Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations 5/2016

09.03.2016 | Short Communication

Roughness and wettability effect on histological and mechanical response of self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants

verfasst von: Eduardo Espinar-Escalona, Luis-Alberto Bravo-Gonzalez, Marta Pegueroles, Francisco Javier Gil

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

Self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants can be used as temporary devices for orthodontic treatments. Our main goal was to evaluate surface characteristics, roughness and wettability, of surface modified mini-implants to increase their stability during orthodontic treatment without inducing bone fracture and tissue destruction during unscrewing.

Materials and methods

Modified mini-implants by acid etching, grit-blasting and its combination were implanted in 20 New Zealand rabbits during 10 weeks. After that, the bone-to-implant (BIC) parameter was determined and the torque during unscrewing was measured. The surface characteristics, roughness and wettability, were also measured, onto modified Ti c.p. discs.

Results

Acid-etched mini-implants (R a ≈ 1.7 μm, contact angle (CA) ≈ 66°) significantly improved the bone-to-implant parameter, 26 %, compared to as-machined mini-implants (R a ≈ 0.3 μm, CA ≈ 68°, BIC = 19 %) due to its roughness. Moreover, this surface treatment did not modify torque during unscrewing due to their statistically similar wettability (p > 0.05). Surface treatments with higher roughness and hydrophobicity (R a ≈ 4.5 μm, CA ≈ 74°) lead to a greater BIC and to a higher removal torque during unscrewing, causing bone fracture, compared to as-machined mini-implants.

Conclusions

Based on these in vivo findings, we conclude that acid-etching surface treatment can support temporary anchoring of titanium mini-implants.

Clinical relevance

This treatment represents a step forward in the direction of reducing the time prior to mini-implant loading by increasing their stability during orthodontic treatment, without inducing bone fracture and tissue destruction during unscrewing.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Reynders R, Ronchi L, Bipat S (2009) Mini-implants in orthodontics: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135(5):564.e1–564.e19 Reynders R, Ronchi L, Bipat S (2009) Mini-implants in orthodontics: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135(5):564.e1–564.e19
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Crismani AG, Bertl MH, Celar AG, Bantleon HP, Burstone CJ (2010) Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: review and analysis of published clinical trials. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 37(1):108–113CrossRef Crismani AG, Bertl MH, Celar AG, Bantleon HP, Burstone CJ (2010) Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: review and analysis of published clinical trials. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 37(1):108–113CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bidra AS, Almas K (2013) Mini implants for definitive prosthodontic treatment: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 109(3):156–164CrossRefPubMed Bidra AS, Almas K (2013) Mini implants for definitive prosthodontic treatment: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 109(3):156–164CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanomi R (1997) Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod 31(11):763–767PubMed Kanomi R (1997) Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod 31(11):763–767PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Kanomi R, Hartsfield JK Jr, Roberts WE, Garetto LP (2003) The use of small titanium screws for orthodontic anchorage. J Dent Res 82(5):377–381CrossRefPubMed Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Kanomi R, Hartsfield JK Jr, Roberts WE, Garetto LP (2003) The use of small titanium screws for orthodontic anchorage. J Dent Res 82(5):377–381CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Schätzle M, Männchen R, Zwahlen M, Lang NP (2009) Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 20(12):1351–1359CrossRefPubMed Schätzle M, Männchen R, Zwahlen M, Lang NP (2009) Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 20(12):1351–1359CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Costa A, Raffaini M, Melsen B (1998) Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 13:201–209 Costa A, Raffaini M, Melsen B (1998) Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 13:201–209
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J (1981) Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 52:155–170CrossRefPubMed Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J (1981) Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 52:155–170CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ceherli S, Arma-Ozçirpici A (2012) Primary stability and histomorphometric bone-implant contact of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 141:187–195CrossRef Ceherli S, Arma-Ozçirpici A (2012) Primary stability and histomorphometric bone-implant contact of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 141:187–195CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Kanomi R, Harstfield JK, Robert WE, Garetto LP (1999) The use of small titanium screws for orthodontic anchorage. J Dent Res 10:95–111 Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Kanomi R, Harstfield JK, Robert WE, Garetto LP (1999) The use of small titanium screws for orthodontic anchorage. J Dent Res 10:95–111
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaddad K, Ferreira FH, Geurs N, Reddy M (2008) Influence of surface characteristics on survival rates of mini-implants. Angle Orthod 78(1):107–113CrossRefPubMed Chaddad K, Ferreira FH, Geurs N, Reddy M (2008) Influence of surface characteristics on survival rates of mini-implants. Angle Orthod 78(1):107–113CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hitchon PW, Brenton MD, Coppes JK, From AM, Torner JC (2003) Factors affecting the pullout strength of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws. Spine 28(1):9–13CrossRefPubMed Hitchon PW, Brenton MD, Coppes JK, From AM, Torner JC (2003) Factors affecting the pullout strength of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws. Spine 28(1):9–13CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B (1996) Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. Biomaterials 17:15–22CrossRefPubMed Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B (1996) Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. Biomaterials 17:15–22CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Puleo DA, Nanci A (1999) Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. Biomaterials 20(23–24):2311–2321CrossRefPubMed Puleo DA, Nanci A (1999) Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. Biomaterials 20(23–24):2311–2321CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pegueroles M, Gil FJ, Planell JA, Aparicio C (2008) The influence of blasting and sterilization on static and time-related wettability and surface-energy properties of titanium surfaces. Surf Coat Tech 202:3470–3479CrossRef Pegueroles M, Gil FJ, Planell JA, Aparicio C (2008) The influence of blasting and sterilization on static and time-related wettability and surface-energy properties of titanium surfaces. Surf Coat Tech 202:3470–3479CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Pegueroles M, Aparicio C, Bosio M, Engel E, Gil FJ, Planell JA, Altankov G (2010) Spatial organization of osteoblast fibronectin matrix on titanium surfaces: effects of roughness, chemical heterogeneity and surface energy. Acta Biomater 6:291–301CrossRefPubMed Pegueroles M, Aparicio C, Bosio M, Engel E, Gil FJ, Planell JA, Altankov G (2010) Spatial organization of osteoblast fibronectin matrix on titanium surfaces: effects of roughness, chemical heterogeneity and surface energy. Acta Biomater 6:291–301CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH (1991) Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A Histomorphometric Study in Miniature Pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 25:889–902CrossRefPubMed Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH (1991) Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A Histomorphometric Study in Miniature Pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 25:889–902CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kokubo T, Miyaji F, Kim HM (1996) Preparation of bioactive Ti and its alloys via simple chemical surface treatment. J Amer Ceram Soc 79:1127–1129CrossRef Kokubo T, Miyaji F, Kim HM (1996) Preparation of bioactive Ti and its alloys via simple chemical surface treatment. J Amer Ceram Soc 79:1127–1129CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Roughness and wettability effect on histological and mechanical response of self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants
verfasst von
Eduardo Espinar-Escalona
Luis-Alberto Bravo-Gonzalez
Marta Pegueroles
Francisco Javier Gil
Publikationsdatum
09.03.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1770-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Clinical Oral Investigations 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.