Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 3/2019

23.10.2018 | Original Article

SBRT planning for spinal metastasis: indications from a large multicentric study

verfasst von: Marco Esposito, PhD, Laura Masi, Margherita Zani, Raffaela Doro, David Fedele, Cristina Garibaldi, Stefania Clemente, Christian Fiandra, Francesca Romana Giglioli, Carmelo Marino, Laura Orsingher, Serenella Russo, Michele Stasi, Lidia Strigari, Elena Villaggi, Pietro Mancosu

Erschienen in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The dosimetric variability in spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) planning was investigated in a large number of centres to identify crowd knowledge-based solutions.

Methods

Two spinal cases were planned by 48 planners (38 centres). The required prescription dose (PD) was 3 × 10 Gy and the planning target volume (PTV) coverage request was: VPD > 90% (minimum request: VPD > 80%). The dose constraints were: planning risk volume (PRV) spinal cord: V18Gy < 0.35 cm3, V21.9 Gy < 0.03 cm3; oesophagus: V17.7 Gy < 5 cm3, V25.2 Gy < 0.03 cm3. Planners who did not fulfil the protocol requirements were asked to re-optimize the plans, using the results of planners with the same technology. Statistical analysis was performed to assess correlations between dosimetric results and planning parameters. A quality index (QI) was defined for scoring plans.

Results

In all, 12.5% of plans did not meet the protocol requirements. After re-optimization, 98% of plans fulfilled the constraints, showing the positive impact of knowledge sharing. Statistical analysis showed a significant correlation (p < 0.05) between the homogeneity index (HI) and PTV coverage for both cases, while the correlation between HI and spinal cord sparing was significant only for the single dorsal PTV case. Moreover, the multileaf collimator leaf thickness correlated with the spinal cord sparing. Planners using comparable delivery/planning system techniques produced different QI, highlighting the impact of the planner’s skills in the optimization process.

Conclusion

Both the technology and the planner’s skills are fundamentally important in spine SBRT planning optimization. Knowledge sharing helped to follow the plan objectives.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Benedict SH, Yenice KM, Followill D et al (2010) Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101. Med Phys 37(8):4078–4101CrossRefPubMed Benedict SH, Yenice KM, Followill D et al (2010) Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101. Med Phys 37(8):4078–4101CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore KL, Brame RS, Low DA et al (2012) Quantitative metrics for assessing plan quality. Semin Radiat Oncol 22(1):62–69CrossRefPubMed Moore KL, Brame RS, Low DA et al (2012) Quantitative metrics for assessing plan quality. Semin Radiat Oncol 22(1):62–69CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelms BE, Robinson G, Markham J et al (2012) Variation in external beam treatment plan quality: an inter-institutional study of planners and planning systems. Pract Radiat Oncol 2(4):296–305CrossRefPubMed Nelms BE, Robinson G, Markham J et al (2012) Variation in external beam treatment plan quality: an inter-institutional study of planners and planning systems. Pract Radiat Oncol 2(4):296–305CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Das IJ, Andersen A, Chen ZJ et al (2017) State of dose prescription and compliance to international standard (ICRU-83) in intensity modulated radiation therapy among academic institutions. Pract Radiat Oncol 7(29):e145–e155CrossRefPubMed Das IJ, Andersen A, Chen ZJ et al (2017) State of dose prescription and compliance to international standard (ICRU-83) in intensity modulated radiation therapy among academic institutions. Pract Radiat Oncol 7(29):e145–e155CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Song T, Li N, Zarepisheh M et al (2016) An automated treatment plan quality control tool for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using a voxel-weighting factor-based re-optimization algorithm. PLoS ONE 11(3):e149273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Song T, Li N, Zarepisheh M et al (2016) An automated treatment plan quality control tool for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using a voxel-weighting factor-based re-optimization algorithm. PLoS ONE 11(3):e149273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Good D, Lo J, Lee WR et al (2013) A knowledge-based approach to improving and homogenizing intensity modulated radiation therapy planning quality among treatment centers: an example application to prostate cancer planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87(1):176–181CrossRefPubMed Good D, Lo J, Lee WR et al (2013) A knowledge-based approach to improving and homogenizing intensity modulated radiation therapy planning quality among treatment centers: an example application to prostate cancer planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87(1):176–181CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Voet PW, Dirkx ML, Breedveld S et al (2014) Fully automated volumetric modulated arc therapy plan generation for prostate cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88:1175–1179CrossRefPubMed Voet PW, Dirkx ML, Breedveld S et al (2014) Fully automated volumetric modulated arc therapy plan generation for prostate cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88:1175–1179CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu B, Kusters M, Kunze-busch M et al (2017) Cross-institutional knowledge-based planning (KBP) implementation and its performance comparison to auto-planning engine (APE). Radiother Oncol 123(1):57–62CrossRefPubMed Wu B, Kusters M, Kunze-busch M et al (2017) Cross-institutional knowledge-based planning (KBP) implementation and its performance comparison to auto-planning engine (APE). Radiother Oncol 123(1):57–62CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Guckenberger M, Sweeney RA, Flickinger JC et al (2011) Clinical practice of image-guided spine radiosurgery—results from an international research consortium. Radiat Oncol 6(1):172CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guckenberger M, Sweeney RA, Flickinger JC et al (2011) Clinical practice of image-guided spine radiosurgery—results from an international research consortium. Radiat Oncol 6(1):172CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed KA, Stauder MC, Miller RC et al (2012) Stereotactic body radiation therapy in spinal metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82(5):e803–e809CrossRefPubMed Ahmed KA, Stauder MC, Miller RC et al (2012) Stereotactic body radiation therapy in spinal metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82(5):e803–e809CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryu S, James JL, Gerszten PC et al (2013) RTOG 0631 phase II/III study of image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery/SBRT for localized spine metastases: phase II results. J Radiosurg SBRT 2:176–177 Ryu S, James JL, Gerszten PC et al (2013) RTOG 0631 phase II/III study of image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery/SBRT for localized spine metastases: phase II results. J Radiosurg SBRT 2:176–177
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Descovich M, Carrara M, Morlino S et al (2013) Improving plan quality and consistency by standardization of dose constraints in prostate cancer patients treated with Cyberknife. J Appl Clin Med Phys 14(5):162–172CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Descovich M, Carrara M, Morlino S et al (2013) Improving plan quality and consistency by standardization of dose constraints in prostate cancer patients treated with Cyberknife. J Appl Clin Med Phys 14(5):162–172CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Cox BW, Spratt DE, Lovelock M et al (2012) International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium Consensus Guidelines for target volume definition in spinal stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83(5):e597–e605CrossRefPubMed Cox BW, Spratt DE, Lovelock M et al (2012) International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium Consensus Guidelines for target volume definition in spinal stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83(5):e597–e605CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Papanikolaou N, Battista JJ, Boyer AL et al (2004) Tissue inhomogeneity corrections for megavoltage photon beams. AAPM Rep 85:1–142 Papanikolaou N, Battista JJ, Boyer AL et al (2004) Tissue inhomogeneity corrections for megavoltage photon beams. AAPM Rep 85:1–142
16.
Zurück zum Zitat The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (2014) Report 91. Journal of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, vol 14, pp 1–160 The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (2014) Report 91. Journal of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, vol 14, pp 1–160
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Blanck O, Wang L, Baus W et al (2016) Inverse treatment planning for spinal robotic radiosurgery: an international multi-institutional benchmark trial. J Appl Clin Med Phys 17(3):313–330CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Blanck O, Wang L, Baus W et al (2016) Inverse treatment planning for spinal robotic radiosurgery: an international multi-institutional benchmark trial. J Appl Clin Med Phys 17(3):313–330CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiff PB (2017) Dose dissonance in radiation oncology: consensus needed when prescribing dose in radiation therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 7(2):e145–e155CrossRef Schiff PB (2017) Dose dissonance in radiation oncology: consensus needed when prescribing dose in radiation therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 7(2):e145–e155CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Giglioli FR, Strigari L, Ragona R et al (2016) Lung stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy: a large scale multi-institutional planning comparison for interpreting results of multi-institutional studies. Phys Med 32(4):600–606CrossRefPubMed Giglioli FR, Strigari L, Ragona R et al (2016) Lung stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy: a large scale multi-institutional planning comparison for interpreting results of multi-institutional studies. Phys Med 32(4):600–606CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Esposito M, Maggi G, Marino C et al (2016) Multicentre treatment planning inter-comparison in a national context: the liver stereotactic ablative radiotherapy case. Phys Med 32(1):277–283CrossRefPubMed Esposito M, Maggi G, Marino C et al (2016) Multicentre treatment planning inter-comparison in a national context: the liver stereotactic ablative radiotherapy case. Phys Med 32(1):277–283CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang J, Ma L, Wang XS et al (2016) Dosimetric evaluation of 4 different treatment modalities for curative-intent stereotactic body radiation therapy for isolated thoracic spinal metastases. Med Dosim 41(2):105–112CrossRefPubMed Yang J, Ma L, Wang XS et al (2016) Dosimetric evaluation of 4 different treatment modalities for curative-intent stereotactic body radiation therapy for isolated thoracic spinal metastases. Med Dosim 41(2):105–112CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Buergy D, Sharfo AWM, Heijmen BJ et al (2017) Fully automated treatment planning of spinal metastases—a comparison to manual planning of volumetric modulated arc therapy for conventionally fractionated irradiation. Radiat Oncol 12(1):33CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Buergy D, Sharfo AWM, Heijmen BJ et al (2017) Fully automated treatment planning of spinal metastases—a comparison to manual planning of volumetric modulated arc therapy for conventionally fractionated irradiation. Radiat Oncol 12(1):33CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Marino C, Villaggi E, Maggi G et al (2015) A feasibility dosimetric study on prostate cancer. Are we ready for a multicenter clinical trial on SBRT? Strahlenther Onkol 191(7):573–581CrossRefPubMed Marino C, Villaggi E, Maggi G et al (2015) A feasibility dosimetric study on prostate cancer. Are we ready for a multicenter clinical trial on SBRT? Strahlenther Onkol 191(7):573–581CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
SBRT planning for spinal metastasis: indications from a large multicentric study
verfasst von
Marco Esposito, PhD
Laura Masi
Margherita Zani
Raffaela Doro
David Fedele
Cristina Garibaldi
Stefania Clemente
Christian Fiandra
Francesca Romana Giglioli
Carmelo Marino
Laura Orsingher
Serenella Russo
Michele Stasi
Lidia Strigari
Elena Villaggi
Pietro Mancosu
Publikationsdatum
23.10.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Elektronische ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-018-1383-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.