Anzeige
Erschienen in:
10.03.2020 | Original Scientific Article
Role of attachment style in prediction of behavior of 3 to 6-year-old children
Erschienen in: European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry | Ausgabe 6/2020
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Purpose
Efficient communication with children is the basis of pediatric dentistry and is a prerequisite for provision of pediatric dental care. Prediction of the behavior of children and their reaction to therapeutic procedures is a challenge for many pediatric dentists. This study aimed to assess the attachment styles of children to predict their behavior during a dental visit.
Methods
The participants included 117 healthy children aged 3 to 6 years presented to the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, in 2017–2018. A postgraduate dental student examined the children. The parents were requested to fill out the Kinship Center attachment questionnaire (KCAQ) regarding their children, while waiting in the waiting room. The children who met the inclusion criteria in the first visit were scheduled for a dental procedure in the second visit. Another postgraduate student of pediatric dentistry assessed the behavior of children during the dental procedure according to the designed questionnaire and based on the Frankl scale. A third examiner along with the second examiner evaluated the behavior of children on a random basis to determine the inter-examiner agreement. Data were analyzed using the Chi-squared test, t test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and linear regression.
Results
The results showed that 67.5% of the children were cooperative, including 54.7% of boys. The mean age of children was 5.1 ± 0.95 years. Also, 80.3% of children had secure and 19.7% had insecure attachment styles (11.97% insecure avoidant and 7.69% insecure ambivalent). A significant association existed between the insecure ambivalent attachment style and child–dentist communication. A significant inverse correlation was also noted between the total score of the questionnaire and parent–child separation in dental office.
Conclusions
The current findings revealed no significant difference in the attachment styles of cooperative and uncooperative children. Significant associations only existed between the insecure ambivalent attachment style and child–dentist communication, and also between mother–child separation and secure attachment style. Thus, the children’s behavior in dental office cannot be predicted based on their attachment style.