M, Chen HN, Eberhardt SC, Kattan MW, Scardino PT, et al. Prostate cancer: incremental value of endorectal MRI findings for prediction of extracapsular extension. Radiology. 2004;232:133–9.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mullins JK1, Bonekamp D, Landis P, Begum H, Partin AW, Epstein JI et al (2013) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings in men with low-risk prostate cancer followed using active surveillance. BJU Int 111:1037–1045. Mullins JK1, Bonekamp D, Landis P, Begum H, Partin AW, Epstein JI et al (2013) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings in men with low-risk prostate cancer followed using active surveillance. BJU Int 111:1037–1045.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Dickinson L, Ahmed HU, Allen C, Barentsz JO, Carey B, Futterer JJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European Consensus Meeting. Eur Urol. 2011;59:477–94.PubMedCrossRef Dickinson L, Ahmed HU, Allen C, Barentsz JO, Carey B, Futterer JJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European Consensus Meeting. Eur Urol. 2011;59:477–94.PubMedCrossRef
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fütterer JJ, Heijmink SW, Scheenen TW, Jager GJ, Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA, Witjes JA, et al. Prostate cancer: local staging at 3-T endorectal MR imaging-early experience. Radiology. 2006;238:184–91.PubMedCrossRef Fütterer JJ, Heijmink SW, Scheenen TW, Jager GJ, Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA, Witjes JA, et al. Prostate cancer: local staging at 3-T endorectal MR imaging-early experience. Radiology. 2006;238:184–91.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Augustin H, Fritz GA, Ehammer T, Auprich M, Pummer K. Accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of prostate cancer in comparison to the Partin tables. Acta Radiol. 2009;50:562–9.PubMedCrossRef Augustin H, Fritz GA, Ehammer T, Auprich M, Pummer K. Accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of prostate cancer in comparison to the Partin tables. Acta Radiol. 2009;50:562–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Heijmink SW, Fütterer JJ, Hambrock T, Takahashi S, Scheenen TW, Huisman HJ, et al. Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3T-comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance. Radiology. 2007;244:184–95.PubMedCrossRef Heijmink SW, Fütterer JJ, Hambrock T, Takahashi S, Scheenen TW, Huisman HJ, et al. Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3T-comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance. Radiology. 2007;244:184–95.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Torricelli P, Barberini A, Cinquantini F, Sighinolfi M, Casinaro AM. 3-T MRI with phased-array coil in local staging of prostatic cancer. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:1118–25.PubMedCrossRef Torricelli P, Barberini A, Cinquantini F, Sighinolfi M, Casinaro AM. 3-T MRI with phased-array coil in local staging of prostatic cancer. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:1118–25.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Beyersdorff D, Taymoorian K, Knösel T, Schnorr D, Felix R, Hamm B, et al. MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0: comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging. AJR. 2005;185:1214–20.PubMedCrossRef Beyersdorff D, Taymoorian K, Knösel T, Schnorr D, Felix R, Hamm B, et al. MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0: comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging. AJR. 2005;185:1214–20.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Park BK, Kim B, Kim CK, Lee HM, Kwon GY. Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:534–8.PubMedCrossRef Park BK, Kim B, Kim CK, Lee HM, Kwon GY. Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:534–8.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sciarra A, Barentsz J, Bjartell A, Eastham J, Hricak H, Panebianco V, et al. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging: how they are changing the management of prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2011;59:962–77.PubMedCrossRef Sciarra A, Barentsz J, Bjartell A, Eastham J, Hricak H, Panebianco V, et al. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging: how they are changing the management of prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2011;59:962–77.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohler JL, Kantoff PW, Armstrong AJ, Bahnson RR, Cohen M, D’Amico AV, et al. Prostate cancer, version 1.2014. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2013;11:1471–9. Mohler JL, Kantoff PW, Armstrong AJ, Bahnson RR, Cohen M, D’Amico AV, et al. Prostate cancer, version 1.2014. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2013;11:1471–9.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, van der Kwast T, et al. EAU Guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur Urol. 2014;65:124–37.PubMedCrossRef Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, van der Kwast T, et al. EAU Guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur Urol. 2014;65:124–37.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Boehmer D, Maingon P, Poortmans P, Baron MH, Miralbell R, Remouchamps V, et al. Guidelines for primary radiotherapy of patients with prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2006;79:259–69.PubMedCrossRef Boehmer D, Maingon P, Poortmans P, Baron MH, Miralbell R, Remouchamps V, et al. Guidelines for primary radiotherapy of patients with prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2006;79:259–69.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Chao KK, Goldstein NS, Yan D, Vargas CE, Ghilezan MI, Korman HJ, et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of extracapsular extension in prostate cancer: should the clinical target volume be expanded posterolaterally to account for microscopic extension? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:999–1007.PubMedCrossRef Chao KK, Goldstein NS, Yan D, Vargas CE, Ghilezan MI, Korman HJ, et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of extracapsular extension in prostate cancer: should the clinical target volume be expanded posterolaterally to account for microscopic extension? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:999–1007.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamada T, Sone T, Jo Y, Yamamoto A, Yamashita T, Egashira N, et al. Prostate cancer: relationships between post biopsy hemorrhage and tumor detectability at MR diagnosis. Radiology. 2008;248:531–9.PubMedCrossRef Tamada T, Sone T, Jo Y, Yamamoto A, Yamashita T, Egashira N, et al. Prostate cancer: relationships between post biopsy hemorrhage and tumor detectability at MR diagnosis. Radiology. 2008;248:531–9.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Walsh PC. Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol. 1998;160:2418–24.PubMedCrossRef Walsh PC. Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol. 1998;160:2418–24.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hedge JV, Chen MH, Mulken RV, Fennessy FM, D’Amico AV, Tempany CM. Preoperative 3-Tesla multiparametric endorectal magnetic resonance imaging findings and the odds of upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;85:101–7.CrossRef Hedge JV, Chen MH, Mulken RV, Fennessy FM, D’Amico AV, Tempany CM. Preoperative 3-Tesla multiparametric endorectal magnetic resonance imaging findings and the odds of upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;85:101–7.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Cerantola Y, Valerio M, Kawkabani Marchini A, Meuwly JY, Jichlinski P. Can 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging accurately detect prostate cancer extracapsular extension? Can Urol Assoc J. 2013;7:699–703.CrossRef Cerantola Y, Valerio M, Kawkabani Marchini A, Meuwly JY, Jichlinski P. Can 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging accurately detect prostate cancer extracapsular extension? Can Urol Assoc J. 2013;7:699–703.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Role of 3.0 T multiparametric MRI in local staging in prostate cancer and clinical implications for radiation oncology
verfasst von
F. Couñago
M. Recio
E. del Cerro
L. Cerezo
A. Díaz Gavela
F. J. Marcos
R. Murillo
J. M. Rodriguez Luna
I. J. Thuissard
J. L. R. Martin
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2014
Verlag
Springer Milan
Erschienen in
Clinical and Translational Oncology / Ausgabe 11/2014
Print ISSN: 1699-048X
Elektronische ISSN: 1699-3055
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-014-1186-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2014

Clinical and Translational Oncology 11/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.