Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2019

06.09.2019 | Colorectal Cancer

Safety of Single-Site Laparoscopic Surgery Requiring Perioperative Heparinization in Colorectal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

verfasst von: Kazuya Iwamoto, MD, Hidekazu Takahashi, MD, Makoto Fujii, MD, Naotsugu Haraguchi, MD, Taishi Hata, MD, Chu Matsuda, MD, Hirofumi Yamamoto, MD, Tsunekazu Mizushima, MD, Masaki Mori, MD, Doki Yuichiro, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 13/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

We assessed the feasibility and safety of single-site laparoscopic surgery for patients with colorectal cancer who required perioperative heparinization.

Methods

This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 390 patients who underwent single-site laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer from January 2010 to December 2016. Antithrombotic drugs were stopped preoperatively and heparin was administered according to the operative risk of each patient, based on consultation with the cardiologist physician or neurosurgeon. Propensity score modeling was utilized to adjust for baseline characteristics.

Results

Of 390 patients, 29 were treated with standard bridging intravenous heparin therapy. Propensity matching identified 119 patients: 22 patients in the heparinization group and 97 in the control group. The matched groups were not significantly different in operation times, bleeding volumes, or conversion rate. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 17.9 days in the heparinization group and 9.5 days in the control group (p = 0.034). Postoperative bleeding was observed in 4 patients (18.2%) in the heparinization group and 11 patients (11.4%) in the control group (p = 0.646), while other complications were similar in the two study groups (p = 0.502). Of these other complications, thromboembolic events were observed in two patients in the heparinization group and one patient in the control group.

Conclusions

We found that single-site laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer with heparinization was feasible and safe. Heparinization did not increase the risk of postoperative bleeding complications, but postoperative hospital stay was prolonged.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Colvin H, Mizushima T, Eguchi H, et al. Gastroenterological surgery in Japan: the past, the present and the future. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2017;1:5–10.CrossRef Colvin H, Mizushima T, Eguchi H, et al. Gastroenterological surgery in Japan: the past, the present and the future. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2017;1:5–10.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Takemasa I, Doki Y, Mori M, et al. Feasibility of single-site laparoscopic colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: a prospective case-control comparison. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1110–8.CrossRef Takemasa I, Doki Y, Mori M, et al. Feasibility of single-site laparoscopic colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: a prospective case-control comparison. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1110–8.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hiraki M, Takemasa I, Mori M, et al. Evaluation of invasiveness in single-site laparoscopic colectomy, using “the PainVision™ system” for quantitative analysis of pain sensation. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:3216–23.CrossRef Hiraki M, Takemasa I, Mori M, et al. Evaluation of invasiveness in single-site laparoscopic colectomy, using “the PainVision™ system” for quantitative analysis of pain sensation. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:3216–23.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Miyo M, Takemasa I, Mori M, et al. Long-term outcomes of single-site laparoscopic colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: comparison with conventional multiport laparoscopic colectomy using propensity score matching. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:664–73.CrossRef Miyo M, Takemasa I, Mori M, et al. Long-term outcomes of single-site laparoscopic colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: comparison with conventional multiport laparoscopic colectomy using propensity score matching. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:664–73.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishizawa Y, Hata T, Mori M, et al. Clinical benefits of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for postoperative delirium in elderly colon cancer patients. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:1434–40.CrossRef Nishizawa Y, Hata T, Mori M, et al. Clinical benefits of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for postoperative delirium in elderly colon cancer patients. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:1434–40.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, et al. Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:272–8.CrossRef West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, et al. Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:272–8.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE, et al. Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:161–8.CrossRef Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE, et al. Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:161–8.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation—technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:354–64.CrossRef Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation—technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:354–64.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi H, Takemasa I, Mori M, et al. The single-center experience with the standardization of single-site laparoscopic colectomy for right-sided colon cancer. Surg Today. 2017;47:966–72.CrossRef Takahashi H, Takemasa I, Mori M, et al. The single-center experience with the standardization of single-site laparoscopic colectomy for right-sided colon cancer. Surg Today. 2017;47:966–72.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Varkarakis IM, Rais-Bahrami S, Allaf ME, et al. Laparoscopic renal-adrenal surgery in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy. J Urol. 2005;174:1020–3.CrossRef Varkarakis IM, Rais-Bahrami S, Allaf ME, et al. Laparoscopic renal-adrenal surgery in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy. J Urol. 2005;174:1020–3.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ercan M, Bostanci EB, Ozer I, et al. Postoperative hemorrhagic complications after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving long-term anticoagulant therapy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010;395:247–53.CrossRef Ercan M, Bostanci EB, Ozer I, et al. Postoperative hemorrhagic complications after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving long-term anticoagulant therapy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010;395:247–53.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mita K, Ito H, Murabayashi R, et al. Postoperative bleeding complications after gastric cancer surgery in patients receiving anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet agents. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3745–52.CrossRef Mita K, Ito H, Murabayashi R, et al. Postoperative bleeding complications after gastric cancer surgery in patients receiving anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet agents. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3745–52.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujikawa T, Tanaka A, Abe T, et al. Effect of antiplatelet therapy on patients undergoing gastroenterological surgery: thromboembolic risks versus bleeding risks during its perioperative withdrawal. World J Surg. 2015;39:139–49.CrossRef Fujikawa T, Tanaka A, Abe T, et al. Effect of antiplatelet therapy on patients undergoing gastroenterological surgery: thromboembolic risks versus bleeding risks during its perioperative withdrawal. World J Surg. 2015;39:139–49.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Wakasugi M, Tei M, Suzuki Y, et al. Single-incision totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair is feasible and safe in patients on antithrombotic therapy: a single-center experience of 92 procedures. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2017;10:301–7.CrossRef Wakasugi M, Tei M, Suzuki Y, et al. Single-incision totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair is feasible and safe in patients on antithrombotic therapy: a single-center experience of 92 procedures. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2017;10:301–7.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamoto S, Inomata M, Katayama H, et al. Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Ann Surg. 2014;260:23–30.CrossRef Yamamoto S, Inomata M, Katayama H, et al. Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Ann Surg. 2014;260:23–30.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurth T, Walker AM, Glynn RJ, et al. Results of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effect. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:262–70.CrossRef Kurth T, Walker AM, Glynn RJ, et al. Results of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effect. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:262–70.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cepeda MS, Boston R, Farrar JT, et al. Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:280–7CrossRef Cepeda MS, Boston R, Farrar JT, et al. Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:280–7CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Leite W. Practical propensity score methods using R. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing; 2017 Leite W. Practical propensity score methods using R. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing; 2017
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang C, Gao Z, Shen K, et al. Safety, quality and effect of complete mesocolic excision vs non-complete mesocolic excision in patients with colon cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19:962–72 CrossRef Wang C, Gao Z, Shen K, et al. Safety, quality and effect of complete mesocolic excision vs non-complete mesocolic excision in patients with colon cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19:962–72 CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Safety of Single-Site Laparoscopic Surgery Requiring Perioperative Heparinization in Colorectal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
verfasst von
Kazuya Iwamoto, MD
Hidekazu Takahashi, MD
Makoto Fujii, MD
Naotsugu Haraguchi, MD
Taishi Hata, MD
Chu Matsuda, MD
Hirofumi Yamamoto, MD
Tsunekazu Mizushima, MD
Masaki Mori, MD
Doki Yuichiro, MD
Publikationsdatum
06.09.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 13/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07794-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 13/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.