Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Neuroradiology 5/2018

15.03.2018 | Diagnostic Neuroradiology

Roles of the apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor volume in predicting tumor grade in patients with choroid plexus tumors

Erschienen in: Neuroradiology | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To explore the utility of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and tumor volume to predict histological grade and prognosis in patients with choroid plexus tumors.

Methods

ADC and tumor volumes were retrospectively evaluated in 25 patients with choroid plexus papilloma (CPP; WHO grade 1 [n = 13]), atypical CPP (aCPP; grade 2 [n = 8]), or choroid plexus carcinoma (grade 3 [n = 4]) The prognostic roles of ADC and tumor volume were assessed.

Results

There were significant differences in mean and minimum ADC values, and tumor volume among the WHO grades (p = 0.033, p = 0.044, and p = 0.014, respectively). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis revealed a mean cutoff ADC value ≤ 1.397 × 10−3 mm2/s for aCPP (sensitivity = 0.667, specificity = 0.923). Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that both mean ADC (β = − 0.455, p = 0.005) and tumor volume (β = 0.513, p = 0.002) were correlated with WHO grade (adjusted R2 = 0.520, p = 0.005). Kaplan-Meier curve analysis identified poorer survival in patients with WHO grade 2 and 3 tumors than in those with WHO grade 1 disease (p = 0.049 and p = 0.012, respectively). A mean ADC ≤ 1.397 × 10−3 mm2/s (p = 0.001) and tumor volume 21.05 ml (p = 0.031) predicted significantly poorer survival.

Conclusion

Mean ADC and tumor volume were correlated with WHO grade of choroid plexus tumors. A lower ADC value and a larger tumor volume predicted a poorer prognosis.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cavenee WK, Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2016) WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. World Health Organization classification of tumours, Revised 4th edn. International Agency For Research On Cancer, Lyon Cavenee WK, Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2016) WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. World Health Organization classification of tumours, Revised 4th edn. International Agency For Research On Cancer, Lyon
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lober RM, Cho Y-J, Tang Y, Barnes PD, Edwards MS, Vogel H, Fisher PG, Monje M, Yeom KW (2014) Diffusion-weighted MRI derived apparent diffusion coefficient identifies prognostically distinct subgroups of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. J Neuro-Oncol 117(1):175–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1375-8 CrossRef Lober RM, Cho Y-J, Tang Y, Barnes PD, Edwards MS, Vogel H, Fisher PG, Monje M, Yeom KW (2014) Diffusion-weighted MRI derived apparent diffusion coefficient identifies prognostically distinct subgroups of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. J Neuro-Oncol 117(1):175–182. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11060-014-1375-8 CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim C, Flood TA, Hakim SW, Shabana WM, Quon JS, El-Khodary M, Thornhill RE, El Hallani S, Schieda N (2016) Evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and MR volumetry as independent associative factors for extra-prostatic extension (EPE) in prostatic carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 43(3):726–736. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25033 CrossRefPubMed Lim C, Flood TA, Hakim SW, Shabana WM, Quon JS, El-Khodary M, Thornhill RE, El Hallani S, Schieda N (2016) Evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and MR volumetry as independent associative factors for extra-prostatic extension (EPE) in prostatic carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 43(3):726–736. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​jmri.​25033 CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ludbrook J (2002) Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: a critical review. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 29(7):527–536CrossRefPubMed Ludbrook J (2002) Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: a critical review. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 29(7):527–536CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Han X, Suo S, Sun Y, Zu J, Qu J, Zhou Y, Chen Z, Xu J (2016) Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement in glioma: influence of region-of-interest determination methods on apparent diffusion coefficient values, interobserver variability, time efficiency, and diagnostic ability. J Magn Reson Imaging 45:722–730. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25405 CrossRefPubMed Han X, Suo S, Sun Y, Zu J, Qu J, Zhou Y, Chen Z, Xu J (2016) Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement in glioma: influence of region-of-interest determination methods on apparent diffusion coefficient values, interobserver variability, time efficiency, and diagnostic ability. J Magn Reson Imaging 45:722–730. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​jmri.​25405 CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Priola AM, Priola SM, Parlatano D, Gned D, Giraudo MT, Giardino R, Ferrero B, Ardissone F, Veltri A (2017) Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior mediastinum: inter-observer reproducibility of five different methods of region-of-interest positioning. Eur Radiol 27(4):1386–1394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4527-8 CrossRefPubMed Priola AM, Priola SM, Parlatano D, Gned D, Giraudo MT, Giardino R, Ferrero B, Ardissone F, Veltri A (2017) Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior mediastinum: inter-observer reproducibility of five different methods of region-of-interest positioning. Eur Radiol 27(4):1386–1394. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00330-016-4527-8 CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas C, Sill M, Ruland V, Witten A, Hartung S, Kordes U, Jeibmann A, Beschorner R, Keyvani K, Bergmann M, Mittelbronn M, Pietsch T, Felsberg J, Monoranu CM, Varlet P, Hauser P, Olar A, Grundy RG, Wolff JE, Korshunov A, Jones DT, Bewerunge-Hudler M, Hovestadt V, von Deimling A, Pfister SM, Paulus W, Capper D, Hasselblatt M (2016) Methylation profiling of choroid plexus tumors reveals 3 clinically distinct subgroups. Neuro-Oncology 18(6):790–796. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nov322 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thomas C, Sill M, Ruland V, Witten A, Hartung S, Kordes U, Jeibmann A, Beschorner R, Keyvani K, Bergmann M, Mittelbronn M, Pietsch T, Felsberg J, Monoranu CM, Varlet P, Hauser P, Olar A, Grundy RG, Wolff JE, Korshunov A, Jones DT, Bewerunge-Hudler M, Hovestadt V, von Deimling A, Pfister SM, Paulus W, Capper D, Hasselblatt M (2016) Methylation profiling of choroid plexus tumors reveals 3 clinically distinct subgroups. Neuro-Oncology 18(6):790–796. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​neuonc/​nov322 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Roles of the apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor volume in predicting tumor grade in patients with choroid plexus tumors
Publikationsdatum
15.03.2018
Erschienen in
Neuroradiology / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0028-3940
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1920
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-018-2008-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Neuroradiology 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.