Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 8/2017

28.02.2017 | Ideas and Technical Innovations

S2 alar iliac screw placement under robotic guidance for adult spinal deformity patients: technical note

verfasst von: Seung-Jae Hyun, Ki-Jeong Kim, Tae-Ahn Jahng

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 8/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screws are generally placed using an open approach, but have recently been shown to be implantable using a minimally invasive approach. Nevertheless, optimal screw positioning, even when supported by fluoroscopic guidance, is challenging in the complex anatomy of the sacral-pelvic area. This work presents our novel technique of S2AI sacropelvic fixation procedures performed with robotic guidance.

Methods

This was a single-center, retrospective, mini case-series of adult spinal deformity patients in need of sacropelvic fixation as part of a longer thoraco-lumbar fusion. The surgeon drilled a pilot hole through a robotic guide and then inserted a K-wire. A Jamshidi needle was placed over the K-wire and used to advance the pilot hole anterolaterally.

Results

Medical charts of four 60–70 year-old patients, who underwent robotic-guided insertion of S2AI screws in a minimally invasive approach were reviewed. Follow-up ranged between 10 and 13 months. Post-operative CTs and X-rays showed all eight trajectories were fully within the bone and accurately placed. Average surgery time per patient was 13 min with 5.3 s of fluoroscopy per screw. No intra- or post-operative complications occurred.

Conclusions

Robotic-guidance with a Jamshidi needle technique was a safe and effective means for implanting S2AI screws in a minimally invasive approach.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Balderston RA, Winter RB, Moe JH, Bradford DS, Lonstein JE (1986) Fusion to the sacrum for nonparalytic scoliosis in the adult. Spine 11:824–829CrossRefPubMed Balderston RA, Winter RB, Moe JH, Bradford DS, Lonstein JE (1986) Fusion to the sacrum for nonparalytic scoliosis in the adult. Spine 11:824–829CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Boachie-Adjei O, Dendrinos GK, Ogilvie JW, Bradford DS (1991) Management of adult spinal deformity with combined anterior–posterior arthrodesis and Luque–Galveston instrumentation. J Spinal Disord 4:131–141CrossRefPubMed Boachie-Adjei O, Dendrinos GK, Ogilvie JW, Bradford DS (1991) Management of adult spinal deformity with combined anterior–posterior arthrodesis and Luque–Galveston instrumentation. J Spinal Disord 4:131–141CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Emami A, Deviren V, Berven S, Smith JA, Hu SS, Bradford DS (2002) Outcome and complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult spine deformity: Luque–Galveston, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation. Spine 27:776–786CrossRefPubMed Emami A, Deviren V, Berven S, Smith JA, Hu SS, Bradford DS (2002) Outcome and complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult spine deformity: Luque–Galveston, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation. Spine 27:776–786CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards CC 2nd, Bridwell KH, Patel A, Rinella AS, Berra A, Lenke LG (2004) Long adult deformity fusions to L5 and the sacrum. A matched cohort analysis. Spine 29:1996–2005CrossRefPubMed Edwards CC 2nd, Bridwell KH, Patel A, Rinella AS, Berra A, Lenke LG (2004) Long adult deformity fusions to L5 and the sacrum. A matched cohort analysis. Spine 29:1996–2005CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Cheh G (2006) Pseudarthrosis in long adult spinal deformity instrumentation and fusion to the sacrum: prevalence and risk factor analysis of 144 cases. Spine 31:2329–2336CrossRefPubMed Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Cheh G (2006) Pseudarthrosis in long adult spinal deformity instrumentation and fusion to the sacrum: prevalence and risk factor analysis of 144 cases. Spine 31:2329–2336CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen BL Jr, Ferguson RL (1982) The Galveston technique for L rod instrumentation of the scoliotic spine. Spine 7:276–284CrossRefPubMed Allen BL Jr, Ferguson RL (1982) The Galveston technique for L rod instrumentation of the scoliotic spine. Spine 7:276–284CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen BL Jr, Ferguson RL (1984) The Galveston technique of pelvic fixation with L-rod instrumentation of the spine. Spine 9:388–394CrossRefPubMed Allen BL Jr, Ferguson RL (1984) The Galveston technique of pelvic fixation with L-rod instrumentation of the spine. Spine 9:388–394CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Peelle MW, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Sides B (2006) Comparison of pelvic fixation techniques in neuromuscular spinal deformity correction: Galveston rod versus iliac and lumbosacral screws. Spine 31:2392-2398. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000238973.13294.16 (discussion 2399) Peelle MW, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Sides B (2006) Comparison of pelvic fixation techniques in neuromuscular spinal deformity correction: Galveston rod versus iliac and lumbosacral screws. Spine 31:2392-2398. doi:10.​1097/​01.​brs.​0000238973.​13294.​16 (discussion 2399)
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gau YL, Lonstein JE, Winter RB, Koop S, Denis F (1991) Luque–Galveston procedure for correction and stabilization of neuromuscular scoliosis and pelvic obliquity: a review of 68 patients. J Spinal Disord 4:399–410CrossRefPubMed Gau YL, Lonstein JE, Winter RB, Koop S, Denis F (1991) Luque–Galveston procedure for correction and stabilization of neuromuscular scoliosis and pelvic obliquity: a review of 68 patients. J Spinal Disord 4:399–410CrossRefPubMed
19.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pechlivanis I, Kiriyanthan G, Engelhardt M, Scholz M, Lucke S, Harders A, Schmieder K (2009) Percutaneous placement of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine using a bone mounted miniature robotic system: first experiences and accuracy of screw placement. Spine 34:392–398. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318191ed32 CrossRefPubMed Pechlivanis I, Kiriyanthan G, Engelhardt M, Scholz M, Lucke S, Harders A, Schmieder K (2009) Percutaneous placement of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine using a bone mounted miniature robotic system: first experiences and accuracy of screw placement. Spine 34:392–398. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e318191ed32​ CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kantelhardt SR, Martinez R, Baerwinkel S, Burger R, Giese A, Rohde V (2011) Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J 20:860–868. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1729-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kantelhardt SR, Martinez R, Baerwinkel S, Burger R, Giese A, Rohde V (2011) Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J 20:860–868. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-011-1729-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Schatlo B, Molliqaj G, Cuvinciuc V, Kotowski M, Schaller K, Tessitore E (2014) Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: a matched cohort comparison. J Neurosurg Spine 20:636–643. doi:10.3171/2014.3.SPINE13714 CrossRefPubMed Schatlo B, Molliqaj G, Cuvinciuc V, Kotowski M, Schaller K, Tessitore E (2014) Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: a matched cohort comparison. J Neurosurg Spine 20:636–643. doi:10.​3171/​2014.​3.​SPINE13714 CrossRefPubMed
28.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat . Kim H, Jung W, Chang B, Lee C, Kang K, Yeom J (2016) A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of robot-assisted vs freehand pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery. Int J Med Robot (epub ahead of print). doi:10.1002/rcs.1779 . Kim H, Jung W, Chang B, Lee C, Kang K, Yeom J (2016) A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of robot-assisted vs freehand pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery. Int J Med Robot (epub ahead of print). doi:10.​1002/​rcs.​1779
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Crawford CH 3rd, Glassman SD, Bridwell KH, Berven SH, Carreon LY (2015) The minimum clinically important difference in SRS-22R total score, appearance, activity and pain domains after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. Spine 40:377–381. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000761 CrossRefPubMed Crawford CH 3rd, Glassman SD, Bridwell KH, Berven SH, Carreon LY (2015) The minimum clinically important difference in SRS-22R total score, appearance, activity and pain domains after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. Spine 40:377–381. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0000000000000761​ CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
S2 alar iliac screw placement under robotic guidance for adult spinal deformity patients: technical note
verfasst von
Seung-Jae Hyun
Ki-Jeong Kim
Tae-Ahn Jahng
Publikationsdatum
28.02.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5012-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2017

European Spine Journal 8/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.