Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2018

07.02.2018 | Thoracic Oncology

Salvage Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: How to Improve Outcomes?

verfasst von: Charlotte Cohen, MD, Williams Tessier, MD, Caroline Gronnier, MD, PhD, Florence Renaud, MD, Arnaud Pasquer, MD, Jérémie Théreaux, MD, Johan Gagnière, MD, Bernard Meunier, MD, Denis Collet, MD, PhD, Guillaume Piessen, MD, PhD, Christophe Mariette, MD, PhD, FREGAT (French Eso-Gastric Tumors working group) – FRENCH (Fédération de Recherche en Chirurgie) – AFC (Association Française de Chirurgie)

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Locoregional recurrence rates after definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC) are high. Salvage surgery (SALV) is considered the best treatment option in case of persistent or recurrent disease for operable patients, but SALV has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to identify factors linked to outcomes after SALV to better select candidates and to optimize perioperative care.

Study Design

We retrospectively analyzed data from 308 consecutive SALV patients from a large multicenter European cohort. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with in-hospital postoperative morbidity, anastomotic leakage (AL), and overall survival (OS).

Results

The in-hospital postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 8.4 and 34.7%, respectively. Squamous cell histology (p = 0.040) and radiation dose ≥ 55 Gy (p = 0.047) were independently associated with major morbidity. The AL rate was 12.7%, and cervical anastomosis was independently associated with AL (p = 0.002). OS at 5 years was 34.0%. Radiation dose ≥ 55 Gy (p = 0.003), occurrence of postoperative complications (p = 0.006), ypTNM stage 3 (p = 0.019), and positive surgical margins (p < 0.001) were linked to poor prognosis.

