Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2020

27.03.2020 | Breast Oncology

Same-Day Discharge After Mastectomy: Breast Cancer Surgery in the Era of ERAS®

verfasst von: Kristen Jogerst, MD, MPH, Olivia Thomas, Heidi E. Kosiorek, MS, Richard Gray, MD, Patricia Cronin, MD, William Casey III, MD, Alanna Rebecca, MD, Ryan Craner, MD, Tonia Young-Fadok, MD, Barbara Pockaj, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 9/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) principles have been beneficial in major abdominal surgery. ERAS® was instituted in our breast surgery practice in 2017. The goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of outpatient mastectomies before and after ERAS®.

Methods

A retrospective review of all mastectomies between 1/2013 and 6/2018 was performed. Patients receiving autologous flap reconstruction were excluded. The institution-specific ERAS® pathway began on February 1, 2017. Patient characteristics, operative intervention, and postoperative outcomes were compared between pre-ERAS® and post-ERAS® groups and between outpatient and inpatient subgroups. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum and Chi-square analyses.

Results

A total of 487 patients were analyzed. Three hundred and forty-seven (71%) were prior to ERAS® and 140 after (29%). The two groups were not significantly different in background characteristics. Same-day discharge occurred in 58.6% of post-ERAS® patients versus 7.2% of pre-ERAS® patients (p < 0.001). Liposomal bupivacaine block was used for pain control more in the post-ERAS® group, 62.1% versus 6.1% (p < 0.001). Reconstruction type differed with 45.7% of the post-ERAS® group undergoing direct-to-implant reconstruction versus 34.3% of pre-ERAS® patients (p < 0.001) and with higher rates of submuscular implant and tissue expander placement in the pre-ERAS® versus post-ERAS® group (p < 0.001). Complications rates were lower in the post-ERAS® group versus pre-ERAS® group, 32.9% versus 52.4% (p < 0.001). The outpatient subgroup had higher rates of liposomal bupivacaine administration 74.4% versus 44.8% (p < 0.001). Baseline characteristics and complication rates did not differ between outpatient and admitted subgroups.

Conclusion

ERAS® principles can be applied to breast cancer patients and allow for outpatient mastectomies with no increase in postoperative morbidity.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Temple-Oberle C, Shea-Budgell MA, Tan M, et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in breast reconstruction: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(5):1056e–1071e.PubMedCrossRef Temple-Oberle C, Shea-Budgell MA, Tan M, et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in breast reconstruction: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(5):1056e–1071e.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2005;24(3):466–477.CrossRef Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2005;24(3):466–477.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248(2):189–198.PubMedCrossRef Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248(2):189–198.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002;183(6):630–641.PubMedCrossRef Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002;183(6):630–641.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Visioni A, Shah R, Gabriel E, Attwood K, Kukar M, Nurkin S. Enhanced recovery after surgery for noncolorectal surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis of major abdominal surgery. Ann Surg. 2018;267(1):57–65.PubMedCrossRef Visioni A, Shah R, Gabriel E, Attwood K, Kukar M, Nurkin S. Enhanced recovery after surgery for noncolorectal surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis of major abdominal surgery. Ann Surg. 2018;267(1):57–65.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L, Gemma M, Pecorelli N, Braga M. Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2014;38(6):1531–1541.PubMedCrossRef Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L, Gemma M, Pecorelli N, Braga M. Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2014;38(6):1531–1541.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(3):292–298.PubMedCrossRef Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(3):292–298.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M, Greim CA, Roewer N. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology. 1999;91(3):693–700.PubMedCrossRef Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M, Greim CA, Roewer N. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology. 1999;91(3):693–700.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Apfel CC, Heidrich FM, Jukar-Rao S, et al. Evidence-based analysis of risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(5):742–753.PubMedCrossRef Apfel CC, Heidrich FM, Jukar-Rao S, et al. Evidence-based analysis of risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(5):742–753.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dumestre DO, Webb CE, Temple-Oberle C. Improved recovery experience achieved for women undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction using an enhanced recovery after surgery model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(3):550–559.PubMedCrossRef Dumestre DO, Webb CE, Temple-Oberle C. Improved recovery experience achieved for women undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction using an enhanced recovery after surgery model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(3):550–559.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Offodile AC, 2nd, Gu C, Boukovalas S, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in breast reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;173(1):65–77.PubMedCrossRef Offodile AC, 2nd, Gu C, Boukovalas S, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in breast reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;173(1):65–77.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rojas KE, Manasseh DM, Flom PL, et al. A pilot study of a breast surgery Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol to eliminate narcotic prescription at discharge. Breast Cancer Res Treatment. 2018;171(3):621–626.PubMedCrossRef Rojas KE, Manasseh DM, Flom PL, et al. A pilot study of a breast surgery Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol to eliminate narcotic prescription at discharge. Breast Cancer Res Treatment. 2018;171(3):621–626.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheaffer WW, Day RW, Harold KL, et al. Decreasing length of stay in bariatric surgery: the power of suggestion. Am J Surg. 2018;215(3):452–455.PubMedCrossRef Sheaffer WW, Day RW, Harold KL, et al. Decreasing length of stay in bariatric surgery: the power of suggestion. Am J Surg. 2018;215(3):452–455.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Zychowicz A, Pisarska M, Laskawska A, et al. Patients’ opinions on enhanced recovery after surgery perioperative care principles: a questionnaire study. Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne. 2019;14(1):27–37. Zychowicz A, Pisarska M, Laskawska A, et al. Patients’ opinions on enhanced recovery after surgery perioperative care principles: a questionnaire study. Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne. 2019;14(1):27–37.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Brummett CM, Waljee JF, Goesling J, et al. New persistent opioid use after minor and major surgical procedures in US adults. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(6):e170504. Brummett CM, Waljee JF, Goesling J, et al. New persistent opioid use after minor and major surgical procedures in US adults. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(6):e170504.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiu C, Aleshi P, Esserman LJ, et al. Improved analgesia and reduced post-operative nausea and vomiting after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for total mastectomy. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018;18(1):41. Chiu C, Aleshi P, Esserman LJ, et al. Improved analgesia and reduced post-operative nausea and vomiting after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for total mastectomy. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018;18(1):41.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Simpson JC, Bao X, Agarwala A. Pain management in Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019;32(2):121–128.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Simpson JC, Bao X, Agarwala A. Pain management in Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019;32(2):121–128.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu D, Onel E, Singla N, Kramer WG, Hadzic A. Pharmacokinetic profile of liposome bupivacaine injection following a single administration at the surgical site. Clin Drug Investig. 2013;33(2):109–115.PubMedCrossRef Hu D, Onel E, Singla N, Kramer WG, Hadzic A. Pharmacokinetic profile of liposome bupivacaine injection following a single administration at the surgical site. Clin Drug Investig. 2013;33(2):109–115.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bragg D, El-Sharkawy AM, Psaltis E, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Lobo DN. Postoperative ileus: recent developments in pathophysiology and management. Clin Nutr (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2015;34(3):367–376.CrossRef Bragg D, El-Sharkawy AM, Psaltis E, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Lobo DN. Postoperative ileus: recent developments in pathophysiology and management. Clin Nutr (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2015;34(3):367–376.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Seth AK, Hirsch EM, Kim JY, et al. Hematoma after mastectomy with immediate reconstruction: an analysis of risk factors in 883 patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71(1):20–23.PubMedCrossRef Seth AK, Hirsch EM, Kim JY, et al. Hematoma after mastectomy with immediate reconstruction: an analysis of risk factors in 883 patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71(1):20–23.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Nickel KB, Fox IK, Margenthaler JA, Wallace AE, Fraser VJ, Olsen MA. Effect of noninfectious wound complications after mastectomy on subsequent surgical procedures and early implant loss. J Am College Surg. 2016;222(5):844–852.e841.CrossRef Nickel KB, Fox IK, Margenthaler JA, Wallace AE, Fraser VJ, Olsen MA. Effect of noninfectious wound complications after mastectomy on subsequent surgical procedures and early implant loss. J Am College Surg. 2016;222(5):844–852.e841.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lovely JK, Nehring SA, Boughey JC, et al. Balancing venous thromboembolism and hematoma after breast surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(10):3230–3235.PubMedCrossRef Lovely JK, Nehring SA, Boughey JC, et al. Balancing venous thromboembolism and hematoma after breast surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(10):3230–3235.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B, Medford-Davis L, Hertl C, Austen Jr WG. Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(6):1170–1178.PubMedCrossRef Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B, Medford-Davis L, Hertl C, Austen Jr WG. Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(6):1170–1178.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Barton MB, West CN, Liu I-LA, et al. Complications following bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. JNCI Monogr. 2005;2005(35):61–66. Barton MB, West CN, Liu I-LA, et al. Complications following bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. JNCI Monogr. 2005;2005(35):61–66.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Newman RM, Traverso LW. Cost-effective minimally invasive surgery: what procedures make sense? World J Surg. 1999;23(4):415–421.PubMedCrossRef Newman RM, Traverso LW. Cost-effective minimally invasive surgery: what procedures make sense? World J Surg. 1999;23(4):415–421.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurusamy K, Junnarkar S, Farouk M, Davidson B. Meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of day‐case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2008;95(2):161-168.PubMedCrossRef Gurusamy K, Junnarkar S, Farouk M, Davidson B. Meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of day‐case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2008;95(2):161-168.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Frazee RC, Abernathy SW, Davis M, et al. Outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy should be the standard of care for uncomplicated appendicitis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(1):79–83.PubMedCrossRef Frazee RC, Abernathy SW, Davis M, et al. Outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy should be the standard of care for uncomplicated appendicitis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(1):79–83.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Same-Day Discharge After Mastectomy: Breast Cancer Surgery in the Era of ERAS®
verfasst von
Kristen Jogerst, MD, MPH
Olivia Thomas
Heidi E. Kosiorek, MS
Richard Gray, MD
Patricia Cronin, MD
William Casey III, MD
Alanna Rebecca, MD
Ryan Craner, MD
Tonia Young-Fadok, MD
Barbara Pockaj, MD
Publikationsdatum
27.03.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 9/2020
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08386-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2020

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.