nach oben

Clinical Oral Investigations

Erschienen in:

05.02.2018 | Original Article

Roughness, surface energy, and superficial damages of CAD/CAM materials after surface treatment

verfasst von: Thomas Strasser, Verena Preis, Michael Behr, Martin Rosentritt

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 8/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of surface pre-treatment on CAD/CAM materials including ceramics, zirconia, resin-infiltrated ceramic, and resin-based composite.

Materials and methods

Specimens were made of ten CAD/CAM materials (Celtra Duo, Degudent, D; Vita Suprinity, Vita, D; E.max CAD, Ivoclar-Vivadent, FL; E.max ZirCAD, Ivoclar-Vivadent, FL; Vita Enamic, Vita, D; Cerasmart, GC, B; LAVA Ultimate, 3M, D; SHOFU Block HC, SHOFU, US; Grandio Blocs, VOCO, D; BRILLIANT Crios, Coltene, CH) and pretreated to represent clinical procedures (Hf 20 s/5%; phosphoric acid 20 s/37%; Monobond etch and prime (Ivoclar-Vivadent, FL); water-cooled diamond bur (80 μm; 4 μm); Al₂O₃-blasting (50 μm/1 bar, 50 μm/2 bar, 120 μm/1 bar, 120 μm/2 bar); untreated; manufacturer’s instructions). SEM-analysis (Phenom, FEI, NL) of the surfaces was performed (magnifications ≤ 10,000×). Roughness values R_a, R_z (KJ 3D, Keyence, J), and surface energy SE (OCA15 plus, SCA20, DataPhysics, D) were determined (statistics: non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test/Kruskal-Wallis test for independent specimen, α = 0.05).

Results

Kruskal-Wallis revealed significant (p < 0.001) differences for all materials with different surface treatments. Roughness ranged from R_a = 0.05 μm (VS; D4)/R_z = 0.41 μm (VS; D4) to R_a = 1.82 μm (EMA; SB120/2)/R_z = 12.05 μm (CS; SB 120/2), SE from 22.7 mN/m (VE; M) to 52.8 mN/m (CD; M). SEM analysis showed material-dependent damages after pre-treatment.

Conclusion

Different CAD/CAM materials require individual pre-treatment for optimized and protective surface activation.

Clinical relevance

Cementation is a key factor for clinical success. Given the variety of available CAD/CAM materials, specific procedures are needed.

Baroudi K, Ibraheem SN (2015) Assessment of chair-side computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing restorations: a review of the literature. J Int Oral Health 7(4):96–104PubMedPubMedCentral

Alghazzawi TF (2016) Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res 60(2):72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.01.003 CrossRefPubMed

Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ (2014) Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 93(12):1232–1234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514553976 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Li RWK, Chow TW, Matinlinna JP (2014) Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: state of the art. J Prosthodont Res 58(4):208–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2014.07.003 CrossRefPubMed

Barutcigil K, Barutcigil C, Kul E, Özarslan MM, Buyukkaplan US (2016) Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength of resin cement to a CAD/CAM restorative material. J Prosthodont. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12574

Belli R, Wendler M, de LD et al (2017) Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 1: measurement of elastic constants and microstructural characterization. Dent Mater 33(1):84–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.10.009 CrossRefPubMed

Hill EE, Lott J (2011) A clinically focused discussion of luting materials. Aust Dent J 56(Suppl 1):67–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01297.x CrossRefPubMed

Roediger M, Gersdorff N, Huels A et al (2010) Prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: four-year clinical results. Int J Prosthodont 23(2):141–148PubMed

Tian T, Tsoi JK, Matinlinna JP et al (2014) Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater 30(7):e147–e162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.01.017 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Spitznagel FA, Horvath SD, Guess PC, Blatz MB (2014) Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: a review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent 26(6):382–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12100 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Behr M, Proff P, Kolbeck C et al (2011) The bond strength of the resin-to-zirconia interface using different bonding concepts. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 4(1):2–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.08.002 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Luthra R, Kaur P (2016) An insight into current concepts and techniques in resin bonding to high strength ceramics. Aust Dent J 61(2):163–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12365 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Ozcan M, Bernasconi M (2015) Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 17(1):7–26. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a33525 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Krejci I, Daher R (2017) Stress distribution difference between Lava Ultimate full crowns and IPS e.max CAD full crowns on a natural tooth and on tooth-shaped implant abutments. Odontology 105(2):254–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-016-0276-z CrossRefPubMed

15.

Borchers L, Eichner K, Kappert HF et al. (2005) Grundlagen und Verarbeitung, 8., unveränd. Aufl. Zahnärztliche Werkstoffe und ihre Verarbeitung, / begr. von Karl Eichner. Fortgef. von Heinrich F. Kappert; Bd. 1. Thieme, Stuttgart

16.

Noppen G, Czichos H (1985) Technische Oberflächen: Teil 1: Oberflächenbeschaffenheit: Zeichnungsangaben - Erläuterungen für Konstruktion, Fertigung, Prüfung : Teil 2: Oberflächenatlas: Rasterelektronenmikroskopische Aufnahmen und Profildiagramme, Aufl. 2, überarb. & erw. Beuth-Kommentare. Beuth Verlag GmbH, Berlin, Köln

17.

Flury S, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A (2012) Influence of surface roughness on mechanical properties of two computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic materials. Oper Dent 37(6):617–624. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-391-L CrossRefPubMed

18.

Mittal KL (1977) The role of the interface in adhesion phenomena. Polym Eng Sci 17(7):467–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760170709 CrossRef

19.

ZISMAN WA (1964) Relation of the equilibrium contact angle to liquid and solid constitution. In: Fowkes FM (ed) Contact angle, wettability, and adhesion, AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, vol 43. WASHINGTON, D.C., pp 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1021/ba-1964-0043 CrossRef

20.

Della-Bona A (2005) Characterizing ceramics and the interfacial adhesion to resin: II- the relationship of surface treatment, bond strength, interfacial toughness and fractography. J Appl Oral Sci 13(2):101–109. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572005000200002 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Sturz CRC, Faber F, Scheer M et al (2015) Effects of various chair-side surface treatment methods on dental restorative materials with respect to contact angles and surface roughness. Dent Mater J 34(6):796–813. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-098 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Ramakrishnaiah R, Alkheraif AA, Divakar DD et al (2016) The effect of hydrofluoric acid etching duration on the surface micromorphology, roughness, and wettability of dental ceramics. Int J Mol Sci 17(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17060822 CrossRefPubMedCentral

23.

Yoshida F, Tsujimoto A, Ishii R et al (2015) Influence of surface treatment of contaminated lithium disilicate and leucite glass ceramics on surface free energy and bond strength of universal adhesives. Dent Mater J 34(6):855–862. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-123 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Venturini AB, Prochnow C, Rambo D, Gundel A, Valandro LF (2014) Hydrofluoric acid concentration effect on resin adhesion to feldspathic ceramic. Dent Mater 30:e37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.075 CrossRef

25.

Ishii R, Tsujimoto A, Takamizawa T et al. (2015) Influence of surface treatment of contaminated zirconia on surface free energy and resin cement bonding. Dent Mater J 34(1): 91–97. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-066 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M (2003) Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 89(3): 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.50 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Menees TS, Lawson NC, Beck PR, Burgess JO (2014) Influence of particle abrasion or hydrofluoric acid etching on lithium disilicate flexural strength. J Prosthet Dent 112(5):1164–1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.021 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Ozcan M, Allahbeickaraghi A, Dundar M (2012) Possible hazardous effects of hydrofluoric acid and recommendations for treatment approach: a review. Clin Oral Investig 16(1):15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0636-6 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Hooshmand T, Parvizi S, Keshvad A (2008) Effect of surface acid etching on the biaxial flexural strength of two hot-pressed glass ceramics. J Prosthodont 17(5): 415–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00319.x CrossRefPubMed

30.

Kocaagaoglu H, Manav T, Albayrak H (2015) In vitro comparison of the bond strength between ceramic repair systems and ceramic materials and evaluation of the wettability. J Prosthodont 26(3):238–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12381 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Inokoshi M, de Munck J, Minakuchi S et al (2014) Meta-analysis of bonding effectiveness to zirconia ceramics. J Dent Res 93(4):329–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514524228 CrossRefPubMed

32.

Gomes AL, Castillo-Oyague R, Lynch CD et al. (2013) Influence of sandblasting granulometry and resin cement composition on microtensile bond strength to zirconia ceramic for dental prosthetic frameworks. J Dent 41(1): 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.09.013 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Inokoshi M, Kameyama A, de Munck J et al (2013) Durable bonding to mechanically and/or chemically pre-treated dental zirconia. J Dent 41(2):170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.10.017 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Yang B, Barloi A, Kern M (2010) Influence of air-abrasion on zirconia ceramic bonding using an adhesive composite resin. Dent Mater 26(1):44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.08.008 CrossRefPubMed

35.

Attia A, Lehmann F, Kern M (2011) Influence of surface conditioning and cleaning methods on resin bonding to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 27(3):207–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.004 CrossRefPubMed

36.

Sciasci P, Abi-Rached FO, Adabo GL, Baldissara P, Fonseca RG (2015) Effect of surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements to Y-TZP ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 113(3):212–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.012 CrossRefPubMed

37.

Schwenter J, Schmidli F, Weiger R et al (2016) Adhesive bonding to polymer infiltrated ceramic. Dent Mater J 35(5):796–802. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-271 CrossRefPubMed

38.

Cekic-Nagas I, Ergun G, Egilmez F, Vallittu PK, Lassila LVJ (2016) Micro-shear bond strength of different resin cements to ceramic/glass-polymer CAD-CAM block materials. J Prosthodont Res 60(4):265–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.02.003 CrossRefPubMed

39.

Lise DP, van Ende A, de Munck J et al (2017) Microtensile bond strength of composite cement to novel CAD/CAM materials as a function of surface treatment and aging. Oper Dent 42(1):73–81. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-263-L CrossRefPubMed

40.

Park J, Choi Y (2016) Microtensile bond strength and micromorphologic analysis of surface-treated resin nanoceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 8(4):275–284. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.4.275 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Irie M, Yoshida Y, van Meerbeek B (2017) Sandblasting may damage the surface of composite CAD-CAM blocks. Dent Mater 33(3):e124–e135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.12.003 CrossRefPubMed

42.

Gungor MB, Nemli SK, Bal BT et al (2016) Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to CAD/CAM resin-ceramic hybrid materials. J Adv Prosthodont 8(4):259–266. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.4.259 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Duzyol M, Sagsoz O, Polat Sagsoz N et al (2016) The effect of surface treatments on the bond strength between CAD/CAM blocks and composite resin. J Prosthodont 25(6):466–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12322 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Roughness, surface energy, and superficial damages of CAD/CAM materials after surface treatment
verfasst von: Thomas Strasser
Verena Preis
Michael Behr
Martin Rosentritt
Publikationsdatum: 05.02.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 8/2018
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2365-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

19.04.2024 | Vorhofflimmern | Nachrichten

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Roughness, surface energy, and superficial damages of CAD/CAM materials after surface treatment

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Clinical relevance

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Clinical relevance

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2018

Effect of EDTA root conditioning on the outcome of coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Influence of operator skill level on the clinical outcome of non-surgical periodontal treatment: a retrospective study

Treatment of intrabony defects with modified perforated membranes in aggressive periodontitis: a 12-month randomized controlled trial

Ten-year survival and chipping rates and clinical quality grading of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses

Radiotherapy alters the composition, structural and mechanical properties of root dentin in vitro

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter