Sie können Operatoren mit Ihrer Suchanfrage kombinieren, um diese noch präziser einzugrenzen. Klicken Sie auf den Suchoperator, um eine Erklärung seiner Funktionsweise anzuzeigen.
Findet Dokumente, in denen beide Begriffe in beliebiger Reihenfolge innerhalb von maximal n Worten zueinander stehen. Empfehlung: Wählen Sie zwischen 15 und 30 als maximale Wortanzahl (z.B. NEAR(hybrid, antrieb, 20)).
Findet Dokumente, in denen der Begriff in Wortvarianten vorkommt, wobei diese VOR, HINTER oder VOR und HINTER dem Suchbegriff anschließen können (z.B., leichtbau*, *leichtbau, *leichtbau*).
Safety and outcome of elective synthetic mesh repair for incisional ventral hernias in immunosuppressed patients – a retrospective propensity-score-matched analysis
Incisional hernia remain an important complication after abdominal surgery. Repair often includes use of synthetic mesh, but certain risk factors for complication after mesh hernia repair have been described. Among these, immunosuppression due to co-existing conditions is hypothesized to increase postoperative complications, but data is scarce and contradicting. Therefore, the aim was to assess outcome after mesh hernia repair in immunosuppressed patients.
Material & methods
Patients with and without immunosuppression undergoing elective incisional hernia repair at our clinic between 2010 and 2019 were analyzed in this retrospective study. Pre-existing conditions, details of immunosuppression, postoperative course and outpatient follow-up for hernia recurrence were collected and impact of clinical variables on outcome was analyzed. Propensity score matching was performed for comparison of cohorts.
Results
Immunosuppression was associated with increased postoperative complications in the overall cohort of 732 patients undergoing incisional ventral hernia repair in univariate but not multivariate analysis (p = 0.036 and p = 0.25, respectively). Overall postoperative complications did not differ between patients with immunosuppression compared to the matched collective. However, use of > 2 immune suppressive agents and immunosuppression history > 48 months showed significant impact on postoperative complications in univariate and multivariate analysis (p = 0.003/p = 0.023 and p = 0.018/p = 0.03, respectively). Age (< 60 years), duration of surgery (> 120 min), midline hernia according to EHS classification and number of immunosuppressive agents administered were identified as important risk factors for recurrence in immunocompromised patients (p = 0.045, p = 0.023, p = 0.012 and 0.049, respectively).
Conclusion
In this study, overall safety with desirable outcome of mesh implantation in immunosuppressed patients was documented. Furthermore, data suggested significant impact of number of immunosuppressive agents as a predicator of postoperative complications in this collective, possibly enabling risk stratification within this subgroup.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ASA
American Society of Anesthesiologists
BMI
Body Mass Index
CI
Confidence Interval
COPD
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
EHS
European Hernia Society
HIV
Human Immunodeficiency Virus
HR
Hazard Ratio
IBD
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
IPOM
Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh
KT
Kidney Transplantation
LT
Liver Transplantation
OT
Organ Transplantation
PRO
Patient reported outcome
SD
Standard Deviation
SSI
Surgical Site Infection
Introduction
Incisional herniae are a common clinical problem and one of the most frequent long-term complications after abdominal operations with a reported incidence of up to 22.4% three years after midline laparotomy [1]. The incidence increases to more than 30% after midline laparotomy when patients are overweight with a body mass index (BMI) exceeding 27 kg/m² [2]. Also, recent chemotherapy, surgical site infection (SSI), active nicotine consumption, immunosuppression and end colostomy are also associated with increased hernia occurrence [3‐6].
The current standard of treatment is surgical hernia repair including the use of permanent synthetic mesh as reinforcement of the abdominal wall [7]. This method can reduce the risk of recurrent hernias, but may cause serious clinical problems, if SSI occurs [8]. According to the Ventral Hernia Working Group, recurrence and SSI are the main issues in ventral hernia repair [9]. Recurrence rates are described to be up to 20–25% within three years following ventral hernia repair using synthetic mesh [10, 11]. The occurrence of SSI has been observed as a major risk factor for hernia recurrence, that may increase the rate up to 80% [3, 10].
Anzeige
Prevalence and incidence of patients classified as “immunosuppressed” is likely to increase due to expanding therapeutical options for and a rising population of patients undergoing administration of immunosuppressive agents in autoimmunological, rheumatological and oncological diseases as well as organ transplantation. However, a systematic classification is not available [12‐14]. Simultaneously, immunosuppression is linked to postoperative complications, such as wound healing disorders and SSI, that may lead to mesh resection [15‐18]. The Ventral Hernia Working Group classifies immunosuppressed patients into “Grade 2 - comorbid” in their assessment of risk of SSI, implying increased risk of infection of synthetic material [9]. An analysis of the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative observed more surgical site occurrences but not infections in immunocompromised patients [19]. Further, immunosuppression has been identified as a risk factor for hernia recurrence [20]. A meta-analysis reported 13.5% surgical complications after mesh hernia repair in patients after renal transplantation, while another study found no differences in complications between patients undergoing incisional hernia repair after liver transplantation compared to a control group [21, 22].
This study aimed to determine postoperative outcome of synthetic mesh implantation for ventral hernia repair in immunosuppressed patients in regard to postoperative complications as well as hernia recurrence with focus on the impact of extent of immunosuppression.
Materials and methods
Cohort and inclusion criteria
All patients undergoing ventral hernia repair for incisional herniae between January 2010 and December 2019 at Surgical Department of the Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin were included in the analysis. Immunosuppressed patients were defined by (i) taking immunosuppressive drugs with systemic effect or (ii) by the definition of their disease (e.g. Human immunodeficiency virus, HIV). Patients undergoing topical steroid therapy without systemic effects were not classified as immunosuppressed. Patients with oncological disease were only considered immunosuppressed if systemic therapy was administered within four weeks prior to surgery.
Patients were excluded from the analysis if the hernia repair was performed as part of a more complex operation (e.g. (oncological) resection, ostomy reversal surgery, organ (transplant) removal) or emergency cases with signs of incarceration. Patients undergoing sole suture repair were also excluded from the analysis.
Anzeige
Herniae were mainly diagnosed by general practitioners and then referred to our outpatient clinic, where diagnosis was confirmed by physical examination and ultrasound and/or computed tomography. Surgery was performed in symptomatic patients only.
Clinical data and follow-up
A follow-up via telephone was conducted at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after surgery by a hernia surgeon for the cohort of immunosuppressed patients. The main objective was to determine rate of recurrent hernias. Follow-up time was determined as time from hernia repair until further abdominal surgery or date of call. Standardized questions using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as described by Baucom et al. were asked in reference to the follow-up time period: patients were asked (i) if they had experienced symptoms like pain, pressure or discomfort in the area of hernia repair and if (ii) bulging reoccurred [23]. Patients reporting recurrent bulging and/or persistent pain at the original repair site were offered to be examined by a surgeon. Patients declining symptoms were categorized without hernia recurrence.
Data for pre-existing conditions were collected from patients` anamnesis. Diabetes was recorded, if any pharmaceutical therapy was administered.
Further data, including surgical complications were collected from hospital stays, ambulatory visits of the patients in the transplant centers or other contacts with surgeons and physicians at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin. For analysis, surgical complication was recorded, if either of the following occurred in the postoperative course: wound healing disorders, paralytic ileus and events directly linked to surgical intervention (bleeding, injuries). Cardiopulmonary complications included arrythmia with need of observation/treatment in an intensive care unit, prolonged necessity of (non-)invasive ventilation, pulmonary or cardiac embolism as well as pneumonia. Renal complications included acute kidney injury or pyelonephritis. Further, non-surgical site infection (e.g. urinary tract infections), post-operative delirium or other occurrences were recorded. The Clavien-Dindo-Classification was used to categorize surgical complications [24].
Statistical analysis
Data were collected in a prospectively designed database and a propensity score-matching was conducted using the following variables: age, BMI, pre-existing diabetes or nicotine consumption, anticoagulation, risk classification according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA–score), recurrent hernia, classification of incisional abdominal wall herniae according to the European Hernia Society (EHS) and surgical approach (laparoscopic vs. open) [25, 26]. A match tolerance of 0.1 was acknowledged.
To enable comparative group analysis, following parameters were dichotomized: age (≤ 59.9 vs. > 60 years), BMI (≤ 29.9 vs. > 30 kg/m²) as well as duration of operation (≤ 120 vs. > 120 min) [27, 28].
Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis using Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection approach was conducted to evaluate impact of parameters on complications after hernia repair. Minimum of cases for upper and lower nodes were defined as 50 and 25, respectively.
All analyses were performed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS), version 29 (IBM, USA). Variables are described as numbers with percentages as appropriate, or as means ± standard deviation (SD). The Chi square test (χ2) was used for analysis of categorical variables, and Student’s t test for numerical variables. Parameters, that revealed statistical significance in univariate analysis were included in multivariate analysis. Here, a logistic regression model, including demographic and operative parameters, was used to assess risk factors for postoperative complications. Hazard Ratio (HR) with Confidence interval (CI) were calculated. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Anzeige
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were used in this study´s design [29].
This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local ethics committee of Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin (EA1/067/20).
Results
Overall cohort characteristics and outcome
Out of 732 patients that underwent elective surgery between 2010 and 2019 because of incisional abdominal wall hernia at our institution, a total of n = 163 (22.3%) patients were classified as immunosuppressed, see Fig. 1. The mean age of the overall cohort was 58.7 (± 12.5) years and most patients were classified as ASA 1 or 2 (n = 347; 47.4%). Using the EHS classification, the majority of herniae was classified as “midline” (n = 555;75.8%) and W2 or W3 (n = 650; 88.8%). 119 (16.3%) patients were operated due to recurrent hernia. Open hernia repair was conducted in 454 (62.0%) patients and sublay (n = 348; 47.5) was performed most frequently, followed by intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM, n = 307; 41.0%).The mean duration of surgery was 149.3 (± 82.7) minutes. Detailed characteristics of the overall cohort are displayed in Table 1.
Fig. 1
Formation of the Cohort and Subgroups. ASA - American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI - Body Mass Index; EHS - European Hernia Society
Values as numbers and percentage or in means ± standard deviation
ASA - American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI - Body Mass Index; COPD - Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; CNI - calcineurine inhibitor; EHS - European Hernia Society; IBD – inflammatory bowel disease, LT – liver transplantation; KT – kidney transplantation; OT – organ transplantation; IPOM – intraperitoneal onlay mesh
Postoperative complications occurred in 166 (22.7%) patients, and here, the majority was classified as Clavien-Dindo grade ≤ IIIa (n = 137; 18.7%). SSI were the most common surgical postoperative complication (n = 35; 4.8%). The mean duration of hospitalization was 8.6 (± 11.1) days, see also Table 2.
Parameters associated with complications in the overall cohort
Univariate analysis revealed age (> 60 years) and patients classified as ASA 3/4 but not BMI as variables significantly associated with complications (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p = 0.49 respectively). Analyzing specific comorbidities, preexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes and immunosuppression also showed significant impact on incidence of postoperative complications (p < 0.001, p = 0.04 and p = 0.036, respectively). Using EHS classification for ventral incision hernia, only larger width but not location reached statistically significant impact on complications (p = 0.003 and p = 0.99, respectively). Further, duration of surgery exceeding 120 min was associated with increased occurrence of postoperative complications (p < 0.001). Supplement Table 1 displays detailed information of the univariate analysis.
In multivariate analysis, only age > 60 years, COPD and duration of surgery > 120 min showed persistent statistically significant impact (p = 0.002, p = 0.032 and p < 0.001, respectively), see also Supplement Table 2.
Anzeige
CART analysis revealed duration of operation as most impactful variable for occurrence of postoperative complications in the overall cohort, followed by comorbidities. In the subset of patients where operation was under 120 min, diabetes was most relevant, while COPD showed most important influence in patients, where operation time was > 120 min. Immunosuppression did not show significant impact in this analysis, see also Fig. 2a.
Fig. 2
Classification and regression tree (CART)-analysis on impact of clinical variables on occurence of postoperative complications after incisional ventral hernia repair using mesh. To investigate and rank the relevance of clinical variables with putative influence on postoperative complications, CART method was used. Regression tree classified patients in this study for their associated variables in regard of occurrence of postoperative complications. Nodes indicate parameters that significantly improve correct classification and hereby decrease impurity toward the terminal (upper) nodes. Variables with statistically significant impact in univariate analysis were implemented. (a) In the overall cohort, duration of operation showed most relevant impact, and in the subgroup of patients operated < 120 min, diabetes mellitus was of importance, while combination of COPD and prolonged length of operation led to increase of postoperative complication. (b) In the cohort of immunosuppressed patients, the number of immunosuppressive agents was of most meaningful impact. Here, in patients with up to two agents, increased age was next-ranking factor, while history of immunosuppression exceeding four years was of relevance in patients with more than two different pharmaceuticals
Characteristics and outcome of immunosuppressed patients
The mean age of patients classified as immunosuppressed was 55.5 (± 10.9) years and most patients were classified with higher ASA gradings of 3 and 4 (n = 82; 50.3%). Preexisting diabetes was reported in 52 (31.9%) of patients. Immunosuppression was mainly caused by pharmacological therapy due to rejection prophylaxis for solid organ transplantation (n = 150; 92.0%). Here, most patients were recorded with a medical history of liver transplantation (n = 98; 60.1%). Similar to the overall cohort, midline herniae (n = 109; 66.8%) with larger width of W2/W3 (n = 150; 92.0%) were most prominent. Laparoscopic approach was performed in 74 (45.4%) patients and hernia repair using IPOM technique was most frequent (n = 80; 49.1%), see also Table 1.
Overall, complications in this cohort were observed in 47 (28.8%) patients and here, SSI were diagnosed in 12 (7.4%) of patients. Complications exceeding Clavien-Dindo IIIa were found in 14 (8.6%) patients while mean hospitalization was 9.3 (± 10.7) days. Details on complications in immunosuppressed patients are displayed in Table 2.
Table 2
Early postoperative outcome
Overall cohort
n = 732
Patients with immunosuppression
n = 163
Patients with postoperative complications
166 (22.7)
47 (28.8)
Patients with postoperative surgical complications
109 (14.9)
24 (14.7)
Typ of complications*
SSI
Seroma
Bleeding/hematoma
Paralytic Ileus
Renal
Cardiopulmonary
Other
35 (4.8)
30 (4.1)
12 (1.6)
8 (1.1)
21 (2.9)
27 (3.7)
80 (10.9)
12 (7.4)
7 (4.3)
1 (0.6)
0 (0)
7 (4.3)
7 (4.3)
31 (19.0)
Grade of complication (Clavien-Dindo)
≤IIIa
≥IIIb
137 (18.7)
29 (4.0)
33 (20.2)
14 (8.6)
Length of Hospital stay in days
8.6 ± 11.1
9.3 ± 10.7
*multiple selection possible
values as numbers and percentage or in means ± standard deviation
SSI – surgical site infection; CDC – Clavien-Dindo Classification
Parameters associated with complications in immunosuppressed patients
In the cohort of immunosuppressed patients, only patients aged > 60 years, patients under therapy with more than two immunosuppressive agents and duration of immunosuppressive therapy beyond 48 months were associated with statistically significant increased rate of complications (p = 0.035, p = 0.003 and p = 0.018), see Table 3.
Table 3
Univariate analysis of impact of clinical variables associated with postoperative complications in immunosuppressed patients
variable
Patients with postoperative complications (%)
p value
Age
< 60 years
≥ 60 years
22 (22.7)
25 (37.9)
0.035
BMI
< 30 kg/m²
> 30 kg/m²
32 (28.3)
13 (28.3)
0.994
ASA
1/2
3/4
13 (24.5)
25 (30.5)
0.452
Comorbidities
COPD
Active nicotine consumption
Diabetes
Oncologic disease
7 (43.8)
5 (38.5)
19 (36.5)
12 (26.1)
0.165
0.424
0.137
0.627
EHS
Midline (M1-5)
Lateral (L1-4)
32 (29.4)
15 (27.8)
0.834
EHS
W1
W2
W3
2 (15.4)
18 (24.7)
27 (35.1)
0.20
Surgical approach
Open
Laparoscopic
25 (28.1)
22 (29.7)
0.818
Duration of surgery
< 120 min
> 120 min
17 (27.0)
30 (30.0)
0.679
Reason for immunosuppression
LT
KT
Other OT
IBD
Rheumatological
HIV
28 (28.6)
13 (35.1)
3 (20.0)
3 (50.0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0.365
Class of immunosuppressive agent
CNI
Steroids
MMF
Antibodies
Other
44 (29.7)
19 (33.9)
17 (27.4)
3 (37.5)
8 (29.6)
0.428
0.299
0.755
0.579
0.920
Number of immunosuppressive agents
≤ 2
> 2
23 (21.3)
24 (43.6)
0.003
Duration of immunosuppression
> 12 months
> 24 months
> 36 months
> 48 months
34 (28.1)
25 (31.3)
23 (35.9)
20 (40.8)
0.820
0.409
0.076
0.018
values as numbers and percentage
ASA - American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI - Body Mass Index; COPD - Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; CNI - calcineurine inhibitor; EHS - European Hernia Society; MMF - Mycophenolat-Mofetil; IBD – inflammatory bowel disease, LT – liver transplantation; KT – kidney transplantation; OT – organ transplantation
Multivariate analysis implementing these parameters verified statistical significant association for “age” (HR 0.45, 95%CI 0.21–0.97, p = 0.042), “number of immunosuppressive agents” (HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.19–0.89, p = 0.023) and “duration of immunosuppression” (HR 0.42, 95%CI 0.19–0.92,p = 0.03), see Table 4.
Table 4
Multivariate logistic regression of parameters associated with postoperative complications in immunosuppressed patients undergoing incision hernia repair
Variable
n
Hazard Ratio
95% CI
p value
lower
upper
Age (< 60* vs. ≥60 years)
144
0.446
0.205
0.972
0.042
Number of immunosuppressive agents
≤ 2* vs. >2
144
0.406
0.186
0.885
0.023
Duration of immunosuppression
≤ 48* vs. > 48 months
144
0.422
0.193
0.922
0.03
*Reference
Values as numbers
CI - Confidence interval
CART analysis identified the number of immunosuppressive agents with most relevance regarding postoperative complications. Patients´ age was most impactful in the subset of patients with up to two immunosuppressive agents and duration of immunosuppression in patients with more than two immunosuppressant, see Fig. 2b.
Parameters associated with hernia recurrence in immunosuppressed patients
Follow-up was available in 155 (95.1%) of patients and mean follow-up was 26.8 (± 20.0) months after hernia repair. During this period, 32 (19.6%) patients reported pain and/or bulging. All of these patients were eventually examined by a surgeon and recurrent hernia was observed in 23 (14.1%) patients, resulting in a specificity of PROs of 71.8%.
Univariate analysis revealed increased rate of recurrence in patients younger than 60 years and in midline herniae (p = 0.045 and p = 0.012, respectively). Further, laparoscopic approach and duration of operation > 120 min were found with statistically significant impact (p = 0.036 and p = 0.023, respectively). A statistically significant, twofold increase of recurrent herniae was observed in patients with more than two immunosuppressive agents (p = 0.049). For details see Table 5.
Table 5
Univariate analysis on impact of clinical parameters on recurrence of hernia in immunosuppressed patients
Variable
Recurrence in Patients with immunosuppression
n = 163
p value
Age
< 60 years
≥ 60 years
18 (19.6)
5 (7.9)
0.045
BMI
< 30 kg/m²
> 30 kg/m²
15 (14.2)
8 (17.8)
0.571
ASA
1/2
3/4
9 (17.6)
11 (14.5)
0.630
Comorbidities
COPD
Active nicotine consumption
Diabetes
Oncologic disease
4 (25.0)
1 (7.7)
8 (15.7)
4 (9.3)
0.227
0.449
0.835
0.230
Recurrence after prior hernia reparation
4 (16.7)
0.813
EHS
Midline (M1-5)
Lateral (L1-4)
21 (19.6)
2 (4.2)
0.012
EHS
W1
W2
W3
0 (0)
9 (13.2)
14 (18.9)
0.185
Surgical approach
Open
Laparoscopic
8 (9.4)
15 (21.4)
0.036
Duration of surgery
< 120 min
> 120 min
4 (6.7)
19 (20.0)
0.023
Reason for Immunosuppression
LT
KT
Other OT
IBD
Rheumatological
HIV
17 (18.3)
2 (5.9)
4 (26.7)
0 (0.0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0.224
Class of Immunosuppressive Agent
CNI
Steroids
MMF
Antibodies
Other
23 (16.4)
8 (15.1)
9 (15.5)
0 (0)
6 (24.0)
0.089
0.949
0.854
0.225
0.159
Number of Immunosuppressive Agents
≤ 2
> 2
11 (10.8)
12 (22.6)
0.049
Duration of Immunosuppression
> 12 months
> 24 months
> 36 months
> 48 months
5 (23.8)
10 (16.7)
11 (14.9)
14 (15.7)
0.200
0.566
0.954
0.643
values as numbers and percentage
ASA - American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI - Body Mass Index; COPD - Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; CNI - calcineurine inhibitor; EHS - European Hernia Society; MMF - Mycophenolat-Mofetil; IBD – inflammatory bowel disease, LT – liver transplantation; KT – kidney transplantation; OT – organ transplantation
Outcome after ventral incisional hernia repair after propensity score matching
After propensity score matching using eight clinical variables, n = 113 patients with ongoing immunosuppression (group IS) were compared to n = 113 patients without (group nIS), see Fig. 1; Table 6. Overall complications did not differ between groups (n = 31/27.4% vs. n = 31/27.4%; p = 0.88). Surgical complications were significantly more frequent in the control group (nIS; n = 24/21.2% vs. IS; n = 15 (13.3%), p = 0.02). Conversely, increased renal complications were observed in the IS group (IS; n = 8/7.1% vs. nIS; n = 2/1.8%, p = 0.05). see Table 7. All patients with renal complications had undergone organ transplantation (liver transplantation: n = 4, kidney transplantation: n = 2, combined kidney/pancreas transplantation: n = 2).
Table 6
Group characteristics and univariate analysis after propensity score matching
Immunosuppression
(Group IS)
n = 113
No Immunosuppression
(Group nIS)
n = 113
p-value
Age* in years;
57.1 ± 10.3
56.0 ± 13.7
0.49
BMI* in kg/m2,
26.6 ± 7.3
26.7 ± 10.4
0.89
ASA*
0.42
< 3
≥ 3
71 (62.8)
42 (37.2)
65 (57.5)
48 (42.5)
COPD
12 (8.0)
9 (10.6)
0.49
Diabetes*
32 (28.3)
25 (22.1)
0.28
Active nicotine consumption*
11 (9.7)
11 (9.7)
1.0
Oncologic disease
34 (30.1)
36 (31.9)
0.77
Reason for IS
101 (89.4)
-
-
Solid OT
LT
KT
Other
IBD
Rheumatological
HIV
66 (58.4)
25 (22.1)
10 (8.8)
4 (3.5)
5 (4.4)
3 (2.7)
Recurrent Hernia*
17 (15.0)
17 (15.0)
1.000
Hernia Size in cm
Length
Width
10.9 ± 7.5
9.8 ± 6.2
9.5 ± 5.6
9.7 ± 6.3
0.13
0.90
EHS*
0.64
Midline (M1-5)
Lateral (L1-4)
84 (74.3)
29 (25.7)
87 (77.0)
26 (23.0)
EHS*
W1
W2
W3
8 (7.1)
51 (45.1)
54 (47.8)
9 (8.0)
51 (45.1)
53 (46.9)
0.97
Surgical approach
Open
Laparoscopic
60 (53.1)
53 (46.9)
61 (54.0)
52 (46.0)
0.89
Type of Repair
Onlay
Sublay
IPOM
Other
4 (3.5)
46 (40.7)
60 (53.1)
3 (2.7)
7 (6.2)
42 (37.2)
56 (49.6)
8 (7.0)
0.59
Duration of surgery in minutes
149.9 ± 65.8
163.3 ± 105.5
0.25
*variable implemented in propensity score matching
values as numbers and percentage or in means ± standard deviation
ASA - American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI - Body Mass Index; COPD - Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; CNI - calcineurine inhibitor; EHS - European Hernia Society; MMF - Mycophenolat-Mofetil; IBD – inflammatory bowel disease, LT – liver transplantation; KT – kidney transplantation; OT – organ transplantation
Table 7
Comparison of early postoperative outcome in patients with and without immunosuppression after propensity score matching
Immunosuppression
(Group IS)
n = 113
No Immunosuppression
(Group nIS)
n = 113
p value
Patients with postoperative complications
31 (27.4)
31 (27.4)
0.88
Patients with postoperative surgical complication
15 (13.3)
24 (21.2)
0.02
Typ of complications*
SSI
Seroma
Bleeding/hematoma
Paralytic Ileus
Renal
Cardiopulmonary
Other
5 (4.4)
9 (8.0)
1 (0.9)
0 (0.0)
8 (7.1)
5 (4.4)
21 (18.6)
9 (8.0)
9 (8.0)
1 (0.9)
3 (2.7)
2 (1.8)
7 (6.2)
17 (15.0)
0.27
0.27
1.0
0.08
0.05
0.55
0.7
CDC Grade of complication
≤IIIa
≥IIIb
20 (17.7)
12 (10.6)
23 (20.3)
8 (7.1)
0.32
Length of Hospital stay in days
9.7 ± 11.8
8.6 ± 10.4
0.46
*multiple selection possible
Values as numbers and percentage or in means ± standard deviation
SSI – surgical site infection; CDC – Clavien-Dindo Classification
Discussion
This retrospective study aimed to investigate safety and long-term outcome of mesh-implantation for incisional hernia repair in immunosuppressed patients.
Variables associated with occurrence of postoperative complications in the overall cohort were common clinical parameters such as age and comorbidities (COPD, diabetes, nicotine consumption) [30‐32]. However, in this cohort, BMI was not associated with postoperative complications. Length of surgery over 120 min and EHS width showed statistically significant impact on occurrence of postoperative complication, as has been reported in a recent meta-analysis and a large cohort study, respectively [27, 33]. In multivariate analysis of these parameters, age, COPD and duration of surgery showed statistical significance. A statistical impact of immunosuppression on postoperative complications was only observed in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis.
We applied CART analysis to stratify variables for impact on postoperative complications. Interestingly, length of operation was associated with highest impact on occurrence of complications and here, longer operations in combination with preexisting pulmonary disease was relevant. This reflects routine clinical experience in surgery; anesthesia duration exceeding 2.5 h has been associated with a three-fold risk of postoperative pulmonary complications [34].
After propensity score matching, overall complications did not differ between patients with and without immunosuppression. This observation comes in line with recent cohort reports, but opposing findings also exist [19, 20, 35].
In this study, immunosuppressive therapy increased the risk of specific postoperative complications e.g. renal dysfunction when compared to the non-immunocompromised cohort. All of these patients had received organ transplantation and this collective is known to suffer of various comorbidities while at the same time those comorbidities are risk factors for complications after abdominal and other surgical interventions [9, 36‐38]. In the cohort of immunosuppressed patients, elderly patients were associated with an elevated risk for complications after operation. However, no other comorbidity reached statistically significant impact, which might be explained due to relatively low numbers. Number of immunosuppressive agents above two and duration of immunosuppressive status over four years revealed negative impact within this cohort and maintained statistical relevance in multivariate analysis. Correspondingly, CART analysis identified the amount of immunosuppressants as most relevant factor for postoperative complications. As mentioned before, effects of immunosuppression on surgical procedures are widely known as well as the immunosuppressive effect of surgery itself [16, 18, 39‐41]. We did not find a previous study to report on the association of the number of administered immunosuppressants and complications, however, we did not assess dosage or trough levels. Recommendations of perioperative handling of immunotherapy remain inconclusive with only poor data and recent guidelines of the World Health Organization for SSI prevention therefore recommend no alteration in the perioperative setting [42]. Our data certainly support this statement.
However, as more than two simultaneously administered immunosuppressants resulted in a significant increase in postoperative complications, a potential benefit might be achieved for a subset of patients when the number of immunosuppressants is reduced in the perioperative setting rather than a dosage reduction. Of interest, combination of immunosuppressants have been observed to amplify their effects: caIcineurin inhibitors might increase immunosuppressive function of steroids and triple immunosuppressive therapy has been reported to affect cytokine profiles beyond the individual drug´s capacity [43, 44].
Still, the choice of substances that might be prone to be paused remains to be evaluated. In LT patients, the phenomenon of tolerance is known, potentially enabling the strategy of pausing the immunosuppression in the perioperative, elective setting. Especially elderly patients might benefit from this [45‐47].
Cumulative mesh-infection rate after hernia repair is reported to be up to 8% and recurrence rate of hernia after using mesh is still up to 30% after 10 years [11, 48]. Recurrence rate in immunosuppressed patients in this study was 14% with a mean follow up of two years. Evaluation of hernia recurrence was therefore limited. Still, our data suggest no detriment for immunosuppressed patients, as estimated recurrence rates of more than 12% have been reported after 2 years [7]. Younger patients were associated with higher rate of recurrence in the group of immunocompromised patients, which is contradictory to other reports [49‐51]. However, a study reporting on on a US database with over 30,000 patients found no age-dependency in ventral hernia repair using mesh and a study based on the Herniamed-Registry found less recurrences in patients > 80 years old [35, 52].
In this study, a laparoscopic approach for incisional hernia repair was associated with increased hernia recurrence in the cohort of immunosuppressed patients. In general, laparoscopic hernia repair has been shown to be equal to open approaches regarding postoperative outcome with benefits in pain, mobilization and length of hospital stay. However, it is mainly recommended in hernia size up to 10 cm maximum [11, 53, 54]. In our cohort, most immunosuppressed patients presented with herniae > 10 cm combined with higher classification in ASA-grading. Thus, the surgical approach might have been influenced by overall morbidity towards minimal-invasive technique, but with the concomitant elevated risk of hernia recurrence. The inferior outcome after laparoscopic hernia repair in our cohort therefore might reflect the complexity of patients´ medical history and should not be generalized.
Of importance, duration of surgery exceeding 120 min and intake of more than two immunosuppressant at time of surgery were associated with increased recurrence of hernia, highlighting the importance of these aspects in this cohort.
Certain limitations of this study have to be addressed. Given its retrospective, single-center character, multiple potential bias might occur. In the setting of a retrospective, exploratory analysis in a large cohort, some findings might be sole statistical phenomena and clinical experience and day-to-day care might not reflect these observation. However, propensity score matching allowed for correction between groups. Thus, certain findings from the overall should be interpreted with the findings from the propensity score matching.
As classification of “immunosuppressed” remains vague due to lack of a coherent definition, some aspects may have been overlooked. Of note, diabetes or an underlying oncological disease/history of disease is sometimes considered as immunosuppressive [55, 56]. Further, we did not assess dosage or serum levels of immunosuppression or reason for combination of immunosuppressants. While increased dosage might hamper e.g. wound healing, most immunosuppressants in this context are trough-level based with focus on rejection prophylaxis in an individualized manner. The clinical concepts or reasonings for multi-drug combinations were not assessed in this analysis.
CART was applied in this analysis. While it is mainly used in analysis of decision-making, it has been used to define and compare categorical variables for their proportion towards a certain outcome variable before [57, 58].
Conclusion
In this study, incisional hernia repair using mesh proved safe in immunosuppressed patients without increased adverse surgical outcome, especially without increase of SSI. Number of immunosuppressants administered and a longer history of immunosuppression however may increase overall postoperative complications in a subset of patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematical evaluation of safety of mesh implantation for hernia surgery in immunosuppressed patients with important insight into its feasibility. Still, optimal handling and risks of immunosuppression in surgery and especially hernia repair using allogenic material remain obscure and require further research, preferably in randomized controlled trials.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Unsere Produktempfehlungen
Die Chirurgie + umfangreiches Online-Angebot
Print-Titel
Das Abo mit mehr Tiefe
Mit der Zeitschrift Die Chirurgie erhalten Sie zusätzlich Online-Zugriff auf weitere 43 chirurgische Fachzeitschriften, CME-Fortbildungen, Webinare, Vorbereitungskursen zur Facharztprüfung und die digitale Enzyklopädie e.Medpedia.
Mit e.Med Chirurgie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Chirurgie, den Premium-Inhalten der chirurgischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten chirurgischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.
Safety and outcome of elective synthetic mesh repair for incisional ventral hernias in immunosuppressed patients – a retrospective propensity-score-matched analysis
Verfasst von
Ramin Raul Ossami Saidy
Yvonne May Callister
Luca Dittrich
Dennis Eurich
Christian Denecke
Johann Pratschke
Jonas Raakow
Fink C, Baumann P, Wente MN, Knebel P, Bruckner T, Ulrich A, Werner J, Büchler MW, Diener MK (2014) Incisional hernia rate 3 years after midline laparotomy. Br J Surg 101:51–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9364CrossRefPubMed
2.
Seiler CM, Bruckner T, Diener MK, Papyan A, Golcher H, Seidlmayer C, Franck A, Kieser M, Büchler MW, Knaebel HP (2009) Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541). Ann Surg 249:576–582. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ec6c8CrossRefPubMed
3.
Itatsu K, Yokoyama Y, Sugawara G, Kubota H, Tojima Y, Kurumiya Y, Kono H, Yamamoto H, Ando M, Nagino M (2014) Incidence of and risk factors for incisional hernia after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 101:1439–1447. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9600CrossRefPubMed
4.
Fischer JP, Basta MN, Mirzabeigi MN, Bauder AR, Fox JP, Drebin JA, Serletti JM, Kovach SJ (2016) A risk model and Cost Analysis of Incisional Hernia after Elective, abdominal surgery based upon 12,373 cases: the case for targeted prophylactic intervention. Ann Surg 263:1010–1017. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000001394CrossRefPubMed
5.
Basta MN, Kozak GM, Broach RB, Messa CAt, Rhemtulla I, DeMatteo RP, Serletti JM, Fischer JP (2019) Can we predict Incisional Hernia? Development of a surgery-specific decision-support interface. Ann Surg 270:544–553. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000003472CrossRefPubMed
6.
Timmermans L, Deerenberg EB, Lamme B, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2014) Parastomal hernia is an independent risk factor for incisional hernia in patients with end colostomy. Surgery 155:178–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.06.014CrossRefPubMed
Rastegarpour A, Cheung M, Vardhan M, Ibrahim MM, Butler CE, Levinson H (2016) Surgical mesh for ventral incisional hernia repairs: understanding mesh design. Plast Surg (Oakv) 24:41–50. https://doi.org/10.4172/plastic-surgery.1000955CrossRefPubMed
9.
Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, Franz M, Hultman CS, Kilbridge JF, Rosen M, Silverman RP, Vargo D (2010) Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 148:544–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.01.008CrossRefPubMed
10.
Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, JN IJ, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343:392–398. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200008103430603CrossRefPubMed
Harpaz R, Dahl R, Dooling K (2016) The prevalence of immunocompromised adults: United States, 2013. Open Forum Infect Dis 3. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofw172.1141
Ramos A, Asensio A, Muñez E, Torre-Cisneros J, Montejo M, Aguado JM, Cofán F, Carratalá J, Len O, Cisneros JM (2008) Incisional surgical site infection in kidney transplantation. Urology 72:119–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.030CrossRefPubMed
Haskins IN, Krpata DM, Prabhu AS, Tastaldi L, Perez AJ, Tu C, Rosenblatt S, Poulose BK, Rosen MJ (2018) Immunosuppression is not a risk factor for 30-day wound events or additional 30-day morbidity or mortality after open ventral hernia repair: an analysis of the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative. Surgery 164:594–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.023CrossRefPubMed
20.
Lee LD, Stroux A, Nickisch D, Wröbel L, Aschenbrenner K, Weixler B, Kreis ME, Lauscher JC (2020) Operative outcome of hernia repair with synthetic mesh in immunocompromised patients. ANZ J Surg 90:2248–2253. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.16212CrossRefPubMed
21.
Woelfel I, Gupta A, Renshaw S, Poulose B (2022) Length of stay and surgical site complications are not increased after elective incisional hernia in patients with a history of solid organ transplantation. Surg Endosc 36:2159–2168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08458-2CrossRefPubMed
22.
Mac Curtain BM, Qian W, Temperley HC, O’Mahony A, Ng ZQ, He B (2024) Incisional hernias post renal transplant: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 28:301–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02879-9CrossRefPubMed
23.
Baucom RB, Ousley J, Feurer ID, Beveridge GB, Pierce RA, Holzman MD, Sharp KW, Poulose BK (2016) Patient reported outcomes after incisional hernia repair-establishing the ventral hernia recurrence inventory. Am J Surg 212:81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.06.007CrossRefPubMed
Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Chelala E, Dietz UA, Eker HH, El Nakadi I, Hauters P et al (2009) Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 13:407–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0518-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Fischer JP, Wink JD, Nelson JA, Kovach SJ (2014) Among 1,706 cases of abdominal wall reconstruction, what factors influence the occurrence of major operative complications? Surgery 155:311–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.08.014CrossRefPubMed
32.
Gupta H, Ramanan B, Gupta PK, Fang X, Polich A, Modrykamien A, Schuller D, Morrow LE (2013) Impact of COPD on postoperative outcomes: results from a national database. Chest 143:1599–1606. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.12-1499CrossRefPubMed
33.
Kroese LF, Kleinrensink GJ, Lange JF, Gillion JF (2018) External validation of the European Hernia Society Classification for Postoperative Complications after Incisional Hernia Repair: a cohort study of 2,191 patients. J Am Coll Surg 226:223–229e221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.11.018CrossRefPubMed
34.
McAlister FA, Khan NA, Straus SE, Papaioakim M, Fisher BW, Majumdar SR, Gajic O, Daniel M, Tomlinson G (2003) Accuracy of the preoperative assessment in predicting pulmonary risk after nonthoracic surgery. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167:741–744. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200209-985BCCrossRefPubMed
Murphy MM, Ng SC, Simons JP, Csikesz NG, Shah SA, Tseng JF (2010) Predictors of major complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgeon, hospital, or patient? J Am Coll Surg 211:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.050CrossRefPubMed
Allegranzi B, Bischoff P, de Jonge S, Kubilay NZ, Zayed B, Gomes SM, Abbas M, Atema JJ, Gans S, van Rijen M et al (2016) New WHO recommendations on preoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective. Lancet Infect Dis 16:e276–e287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30398-XCrossRefPubMed
43.
Takeuchi H, Iwamoto H, Nakamura Y, Hirano T, Konno O, Kihara Y, Chiba N, Yokoyama T, Takano K, Toraishi T et al (2015) Synergistic effects of Calcineurin inhibitors and steroids on Steroid Sensitivity of Peripheral Blood mononuclear cells. Cell Med 7:51–57. https://doi.org/10.3727/215517914x681802CrossRefPubMed
44.
He Y, Luo Y, Lao X, Tan L, Sun E (2014) Experimental immunology cytokine signatures of human whole blood for monitoring immunosuppression. Centr Eur J Immunol 39:271–278. https://doi.org/10.5114/ceji.2014.45936CrossRef
45.
Levitsky J, Burrell BE, Kanaparthi S, Turka LA, Kurian S, Sanchez-Fueyo A, Lozano JJ, Demetris A, Lesniak A, Kirk AD et al (2020) Immunosuppression Withdrawal in Liver Transplant recipients on Sirolimus. Hepatology 72:569–583. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.31036CrossRefPubMed
46.
Eurich D, Schlickeiser S, Ossami Saidy RR, Uluk D, Rossner F, Postel M, Schoening W, Oellinger R, Lurje G, Pratschke J et al (2023) How to Estimate the Probability of Tolerance Long-Term in Liver Transplant recipients. J Clin Med 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206546
Arnold MR, Kao AM, Gbozah KK, Heniford BT, Augenstein VA (2018) Optimal management of mesh infection: evidence and treatment options. Int J Abdom Wall Hernia Surg 1:42–49. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_16_18CrossRef
Deerenberg EB, Henriksen NA, Antoniou GA, Antoniou SA, Bramer WM, Fischer JP, Fortelny RH, Gök H, Harris HW, Hope W et al (2022) Updated guideline for closure of abdominal wall incisions from the European and American Hernia societies. Br J Surg 109:1239–1250. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Bosanquet DC, Ansell J, Abdelrahman T, Cornish J, Harries R, Stimpson A, Davies L, Glasbey JCD, Frewer KA, Frewer NC et al (2015) Systematic review and Meta-regression of factors affecting midline Incisional Hernia Rates: analysis of 14 618 patients. PLoS ONE 10:e0138745. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138745CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
Mehdizadeh-Shrifi A, Soll C, Vuille-Dit-Bille RN, Köckerling F, Adolf D, Staerkle RF (2023) Outcome of incisional hernia repair in patients 80 years and older: results from the Herniamed-Registry. Hernia 27:1273–1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02866-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
53.
van Silfhout L, Leenders LAM, Heisterkamp J, Ibelings MS (2021) Recurrent incisional hernia repair: surgical outcomes in correlation with body-mass index. Hernia 25:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02320-5CrossRefPubMed
54.
Henriksen NA, Friis-Andersen H, Jorgensen LN, Helgstrand F, Database o.b.o.t.D.H (2021) Open versus laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: nationwide database study. BJS Open 5. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa010
Spencer SP, Power N, Reznek RH (2009) Multidetector Computed Tomography of the Acute Abdomen in the immunocompromised host: a Pictorial Review. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 38:145–155. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2007.11.001CrossRefPubMed
57.
Zimmerman RK, Balasubramani GK, Nowalk MP, Eng H, Urbanski L, Jackson ML, Jackson LA, McLean HQ, Belongia EA, Monto AS et al (2016) Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis to predict influenza in primary care patients. BMC Infect Dis 16:503. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1839-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
58.
Lemon SC, Roy J, Clark MA, Friedmann PD, Rakowski W (2003) Classification and regression tree analysis in public health: methodological review and comparison with logistic regression. Ann Behav Med 26:172–181. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2603_02CrossRefPubMed
Ist eine Speichelgangsblockade und die damit verbundene Sialadenitis nicht durch Steine bedingt, wird oftmals versucht, die Symptomatik zu lindern, indem man den Gang mechanisch weitet. Ein aktuelles Review kann den Eingriff als chancenreiches Verfahren bestätigen und deckt gleichzeitig Schwächen auf.
Mehr als eine Million Menschen in Deutschland leiden unter Hallux valgus – eine Fehlstellung des Großzehs, die je nach Schweregrad und Symptomen behandelt wird. Welche neuen Empfehlungen die aktualisierte S2e-Leitlinie bietet, erklärt der Orthopäde Prof. Sebastian Baumbach im MedTalk Leitlinie KOMPAKT der Zeitschrift Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie.
Ein chirurgischer Eingriff kann für Patienten mit primärem Hyperparathyreoidismus gegenüber dem konservativen Management metabolisch von Vorteil sein. Denn wie eine Studie zeigt, senkt die Operation das Diabetesrisiko.