Introduction Postpartum depression (PPD) is a mental health problem frequently experienced by mothers in the first year postpartum. Early detection and treatment can help to reduce its negative effect on the development of the newborn child. Well-baby care (WBC) is a promising screening setting for early detection of PPD. This systematic review investigates the evidence of the effectiveness of screening for PPD in WBC settings regarding mother and child outcomes. Methods Three electronic databases were searched: SCOPUS, PsychINFO and CINAHL. Two reviewers independently performed the study selection. Data extraction was based on a predefined data extraction form. Results Six studies were included; a quality assessment rated two studies as strong and four as weak. Four studies measuring outcomes at process level showed improvement in detection, referral and/or treatment rates. Four studies, including the two strong ones, where screening and enhanced care were combined, showed improvements in the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale scores of the mothers in the intervention groups. No improvements were reported on other outcomes at parent level or at child level. At child level, weight was the only outcome that was measured. Discussion This review provides limited yet positive evidence for the value of screening for PPD in a WBC setting. The outcomes are comparable with studies on screening for PPD in general. The evidence that we found is very promising but the small number of available studies shows a need for additional high-quality studies, to strengthen the evidence regarding the potential benefits of screening in a WBC setting.
Armijo-Olivo, S., Stiles, C. R., Hagen, N. A., Biondo, P. D., & Cummings, G. G. (2012). Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: A comparison of the cochrane collaboration risk of bias tool and the effective public health practice project quality assessment tool: Methodological research. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(1), 12–8. CrossRefPubMed
Gerrard, J., Holden, J. M., Elliott, S. A., McKenzie, P., McKenzie, J., & Cox, J. L. (1993). A trainer’s perspective of an innovative programme teaching health visitors about the detection, treatment and prevention of postnatal depression. Journal of Advanced Nursing,18(11), 1825–1832. CrossRefPubMed
Glavin, K. (2012). Preventing and treating postpartum depression in women. Journal of Research in Nursing.,17(2), 142–156. CrossRef
Hewitt, C., Gilbody, S., Brealey, S., et al. (2009). Methods to identify postnatal depression in primary care: an integrated evidence synthesis and value of information analysis. Health Technol Assess, 13(36):1–145, 147–230.
Leung, S. S., Leung, C., Lam, T. H., et al. (2011). Outcome of a postnatal depression screening programme using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Public Health (Oxford),33(2), 292–301. CrossRef
Myers, E. R., Aubuchon-Endsley, N., Bastian, L. A., et al. (2013). Efficacy and safety of screening for postpartum depression (Comparative Effectiveness Review 106). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Yawn, B. P., Dietrich, A. J., Wollan, P., et al. (2012a). TRIPPD: A practice-based network effectiveness study of postpartum depression screening and management. The Annals of Family Medicine,10(4), 320–329. CrossRef
- Screening for Postpartum Depression in Well-Baby Care Settings: A Systematic Review
Angarath I. van der Zee-van den Berg
Magda M. Boere-Boonekamp
Maarten J. IJzerman
Riet M. E. Haasnoot-Smallegange
Sijmen A. Reijneveld
- Springer US