Conclusions

SALV is a valuable option for patients with persistent or recurrent disease after dCRT and offers long-term survival. Factors such as radiation dose and anastomosis location identified here will help to optimize outcomes after SALV, which may be considered a standard treatment in the EC therapeutic armamentarium.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:220–41.CrossRefPubMed Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:220–41.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mariette C, Piessen G, Briez N, et al. Oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: which therapeutic approach? Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:296–305.CrossRefPubMed Mariette C, Piessen G, Briez N, et al. Oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: which therapeutic approach? Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:296–305.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Stahl M, Stuschke M, Lehmann N, et al. Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2310–17.CrossRefPubMed Stahl M, Stuschke M, Lehmann N, et al. Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2310–17.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bedenne L, Michel P, Bouche O, et al. Randomized phase III trial in locally advanced esophageal cancer: radiochemotherapy followed by surgery versus radiochemotherapy alone (FFCD 9102). J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1160–8.CrossRefPubMed Bedenne L, Michel P, Bouche O, et al. Randomized phase III trial in locally advanced esophageal cancer: radiochemotherapy followed by surgery versus radiochemotherapy alone (FFCD 9102). J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1160–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Stahl M, Mariette C, Haustermans K, et al. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013;24 Suppl 6:vi52–56. Stahl M, Mariette C, Haustermans K, et al. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013;24 Suppl 6:vi52–56.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Thésaurus National de Cancerologie Digestive. Société nationale française de gastroenterologie. Chapitre 1: Cancer de l’oesophage. http://www.tncd.org. Accessed 21 Aug 21 2015. Thésaurus National de Cancerologie Digestive. Société nationale française de gastroenterologie. Chapitre 1: Cancer de l’oesophage. http://​www.​tncd.​org. Accessed 21 Aug 21 2015.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gardner-Thorpe J, Hardwick R, Dwerryhouse S. Salvage esophagectomy after local failure of definitive chemoradiotherapy. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1059–66.CrossRefPubMed Gardner-Thorpe J, Hardwick R, Dwerryhouse S. Salvage esophagectomy after local failure of definitive chemoradiotherapy. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1059–66.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rice TW. Esophageal nightmare: cancer recurrence after definitive chemoradiation. Is salvage esophagectomy possible? Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;25:83–6.CrossRefPubMed Rice TW. Esophageal nightmare: cancer recurrence after definitive chemoradiation. Is salvage esophagectomy possible? Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;25:83–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Piessen G, Messager M, Mirabel X, et al. Is there a role for surgery for patients with a complete clinical response after chemoradiation for esophageal cancer? An intention to-treat case-control study. Ann Surg. 2013;258:793–9.CrossRefPubMed Piessen G, Messager M, Mirabel X, et al. Is there a role for surgery for patients with a complete clinical response after chemoradiation for esophageal cancer? An intention to-treat case-control study. Ann Surg. 2013;258:793–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mariette C, Piessen G, Briez N, Triboulet JP. The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent. Ann Surg. 2008;247:365–71.CrossRefPubMed Mariette C, Piessen G, Briez N, Triboulet JP. The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent. Ann Surg. 2008;247:365–71.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Briez N, Piessen G, Bonnetain F, et al. Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled phase III trial-the MIRO trial. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:310.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Briez N, Piessen G, Bonnetain F, et al. Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled phase III trial-the MIRO trial. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:310.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010:103–115. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010:103–115.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Akutsu Y, Kono T, Uesato M, et al. Is outcome of salvage surgery for T4 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma really poor? World J Surg. 2014;38:2891–7.CrossRefPubMed Akutsu Y, Kono T, Uesato M, et al. Is outcome of salvage surgery for T4 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma really poor? World J Surg. 2014;38:2891–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Borghesi S, Hawkins M, Tait D. Esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Clin Oncol. 2008;20:221–6.CrossRef Borghesi S, Hawkins M, Tait D. Esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Clin Oncol. 2008;20:221–6.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoo C, Park JH, Yoon DH, et al. Salvage esophagectomy for locoregional failure after chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:1862–8.CrossRefPubMed Yoo C, Park JH, Yoon DH, et al. Salvage esophagectomy for locoregional failure after chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:1862–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chao YK, Chan SC, Chang HK, et al. Salvage surgery after failed chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:289–94.CrossRefPubMed Chao YK, Chan SC, Chang HK, et al. Salvage surgery after failed chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:289–94.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen Y, Lu Y, Wang Y, et al. Comparison of salvage chemoradiation versus salvage surgery for recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive radiochemotherapy or radiotherapy alone. Dis Esophagus. 2014;27:134–40.CrossRefPubMed Chen Y, Lu Y, Wang Y, et al. Comparison of salvage chemoradiation versus salvage surgery for recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive radiochemotherapy or radiotherapy alone. Dis Esophagus. 2014;27:134–40.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Journo XB, Michelet P, Dahan L, et al. Indications and outcome of salvage surgery for esophageal cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33:1117–23.CrossRefPubMed D’Journo XB, Michelet P, Dahan L, et al. Indications and outcome of salvage surgery for esophageal cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33:1117–23.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Farinella E, Safar A, Nasser H, et al. Salvage esophagectomy after failure of definitive radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2016; 114:833–7.CrossRefPubMed Farinella E, Safar A, Nasser H, et al. Salvage esophagectomy after failure of definitive radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2016; 114:833–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Marks J, Hofstetter W, Correa A, et al. Salvage esophagectomy after failed definitive chemoradiation for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:1126–33.CrossRefPubMed Marks J, Hofstetter W, Correa A, et al. Salvage esophagectomy after failed definitive chemoradiation for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:1126–33.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Miyata R, Yamasaki M, Takiguchi S, et al. Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2009;100:442–6.CrossRefPubMed Miyata R, Yamasaki M, Takiguchi S, et al. Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2009;100:442–6.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Morita M, Kumashiro R, Hisamatsu Y, et al. Clinical significance of salvage esophagectomy for remnant or recurrent cancer following definitive chemoradiotherapy. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:1284–91.CrossRefPubMed Morita M, Kumashiro R, Hisamatsu Y, et al. Clinical significance of salvage esophagectomy for remnant or recurrent cancer following definitive chemoradiotherapy. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:1284–91.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura T, Hayashi K, Ota M, et al. Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer. Am J Surg. 2004;188:261–6.CrossRefPubMed Nakamura T, Hayashi K, Ota M, et al. Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer. Am J Surg. 2004;188:261–6.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Oki E, Morita M, Kakeji Y, et al. Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2007;20:301–4.CrossRefPubMed Oki E, Morita M, Kakeji Y, et al. Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2007;20:301–4.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Piessen G, Briez N, Triboulet JP, Mariette C. Patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma nonresponder to radiochemotherapy: who will benefit from surgery? Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2036–44.CrossRefPubMed Piessen G, Briez N, Triboulet JP, Mariette C. Patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma nonresponder to radiochemotherapy: who will benefit from surgery? Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2036–44.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinto CE, de Souza Fernandes D, Moura Sà E, Mello ELR. Salvage esophagectomy after exclusive chemoradiotherapy: results at the Brazilian Cancer Institute. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22:682–6.CrossRefPubMed Pinto CE, de Souza Fernandes D, Moura Sà E, Mello ELR. Salvage esophagectomy after exclusive chemoradiotherapy: results at the Brazilian Cancer Institute. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22:682–6.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Schieman C, Wigle DA, Deschamps C, et al. Salvage resections for recurrent or persistent cancer of the proximal esophagus after chemoradiotherapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:459–63.CrossRefPubMed Schieman C, Wigle DA, Deschamps C, et al. Salvage resections for recurrent or persistent cancer of the proximal esophagus after chemoradiotherapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:459–63.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Smithers BM, Cullinan M, Thomas JM, et al. Outcomes from salvage esophagectomy post definitive chemoradiotherapy compared with resection following preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Dis Esophagus. 2007;20:471–7.CrossRefPubMed Smithers BM, Cullinan M, Thomas JM, et al. Outcomes from salvage esophagectomy post definitive chemoradiotherapy compared with resection following preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Dis Esophagus. 2007;20:471–7.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Sohda M, Kumakura Y, Saito H, et al. Clinical significance of salvage esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer and factors of influencing long-term survival. Anticancer Res. 2017;37:5045–51.PubMed Sohda M, Kumakura Y, Saito H, et al. Clinical significance of salvage esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer and factors of influencing long-term survival. Anticancer Res. 2017;37:5045–51.PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Swisher SG, Wynn P, Putnam JB, et al. Salvage esophagectomy for recurrent tumors after definitive chemotherapy and radiotherapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:175–83.CrossRefPubMed Swisher SG, Wynn P, Putnam JB, et al. Salvage esophagectomy for recurrent tumors after definitive chemotherapy and radiotherapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:175–83.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Tachimori Y, Kanamori N, Uemura N, et al. Salvage esophagectomy after high-dose chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:49–54.CrossRefPubMed Tachimori Y, Kanamori N, Uemura N, et al. Salvage esophagectomy after high-dose chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:49–54.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Takeuchi H, Saikawa Y, Oyama T, et al. Factors influencing the long-term survival in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy. World J Surg. 2010;34:277–84.CrossRefPubMed Takeuchi H, Saikawa Y, Oyama T, et al. Factors influencing the long-term survival in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy. World J Surg. 2010;34:277–84.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Tomimaru Y, Yano M, Takachi K, et al. Factors affecting the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing salvage surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy. J Surg Oncol. 2006;93:422–8.CrossRefPubMed Tomimaru Y, Yano M, Takachi K, et al. Factors affecting the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing salvage surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy. J Surg Oncol. 2006;93:422–8.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang S, Tachimori Y, Hokamura N, et al. Prognosis analysis of salvage esophagectomy following definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the importance of lymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:1805–11.CrossRefPubMed Wang S, Tachimori Y, Hokamura N, et al. Prognosis analysis of salvage esophagectomy following definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the importance of lymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:1805–11.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Watanabe M, Mine S, Nishida K et al. Salavage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: who really benefits from this high risk surgery? Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:4438–44.CrossRefPubMed Watanabe M, Mine S, Nishida K et al. Salavage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: who really benefits from this high risk surgery? Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:4438–44.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghaly G, Kamel M, Nasar A, et al. Locally advanced esophageal cancer: what becomes of 5-year survivors? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;151:726–32.CrossRefPubMed Ghaly G, Kamel M, Nasar A, et al. Locally advanced esophageal cancer: what becomes of 5-year survivors? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;151:726–32.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Gronnier C, Tréchot B, Duhamel A, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on postoperative outcomes after esophageal cancer resection: results of a European multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2014;260:764–70.CrossRefPubMed Gronnier C, Tréchot B, Duhamel A, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on postoperative outcomes after esophageal cancer resection: results of a European multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2014;260:764–70.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Minsky BD, Pajak TF, Ginsberg RJ, et al. INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) phase III trial of combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1167–74.CrossRefPubMed Minsky BD, Pajak TF, Ginsberg RJ, et al. INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) phase III trial of combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1167–74.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Girard E, Messager M, Sauvanet A, et al. Anastomotic leakage after gastrointestinal surgery: diagnosis and management. J Visc Surg. 2014;151:441–50.CrossRefPubMed Girard E, Messager M, Sauvanet A, et al. Anastomotic leakage after gastrointestinal surgery: diagnosis and management. J Visc Surg. 2014;151:441–50.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Markar S, Gronnier C, Duhamel A, et al. Salvage surgery after chemotherapy in the management of esophageal cancer: is it a viable therapeutic option? J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33:3866–73.CrossRefPubMed Markar S, Gronnier C, Duhamel A, et al. Salvage surgery after chemotherapy in the management of esophageal cancer: is it a viable therapeutic option? J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33:3866–73.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Vincent J, Mariette C, Pezet D, et al. Early surgery for failure after chemoradiation in operable thoracic oesophageal cancer. Analysis of the non-randomised patients in FFCD 9102 phase III trial: Chemoradiation followed by surgery versus chemoradiation alone. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:1683–93.CrossRefPubMed Vincent J, Mariette C, Pezet D, et al. Early surgery for failure after chemoradiation in operable thoracic oesophageal cancer. Analysis of the non-randomised patients in FFCD 9102 phase III trial: Chemoradiation followed by surgery versus chemoradiation alone. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:1683–93.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Salvage Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: How to Improve Outcomes?
verfasst von
Charlotte Cohen, MD
Williams Tessier, MD
Caroline Gronnier, MD, PhD
Florence Renaud, MD
Arnaud Pasquer, MD
Jérémie Théreaux, MD
Johan Gagnière, MD
Bernard Meunier, MD
Denis Collet, MD, PhD
Guillaume Piessen, MD, PhD
Christophe Mariette, MD, PhD
FREGAT (French Eso-Gastric Tumors working group) – FRENCH (Fédération de Recherche en Chirurgie) – AFC (Association Française de Chirurgie)
Publikationsdatum
07.02.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6365-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.