Background
Methods
Study design
Setting and sample
Data collection
Surveys
Semi-structured interviews
Data analysis
Surveys
Semi-structured interviews
Ethics approval
Results
Sample description
Time 1 | Time 2 | Time 3 | Time 4 | Time 5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of surveys collected | 114 | 99 | 119 | 95 | 106 |
Completed the survey first time, N (%) | – | 62 (62.6%) | 86 (72.3%) | 57 (60.0%) | 57 (53.8%) |
Age range, N (%) | |||||
< 25 years | 3 (2.6%) | 1 (1.0%) | 3 (2.5%) | 2 (2.1%) | 1 (0.9%) |
25-34 years | 10 (8.7%) | 7 (7.0%) | 8 (6.7%) | 5 (5.2%) | 14 (13.1%) |
35-44 years | 35 (30.6%) | 28 (28.2%) | 36 (30.2%) | 26 (27.3%) | 25 (23.5%) |
45-54 years | 42 (36.7%) | 44 (44.4%) | 44 (36.9%) | 47 (49.4%) | 47 (44.2%) |
> 54 years | 23 (20.1%) | 19 (19.1%) | 27 (22.5%) | 15 (15.7%) | 19 (17.7%) |
Missing |
1 (0.8%)
|
–
|
1 (0.8%)
|
–
|
–
|
Sex, N (%) | |||||
Male | 16 (14.0%) | 11 (11.1%) | 5 (4.2%) | 14 (14.7%) | 15 (14.1%) |
Female | 98 (85.9%) | 88 (88.8%) | 114 (95.7%) | 81 (85.2%) | 90 (84.9%) |
Missing |
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
1 (0.9%)
|
Care provider group, N (%) | |||||
Care aides | 93 (81.5%) | 81 (81.8%) | 90 (75.6%) | 83 (87.3%) | 82 (77.3%) |
Nurses | 16 (14.0%) | 12 (12.1%) | 23 (19.3%) | 10 (10.5%) | 23 (21.6%) |
Allied health providers | – | 2 (2.0%) | 1 (0.8%) | – | – |
Managers | 5 (4.3%) | 4 (4.0%) | 5 (4.2%) | 2 (2.1%) | 1 (0.9%) |
Years worked in current role, M (SD) | 12.95 (8.51) | 13.36 (8.03) | 12.38 (8.88) | 12.02 (8.04) | 13.18 (9.2) |
Years worked on unit, M (SD) | 7.04 (6.01) | 7.9 (6.61) | 7.74 (7.57) | 6.27 (4.97) | 8.3 (7.48) |
Intervention unit, N (%) | 45 (39.5%) | 39 (39.4%) | 42 (35.3%) | 47 (49.5%) | 42 (39.6%) |
Intervention units | Non-intervention units |
P
| |
---|---|---|---|
Number of surveys collected | 215 | 318 | |
Age range, N (%) | |||
< 25 years | 5 (2.3%) | 5 (1.6%) | < 0.0001a |
25-34 years | 12 (5.6%) | 32 (10.0%) | |
35-44 years | 50 (23.3%) | 100 (31.4%) | |
45-54 years | 100 (46.5%) | 124 (39.0%) | |
> 54 years | 47 (21.9%) | 56 (17.6%) | |
Missing |
1 (0.5%)
|
1 (0.3%)
| |
Sex, N (%) | |||
Male | 28 (13.0%) | 33 (10.4%) | 0.069a |
Female | 186 (86.5%) | 285 (89.6%) | |
Missing | 1 (0.5%) | – | |
Care provider group, N (%) | |||
Care aides | 187 (87.0%) | 242 (76.1%) | < 0.0001a |
Nurses | 22 (10.2%) | 62 (19.5%) | |
Allied health providers | 1 (0.5%) | 2 (0.6%) | |
Managers | 5 (2.3%) | 12 (3.8%) | |
Years worked in current role, M (SD) | 13.9 (9.18) | 12.01 (8.03) |
0.015
b
|
Years worked on unit, M (SD) | 8.7 (6.97) | 6.64 (6.32) | < 0.001b |
Facility ID | Province | Facilitysizea | Ownership type | Numberof units | Clinicalarea | Successrankingb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | Alberta | Large | Public | 6 | Pain, behaviour | Low |
B | Alberta | Large | Voluntary | 8 | Pain, skin care, behaviour | Medium |
C | British Columbia | Medium | Public | 2 | Skin care | Medium |
D | British Columbia | Small | Public | 4 | Pain | Low |
E | British Columbia | Small | Public | 6 | Behaviour | High |
F | British Columbia | Small | Public | 6 | Behaviour | High |
G | British Columbia | Small | Public | 2 | Pain | Medium |
QI activities (intervention vs non-intervention units)
Interview data
Sustainability and spread
SCOPEOUT facility rankingsa | Sustained | Sustained and embedded | Spread |
---|---|---|---|
1. Facility F | √ | √ | √ |
2. Facility E | √ | √ | |
3. Facility C | √ | √ | |
4. Facility B | |||
5. Facility G | √ | √ | |
6. Facility D | |||
7. Facility A |