Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice 1/2013

Open Access 01.09.2013 | Meeting abstract

Screening and brief intervention for drug use in primary care: the Assessing Screening Plus brief Intervention’s Resulting Efficacy to stop drug use (ASPIRE) randomized trial

verfasst von: Richard Saitz, Tibor P Palfai, Debbie M Cheng, Daniel P Alford, Judith A Bernstein, Christine A Lloyd-Travaglini, Seville M Meli, Christine E Chaisson, Jeffrey H Samet

Erschienen in: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice | Sonderheft 1/2013

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN

Background

The efficacy of universal screening and brief intervention (SBI) for drug use among primary care (PC) patients is unknown.

Methods

In this randomized trial (the Assessing Screening Plus brief Intervention’s Resulting Efficacy to stop drug use (ASPIRE) study) we tested the efficacy of a brief negotiated interview (BNI), and an adaptation of motivational interviewing (AMI), compared to no BI. Primary care patient participants had Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) drug specific scores of ≥4. Primary outcome at 6 months was number of days use of the drug of most concern (DOMC) in the past 30 days.

Results

Of 528 subjects, DOMC was: marijuana 63%, opioid 17% (prescription opioid 11%), and cocaine 19%. ASSIST score was ≥27 (consistent with dependence) for 18%, mean days DOMC use (of 30 days) was 14.4. At 6 months, 98% completed follow-up and mean days DOMC use was 14.0. Mean adjusted days use of the DOMC at 6 months (negative binomial regression) was 11.5 (no BI) vs. 11.2 (BNI) (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.97, 95% CI 0.77-1.22) and 12.1 (AMI) (IRR 1.05, 95% CI 0.84-1.32) (p=0.81 for both comparisons vs. no BI). There were also no significant effects in analyses stratified by DOMC or ASSIST score.

Conclusions

In this trial, BNI and AMI did not have efficacy for decreasing drug use. If other trials yield consistent results, widespread implementation of drug screening and BI should be reconsidered, and research should focus on alternative ways to address drug use and consequences in primary care settings. Funding was provided by the US National Institutes of Health (National Institute on Drug Abuse and National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences).
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Metadaten
Titel
Screening and brief intervention for drug use in primary care: the Assessing Screening Plus brief Intervention’s Resulting Efficacy to stop drug use (ASPIRE) randomized trial
verfasst von
Richard Saitz
Tibor P Palfai
Debbie M Cheng
Daniel P Alford
Judith A Bernstein
Christine A Lloyd-Travaglini
Seville M Meli
Christine E Chaisson
Jeffrey H Samet
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2013
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice / Ausgabe Sonderheft 1/2013
Elektronische ISSN: 1940-0640
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1940-0640-8-S1-A61

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2013

Addiction Science & Clinical Practice 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe