Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Routine collection of post-discharge patient-reported outcomes within trauma registries can be used to benchmark quality of trauma care. This process is dependent on geographic and cultural context, but results are lacking regarding the European experience. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of routine inclusion of longer-term patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a Dutch National Trauma Database (DNTD) and to characterize these outcomes in a prospective cohort study.
All adult patients (≥ 18 years) who presented for traumatic injury in 2015–2016 and met the inclusion criteria of the DNTD were included. Inclusion criteria of the DNTD are presence of traumatic injury, hospital presentation within 48 h from trauma and hospital admission for treatment of traumatic injury or immediate mortality from traumatic injury after presentation. Exclusion criteria were death, mental impairment, insufficient command of Dutch language and residency outside the Netherlands. Primary outcomes were process-related measures of feasibility (response rate, response methods and reasons for non-response). Secondary outcomes were HRQoL measures [EuroQOL 5-Dimensions 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) with added cognitive dimension and Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS)].
2025 unique patients met the initial inclusion criteria, with 1753 patients eligible for follow-up. Of these, 1315 patients participated (response rate 75%). The majority of questionnaires, 990 (75%), were completed on paper, with an additional 325 (25%) through telephone interviews. Primary reason for non-response was lack of contact information (245/438 non-responders; 56%). Median EQ-5D score was 0.81 (IQR 0.68–1.00) (mean 0.74; SD 0.31) and median EQ-VAS score was 78 (IQR 65–90). Compared to a Dutch reference population (mean EQ-5D = 0.87), EQ-5D scores were significantly lower (p < 0.001).
Routine collection of HRQoL is feasible within European health systems, like in the Netherlands. Further integration of these measures into trauma registries may aid worldwide benchmarking of trauma care quality.
Rutledge, R. (1995). The goals, development, and use of trauma registries and trauma data sources in decision-making in injury. Surgical Clinics of North America, 75, 305–326. CrossRef
Moore, L., & Clark, D. E. (2008). The value of trauma registries. Injury, 39, 686–695. CrossRef
MacKenzie, E. J., Rivara, F. P., Jurkovich, G. J., et al. (2006). A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. New England Journal of Medicine, 354, 366–378. CrossRef
Jochems, D., Leenen, L. P. H., Hietbrink, F., et al. (2018). Increased reduction in exsanguination rates leaves brain injury as the only major cause of death in blunt trauma. Injury, 49, 1661–1667. CrossRef
Pfeifer, R., Tarkin, I. S., Rocos, B., et al. (2009). Patterns of mortality and causes of death in polytrauma patients-Has anything changed? Injury, 40, 907–911. CrossRef
Gabbe, B. J., Simpson, P. M., Sutherland, A. M., et al. (2008). Functional measures at discharge: Are they useful predictors of longer term outcomes for trauma registries? Annals of Surgery, 247, 854–859. CrossRef
Cameron, P. A., Gabbe, B. J., & McNeil, J. J. (2006). The importance of quality of survival as an outcome measure for an integrated trauma system. Injury, 37, 1178–1184. CrossRef
Rios-Diaz, A. J., Herrera-Escobar, J. P., Lilley, E. J., et al. (2017). Routine inclusion of long-term functional and patient reported outcomes (PROs) into trauma registries. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 83, 97–104. CrossRef
Gabbe, B. J., Cameron, P. A., Hannaford, A. P., et al. (2006). Routine follow up of major trauma patients from trauma registries: What are the outcomes? Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 61, 1393–1399. CrossRef
Porter, M. E., Larsson, S., & Lee, T. H. (2016). Standardizing patient outcomes measurement. New England Journal of Medicine, 374, 504–506. CrossRef
Gabbe, B. J., Sutherland, A. M., Hart, M. J., et al. (2010). Population-based capture of long-term functional and quality of life outcomes after major trauma: The experiences of the Victorian State Trauma Registry. Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 69, 532–536. CrossRef
Gabbe, B. J., Simpson, P. M., Harrison, J. E., et al. (2016). Return to work and functional outcomes after major trauma who recovers, when, and how well? Annals of Surgery, 263, 623–632. CrossRef
Rainer, T. H., Yeung, H. H., Gabbe, B. J., et al. (2019). A comparison of functional outcome in patients sustaining major trauma: A multicentre, prospective, international study. PLoS ONE, 9, e0103396.
Beck, B., Gantner, D., Cameron, P., et al. (2017). Temporal trends in functional outcomes following severe traumatic brain injury: 2006–2015. Journal of Neurotrauma, 35, 1021–1029. CrossRef
Nguyen, T. Q., Simpson, P. M., Braaf, S. C., et al. (2017). Mortality, functional and return to work outcomes of major trauma patients injured from deliberate self-harm. Injury, 48, 184–194. CrossRef
Gabbe, B. J., Cleland, H., Watterson, D. M., et al. (2015). Long term outcomes data for the Burns Registry of Australia and New Zealand: Is it feasible? Burn, 41, 1732–1740. CrossRef
Rainer, T. H., Yeung, J. H. H., Cheung, S. K. C., et al. (2014). Assessment of quality of life and functional outcome in patients sustaining moderate and major trauma: A multicentre, prospective cohort study. Injury, 45, 902–909. CrossRef
Zorginstituut Nederland. Outcome Information for Shared Decision-Making. Published October 19, 2017. Retrieved from https://english.zorginstituutnederland.nl/publications/publications/2017/10/19/programme-%E2%80%98outcome-information-for-shared-decision-making%E2%80%99—factsheet. Accessed September 28, 2018.
Berden HJJ, Leenen LPH. Landelijke Traumaregistratie. 2015. Retrieved September 28, 2018, from http://www.lnaz.nl/cms/LNAZ_LTR_rapportage_2010-2014.pdf.
Rotondo, M., Cribari, C., & Smith, R. (Eds.). (2014). Resources for optimal care of the injured patient (1st ed.). Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons.
Voskens, F. J., Van Rein, E. A. J., Van Der Sluijs, R., et al. (2018). Accuracy of prehospital triage in selecting severely injured trauma patients. JAMA Surgery, 153, 322–327. CrossRef
Kaplan, R. S., & Anderson, S. R. (2004). Time-driven activity-based costing. Harverd Business Review, 82, 131–138.
Hoeymans, N., Van Lindert, H., & Westert, G. P. (2005). The health status of the Dutch population as assessed by the EQ-6D. Quality of Life Research, 14, 655–663. CrossRef
Szende, A., Oppe, M., & Devlin, N. (2007). EQ-5D Value sets: Inventory, comparative review and user guide. New York: Springer. CrossRef
Ramos-Goni, J. M., & Rivero-Arias, O. (2011). Eq5d: A command to calculate index values for the EQ-5D quality-of-life instrument. The Stata Journal, 11, 120–125. CrossRef
Krabbe, P. F., Stouthard, M. E., Essink-Bot, M. L., & Bonsel, G. J. (1991). The effect of adding a cognitive dimension to the EuroQol multiattribute health-status classification system. Journal of Clinical Epidemology, 52, 293–301. CrossRef
Hall, E. C., Lund, E., Brown, D., et al. (2014). How are you really feeling? A prospective evaluation of cognitive function following trauma. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 76, 859–865. CrossRef
Qureshi, S. U., Long, M. E., Bradshaw, M. R., et al. (2011). Does PTSD impair cognition beyond the effect of trauma? The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 23, 16–28. CrossRef
Szende, A., Janssen, B., & Cabasés, J. (2008). Measuring self-reported population health: An international perspective based on EQ-5D. Dordrecht: Springer.
Subcommittee ATLS, American College of Surgeons’ Committee on Trauma, International ATLS Working Group. (2013). Advanced trauma life support (ATLS ®). The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 74, 1363–1366.
Versteegh, M. M., Vermeulen, K. M., Evers, S. M. A. A., et al. (2016). Dutch tariff for the five-level version of EQ-5D. Value in Health, 19, 343–352. CrossRef
Hollman, E. J., van der Vliet, Q. M. J., Alexandridis, G., et al. (2017). Functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with subtalar arthrodesis for posttraumatic arthritis. Injury, 48, 1696–1700. CrossRef
Ferree, S., van der Vliet, Q. M. J., van Heijl, M., et al. (2017). Fractures and dislocations of the hand in polytrauma patients: Incidence, injury pattern and functional outcome. Injury, 48, 930–935. CrossRef
Sluys, K., Häggmark, T., & Iselius, L. (2005). Outcome and quality of life 5 years after major trauma. Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 59, 223–232. CrossRef
Sutherland, A. G., Alexander, D. A., & Hutchison, J. D. (2005). Recovery after musculoskeletal trauma in men and women. Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 59, 213–216. CrossRef
Schluter, P. J., Neale, R., Scott, D., et al. (2005). Validating the Functional Capacity Index: A comparison of predicted versus observed total body scores. Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 58, 259–263. CrossRef
Leukhardt, W. H., Golob, J. F., McCoy, A. M., et al. (2010). Follow-up disparities after trauma: A real problem for outcomes research. American Journal of Surgery, 199, 348–353. CrossRef
Gunning, A., van Heijl, M., van Wessem, K., et al. (2017). The association of patient and trauma characteristics with the health-related quality of life in a Dutch trauma population. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 25, 41. CrossRef
Van Gelder, M. M. H. J., Bretveld, R. W., & Roeleveld, N. (2010). Web-based questionnaires: The future in epidemiology? American Journal of Epidemiology, 172, 1292–1298. CrossRef
Varian, H. R. (2006). Revealed preference (pp. 99–115). Oxford: Samuelsonian econonics twenty-first century. Ocford University Press.
Scholten, A. C., Haagsma, J. A., Steyerberg, E. W., et al. (2017). Assessment of pre-injury health-related quality of life: A systematic review. Population Health Metrics, 15, 10. CrossRef
Watson, W. L., Ozanne-Smith, J., & Richardson, J. (2007). Retrospective baseline measurement of self-reported health status and health-related quality of life versus population norms in the evaluation of post-injury losses. Injury Prevention, 13, 45–50. CrossRef
Polinder, S., Haagsma, J. A., Belt, E., et al. (2010). A systematic review of studies measuring health-related quality of life of general injury populations. BMC Public Health, 10, 783. CrossRef
- Routine incorporation of longer-term patient-reported outcomes into a Dutch trauma registry
Quirine M. J. van der Vliet
Abhiram R. Bhashyam
R. Marijn Houwert
F. Cumhur Öner
Luke P. H. Leenen
- Springer International Publishing
Quality of Life Research
An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation - An Official Journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649