Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2/2014

01.02.2014 | Editor’s Commentary

Searching for genomic answers to recurrent pregnancy loss—barking up the wrong tree?

verfasst von: David F. Albertini

Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Several months ago I attended a seminar entitled “What does our genome encode?” To finally hear that the bulk of our genomes have uses in unpredictable ways was encouraging. After all, unlike most of the organisms that populate our planet, mammals in general and humans in particular have brought to the genomics discussion table a most perplexing and puzzling situation. While plants and invertebrates engage > 90 % of their genomes in protein-encoding genes and domains that regulate gene activity--with the balance ascribed to “junk DNA”--we humanoids have taken an apparently alternative tack by endowing a meager 2 % of our genomes as protein-encoding and designating the 98 % balance as junk! But what is one person’s junk may be turning into another’s gold. …
Metadaten
Titel
Searching for genomic answers to recurrent pregnancy loss—barking up the wrong tree?
verfasst von
David F. Albertini
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0192-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.