Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

05.01.2022 | Original Scientific Report

Roux-en-Y Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as Redo-Operations Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Study

verfasst von: Karl Peter Rheinwalt, Sandra Schipper, Andreas Plamper, Patrick Hamid Alizai, Jonel Trebicka, Maximilian Joseph Brol, Andreas Kroh, Sophia Schmitz, Chetan Parmar, Ulf Peter Neumann, Tom Florian Ulmer

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Aim of this study was to improve knowledge about the best conversional bariatric procedure following sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

Methods

Data of conversional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) after SG were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. Weight loss parameters, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and comorbidities outcomes were recorded.

Results

Total of 123 patients (90 female, mean age 44 ± 0.9 years, mean body mass index (BMI) 42 ± 0.8 kg/m2) had either RYGB (n = 68) or OAGB (n = 55). Perioperative mortality was zero. Mean surgery time was significantly shorter for OAGB (168 ± 7.2 vs. 201 ± 6.8 min). Perioperative complication rates were not significantly (ns) different between RYGB and OAGB. Total body weight loss (TBWL) in RYGB and OAGB was 18 ± 2.2% and 18 ± 1.9% (12 months) and 18 ± 3.0% and 23 ± 2.6% (24 months; ns), respectively. Length of (individualized) biliopancreatic limb (BPL) correlated significantly with weight loss. Remission rates after 12 months of RYGB and OAGB for arterial hypertension (aHt) were 89% and 92%, for obstructive sleep apnea (OSAS) 56% and 82%, for Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) 100% and 92%, for osteoarthritis 64% and 85% and for GERD 89% versus 87% (ns), respectively. Nutritional deficiencies were comparable in RYGB (n = 11) and OAGB (n = 14) group (ns).

