Background
In recent years it has become evident that the tumor microenvironment is deeply engaged in determining the metastatic fate of the tumor [
1]. Many components of the stroma can influence the metastatic spread of tumor cells by modulating the molecular network in the tumor milieu. Similarly, the microenvironment of secondary organs, where metastases develop, plays a crucial role. Molecular changes in the microenvironment of secondary organs contribute to the formation of pre-metastatic niches, the future location where cancer cells will reside, proliferate and develop metastases [
2,
3].
Therapeutic targeting of cells comprising the tumor stroma by ablation was suggested as a novel and efficient way to combat cancer [
4]. Immune cells that represent a substantial component of the stroma in many solid human tumors exhibit a remarkable dichotomy between tumor-suppressing and tumor-promoting functions. From a therapeutic prospective, this plasticity can be used to educate immune cells to become tumor-suppressing, which is a more advantageous strategy than simply eradicating immune stroma cells, as was suggested earlier [
5]. For example, it has been shown that tumor-associated macrophages, educated to be pro-tumorigenic by T-cell-produced cytokines, can be re-educated to exhibit tumor suppressing functions [
6].
Similar to macrophages, lymphocytes also play a dual role in the tumor microenvironment by regulating both pro- and anti-tumor immunity [
7].
Among the numerous molecules of the tumor microenvironment that play causal roles in metastatic spread of cancer cells is the S100A4, which belongs to the S100 family of small Ca-binding proteins. This group of proteins is characterized by both intra- and extra-cellular activity. S100A4 is expressed in many human cancers, and is correlated with poor prognosis and an elevated incidence of metastasis [
8,
9]. By using transgenic and knockout mouse models stroma-cell derived S100A4 was shown to have a causal role in tumor progression [
10-
15]. It has been suggested that it modulates the microenvironment, both at the site of the primary tumor and the pre-metastatic niche [
13,
15,
16].
Tumor-associated fibroblasts are one of the sources of extracellular S100A4 in tumors [
12,
15]. S100A4-positive fibroblasts produce VEGF-A and tenascin-C, which in turn contribute to generating a pro-metastatic environment [
15]. Pro-tumorigenic signal transduction pathways as well as the production of proteases and cytokines from various cell types are activated by S100A4 [
17-
20]. Furthermore, it has been shown that S100A4 acts as an angiogenic factor, as well as attracting T-cells to the site of the growing tumor and pre-metastatic lungs [
11,
13,
20,
21]. Unfortunately, receptors mediating extracellular functions of S100A4 remain elusive. Several receptors have been suggested by the research community including RAGE, TLR-4 and EGFR, pointing to the possibility of multiple-receptor interaction of S100A4 at the cell surface [
22].
Taking into account its pivotal role in metastasis, S100A4 was suggested as a potential target for a novel cancer therapy. For examples, the anti-inflammatory drug sulindac, which inhibits S100A4 transcription, effectively suppressed colon cancer metastasis [
23]. Recently, we have shown that the S100A4 function-blocking antibody (6B12) suppressed metastasis formation in mice grafted with metastatic mammary cancer cells. Furthermore, this study suggested that, the anti-S100A4 antibody decreased metastatic burden by blocking the attraction of T-cells [
24].
In vitro, S100A4 was chemo-attractive for T-cells and modified the pattern of cytokines produced by these cells [
13].
Based on the above, we propose that S100A4 might alter the T-cell balance in the tumor microenvironment and thereby promote cancer metastasis. We further suggest that blocking S100A4 activity can reinstate the “normal” T-cell balance and by this suppress the metastasis.
Here we show that S100A4 -challenged T-cells showed reduced amount of Th1-polarized cells by this altering the Th1/Th2 polarization balance. The Th1/Th2 balance is restored by the S100A4 neutralizing antibody. By implementing two different mouse models we demonstrate that the S100A4 function blocking antibody suppresses spontaneous tumor progression and pre-metastatic niche formation which correlates with suppression of T-cell accumulation both at the site of primary tumor and in pre-metastatic lungs.
Methods
Reagents
RPMI 1640, PBS and FCS were from (Gibco Life Technologies). Protease inhibitors were from (Roche). Recombinant mouse IL2 was from (Miltenyi Biotech). Mouse IgG and rabbit IgG were from (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Isolation of the oligomeric form of the S100A4 protein and the S100A4 mutant (G47W) was described earlier [
25,
26]. Isolation and characterization of 6B12 anti-S100A4 mouse monoclonal antibody was described in [
24].
Animal experiments
Ethical considerations
All mouse experiments were performed according with the charter of fundamental animal rights of the European Union (20007C364/01, Dec 7 2000). Permission to work with mouse tumor models and breeding of genetically modified animals has been granted to Noona Ambartsumian by the Dyreforsøgstilsynet, Fødevarestyrelsen. (Danish Agency for Animal Experiments, Food Administration) (license 2013-15-2934-00864/ACHOV). All animals were maintained according to the FELASA guidelines. All animals were health checked daily. Tumors were measured at least twice a week and mice were sacrificed when tumors reach 1 cm
3 or if they have any clinical signs of illness or distress due to the tumor burden. Detailed description of experimental procedures was done in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines and could be found in Additional file
1.
PyMT mouse model
Virgin female PyMT mice (Polyoma-middle T spontaneous metastatic mammary cancer model) of A/Sn genetic background were used for the experiments. Breeding and genotyping was performed as described earlier [
13]. 6-week-old PyMT female mice were injected either with a loading dose (7.5 mg/kg) of 6B12 (n = 20), or IgG control (n = 20), intra-peritoneal. Injections of antibodies were repeated three times a week. 5 animals of each experimental group were sacrificed at age of 12 weeks. For the rest animals were sacrificed and processed as described earlier when the biggest tumor reached 1 cm
3 [
13].
CSML100 metastatic mouse mammary carcinoma cells (1×10
6) [
27] were injected subcutaneously into S100A4(-/-) mice of A/Sn genetic background [
11] followed by intravenous injection of 2.5×10
5 S100A4(+/+) or S100A4(-/-) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). Experiment was repeated twice.
For the analysis of the antibody effect, CSML100 cells (1×10
6) were injected subcutaneously followed by intravenous injection of 2.5×10
5 S100A4(+/+) or S100A4(-/-) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) mixed with either 100 μg of 6B12, or IgG control. Then the mice were injected with a loading dose (7.5 mg/kg) of 6B12, or IgG control intra-peritoneally three times a week. Injections of MEFs mixed with antibodies were repeated three times with a one-week interval. Animals were sacrificed when the tumor reaches 5-6 mm in diameter (pre-metastatic phase) [
13]. Experiment was repeated twice.
Cytokine antibody and PCR array analyses
Pre-metastatic lungs were incubated for 2 hours in PBS at 37°C. Conditioned media (CM) from five individual lung cultures were combined in equal ratio and applied to RayBio Mouse Cytokine Antibody Arrays 3 and 4, allowing simultaneous analysis of 96 cytokines (RayBiotech Inc.). The assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The mouse Th1-Th2-Th3 RT Profiler™ PCR Array (SABiosciences) was used to determine the relative expression of 84 genes related to CD4+ T-helper cells, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RayBio Mouse Cytokine Antibody Array 1 for detecting 22 cytokines was used to test the cytokine profile in the T-cell CM.
Immunohistochemistry
Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue sections were stained with antibodies against CD3 (rabbit polyclonal, catalogue #ab5690; Abcam), mouse α-smooth muscle actin (clone 1A4; Sigma-Aldrich), anti-Fibronectin (FN) (clone AB-10; Neomarkers), anti-CD31 (clone MEC 13.3) and anti-CD45 (clone 30 F11), both from BD Biosciences according to the manufacturer’s protocols.
Corresponding secondary horse-radish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) were used, followed by incubation with chromogenic substrate 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAKO).
For double staining, secondary antibodies coupled to Alexa Fluor 488 or 568 (1:1500) were purchased from Molecular Probes. Sections were examined by means of confocal microscopy on a LSM 510 (Carl Zeiss Inc).
The blood vessel density was determined by quantifying CD31+ capillaries in 3-4 fields from two different sections of the tumor (magnification, ×200).
Quantification of CD3+ T-cells in tumors from 12-week-old PyMT mice and in pre-metastatic lungs was performed as described [
13].
Protein expression analysis
Proteins isolated from the pre-metastatic lungs were resolved by SDS-PAGE. FN expression was analyzed using a standard Western-blot procedure with anti-FN (DAKO) antibodies. Mouse anti-tubulin-α (clone AA13; Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a loading control. MultiGauge software was used for data analysis (Fujifilm).
To test the Jak-Stat signalling pathway activation, purified T-cells were starved in RPMI 1640 for 3 h and stimulated for 5 and 10 minutes with S100A4 protein (1 μg/ml), or mixed with 6B12 antibody (6 μg/ml).
Cell lysates were prepared in the presence of protease- and phosphatase-inhibitors. Activation of the Jak3/Stat3 signalling pathway was analysed using a standard Western blot procedure with phospho-Janus Kinase 3 (Jak3; Tyr980/Tyr981, clone D44E3), phospho-Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 (Stat3; Tyr705, clone D3A7) and Jak3 (clone D7B12) and Stat3 (clone D3Z2G), antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology). Each experiment was reproduced 3 times using independent primary T-cell isolations.
RNA sample preparation and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)
T-cells purified as described in [
13] were stimulated with S100A4 (1 μg/ml) for 19 h in presence of 10 μg/ml Polymyxin B (Invitrogen). Total RNA was isolated using a NucleoSpin® TriPrep kit (Macherey-Nagel). First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using Super-Script III RT according to the manufacturer instructions. qRT-PCR was performed using a LightCycler 2.0 instrument (Roche Applied Science, USA). The expression level relative to the housekeeping GAPDH gene, as a control, was calculated. The PCR analysis was repeated 3 times using independent primary T-cell isolation. The primers used in this work are presented in Table
1.
Table 1
List of primers used for analysis
FN | 5′-TGCCGCAACTACTGTGAT-3′ | 5′GAATCCTGGGCTGGAGTA--3′ |
G-CSF | 5′-CAGATCACCCAGAATCCAT-3′ | 5′-CTCTCGTCCTGACCATAGTG-3′ |
Jak3 | 5′-TGGCCACTGAGGACTTCTCT-3′ | 5′-GGATGGCACTGGTCAAATCT-3′ |
IL6 | 5′-ACAAGAAAGACAAAGCCAGA-3′ | 5′-TAGCCACTCCTTCTGTGACT-3′ |
GATA3 | 5′-CTGGAGGAGGAACGCTAATG-3′ | 5′-GTTGAAGGAGCTGCTCTTGG-3′ |
IL10 | 5′-TCTCCCCTGTGAAAATAAGA-3′ | 5′-TCCAGCAGACTCAATACACA-3′ |
Tyk2 | 5′-ATCCGTTTGTACAGGCCAAG-3′ | 5′-GCTGTGTGATGGGGAACTTT-3′ |
CD40 | 5′-GGCTTCGGGTTAAGAAGGAG-3′ | 5′-GCAGGGATGACAGACGGTAT-3′ |
CTLA4 | 5′-GGATCCTTGTCGCAGTTAGC-3′ | 5′-AAACGGCCTTTCAGTTGATG-3′ |
TGFβ | 5′-TGCGCTTGCAGAGATTAAAA-3′ | 5′-CGTCAAAAGACAGCCACTCA-3′ |
GAPDH | 5′-TCATCCCTGCATCCACTG-3′ | 5′-TAGGAACACGGAAGGCCA-3′ |
T-cell phenotyping
Spleen, thymus and inguinal and brachial lymph nodes were dissected from 8-week-old A/Sn S100A4(+/+) and S100A4(-/-) mice [
11]. Single-cell suspensions were prepared from the organs. Cells were counted, adjusted to 1 × 10
7cell/ml and plated in 96-well plates (100 μl/well). Distribution and activation status of T/B cells was assessed using a cocktail of primary conjugated antibodies: anti-CD4 (clone RM4-5), anti-CD8a (clone 53-6.7), anti-CD19 (clone ID3), anti-TCRαβ (clone H57-597), anti-CD25 (clone PC61), anti-CD44 (clone IM7), or anti-CD62L (clone MEL-14) (BD Biosciences). Cells were incubated with the antibodies (1:100) in ice-cold PBS containing 2% FCS and 0.1% NaN
3 for 30 min on ice. Data acquisition and analysis were performed on aFACSCalibur (BD Biosciences) using FlowJo software (Tree Star).
