Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 7/2018

08.02.2018 | Special Section: Test Construction (by invitation only)

Scale development with small samples: a new application of longitudinal item response theory

verfasst von: Carrie R. Houts, Robert Morlock, Steven I. Blum, Michael C. Edwards, R. J. Wirth

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 7/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Measurement development in hard-to-reach populations can pose methodological challenges. Item response theory (IRT) is a useful statistical tool, but often requires large samples. We describe the use of longitudinal IRT models as a pragmatic approach to instrument development when large samples are not feasible.

Methods

The statistical foundations and practical benefits of longitudinal IRT models are briefly described. Results from a simulation study are reported to demonstrate the model’s ability to recover the generating measurement structure and parameters using a range of sample sizes, number of items, and number of time points. An example using early-phase clinical trial data in a rare condition demonstrates these methods in practice.

Results

Simulation study results demonstrate that the longitudinal IRT model’s ability to recover the generating parameters rests largely on the interaction between sample size and the number of time points. Overall, the model performs well even in small samples provided a sufficient number of time points are available. The clinical trial data example demonstrates that by using conditional, longitudinal IRT models researchers can obtain stable estimates of psychometric characteristics from samples typically considered too small for rigorous psychometric modeling.

Conclusion

Capitalizing on repeated measurements, it is possible to estimate psychometric characteristics for an assessment even when sample size is small. This allows researchers to optimize study designs and have increased confidence in subsequent comparisons using scores obtained from such models. While there are limitations and caveats to consider when using these models, longitudinal IRT modeling may be especially beneficial when developing measures for rare conditions and diseases in difficult-to-reach populations.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
These models could be estimated in any program capable of fitting truly high-dimensional multidimensional IRT models (e.g., IRTPRO, the ‘mirt’ package in R, WINBUGS).
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Walton, M. K., Powers, J. H., Hobart, J., Patrick, D., Marquis, P., Vamvakas, S., Isaac, M., Molsen, E., et al. (2015). Clinical outcome assessments: Conceptual foundation—Report of the ispor clinical outcomes assessment—Emerging good practices for outcomes research. Value in Health, 18, 741–752.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Walton, M. K., Powers, J. H., Hobart, J., Patrick, D., Marquis, P., Vamvakas, S., Isaac, M., Molsen, E., et al. (2015). Clinical outcome assessments: Conceptual foundation—Report of the ispor clinical outcomes assessment—Emerging good practices for outcomes research. Value in Health, 18, 741–752.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Reeve, B. B., & Fayers, P. (2005). Applying item response theory modelling for evaluating questionnaire item and scale properties. In P. Fayers & R. Hay (Eds.), Assessing quality of life in clinical trials: Methods & practice (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reeve, B. B., & Fayers, P. (2005). Applying item response theory modelling for evaluating questionnaire item and scale properties. In P. Fayers & R. Hay (Eds.), Assessing quality of life in clinical trials: Methods & practice (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Houts, C. R., Edwards, M. C., Wirth, R. J., & Deal, L. (2016). A review of empirical research related to the use of small quantitative samples in clinical outcome scale development. Quality of Life Research, 25, 2685–2269.CrossRefPubMed Houts, C. R., Edwards, M. C., Wirth, R. J., & Deal, L. (2016). A review of empirical research related to the use of small quantitative samples in clinical outcome scale development. Quality of Life Research, 25, 2685–2269.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Reise, S. P., & Yu, J. (1990). Parameter recovery in the graded response model using MULTILOG. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 133–144.CrossRef Reise, S. P., & Yu, J. (1990). Parameter recovery in the graded response model using MULTILOG. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 133–144.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker, F. B., & Kim, S.-H. (2004). Item response theory: Parameter estimation techniques (2nd edn.). New York: Marcel Decker, Inc.CrossRef Baker, F. B., & Kim, S.-H. (2004). Item response theory: Parameter estimation techniques (2nd edn.). New York: Marcel Decker, Inc.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Thissen, D., & Wainer, H. (Eds.). (2001). Test Scoring. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Thissen, D., & Wainer, H. (Eds.). (2001). Test Scoring. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. New York: Psychology Press. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. New York: Psychology Press.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Linden, W. J. Van der, & Hambleton, R. K. (Eds.). Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer. Linden, W. J. Van der, & Hambleton, R. K. (Eds.). Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Reckase, M. D. (2009). Multidimensional item response theory models. New York: Springer.CrossRef Reckase, M. D. (2009). Multidimensional item response theory models. New York: Springer.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai, L. (2010). Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro algorithm for confirmatory item factor analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35, 307–335.CrossRef Cai, L. (2010). Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro algorithm for confirmatory item factor analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35, 307–335.