Conclusion

Both RYGB and OAGB are effective conversional procedures after SG, leading to comparable TBWL, BMI-loss and high remission rates of comorbidities including GERD. Significantly shorter operation times were in favor of OAGB. BPL, which was longer in OAGB was significantly related to higher %TBWL and %BMI-loss compared to RYGB.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bakr AA, Fahmy MH, Elward AS et al (2019) Analysis of medium-term weight regain 5 years after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 29:3508–3513CrossRef Bakr AA, Fahmy MH, Elward AS et al (2019) Analysis of medium-term weight regain 5 years after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 29:3508–3513CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Rutte PWJ, Smulders JF, De Zoete JP et al (2012) Indications and short-term outcomes of revisional surgery after failed or complicated sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 22:1903–1908CrossRef Van Rutte PWJ, Smulders JF, De Zoete JP et al (2012) Indications and short-term outcomes of revisional surgery after failed or complicated sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 22:1903–1908CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Felsenreich DM, Kefurt R, Schermann M et al (2017) Reflux, sleeve dilation, and barrett’s esophagus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: long-term follow-up. Obes Surg 27:3092–3101CrossRef Felsenreich DM, Kefurt R, Schermann M et al (2017) Reflux, sleeve dilation, and barrett’s esophagus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: long-term follow-up. Obes Surg 27:3092–3101CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Felsenreich DM, Langer FB, Kefurt R et al (2016) Weight loss, weight regain, and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:1655–1662CrossRef Felsenreich DM, Langer FB, Kefurt R et al (2016) Weight loss, weight regain, and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:1655–1662CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lazzati A, Bechet S, Jouma S et al (2020) Revision surgery after sleeve gastrectomy: a nationwide study with 10 years of follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis 16:1497–1504CrossRef Lazzati A, Bechet S, Jouma S et al (2020) Revision surgery after sleeve gastrectomy: a nationwide study with 10 years of follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis 16:1497–1504CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Altieri MS, Yang J, Nie L et al (2018) Rate of revisions or conversion after bariatric surgery over 10 years in the state of New York. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14:500–507CrossRef Altieri MS, Yang J, Nie L et al (2018) Rate of revisions or conversion after bariatric surgery over 10 years in the state of New York. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14:500–507CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Casillas RA, Um SS, Zelada Getty JL et al (2016) Revision of primary sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: indications and outcomes from a high-volume center. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:1817–1825CrossRef Casillas RA, Um SS, Zelada Getty JL et al (2016) Revision of primary sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: indications and outcomes from a high-volume center. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:1817–1825CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat AlSabah S, Alsharqawi N, Almulla A et al (2016) Approach to poor weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: re-sleeve versus gastric bypass. Obes Surg 26:2302–2307CrossRef AlSabah S, Alsharqawi N, Almulla A et al (2016) Approach to poor weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: re-sleeve versus gastric bypass. Obes Surg 26:2302–2307CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Parmar CD, Mahawar KK, Boyle M et al (2017) Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is effective for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease but not for further weight loss. Obes Surg 27:1651–1658CrossRef Parmar CD, Mahawar KK, Boyle M et al (2017) Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is effective for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease but not for further weight loss. Obes Surg 27:1651–1658CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheung D, Switzer NJ, Gill RS et al (2014) Revisional bariatric surgery following failed primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Obes Surg 24:1757–1763CrossRef Cheung D, Switzer NJ, Gill RS et al (2014) Revisional bariatric surgery following failed primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Obes Surg 24:1757–1763CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Homan J, Betzel B, Aarts EO et al (2015) Secondary surgery after sleeve gastrectomy: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11:771–777CrossRef Homan J, Betzel B, Aarts EO et al (2015) Secondary surgery after sleeve gastrectomy: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11:771–777CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kichler K, Rosenthal RJ, DeMaria E et al (2019) Reoperative surgery for nonresponders and complicated sleeve gastrectomy operations in patients with severe obesity. An international expert panel consensus statement to define best practice guidelines. Surg Obes Relat Dis 15:173–186CrossRef Kichler K, Rosenthal RJ, DeMaria E et al (2019) Reoperative surgery for nonresponders and complicated sleeve gastrectomy operations in patients with severe obesity. An international expert panel consensus statement to define best practice guidelines. Surg Obes Relat Dis 15:173–186CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahawar KK, Himpens JM, Shikora SA et al (2020) The first consensus statement on revisional bariatric surgery using a modified Delphi approach. Surg Endosc 34:1648–1657CrossRef Mahawar KK, Himpens JM, Shikora SA et al (2020) The first consensus statement on revisional bariatric surgery using a modified Delphi approach. Surg Endosc 34:1648–1657CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruzzi M, Voron T, Zinzindohoue F et al (2016) Revisional single-anastomosis gastric bypass for a failed restrictive procedure: 5-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:240–245CrossRef Bruzzi M, Voron T, Zinzindohoue F et al (2016) Revisional single-anastomosis gastric bypass for a failed restrictive procedure: 5-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:240–245CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiappetta S, Stier C, Scheffel O et al (2019) Mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a second step procedure after sleeve gastrectomy—a retrospective cohort study. Obes Surg 29:819–827CrossRef Chiappetta S, Stier C, Scheffel O et al (2019) Mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a second step procedure after sleeve gastrectomy—a retrospective cohort study. Obes Surg 29:819–827CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Almalki OM, Lee WJ, Chen JC et al (2018) Revisional gastric bypass for failed restrictive procedures: comparison of single-anastomosis (Mini-) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 28:970–975CrossRef Almalki OM, Lee WJ, Chen JC et al (2018) Revisional gastric bypass for failed restrictive procedures: comparison of single-anastomosis (Mini-) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 28:970–975CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Velotti N, Vitiello A, Berardi G et al (2021) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one anastomosis-mini gastric bypass as a rescue procedure following failed restrictive bariatric surgery. A systematic review of literature with metanalysis. Updates Surg 73:639–647CrossRef Velotti N, Vitiello A, Berardi G et al (2021) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one anastomosis-mini gastric bypass as a rescue procedure following failed restrictive bariatric surgery. A systematic review of literature with metanalysis. Updates Surg 73:639–647CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Poublon N, Chidi I, Bethlehem M et al (2020) One anastomosis gastric bypass vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, remedy for insufficient weight loss and weight regain after failed restrictive bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 30:3287–3294CrossRef Poublon N, Chidi I, Bethlehem M et al (2020) One anastomosis gastric bypass vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, remedy for insufficient weight loss and weight regain after failed restrictive bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 30:3287–3294CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K et al (2009) Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med 122:248-256 e245CrossRef Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K et al (2009) Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med 122:248-256 e245CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Reinhold RB (1982) Critical analysis of long term weight loss following gastric bypass. Surg Gynecol Obstet 155:385–394PubMed Reinhold RB (1982) Critical analysis of long term weight loss following gastric bypass. Surg Gynecol Obstet 155:385–394PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W et al (2005) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 242:20–28CrossRef Lee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W et al (2005) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 242:20–28CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Robert M, Espalieu P, Pelascini E et al (2019) Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet 393:1299–1309CrossRef Robert M, Espalieu P, Pelascini E et al (2019) Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet 393:1299–1309CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Mustafa A, Rizkallah NNH, Samuel N et al (2020) Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric bypass versus one anastomosis (loop) gastric bypass for obesity: a prospective comparative study of weight loss and complications. Ann Med Surg 55:143–147CrossRef Mustafa A, Rizkallah NNH, Samuel N et al (2020) Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric bypass versus one anastomosis (loop) gastric bypass for obesity: a prospective comparative study of weight loss and complications. Ann Med Surg 55:143–147CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Jammu GS, Sharma R (2016) A 7-year clinical audit of 1107 cases comparing sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-En-Y gastric bypass, and mini-gastric bypass, to determine an effective and safe bariatric and metabolic procedure. Obes Surg 26:926–932CrossRef Jammu GS, Sharma R (2016) A 7-year clinical audit of 1107 cases comparing sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-En-Y gastric bypass, and mini-gastric bypass, to determine an effective and safe bariatric and metabolic procedure. Obes Surg 26:926–932CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Rheinwalt KP, Plamper A, Rückbeil MV et al (2020) One Anastomosis gastric bypass–mini-gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)—a mid-term cohort study with 612 patients. Obes Surg 30:1230–1240CrossRef Rheinwalt KP, Plamper A, Rückbeil MV et al (2020) One Anastomosis gastric bypass–mini-gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)—a mid-term cohort study with 612 patients. Obes Surg 30:1230–1240CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Souto-Rodríguez R, Alvarez-Sánchez M-V (2017) Endoluminal solutions to bariatric surgery complications: a review with a focus on technical aspects and results. World J Gastrointest Endosc 9:105CrossRef Souto-Rodríguez R, Alvarez-Sánchez M-V (2017) Endoluminal solutions to bariatric surgery complications: a review with a focus on technical aspects and results. World J Gastrointest Endosc 9:105CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeo C, Ho G, Syn N et al (2021) Revisional one-anastomosis gastric bypass after restrictive index surgery-a metaanalysis and comparison with revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 31:949–964CrossRef Yeo C, Ho G, Syn N et al (2021) Revisional one-anastomosis gastric bypass after restrictive index surgery-a metaanalysis and comparison with revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 31:949–964CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Parmar CD, Bryant C, Luque-de-Leon E et al (2019) One anastomosis gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2: a systematic review comparing it with Roux-En-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 29:3039–3046CrossRef Parmar CD, Bryant C, Luque-de-Leon E et al (2019) One anastomosis gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2: a systematic review comparing it with Roux-En-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 29:3039–3046CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Nergaard BJ, Leifsson BG, Hedenbro J et al (2014) Gastric bypass with long alimentary limb or long pancreato-biliary limb—long-term results on weight loss, resolution of co-morbidities and metabolic parameters. Obes Surg 24:1595–1602CrossRef Nergaard BJ, Leifsson BG, Hedenbro J et al (2014) Gastric bypass with long alimentary limb or long pancreato-biliary limb—long-term results on weight loss, resolution of co-morbidities and metabolic parameters. Obes Surg 24:1595–1602CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Darabi S, Pazouki A, Hosseini-Baharanchi FS et al (2020) The role of alimentary and biliopancreatic limb length in outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Wideochirurgia I Inne Techniki Maloinwazyjne 15:290–297PubMed Darabi S, Pazouki A, Hosseini-Baharanchi FS et al (2020) The role of alimentary and biliopancreatic limb length in outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Wideochirurgia I Inne Techniki Maloinwazyjne 15:290–297PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Homan J, Boerboom A, Aarts E et al (2018) A longer biliopancreatic limb in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass improves weight loss in the first years after surgery: results of a randomized controlled trial. Obes Surg 28:3744–3755CrossRef Homan J, Boerboom A, Aarts E et al (2018) A longer biliopancreatic limb in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass improves weight loss in the first years after surgery: results of a randomized controlled trial. Obes Surg 28:3744–3755CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruiz-Tovar J, Vorwald P, Gonzalez-Ramirez G et al (2019) Impact of biliopancreatic limb length (70 cm vs 120 cm), with constant 150 cm alimentary limb, on long-term weight loss, remission of comorbidities and supplementation needs after roux-En-Y gastric bypass: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Obes Surg 29:2367–2372CrossRef Ruiz-Tovar J, Vorwald P, Gonzalez-Ramirez G et al (2019) Impact of biliopancreatic limb length (70 cm vs 120 cm), with constant 150 cm alimentary limb, on long-term weight loss, remission of comorbidities and supplementation needs after roux-En-Y gastric bypass: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Obes Surg 29:2367–2372CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyle M, Mahawar K (2020) One anastomosis gastric bypass performed with a 150-cm biliopancreatic limb delivers weight loss outcomes similar to those with a 200-cm biliopancreatic limb at 18–24 months. Obes Surg 30:1258–1264CrossRef Boyle M, Mahawar K (2020) One anastomosis gastric bypass performed with a 150-cm biliopancreatic limb delivers weight loss outcomes similar to those with a 200-cm biliopancreatic limb at 18–24 months. Obes Surg 30:1258–1264CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Tolone S, Cristiano S, Savarino E et al (2016) Effects of omega-loop bypass on esophagogastric junction function. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:62–69CrossRef Tolone S, Cristiano S, Savarino E et al (2016) Effects of omega-loop bypass on esophagogastric junction function. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:62–69CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Patterson EJ, Davis DG, Khajanchee Y et al (2003) Comparison of objective outcomes following laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication vs laparoscopic gastric bypass in the morbidly obese with heartburn. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 17:1561–1565CrossRef Patterson EJ, Davis DG, Khajanchee Y et al (2003) Comparison of objective outcomes following laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication vs laparoscopic gastric bypass in the morbidly obese with heartburn. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 17:1561–1565CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahmood F, Sharples AJ, Rotundo A et al (2018) Factors Predicting length of stay following bariatric surgery: retrospective review of a single UK Tertiary centre experience. Obes Surg 28:1924–1930CrossRef Mahmood F, Sharples AJ, Rotundo A et al (2018) Factors Predicting length of stay following bariatric surgery: retrospective review of a single UK Tertiary centre experience. Obes Surg 28:1924–1930CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Roux-en-Y Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as Redo-Operations Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Study
verfasst von
Karl Peter Rheinwalt
Sandra Schipper
Andreas Plamper
Patrick Hamid Alizai
Jonel Trebicka
Maximilian Joseph Brol
Andreas Kroh
Sophia Schmitz
Chetan Parmar
Ulf Peter Neumann
Tom Florian Ulmer
Publikationsdatum
05.01.2022
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06424-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Nackenschmerzen nach Bandscheibenvorfall: Muskeltraining hilft!

Bei hartnäckigen Schmerzen aufgrund einer zervikalen Radikulopathie schlägt ein Team der Universität Istanbul vor, lokale Steroidinjektionen mit einem speziellen Trainingsprogramm zur Stabilisierung der Nackenmuskulatur zu kombinieren.

US-Team empfiehlt Gastropexie nach Hiatushernien-Op.

Zur Vermeidung von Rezidiven nach Reparatur einer paraösophagealen Hiatushernie sollte einem US-Team zufolge der Magen bei der Op. routinemäßig an der Bauchwand fixiert werden. Das Ergebnis einer randomisierten Studie scheint dafür zu sprechen.

Mit Lidocain kommt der Darm nicht schneller in Schwung

Verzögertes Wiederanspringen der Darmfunktion ist ein Hauptfaktor dafür, wenn Patientinnen und Patienten nach einer Kolonresektion länger als geplant im Krankenhaus bleiben müssen. Ob man diesem Problem mit Lidocain vorbeugen kann, war Thema einer Studie.

Die elektronische Patientenakte kommt: Das sollten Sie jetzt wissen

Am 15. Januar geht die „ePA für alle“ zunächst in den Modellregionen an den Start. Doch schon bald soll sie in allen Praxen zum Einsatz kommen. Was ist jetzt zu tun? Was müssen Sie wissen? Wir geben in einem FAQ Antworten auf 21 Fragen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.