T cell isolation and in vitro differentiation
Primary T-cells were isolated from 3-4 mouse spleens by negative selection on magnetic bids using the Pan T cell Isolation Kit II (Miltenyi Biotech), see Grum-Schwensen
et al. for details [
13]. Purified T-cells were maintained in RPMI for 3 or 6 days with anti-CD3 or a combination of anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies, coupled to MACSibeads (Miltenyi Biotec) plus 10 ng/ml recombinant IL2 as described in [
28].
Activated T-cells were stimulated with S100A4 protein (1 μg/ml) or S100A4 protein mixed with 6B12 antibody (6 μg/ml). Before fixation, PMA/Ionomycin and Golgistop™ (BD Biosciences) were added for 5 hours. Cells were washed with PBS and Fixable Viability Stain 450 (BD Biosciences) was added to discriminate between viable and dead cells.
Cells were fixed using the Cytofix/Cytoperm™ kit (BD Biosciences) and stained with the mouse Th1/Th2/Th17 phenotyping kit (BD Biosciences) containing antibodies against CD4, IL17A, IFNγ and IL4 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Data acquisition and analysis were performed on a FACSVerse (BD Biosciences) using FlowJo software (Tree Star). All experiments were repeated 3-5 times.
Viability and proliferation assay
Cell viability and proliferation were measured by the LDH (Roche) and CyQuant® cell proliferation assay kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
ELISA assay
The concentration of the cytokines IL2, IL4, IFNγ and IL4 in the CM from the T-cell cultures was measured using the Mouse Th1/Th2 ELISA assay (eBioscience) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The experiment was performed twice.
Statistical analysis
The confidence level was calculated using paired or unpaired Student’s t test, depending on the content of the experiment, using GraphPad Prism software. Data is shown as mean ± SEM.
Discussion
Metastasis is a complex process, which relies on a cross-talk between emerging cancer cells and the surrounding stroma, both at the site of the primary tumor and at the pre-metastatic niche. This suggests that targeting the microenvironment could be an efficient route in combating the metastatic disease.
Immune cells, invading the primary tumor site, are important components of the tumor stroma, indicating that inflammatory processes substantially influence tumor progression. Similar to the primary tumor, metastasis formation is also determined by the presence of a variety of inflammatory cells in the pre-metastatic organs [
35].
It has been shown that, depending on the context, immune cells in the primary tumor could act as either anti- or pro-tumorigenic [
36,
37]. For example, in human breast cancer a CD68
high/CD4
high/CD8
low T-cell signature is significantly correlated with reduced patient survival [
38]. Additionally, a high percentage of CD4
+ T-cells positively correlates with tumor stage and metastasis [
39]. CD4
+ Th2-polarized T-lymphocytes stimulate pulmonary metastasis by regulating the pro-tumor properties of tumor-associated macrophages [
40]. Finally, blocking macrophage recruitment in combination with chemotherapy substantially improves therapeutic outcomes in a mouse model system, proving the principle that targeting immune cells of the tumor microenvironment could be an efficient way to combat metastasis [
38]. Likewise, reducing the numbers of Th2-polarized T-cells could serve as an effective method of anti-metastatic therapy, since this subpopulation of T-cells has been shown to regulate macrophage accumulation [
40].
The S100A4 protein exhibits, at least in part, its pro-metastatic function as an extracellular factor produced by stroma-associated fibroblasts that attracted T-cells to the tumor site and to the pre-metastatic lungs [
12,
13]. Moreover, S100A4 is found to be strongly up-regulated in several different human inflammatory disorders [
41-
43]. Recently S100A4 has been shown to serve as a link between metastatic and pro-inflammatory pathways [
25]. We therefore suggest that S100A4 in the tumor microenvironment acts as a pro-inflammatory factor that leads to modulation of T-cells and propose that neutralizing S100A4 protein activity might lead to restoration of a “normal” immune microenvironment at the site of the primary tumor and the pre-metastatic niche.
Pre-metastatic lungs, preconditioned by S100A4(+/+)MEFs, exhibited an altered cytokine repertoire that substantially overlapped with the cytokines produced by S100A4-boosted T-cells [
13]. Cytokines, secreted by T-cells in response to S100A4, showed increased levels of Th2-characteristic cytokines as well as a decrease in the level of IFN-γ, suggesting relatively higher representation of Th2-polarized cells in culture. Recently, we also reported an S100A4-dependent increase of IL13 production in T-cells [
41]. This indicates that S100A4 could induce alterations that lead to a shift in the Th1/Th2 polarization balance.
Moreover, S100A4 activated the Jak/Stat and MAP kinase pathways in T-cells. In fact, similar to T-cells, the S100A4 protein activated Jak3/Stat3 and MAP-kinase pathways in other cell types [
17,
18]. The Jak3/Stat3 and MAP-kinase pathways are known to affect T-cell differentiation [
30,
44-
46].
Indeed, this paper has demonstrated an extracellular S100A4 induced alteration in the Th1/Th2 balance. S100A4 reduced the percentage of Th1-polarized cells leading to a shift in the Th1/Th2 ratio. The S100A4-neutralizing antibody restored it, indicating that the process was S100A4-dependent. Importantly, the S100A4 protein did not affect proliferation, survival, nor the proportion of CD4+ T-cells in the population, therefore suggesting that S100A4’s influence is isolated to T-cell polarization.
It has been shown that the prevalence of Th2-polarized cells in the tumor microenvironment is strongly associated with the metastatic progression of a tumor [
7,
40,
47,
48]. Based on this, we propose that S100A4-induced alterations of the Th1/Th2 polarization balance in the tumor microenvironment can therefore promote tumor progression. To reach a final conclusion on these propositions, we will need to obtain
in vivo data that directly links S100A4 with the regulation of T-cell differentiation patterns.
The 6B12 antibody not only reduced T-cell infiltration in pre-malignant tumors and pre-metastatic lungs, but also suppressed tumor growth and vascular density, which was not observed earlier in a tumor graft model [
13,
24]. We suggest therefore that the pro-angiogenic activity of S100A4 unfolds at the pre-malignant stage. Recently, an anti-angiogenic effect of a different anti-S100A4 antibody was demonstrated in another model [
47].
In addition, S100A4 attracted T-cells to the primary tumor and pre-metastatic lungs, suggesting that it could affect the homing of T-cells. Indeed, the number of T-cells in the spleen of S100A4-deficient mice was reduced, suggesting that it could distress homing of T-cells to secondary lymphoid organs. One could speculate that mechanisms involved S100A4-dependent attraction of T-cells to the tumor and spleen are similar.
We also suggest here that S100A4-dependent T-cell activation is essential for its pro-metastatic function. By utilizing this function S100A4 modifies the tumor microenvironment and pre-conditions secondary organs to accept tumor cells.
Current cancer treatments, including chemotherapy, have thus far had a limited effect on metastatic tumors. The data in this paper clearly suggests that blocking S100A4 activity, using the 6B12 antibody, should hamper the pro-metastatic activity of the tumor microenvironment by restoring the T-cell polarization balance. This, in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy, could substantially increase the effectiveness of anti-cancer treatment in metastatic tumors.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Competing interests
The authors declare that some of the data relates to the patent application WO/2014/068300, where JK, NA and MG are also inventors.
Authors’ contributions
BGS carried out the protein expression analysis, parts of the flow cytometry analysis, studied the effect of 6B12 antibody on tumor development and metastasis formation in the PyMT mouse model and performed immunohistochemical analysis of mouse tissues. JK carried out recombinant protein and antibody production and characterization, participated in protein expression and cytokine microarray analysis and helped writing the final manuscript. MB performed gene expression profiling, q-RT-PCR analysis and studied of the role of 6B12 in the modulation of the pre-metastatic niche formation using the pre-metastatic niche mouse model. CMB did flow cytometry analysis of the T-cell compartment in S100A4(-/-) mice. PH and PG helped with the flow cytometry analysis of in vitro T-cell differentiation and gene expression profiling. MG participated in the analysis of the in vivo effect of the 6B12 antibody in mouse models. EL analyzed data and critically reviewed the manuscript. NA designed the experiments, established the methods used in this work, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.