Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 2/2021

12.10.2020 | Original Contributions

SADI-S 250 vs Roux-en-Y Duodenal Switch (RY-DS): Results of 5-Year Observational Study

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

There are only a small number of studies providing a comparison between SADI-S and Hess-Marceau’s BPD/Duodenal Switch (RY-DS) operations. We aimed to compare 5-year results of SADI-S 250 (common limb 250 cm) with RY-DS.

Material and Methods

Data of patients who underwent open SADI-S (n 226) and RY-DS (n 528) were retrospectively studied. EWL(%), EBMIL(%), TWL(%), antidiabetic effect, complications, and revision rate were compared between the two groups.

Results

After the first 12 months, EWL% (77.0% vs 73.3%) and TWL% (39.4% vs 38.9%) were statistically significantly better after SADI-S (p < 0.01, and p < 0.05 respectively), but not EBMIL% (p > 0.05). At nadir to 24–36 months, EWL, TBWL, and EBMIL after SADI-S was comparable to the RY-DS group. Up to the fourth and fifth year, better weight loss (TBWL, EBMIL, EWL) was observed after RY-DS than after SADI-S. Early complication rate was less (2.65%) in the SADI-S group vs 5.1% in the RY-DS. Protein deficiency and small bowel obstruction rates were also lower after SADI-S. 93.4% of patients achieved total remission of their diabetes. 7.5% of patients in the SADI-S group had symptoms of bile reflux, which was a main indication for revisions.

Conclusion

SADI-S has many advantages over RY-DS. However, weight loss and antidiabetic effects after the third year were marginally lower after SADI-S compared to RY-DS. SADI-S is less dangerous in terms of malabsorption and looks to be a reasonable alternative to RY-DS as a metabolic operation. RY-DS could be implemented for weight regain and/or bile reflux after SADI-S.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122(3):248–56.CrossRef Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122(3):248–56.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramos A, Kow L, Brown W. et al. Fifth IFSO Global registry report 2019. Published by Dendrite Clinical Systems 2019 Ramos A, Kow L, Brown W. et al. Fifth IFSO Global registry report 2019. Published by Dendrite Clinical Systems 2019
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Scopinaro N, Adami GF, Marinari GM, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion. World J Surg. 1998;22(9):936–46.CrossRef Scopinaro N, Adami GF, Marinari GM, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion. World J Surg. 1998;22(9):936–46.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hess DS, Hess DW. Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 1998;8(3):267–82.CrossRef Hess DS, Hess DW. Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 1998;8(3):267–82.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Marceau P, Biron S, Georges RS, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with gastrectomy as surgical treatment of morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 1991;1(4):381–7.CrossRef Marceau P, Biron S, Georges RS, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with gastrectomy as surgical treatment of morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 1991;1(4):381–7.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hess DS, Hess DW, Oakley RS. The biliopancreatic diversion with the duodenal switch: results beyond 10 years. Obes Surg. 2005;15:408–16.CrossRef Hess DS, Hess DW, Oakley RS. The biliopancreatic diversion with the duodenal switch: results beyond 10 years. Obes Surg. 2005;15:408–16.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Marceau P, Biron S, Hould FS, et al. Duodenal switch: long-term results. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1421–30.CrossRef Marceau P, Biron S, Hould FS, et al. Duodenal switch: long-term results. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1421–30.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre E, et al. Proximal duodenal-ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: proposed technique. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1614–8.CrossRef Sanchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre E, et al. Proximal duodenal-ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: proposed technique. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1614–8.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sánchez-Pernaute A, Herrera MAR, Pérez-Aguirre, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). One to three-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2010;20(12):1720–6.CrossRef Sánchez-Pernaute A, Herrera MAR, Pérez-Aguirre, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). One to three-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2010;20(12):1720–6.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MA, Cabrerizo L, et al. Single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) for obese diabetic patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:1092–8.CrossRef Sanchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MA, Cabrerizo L, et al. Single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) for obese diabetic patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:1092–8.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Pérez Aguirre E, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: metabolic improvement and weight loss in first 100 patients. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2013;9(5):731–5.CrossRef Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Pérez Aguirre E, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: metabolic improvement and weight loss in first 100 patients. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2013;9(5):731–5.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitzman B, Cottam D, Goriparthi R, et al. Stomach intestinal pylorus sparing (SIPS) surgery for morbid obesity: retrospective analyses of our preliminary experience. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2098–104.CrossRef Mitzman B, Cottam D, Goriparthi R, et al. Stomach intestinal pylorus sparing (SIPS) surgery for morbid obesity: retrospective analyses of our preliminary experience. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2098–104.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Shoar S, Poliakin L, Rubenstein R, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal switch (SADIS): a systematic review of efficacy and safety. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):104–13.CrossRef Shoar S, Poliakin L, Rubenstein R, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal switch (SADIS): a systematic review of efficacy and safety. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):104–13.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Topart P, Becouarn G. The single anastomosis duodenal switch modifications: a review of the current literature on outcomes. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2017;13:1306–12.CrossRef Topart P, Becouarn G. The single anastomosis duodenal switch modifications: a review of the current literature on outcomes. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2017;13:1306–12.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown WA, Ooi G, Higa K, et al. Single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy/one anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S/OADS) IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018;28:1207–16.CrossRef Brown WA, Ooi G, Higa K, et al. Single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy/one anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S/OADS) IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018;28:1207–16.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Prachand VN, Ward M, Alverdy JC. Duodenal switch provides superior resolution of metabolic comorbidities independent of weight loss in the super-obese (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(2):211–20.CrossRef Prachand VN, Ward M, Alverdy JC. Duodenal switch provides superior resolution of metabolic comorbidities independent of weight loss in the super-obese (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(2):211–20.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee Y, Ellenbogen Y, Doumouras AG, et al. Single or double-anastomosis duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a revisional procedure for sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2019;15(4):556–66.CrossRef Lee Y, Ellenbogen Y, Doumouras AG, et al. Single or double-anastomosis duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a revisional procedure for sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2019;15(4):556–66.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruiz AG, Sanchez-Pernaute A, Badia AC, et al. Laparoscopic duodenal switch: one or two loops? SOARD. 2015;11(6):S74. Ruiz AG, Sanchez-Pernaute A, Badia AC, et al. Laparoscopic duodenal switch: one or two loops? SOARD. 2015;11(6):S74.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Brethauer SA, Kim J, Chaar M, et al. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(3):489–506.CrossRef Brethauer SA, Kim J, Chaar M, et al. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(3):489–506.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Buse JB, Caprio S, Cefalu WT, et al. How we define cure of diabetes? Diabetes Care. 2009;32:2133–5.CrossRef Buse JB, Caprio S, Cefalu WT, et al. How we define cure of diabetes? Diabetes Care. 2009;32:2133–5.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ershova ЕV, Yashkov YI. Status of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after biliopancreatic diversion surgery. Obes Metab. 2013;10(3):28–36.CrossRef Ershova ЕV, Yashkov YI. Status of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after biliopancreatic diversion surgery. Obes Metab. 2013;10(3):28–36.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Cottam A, Cottam D, Portenier D, et al. A matched cohort analysis of stomach intestinal pylorus saving (SIPS) surgery versus biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch with two -year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2016;27:454–61.CrossRef Cottam A, Cottam D, Portenier D, et al. A matched cohort analysis of stomach intestinal pylorus saving (SIPS) surgery versus biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch with two -year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2016;27:454–61.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Balibrea JM, Vilallonga R, Hidalgo M, et al. Mid-term results and responsiveness predictors after two-step single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1302–8.CrossRef Balibrea JM, Vilallonga R, Hidalgo M, et al. Mid-term results and responsiveness predictors after two-step single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1302–8.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Conde M, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass as a second step after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2015;11(2):351–5.CrossRef Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Conde M, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass as a second step after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2015;11(2):351–5.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu A, Tian J, Cao L, et al. Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) as a revisional surgery. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2018;14(11):1686–90.CrossRef Wu A, Tian J, Cao L, et al. Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) as a revisional surgery. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2018;14(11):1686–90.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Scopinaro N. Biliopancreatic diversion: mechanisms of action and long-term results. Obes Surg. 2006;16(6):683–9.CrossRef Scopinaro N. Biliopancreatic diversion: mechanisms of action and long-term results. Obes Surg. 2006;16(6):683–9.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim J. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Clinical Issue Committee. Statement on single-anastomosis duodenal switch. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2016;12(5): 944–945. Kim J. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Clinical Issue Committee. Statement on single-anastomosis duodenal switch. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2016;12(5): 944–945.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat De Luca M, Tie T, Ooi G, et al. Mini gastric bypass – one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB) – IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018;28:1188–206.CrossRef De Luca M, Tie T, Ooi G, et al. Mini gastric bypass – one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB) – IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018;28:1188–206.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
SADI-S 250 vs Roux-en-Y Duodenal Switch (RY-DS): Results of 5-Year Observational Study
Publikationsdatum
12.10.2020
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05031-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Obesity Surgery 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.