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Oort, F. (2005). Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change. Quality of Life Research, 14, 587–598.CrossRefPubMed Oort, F. (2005). Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change. Quality of Life Research, 14, 587–598.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Millsap, R. E. (2010). Testing measurement invariance using item response theory in longitudinal data: An introduction. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 5–9.CrossRef Millsap, R. E. (2010). Testing measurement invariance using item response theory in longitudinal data: An introduction. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 5–9.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Douglas, J. A. (1999). Item response models for longitudinal quality of life data in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine, 18, 2917–2931.CrossRefPubMed Douglas, J. A. (1999). Item response models for longitudinal quality of life data in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine, 18, 2917–2931.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai, L. (2015). flexMIRT® version 3: Flexible multilevel multidimensional item analysis and test scoring [Computer software]. Chapel Hill, NC: Vector Psychometric Group. Cai, L. (2015). flexMIRT® version 3: Flexible multilevel multidimensional item analysis and test scoring [Computer software]. Chapel Hill, NC: Vector Psychometric Group.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts, G. O., & Rosenthal, J. S. (2001). Optimal scaling for various Metropolis-Hastings algorithms. Statistical Science, 16, 351–367.CrossRef Roberts, G. O., & Rosenthal, J. S. (2001). Optimal scaling for various Metropolis-Hastings algorithms. Statistical Science, 16, 351–367.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 159–176.CrossRef Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 159–176.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wirth, R. J., Edwards, M. C., Henderson, M., Henderson, T., Olivares, G., & Houts, C. R. (2016). Development of the contact lens user experience: CLUE Scales. Optometry and Vision Science, 93, 801–808.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wirth, R. J., Edwards, M. C., Henderson, M., Henderson, T., Olivares, G., & Houts, C. R. (2016). Development of the contact lens user experience: CLUE Scales. Optometry and Vision Science, 93, 801–808.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Edelen, M. O., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16, 5–18.CrossRefPubMed Edelen, M. O., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16, 5–18.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, R. L. (1991). The effect of collapsing ordered polytomous scales on parameter estimates in structural equation measurement models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(2), 317–328.CrossRef Brown, R. L. (1991). The effect of collapsing ordered polytomous scales on parameter estimates in structural equation measurement models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(2), 317–328.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Wollack, J. A., Bolt, D. M., Cohen, A. S., & Lee, Y.-S. (2002). Recovery of item parameters in the nominal response model: A comparison of marginal maximum likelihood estimation and Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 339–352.CrossRef Wollack, J. A., Bolt, D. M., Cohen, A. S., & Lee, Y.-S. (2002). Recovery of item parameters in the nominal response model: A comparison of marginal maximum likelihood estimation and Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 339–352.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hegade, V. S., Kendrick, S. F., Dobbins, R. L., Miller, S. R., Thompson, D., Richards, D., Storey, J., et al. (2017). Effect of ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor GSK2330672 on pruritus in primary biliary cholangitis: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover, phase 2a study. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30319-7.CrossRef Hegade, V. S., Kendrick, S. F., Dobbins, R. L., Miller, S. R., Thompson, D., Richards, D., Storey, J., et al. (2017). Effect of ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor GSK2330672 on pruritus in primary biliary cholangitis: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover, phase 2a study. The Lancet. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(17)30319-7.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Talwalkar, J. A., & Lindor, K. D. (2003). Primary biliary cirrhosis. The Lancet, 362(9377), 53–61.CrossRef Talwalkar, J. A., & Lindor, K. D. (2003). Primary biliary cirrhosis. The Lancet, 362(9377), 53–61.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergasa, N. V. (2014). Pruritus of cholestasis. In E. Carstens & T. Akiyama (Eds.), Itch: Mechanisms and treatment. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Bergasa, N. V. (2014). Pruritus of cholestasis. In E. Carstens & T. Akiyama (Eds.), Itch: Mechanisms and treatment. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Beuers, U., Kremer, A. E., Bolier, R., & Elferink, R. P. (2014). Pruritus in cholestasis: Facts and fiction. Hepatology, 60(1), 399–407.CrossRefPubMed Beuers, U., Kremer, A. E., Bolier, R., & Elferink, R. P. (2014). Pruritus in cholestasis: Facts and fiction. Hepatology, 60(1), 399–407.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, E. A., & Bergasa, N. V. (1999). The pruritus of cholestasis. Hepatology, 29(4), 1003–1006.CrossRefPubMed Jones, E. A., & Bergasa, N. V. (1999). The pruritus of cholestasis. Hepatology, 29(4), 1003–1006.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Metadaten
Titel
Scale development with small samples: a new application of longitudinal item response theory
verfasst von
Carrie R. Houts
Robert Morlock
Steven I. Blum
Michael C. Edwards
R. J. Wirth
Publikationsdatum
08.02.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1801-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2018

Quality of Life Research 7/2018 Zur Ausgabe