nach oben

Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2022 | Research

Searching for plant-derived antivirals against dengue virus and Zika virus

verfasst von: Emerson de Castro Barbosa, Tânia Maria Almeida Alves, Markus Kohlhoff, Soraya Torres Gaze Jangola, Douglas Eduardo Valente Pires, Anna Carolina Cançado Figueiredo, Érica Alessandra Rocha Alves, Carlos Eduardo Calzavara-Silva, Marcos Sobral, Erna Geessien Kroon, Luiz Henrique Rosa, Carlos Leomar Zani, Jaquelline Germano de Oliveira

Erschienen in: Virology Journal | Ausgabe 1/2022

Abstract

Background

The worldwide epidemics of diseases as dengue and Zika have triggered an intense effort to repurpose drugs and search for novel antivirals to treat patients as no approved drugs for these diseases are currently available. Our aim was to screen plant-derived extracts to identify and isolate compounds with antiviral properties against dengue virus (DENV) and Zika virus (ZIKV).

Methods

Seven thousand plant extracts were screened in vitro for their antiviral properties against DENV-2 and ZIKV by their viral cytopathic effect reduction followed by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) method, previously validated for this purpose. Selected extracts were submitted to bioactivity-guided fractionation using high- and ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography. In parallel, high-resolution mass spectrometric data (MSn) were collected from each fraction, allowing compounds into the active fractions to be tracked in subsequent fractionation procedures. The virucidal activity of extracts and compounds was assessed by using the plaque reduction assay. EC₅₀ and CC₅₀ were determined by dose response experiments, and the ratio (EC₅₀/CC₅₀) was used as a selectivity index (SI) to measure the antiviral vs. cytotoxic activity. Purified compounds were used in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to identify their chemical structures. Two compounds were associated in different proportions and submitted to bioassays against both viruses to investigate possible synergy. In silico prediction of the pharmacokinetic and toxicity (ADMET) properties of the antiviral compounds were calculated using the pkCSM platform.

Results

We detected antiviral activity against DENV-2 and ZIKV in 21 extracts obtained from 15 plant species. Hippeastrum (Amaryllidaceae) was the most represented genus, affording seven active extracts. Bioactivity-guided fractionation of several extracts led to the purification of lycorine, pretazettine, narciclasine, and narciclasine-4-O-β-D-xylopyranoside (NXP). Another 16 compounds were identified in active fractions. Association of lycorine and pretazettine did not improve their antiviral activity against DENV-2 and neither to ZIKV. ADMET prediction suggested that these four compounds may have a good metabolism and no mutagenic toxicity. Predicted oral absorption, distribution, and excretion parameters of lycorine and pretazettine indicate them as candidates to be tested in animal models.

Conclusions

Our results showed that plant extracts, especially those from the Hippeastrum genus, can be a valuable source of antiviral compounds against ZIKV and DENV-2. The majority of compounds identified have never been previously described for their activity against ZIKV and other viruses.

Additional file 1: Figure S1. Map of the plates used for the validation assays of antiviral activity against DENV-2 and ZIKV using the MTT method. The validation was performed as per the High Throughput Screening (HTS) protocol described by Iversen et al., 2012 [24]. The model shows a combination of wells that produce the different intercalated signals, namely: uninfected cells (H), infected cells (L) and infected and treated cells (M), suitable for statistical analysis of absorbance readings of the product of the reduction of MTT by the cells. Figure S2. Validation of the antiviral HTS assay against DENV-2 and ZIKV using the MTT method. The validation was performed as per the High Throughput Screening (HTS) protocol described by Iversen et al., 2012 [24]. Raw data values of the plates on the day 3 (endpoint) of plate uniformity study with interleaved distribution of MIN (infected cells), MED (treated and infected cells) and MAX (cell control) signals analyzed by row (A and C) and by column (B and D). Figure S3. CC50 and EC50 titration curves of pretazettine (PTZ),lycorine (LYC), narciclasine (NCL), and narciclasine-4-O-β-D-xylopiranoside (NXP) against DENV-2 and ZIKV. The values were determined by regression curve using GraphPad Prism 5 based on nonlinear logistic regression of the dose-response curves. The values correspond to the average and standard deviation of three independent assays with at least 8 concentrations of the substance. The red dots correspond to the concentration at which the substance has reached host cell toxicity in antiviral assays.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-022-01751-z.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

ADMET

Stands for Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion and Toxicity

ATCC

American Type Culture Collection

CAPES

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

CC₅₀

Half maximum cytotoxic concentration

CNPq

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

CPE

Cytopathic effect

DENV

Dengue virus

DENV-2

Dengue virus serotype 2

DENV-4

Dengue virus serotype 4

DMSO

Dimethyl sulfoxide

EC₅₀

Half maximum effective concentration

EDTA

Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid

FBS

Fetal bovine serum

FIC

Fractional inhibitory concentration

FICI

Fractional inhibitory concentration index

H. puniceum

Hippeastrum puniceum

H. glaucescens

Hippeastrum glaucescens

HCV

Hepatitis C virus

HHV-1

Human herpesvirus 1

HIV

Human Immunodeficiency virus

HRMS/MS

High resolution mass spectrometry in tandem with mass spectrometry

JEV

Japanese encephalitis virus

MEM

Minimum Eagle's Medium

m.o.i.

Multiplicity of infection

MTT

3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide

MSn

Mass spectrometry

MRTD

Maximum recommended tolerated doses

NMR

Nuclear magnetic resonance

NXP

Narciclasine-4-O-β-D-xylopyranoside

PFU

Plaque forming unit

p.i.

Post infection

UHPLC

Ultra high pressure liquid chromatography

YFV

Yellow fever virus

ZIKV

Zika virus

Introduction

Zika virus (ZIKV) and Dengue virus (DENV), members of the Flaviviridae family, are arboviruses of great importance in human Public Health worldwide. Primarily asymptomatic, ZIKV and DENV infected patients may have mild clinical symptoms such as fever, headache, and rashes. However, ZIKV can also cause severe neurologic manifestations in fetuses and newborns after congenital infection and Guillain-Barré syndrome in adults [1‐3]. There are no currently approved vaccines for ZIKV infection [4]. This scenario is worsened by the imminent risk of DENV infections, which, although it already has a licensed vaccine, CYD-TDV (Dengvaxia), its indication is not well established. CYD-TDV efficacy varies according to DENV serotype, serostatus (with detectable dengue antibodies), and age [5, 6]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), Dengvaxia is recommended for people living in regions where dengue is endemic, from 9 to 45 years old, and who have had at least one previous DENV infection [5]. Unfortunately, there are an estimated 100–400 million dengue infections each year, and severe dengue is a potentially deadly complication due to plasma leaking, fluid accumulation, respiratory distress, severe bleeding, or organ impairment. Furthermore, without proper medical care, severe dengue can reach up to 10% case fatality [5, 7, 8]. As for Zika, there are no approved antivirals for dengue treatment. Treatments are palliative and mainly directed toward alleviating symptoms, such as fever and rash, by administering antipyretics, antihistamine, and fluids against dehydration [9‐11]. Therefore, Zika and dengue outbreaks have been triggered intense efforts to drug repurposing and identification of novel antiviral agents for specific treatment [12, 13]. Different approaches and methodologies have been used for drug repurposing to find antivirals against ZIKV and DENV, such as testing specific compounds with known antiviral activity in other virus models and screening of libraries composed of hundreds of bioactive molecules, many of them already approved for human use. These molecules target viral and cellular components, including nucleosides analogues, nucleoside synthesis inhibitors, drugs targeting viral enzymes, anticancer and anti-inflammatory molecules, antibiotics, antiparasitics, among others [11, 14].

Compounds derived from plants have long been used worldwide as a source of medicines since ancient times until today [15, 16]. Indeed, natural products derived from plants and other living organisms represent a huge reservoir of bioactive chemical diversity and have been successful sources of potential drug leads to new therapeutic agents for many human diseases, including those caused by viruses [17‐19]. Our strategy was to screen large numbers of plant extracts for their anti-flavivirus activities to identify compounds that exhibit antiviral activity against DENV and ZIKV. Other studies have shown that higher plants represent a recognized source of antiviral drug leads [19, 20]. Thus, the aim of our study was threefold: (1) to identify extracts of plants collected in distinct Brazilian biomes as potential sources of antiviral compounds; (2) to identify and purify the active compounds present in the selected extracts and (3) assess the antiviral activity of the purified compounds against DENV-2 and ZIKV.

Methods

Reagents

Solvents and reagents used in analytical methods were purchased from Merck (Brazil). 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT), cell culture media, and supplements were purchased from Thermo (USA). Trypsin–EDTA and carboxymethyl cellulose were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Formic acid (> 98%) was purchased from Fluka (USA). Lycorine (HCl Salt Form) was purchased from BOC Sciences (USA).

Cells, viruses, and Interferon-α 2B

C6/36 (ATCC #CRL-1660) cells derived from larvae of Aedes albopictus mosquito were used to obtain working stock of DENV-2 and ZIKV. Baby Hamster Kidney 21 cells (BHK-21; ATCC #CCL-10) and Vero cells (ATCC #CCL-81) were used, respectively, for virus titration and antiviral assays activity against DENV-2 and ZIKV. The ZIKV used in this study (PE243/2015; GenBank: KX197192.1) was kindly given by Dr. Marli Tenório Cordeiro from Aggeu Magalhães Institute, Fiocruz Pernambuco, Brazil. The working stock of low passage ZIKV (7.4 × 10⁸ PFU/ml) was prepared and stored at − 80 °C in our lab at the René Rachou Institute, Fiocruz Minas, Brazil. ZIKV stock titration was performed by plaque formation assay in Vero cells. The DENV-2 sample was provided by Dr. Luiz Tadeu Figueiredo from University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. DENV-2 was multiplied in C6/36 cells and titrated by plaque formation assay in BHK-21 cells. Interferon-α 2B (INREC, Uruguay) was used as a positive control in antiviral assays.

Plant material

Plant specimens were collected in different Brazilian biomes by Dr. Marcos Sobral, from Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei/MG. Hippeastrum glaucescens (H. glaucescens) and Hippeastrum puniceum (H. puniceum) were also collected by Carlos Alberto Ferreira Junior at Fundação Zoobotânica de Belo Horizonte-MG. Both researchers were also responsible for the identification of the plant specimens. Voucher codes are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Plant extracts with anti-DENV-2 and anti-ZIKV activity: EC₅₀, CC₅₀, SI and virucidal activity

Family	Plant species	Voucher	Part	Extract	EC₅₀ DENV-2	CC₅₀ BHK-21	SI	Virucidal activity	EC₅₀ ZIKV	CC₅₀ Vero	SI	Virucidal activity
Amaryllidaceae	Hippeastrum glaucescens	HUFSJ-2914	Flower	13356	27.9	> 100	> 3.6	No	56.8	> 100	> 1.8	No
Amaryllidaceae	Hippeastrum glaucescens	HUFSJ-2914	Bulb	13358	3.9	8.6	2.2	No	8.9	53.0	5.9	No
Amaryllidaceae	Hippeastrum sp.	HUFSJ-3007	Root	13418	27.5	76.2	2.8	No	41.8	> 100	> 2.4	No
Amaryllidaceae	Hippeastrum glaucescens	HUFSJ-4494	Bulb	17006	6.2	8.4	1.4	No	10.6	44.1	4.2	No
Amaryllidaceae	Hippeastrum puniceum	BHZB-12069	Flower	17007	3.1	8.7	2.8	No	6.8	18.2	2.8	No
Amaryllidaceae	Hippeastrum puniceum	BHZB-12069	Root	17010	3.1	5.9	1.9	No	5.5	16.5	3.0	No
Amaryllidaceae	Hippeastrum puniceum	BHZB-12069	Bulb	17011	0.8	1.3	1.7	No	1.1	4.2	3.8	No
Annonaceae	Duguetia furfuracea	HUFSJ-2345	Fruit	12829	9.8	> 100	> 10.2	+	34.7	> 100	> 2.9	+
Asteraceae	Chrysolaena sp.	HUFSJ-2686	Flower	13211	8.9	16.4	1.8	+	35.1	> 100	> 2.8	+
Erythroxylaceae	Erythroxylum sp.	HUFSJ-2580	Stem	13023	9.1	41.1	4.5	+	29.3	> 100	> 3.4	+
Fabaceae	Chamaecrista sp.	HUFSJ-2193	Fruit	11279	2.9	35.4	11.9	+	53.7	> 100	> 1.9	+
Fabaceae	Chamaecrista sp.	HUFSJ-2193	Stem	11280	7.8	> 100	> 20.5	No	> 100	> 100	> 1.0	No
Malpighiaceae	Banisteriopsis argyrophylla	HUFSJ-2201	Stem	11298	12.5	36.6	2.9	+	48.9	> 100	> 2.0	+
Malpighiaceae	Banisteriopsis sp.	HUFSJ-1995	Stem	11117	34.8	80.5	2.3	+	63.2	> 100	> 1.6	+
Malpighiaceae	Byrsonima coccolobifolia	HUFSJ-2683	Flower	13203	9.4	26.7	2.8	+	43.4	> 100	> 2.3	+
Primulaceae	Ardisia sp.	HUFSJ-2368	Stem	12875	11.8	31.1	2.6	+	43.9	> 100	> 2.3	+
Rubiaceae	Palicourea sp.	HUFSJ-2360	Flower	12860	16.5	> 100	> 6.0	+	62.4	> 100	> 1.6	+
Sapindaceae	Urvillea sp.	HUFSJ-1997	Stem	11123	23.8	31.5	1.3	+	43.1	> 100	> 2.3	+
Sapindaceae	Cupania sp.	HUFSJ-1992	Leaf	11107	19.5	38.7	2.0	+	52.7	> 100	> 1.9	+
Sapindaceae	Cupania sp.	HUFSJ-1992	Stem	11108	17.8	47.9	2.7	+	21.6	> 100	> 4.6	+
Ochnaceae	Ouratea sp.	HUFSJ-2555	Flower	12969	5.2	51.7	9.9	+	26.2	> 100	> 3.8	+

EC₅₀: Half maximum effective concentration; CC₅₀: Half maximum cytotoxic concentration; SI: Selectivity Index = ratio CC₅₀/EC₅₀; ( +) positive virucidal activity

Preparation of extracts

In brief, fresh plant parts were separated, cut into small pieces, and approximately 20 g placed in a 50 ml flask. The flask was then filled with absolute ethanol (Merck, Brazil) and kept at room temperature in the dark for at least one week. The extract was filtered and dried under vacuum at 45 °C. Stock solutions of the extracts at 20 mg/ml were prepared using 90% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and stored at –20 °C. For isolation of active compounds, about 2 kg of H. puniceum bulbs were used.

Validation of the MTT method for antiviral screening against ZIKV and DENV-2

The validation of the MTT method [21‐23] for High Throughput Screening (HTS) of antivirals against ZIKV and DENV was performed in accordance with the Assay Guidance Manual published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [24]. Briefly, tests were made with three levels of signals as follows: high signal (H) for cell control, medium signal (M) for antiviral control and, low signal (L) for virus infection control. the MTT assays were done in sets of 96-well plates containing positive and negative controls (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). For the assays with ZIKV and DENV-2, 1.0 × 10⁴ Vero cells per well and 8.0 × 10³ BHK-21 cells per well, respectively, were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated for 24 h in MEM with 5% FBS. We used 200 µL of MEM with 0.25% DMSO for the high signal wells (H); 100 µL of ZIKV or DENV-2 suspension at m.o.i. of 2 and 100 µL of IFN-α 2b (100 IU/ml) for the medium signal (M); and for low signal (L), 100 µL of ZIKV or DENV-2 suspension at m.o.i. of 2 were added 100 µl of MEM medium. After three days post-infection (p.i.) with DENV-2 and 4 days p.i. with ZIKV, the reduction of viral CPE was verified by optic microscopy using a scoring system as described [23] and by the MTT method. The evaluation of the test and the variability between wells and between plates was done using the software available at the NIH website [24].

Screening of antiviral activity by cytopathic effect reduction and by the MTT method

Plant extracts were screened for their cytotoxic and anti-ZIKV and anti-DENV activities in Vero cells and BHK-21, respectively, in 96-well culture plates by observing the reduction of the viral cytopathic effect (CPE) [23] and then measured by the MTT method [21, 22]. The crude extracts were dissolved in 4% DMSO aqueous solution, and their concentration was normalized to 50 µg/ml with Eagle's minimum essential medium (MEM) supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Briefly, 8 × 10³ of BHK-21 cells or 1 × 10⁴ of Vero cells per well were seeded in a 96-well plate and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C and 5% CO₂ atmosphere. Extract solution and virus suspension, at a multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.) of 2, for both viruses, were simultaneously added on 70% confluent monolayers. Each extract was tested in duplicate. Controls of untreated infected and untreated uninfected cells incubated with or without DMSO were included. Interferon-α 2B, in concentrations of 500 and 1000 IU/mL, was used as a positive antiviral control in all antiviral assays. After three days post-infection (p.i.) with DENV-2 and 4 days p.i. with ZIKV, the reduction of viral CPE was verified by optic microscopy using a scoring system as described by Kudi and Myint (1999) [23] and by the MTT method. Briefly, the supernatants were removed, and 30 µl of a stock solution of MTT (2 mg/ml) dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline were added to each well. After 90 min of incubation at 37 °C, 130 µl of DMSO were added to each well, and plates were homogenized for 5 min at 500 rpm. The absorbance values of each reaction were measured in an ELISA reader (Spectra Max, Molecular Devices, USA) at λ₅₄₀ nm. Extracts were considered active when they showed at least 50% of protection or reduction of the viral CPE by at least 50%. Cytotoxicity (CC₅₀) and anti-ZIKV/DENV-2 (CE₅₀) experiments were performed in duplicate and repeated at least three times.

Determination of CC₅₀

The half-maximal cytotoxic concentration (CC₅₀) was calculated as the extract/compound concentration at which only 50% of cells were alive, in comparison with non-treated cell controls. Compounds and selected extracts that tested positive for anti-ZIKV or anti-DENV-2 activity at the screening step had their CC₅₀ determined by using an 8‐point dose range in 96 well microplate containing Vero or BHK-21 cell monolayers. Cell viability was observed by optic microscopy and measured by the MTT method as described. The experiments were performed in duplicate and repeated at least three times.

Determination of EC₅₀

Viral CPE and cell viability were observed by optic microscopy and measured by the MTT method as previously described. The half-maximal effective concentration (EC₅₀) was calculated as the extract/compound concentration at which only 50% of cells were alive, in comparison with non-infected cell controls. Compounds and extracts that tested positive for anti-ZIKV or anti-DENV-2 activity at the screening step had their EC₅₀ determined using an 8‐point dose range in 96 well microplates in Vero cells or BHK-21 monolayers, respectively. The experiments were performed in duplicate and repeated at least three times.

Virucidal mechanism of action

The virucidal activity of extracts and compounds against ZIKV and DENV was assessed by plaque reduction assay [25] in Vero and BHK-21 cells, respectively, in 24 well microplates. Prior viral adsorption, equal volumes of viral suspension and extract or compound dilutions, corresponding to its EC₅₀, EC₅₀/2, and two times EC_50, were mixed and incubated for 60 min at 37 °C and 5% CO₂ atmosphere_. Virus suspension without the extract/compound was included as a control. Surviving infectious viral particles were assessed by viral plaque formation assay. Briefly, the infected monolayers were overlaid with 1.5% carboxymethyl cellulose containing MEM with 2% FBS and incubated for five days. After that, cell monolayers were fixed with 10% formaldehyde and stained with 1% crystal violet 1% in an 30% ethanol aqueous solution. Extract and compounds were considered virucidal when their EC₅₀ reduced at least by 90% the number of virus plaques compared to the untreated virus control [26, 27].

Bioassay-guided chromatographic fractionation

Selected extracts were fractionated in a Nexera UHPLC-system (Shimadzu, Japan) hyphenated to a MaXis ETD high-resolution ESI-QTOF mass spectrometer (Bruker, Germany) controlled by the Compass 1.7 software package (Bruker, Germany). Samples were diluted to final 5 mg/ml, and 1–3 µl (5–15 µg) injected on a Shim-Pack XR-ODS-III column (C18, 2.2 µm, 2.0 × 150 mm) (Shimadzu, Japan) at 40 °C under a flow rate of 400 μl/min. An additional identical run was performed with injection of 10 μl (50 µg). Instead of being sent to the mass spectrometer, the column effluent was collected in 80 wells of a polypropylene microtiter plate (200 µl/well/fraction). The mobile phases A and B (0.1% formic acid in distilled water and acetonitrile, respectively) formed an eluent gradient of initial 5 min 5% B, a linear gradient to 100% B in 40 min, and hold at 100% B for 5 min. The mass spectra were acquired in positive mode at a spectra rate of 2–5 Hz. Ion-source parameters were set to 500 V endplate offset, 4500 V capillary voltage, 3.0 bar nebulizer pressure, 8 l/min, and 200 °C dry gas flow and temperature, respectively. Data-dependent fragment spectra were recorded using a collision energy range between 15 and 60 eV. Ion cooler settings were optimized for an m/z 40–1000 range using a calibrant solution of 1 mM sodium formate in 50% 2-propanol. Mass calibration was achieved by initial ion-source infusion of 20 µl calibrant solution and post-acquisition recalibration of the raw data. Compound detection was performed by chromatographic peak dissection with subsequent formula determination according to exact mass and isotope pattern (MS1). Putative identification was based on the comparison of compound fragment spectra (MS2) with reference spectra of an in-house database of standard compounds, the public spectra database MassBank [28] as well as in silico fragment spectra generated from the Universal Natural Product Database (UNPD-ISDB) [29]. The collected fractions were dried in a vacuum centrifuge at 45 °C before being used in the bioassays. Compounds in the active fractions were identified by their retention time, exact m/z, and MS/MS fragmentation. These features were then used to track these compounds during the extract's preparative fractionation steps, aiming to isolate the active compounds for structural elucidation and further bioassays. The antiviral activity of all fractions was accessed using the bioassays with DENV-2 or ZIKV by the MTT method as described. IFN alpha 2B and the original crude extract were positive controls for antiviral activity.

Nuclear magnetic resonance analysis

Mono and bidimensional 1H and inversed detection 13C NMR experiments were run on a Bruker Avance 400 MHz spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) using TMS as an internal standard. Samples were dissolved in chloroform-d. The experiments were run at 27 °C. Data were analysed using TopSpin software from Bruker.

Synthesis of Lycorine mono and di-acetylated derivatives

The methodology described by Wang et al. [30] was used. The chemical structures of the mono and di-acetylated derivatives were confirmed by comparing their MS and NMR spectral data with those described by the mentioned authors. The compounds were dissolved in DMSO and assayed at 0.5% DMSO final concentration.

Investigation of pretazettine and lycorine synergism against DENV-2 and ZIKV

The antiviral effect of the association of lycorine and pretazettine against DENV-2 and ZIKV was evaluated in vitro by a modified isobologram method [31, 32]. The results were analysed by nonlinear regression in the GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.). The EC₅₀ and CC₅₀ of each combination were assessed by the MTT method as described previously. Thus, two EC₅₀ and CC₅₀ for each of the five combination curves were calculated separately using the known concentration ratios of lycorine and pretazettine. The fractional inhibitory concentration of lycorine (FIC_L) and pretazettine (FIC_P) were calculated for each point, i.e. [EC₅₀ when in combination]/[EC₅₀ of drug alone]. The sum of the FIC (ΣFIC) with the equation ΣFIC = FIC lycorine + FIC pretazettine was calculated [33]. From the median of the sum of all FIC (xΣFIC), the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) value was obtained and used to classify the interaction between lycorine and pretazettine. There would be synergy when xΣFIC ≤ 0.5; indifference when xΣFIC between 0.5 and ≤ 4 or antagonism if xΣFIC was ≥ 4 [33]. Isobolograms were built by plotting the FIC of lycorine vs. pretazettine. The ratio reveals the effect of their association on toxicity and antiviral activity [31, 32, 34, 35].

ADMET prediction

Pharmacokinetics and toxicity properties of compounds were predicted using the pkCSM platform [36]. pkCSM is a comprehensive web-based, user-friendly resource that allows for the rapid screening of 30 different properties regarding absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (http://biosig.unimelb.edu.au/pkcsm). pkCSM relies on the concept of graph-based signatures [37, 38] to model small molecule physicochemical and geometrical properties. These are used as evidence to train machine learning-based models, which have been invaluable to predict and optimize ligand pharmacokinetic properties [39]. Compounds structures were provided to the pkCSM web server as their canonical SMILES representation.

Data analysis and selectivity index

Bioassay data were normalized to untreated uninfected cells and the EC₅₀ and CC₅₀ values were obtained using GraphPad Prism 5 based on nonlinear logistic regression of the experimental dose–response curves. The values correspond to three independent assays' average and standard deviation with at least 8 sample distinct concentrations. The CC₅₀ and EC₅₀ values ratio was used as a selectivity index (SI). The extracts and compounds with higher SI values were considered the most promising and selected for further investigation if available in sufficient quantities.

Results

The MTT method is a reliable tool for antiviral high-throughput screening (HTS) against DENV and ZIKV

The results of the validation of the MTT method for antiviral HTS against ZIKV in Vero cells and DENV-2 in BHK-21 cells are shown in Additional file 1: Figs. S2 and S3. We observed no effects of systematic errors, which could be verified if the difference of over 20% in the values of each column or observing the distribution of points (each point is equivalent to the reading of a well). We noticed a considerable edge effect in both ZIKV and DENV assays. Indeed, edge effects are usually due to evaporation in the wells on the sides of the plate, especially when the assay requires incubation for very long periods. To reduce this variability, the incubation time was reduced from 96 to 72 h. Finally, for the assessment of the MTT assay and the variability between plates, the acceptance criterion is that the L or MIN signal (infected and untreated cells) should not show any significant change. Furthermore, the coefficient of variation between the H or MAX signals (uninfected and untreated cells) and between the M or MED signals (infected cells and treated with the positive control) must not exceed 20%, and the Z' factor must be above of 0.4 (data not shown). All criteria listed in the statistical analysis were met. Finally, it is worth mentioning that we demonstrated that the CE₅₀ values of several extracts obtained from the assessment of viral CPE protection against DENV-2 and ZIKV were similar to those obtained by the MTT assay (data not shown).

Antiviral, EC₅₀, CC₅₀ , and virucidal activities of crude plant extracts

A total of 7,000 extracts obtained from plants occurring in different Brazilian biomes were screened at 20 µg/ml on cells infected with DENV-2. A smaller number (1,000 extracts) were also tested against ZIKV. As a result, 21 plant extracts from ten plant families displayed consistently in vitro activity against DENV-2 and ZIKV, and their EC₅₀, CC₅₀, and virucidal properties were determined (Table 1). Among the 21 selected extracts, 12 exhibited good DENV-2 activity, disclosing EC₅₀ values < 10 µg/ml, while nine had a moderate activity with an EC₅₀ ranging from 10 to 35 µg/ml. Four extracts exhibited good anti-ZIKV activity and showed EC₅₀ values < 10 µg/ml, while 17 had a moderate anti-ZIKV activity with an EC₅₀ ranging from 10 to 100 µg/ml. The extracts of the Amaryllidaceae family were cytotoxic in very low concentrations, with CC₅₀ values < 10 µg/ml, while extracts from other families presented CC₅₀ > 10 µg/ml. The SI values of the extracts ranged from 1.3 to > 20.5 µg/ml for DENV-2 and 1.0 to 5.9 for ZIKV. Afterward, inhibition of infection due to virucidal effect on DENV and ZIKV particles was tested using at least three non-cytotoxic concentrations. Thirteen extracts were considered virucidal since they caused a 90% or higher reduction in plaque numbers (Table 1).

Bioassay-guided fractionation

The choice of extracts for bioassay-guided fractionation was based on their antiviral activity and sample availability. Thirteen active extracts, eight virucidal and five non-virucidal (listed in Tables 1, 2) were subjected to bioactivity-guided fractionation to identify their antiviral compounds. The extracts from fruits of Duguetia furfuracea (Annonaceae), stems of Banisteriopsis argyrophylla (Malpighiaceae), and flowers of Palicourea sp. (Rubiaceae) did not yield fractions with significant activity against ZIKV and DENV-2 (Table 2). The flower from Ouratea sp. (Ochnaceae) afforded an extract for which the activity appeared only in the first experiment. The fractionation of this extract yielded highly polar fractions of the UHPLC RP-18 chromatography; however, no useful MS or MS/MS spectra could be obtained. In the active fractions of stem extract of Chamaecrista sp. (Fabaceae) the presence of agarobiose and leuhistin was proposed based on the HRMS/MS data. Similarly, fragment spectra indicated the presence of leuhistin and plumbagin in the active fractions of its fruit extracts. Extracts of H. glaucescens (Amaryllidaceae) afforded several active fractions, from which HRMS/MS data suggested the presence of pancratine (flowers), pretazettine (flowers and bulbs), rutine (flower), lycorine (flowers and bulbs), pseudolycorine, pancracine and nangustine (bulbs) (Table 2). HRMS/MS spectra of the active fractions from the extracts of H. puniceum suggested the presence of incartine and pseudolycorine from its flowers. The MS/MS spectra of root extract were compatible with lycoramine, narcissidine acetate, and 6-hydroxy-hippeastrine. narciclasine, kalbreclasine, NXP, pseudolycorine, lycoranine E, lycoranine C, N-norlycoramine, incartine, lycorine, crisarnine, acetylnerbowdine, and narcissidine acetate were detected in the bulbs extract of H. puniceum (Table 2). Lycorine, narciclasine, and NXP were isolated, and their identity was confirmed based on their NMR spectra or by comparison with a commercial standard. Pretazettine, as well, was compared with 1H NMR data from those described by Moraes [40]. Commercial rutine was compared with the MS/MS spectra of its respective flower extract fraction of H. glaucescens.

Table 2

Compounds identified by UHPLC-HRMS/MS in active extract fractions against DENV-2 and ZIKV

Extract number	Plant family	Species	Part	Chemical compound
13356		Hippeastrum glaucescens	Flower	Pancratine, pretazettine, rutine and lycorine
13358	Amaryllidaceae	Hippeastrum glaucescens	Bulb	Lycorine and pretazettine
13418	Amaryllidaceae	Hippeastrum sp.	Root	Lycorine
17006	Amaryllidaceae	Hippeastrum glaucescens	Bulb	Lycorine, pseudolycorine, pancracine, nangustine and pretazettine
17007	Amaryllidaceae	Hippeastrum puniceum	Flower	Pseudolycorine, incartine
17010	Amaryllidaceae	Hippeastrum puniceum	Root	Lycorine, lycoramine, narcissidine acetate and 6-hydroxy-hippeastrine
17011	Amaryllidaceae	Hippeastrum puniceum	Bulb	Narcissidine acetate, narciclasine, lycorine, kalbreclasine, lycoranine E, lycoranine C, acetylnerbowdine, incartine, crisarnine, pseudolycorine, N-norlycoramine and narciclasine-4-O-β-D-xylopyranoside (NXP)
12829	Annonaceae	Duguetia furfuracea	Fruit	No active fractions
11280	Fabaceae	Chamaecrista sp.	Stem	Agarobiose and leuhistin
11279	Fabaceae	Chamaecrista sp.	Fruit	Leuhistin and plumbagin
11298	Malpighiaceae	Banisteriopsis argyrophylla	Stem	No active fractions
12860	Rubiaceae	Palicourea sp.	Flower	No active fractions
12969	Ochnaceae	Ouratea sp.	Flower	Mix of polar or ionizable compounds

Anti-DENV-2 and anti-ZIKV activity of rutine, lycorine and its derivatives, pretazettine, narciclasine and NXP

Among the 22 compounds detected in the bioactive fractions, three were isolated and identified: pretazettine, narciclasine, and NXP. Rutine and lycorine were acquired from commercial sources. Lycorine derivatives were synthesized in our lab. These compounds were tested for their antiviral and cytotoxic properties. Rutine showed low toxicity against BHK-21 and Vero cells, with CC₅₀ of > 300 µM and no antiviral activity against DENV-2 and ZIKV (Table 3). Pretazettine showed antiviral activity against DENV-2 (EC₅₀ of 0.8 µM and SI of 6.8) and ZIKV (EC₅₀ of 1.9 µM and SI of 3.8) with CC₅₀ of 5.4 µM for BHK-21 cells and 7.2 µM for Vero cells. Narciclasine, isolated from H. puniceum, showed anti-DENV and anti-ZIKV activity at very low concentrations, with EC₅₀ of 0.02 µM for both viruses, but also a CC₅₀ in the low micromolar range (0.09 µM for BHK-21 and 0.12 µM for Vero cells), resulting in SI values of 4.5 and 6.0 for DENV-2 and ZIKV, respectively. Its sugar conjugate, narciclasine-4-O-β-D-xylopyranoside or NXP, described recently by Katoch et al. [41], was much less active against these viruses (EC₅₀ = 7.9 µM) and less toxic to BHK-21 and Vero cells (CC₅₀ of 39.3 µM and 51.8 µM, respectively) (Table 3). Lycorine was active against DENV-2 (EC₅₀ of 0.5 µM and SI of 8.6) and ZIKV (EC₅₀ of 0.9 µM and SI of 3.8). Similarly, to other Amarillydaceae alkaloids, lycorine was toxic at low concentrations to BHK-21 and Vero cells, with CC₅₀ of 4.3 µM and 3.4 µM, respectively. Using commercial lycorine, we synthesized 1-acetyl-lycorine and 1,2-diacetyl-lycorine derivatives to test them against DENV-2 and ZIKV. 1,2-diacetyl-lycorine showed CC₅₀ > 100 µM on BHK-21 and Vero cells but was inactive against DENV-2 and ZIKV. Likewise, the 1-acetyl-lycorine showed decreased cytotoxicity in BHK-21 cells (CC₅₀ of 7.8 µM) and in Vero cells (CC₅₀ of 19.8 µM) when compared to lycorine. However, 1-acetyl-lycorine was inactive against DENV-2 and showed very weak activity against ZIKV, with EC₅₀ of 19.3 µM and SI of 1.0. The CC₅₀ and EC₅₀ titration curves of lycorine, pretazettine, narciclasine, against ZIKV and DENV are shown in the Additional file 1: Fig. S3.

Table 3

Antiviral activities of compounds against DENV-2 and ZIKV

Compounds	DENV-2			ZIKV			CC₅₀ (µM)
Compounds	EC₅₀ (µM)	Virucidal activity	SI	EC₅₀ (µM)	Virucidal activity	SI	BHK-21	Vero
Lycorine	0.5	No	8.6	0.9	No	3.8	4.3	3.4
Rutine	Inactive	No	–	Inactive	NT	–	> 300	> 300
Pretazettine	0.8	No	6.8	1.9	No	3.8	5.4	7.2
Narciclasine	0.02	No	4.5	0.02	No	6.0	0.09	0.12
Narciclasine-4-O-β-D-xylopyranoside	7.9	No	4.9	7.9	No	6.5	39.3	51.8
1-acetyl-lycorine*	Inactive	No	–	19.3	No	1.0	7.8	19.8
1,2-diacetyl-lycorine*	Inactive	No	–	Inactive	No	–	> 100	> 100

EC₅₀: half maximum effective concentration; CC₅₀: half maximum cytotoxic concentration; SI: Selectivity Index = ratio CC₅₀/EC₅₀; *Synthetic derivatives from lycorine

Pretazettine and lycorine association against DENV-2 and ZIKV

Since pretazettine and lycorine were active against both viruses and could act by different mechanisms of action, the combinations at different proportions of these compounds were tested against DENV-2 and ZIKV to assess possible synergistic effects. Data analyses resulted in FICI values of 0.87 for DENV-2, 0.94 for ZIKV, 1.08 for BHK-21 cells, and 1.17 for Vero cells. According to Odds, 2003 [33], such interactions with 0.5 < FICI > 4.0, both in terms of antiviral activity and cytotoxicity, are considered indifferent. The absence of interactions between lycorine and pretazettine is most evident when the FIC was plotted and illustrated through the isobolograms. No synergistic or antagonistic interactions were identified (Fig. 1). Results are from two experiments performed with duplicates.

Predicted pharmacokinetic and toxicity profiles

The pharmacokinetics and toxicity profiles, comprising 30 different ADMET properties, were calculated for lycorine, pretazettine, narciclasine, and NXP using the pkCSM platform. Kalbreclasine was also included, but its activity against ZIKV and DENV was not tested yet. The complete set of their predicted properties is available in Table 4. Pretazettine was predicted to have the highest intestinal absorption by both Caco2 cells permeability (log P_app > 0.90), which models the absorption of orally administered drugs, and by the intestinal absorption model (predicted to be 95% absorbed). The other compounds were predicted to have intermediate to low intestinal absorption. Pretazettine was also the molecule with the highest predicted steady-state volume of distribution (VDss) (VDss = 0.80), meaning better distribution in tissue rather than plasma, followed closely by lycorine (VDss = 0.79). Also, in terms of distribution properties, none of the molecules was predicted to readily cross the blood–brain barrier and penetrate the central nervous system, with kalbreclasine and NXP predicted to be very poorly distributed in the brain (log BB = -1.66 and -1.78, respectively). None of the compounds were predicted to be P450 inhibitors, and, instead, lycorine and pretazettine were predicted to be P450 substrates. In line with the predicted metabolism profiles of these two molecules were their excretion profiles. Both presented the highest total clearance (logCL = 1.03 for lycorine and logCL = 0.97 for pretazettine). In terms of their toxicity profile, none of the molecules were predicted to be mutagenic (AMES toxicity) or elicit skin sensitization. Three out of four were predicted to be hepatotoxic; however (NXP) was expected not to disrupt normal liver function. Three out of four molecules were also predicted to have low maximum recommended tolerated doses (MRTD), with only narciclasine presenting a high MRTD [0.60 log (mg/kg/day)] and NXP presenting an intermediate MRTD [0.34 log (mg/kg/day)].

Table 4

Predicted pharmacokinetic and toxicity profiles (ADMET) of the studied compounds

Compound/pkCSM property	LYC	PRZ	NCL	NXP	KBL
Water solubility	− 2.982	− 2.935	− 2.667	− 2.431	− 2.468
Caco2 permeability	0.517	1.192	0.586	− 0.47	− 0.417
Intestinal absorption (human)	68.852	95.146	68.248	47.934	35.249
Skin Permeability	− 3.319	− 3.810	− 2.931	− 2.749	− 2.736
P-Glycoprotein substrate	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes
P-Glycoprotein I inhibitor	No	No	No	No	No
P-Glycoprotein II inhibitor	No	No	No	No	No
VDss (human)	0.790	0.802	− 0.561	− 0.540	− 0.537
Fraction unbound (human)	0.446	0.458	0.536	0.609	0.576
BBB permeability	− 0.153	− 0.084	− 1.315	− 1.784	− 1.660
CNS permeability	− 2.518	− 2.502	− 3.788	− 4.649	− 4.883
CYP2D6 substrate	Yes	No	No	No	No
CYP3A4 substrate	Yes	Yes	No	No	No
CYP1A2 inhibitor	No	No	No	No	No
CYP2C19 inhibitor	No	No	No	No	No
CYP2C9 inhibitor	No	No	No	No	No
CYP2D6 inhibitor	No	No	No	No	No
CYP3A4 inhibitor	No	No	No	No	No
Total Clearance	1.031	0.974	0.223	0.480	0.491
Renal OCT2 substrate	No	Yes	No	No	No
AMES toxicity	No	No	No	No	No
Max. tolerated dose (human)	− 0.386	− 0.566	0.597	0.335	0.181
hERG I inhibitor	No	No	No	No	No
hERG II inhibitor	No	No	No	No	No
Oral Rat Acute Toxicity (LD50)	2.674	2.417	1.982	2.854	2.621
Oral Rat Chronic Toxicity (LOAEL)	0.977	1.739	2.896	4.310	3.692
Hepatotoxicity	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Skin Sensitisation	No	No	No	No	No
T. pyriformis toxicity	0.526	0.443	0.276	0.285	0.285
Minnow toxicity	1.877	2.583	4.660	7.014	8.766

LYC: lycorine; PRZ: pretazettine; NCL: narciclasine; NXP: narciclasine-4-O-β-D-xylopyranoside; \: kalbreclasine; ADMET: Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity

Discussion

Numerous human viral diseases have a significant economic impact worldwide. The lack of licensed drugs to treat patients affected by many viral diseases such as dengue and Zika urges the need to discover, develop, and reposition drugs with innovative viral targets and mechanisms of action. In this work, in vitro assays were established and employed to identify extracts with antiviral properties against DENV and ZIKV and used to test thousands of extracts from different parts of hundreds of plant species from different Brazilian biomes.

Some of the active extracts showed virucidal properties since their activity relied on direct inactivation of the viral particles before virus adsorption. It is also speculated that compounds in the crude extracts could interfere with the virion envelope, masking the E and M proteins necessary for viral adsorption and entry into the host cells [42‐45]. However, the composition and the precise mechanism of action of the virucidal extracts identified in this study needs further investigation.

One of our study's limitations is that some active non-virucidal extracts from Annonaceae, Malpighiaceae, and Rubiaceae families, when submitted to bioassay-guided fractionation, afforded no active fractions against DENV-2 and ZIKV. It is known that the phenomenon of synergistic effects of compounds present in an extract frequently causes loss-of-activity during bioassay-guided fractionation efforts, precluding identification or characterization of a relevant fraction for further evaluation, which is also a subject of further study. Therefore, we can infer that the antiviral activity verified in those extracts may have been due to the association of compounds separated in the fractionation steps or even their degradation along these procedures. Indeed, extracts and even their fractions may contain complex mixtures of substances which can result in a combination of different effects, not allowing reliable "go/no-go" decisions for further processing.

For those extracts presented active fractions against DENV-2 and ZIKV, we identified 18 known alkaloids and one flavonoid. However, few reports about the antiviral properties of these natural products were published. Only lycorine was detected in extracts of three species of Hippeastrum. Pseudolycorine was detected in H. glaucescens and H. puniceum. Among the 16 alkaloids identified, 12 were detected exclusively in H. puniceum and four in H. glaucescens. These results emphasize the importance of investigating this class of alkaloids as antivirals. Noteworthy, the alkaloids pretazettine, narciclasine, narciclasine-4-O-β-D-xylopyranoside, and the flavonoid rutine have never been tested against ZIKV. Just recently, the in vitro and in vivo antiviral properties of lycorine, found in more than 30 genera of plants, were reported against ZIKV [46]. Still, any lycorine derivatives have never been tested against this virus. Lycorine has broad-spectrum inhibitory activities against several RNA and DNA viruses, such as poliovirus [47], severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) [48], Herpes simplex virus (type 1) [49], DENV, West Nile virus and Yellow fever virus [50]. Some studies have put considerable effort into identifying related compounds or analogues from lycorine [30, 51, 52] by investigating its structure–activity relationships and analogues. These strategies have allowed us to discover promising less toxic molecules with higher or comparable levels of antiviral activity. Wang et al. [30] showed that a lycorine analogue, 1‐acetyl-lycorine, exhibited the most potent anti‐DENV activity with reduced cytotoxicity in A549 cells. In addition, 1-acetyl-lycorine inhibited hepatitis C virus (HCV) and suppressed the proliferation of multiple strains of Enterovirus 71 (EV71) through targeting viral proteases [53]. Here, we showed that 1-acetyl-lycorine and 1,2-diacetyl-lycorine have no antiviral activity against DENV-2 and a weak activity against ZIKV. We believe that different cell lines and assays could explain this discordance among those studies. Pretazettine, another alkaloid detected in active fractions of Hippeastrum, was isolated for the first time by Furusawa et al. [54] from Narcissus tazetta, an Amaryllidaceae species. Pretazettine strongly inhibited the activity of RNA-dependent DNA polymerase (reverse transcriptase) of the avian myeloblastosis virus [55]. Furthermore, this alkaloid exhibited consistent in vitro activity against Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), YFV, Punta toro virus (PTV), Rift Valley fever virus [50], and human herpesvirus 1 (HHV-1) [49]. Interestingly, pretazettine inhibited the growth of the Rauscher virus and cellular protein synthesis in eukaryotic cells by a mechanism that does not affect DNA and RNA synthesis [50, 56‐60].

In our work, we reasoned that the combination between pretazettine and lycorine could be more beneficial, given a possible synergistic action between them. This is supported by the fact that two compounds could act in different steps of the viral cycle and increase their effectiveness as antivirals. Indeed, combination therapies with multiple drugs have been demonstrated as effective approaches to treat several diseases such as malaria, tuberculosis, leishmaniasis, HIV, and HCV [61‐67]. However, according to our results and the isobologram analyses, the antiviral effects of pretazettine-lycorine combinations in vitro showed to be indifferent against DENV-2 and ZIKV. The same was observed for their toxicity in Vero and BHK-21 cells.

Narciclasine, isolated from H. puniceum in this work, was reported to have selective and highly potent cytotoxic action on cancer cells, therefore being intensively investigated as an antitumor compound, in vitro and in vivo [68‐72], as well as anti-inflammatory [73], anti-Alzheimer [74] and antiviral against JEV, YFV and DENV [50]. We have shown that narciclasine, though more toxic than lycorine and pretazettine was active against DENV-2 at a concentration 25 times less than presented by lycorine and 40 times less than presented by pretazettine. Similarly, the same was observed for ZIKV, being narciclasine activity verified at concentrations 45 times less than presented by lycorine and 95 times less than presented by pretazettine. Our data are similar to those reported by Gabrielsen et al. [50] for other flaviviruses as JEV, YFV, and DENV-4. Even though our study showed that minimum toxic doses and therapeutic doses were very similar, indicating a very narrow window for prophylaxis and therapy, there is room for improvement. As already mentioned, studies of the structure–activity relationship can be a promising area for exploring chemical radicals that can lead to increased antiviral activity and reduced cytotoxicity. Until now, the synthesis of narciclasine derivatives did not result in an optimized compound, at least concerning its antimitotic properties [75]. However, the discovery of new natural congeners of narciclasine with conserved antiviral activity can spur new studies of the antiviral activity of this molecule. Here we report the anti-DENV-2 and anti-ZIKV activity of narciclasine-4-O-β-D-xylopyranoside (NXP) isolated from bulbs of H. puniceum. NXP was 430 times less toxic than narciclasine in BHK-21 and Vero cells. Its EC₅₀ values against DENV-2 and ZIKV were at concentrations 395 times those detected for narciclasine for both viruses. NXP was recently reported and characterized by Katoch et al. [41] in another species of Amaryllidaceae. It's relevant to mention that not all alkaloids identified in active extracts of Hippeastrum against DENV-2 and/ZIKV were tested in this work, and some of them, as narcissidine acetate, N-norlycoramine, 6-hidroxi-hippeastrine, lycoranine E, lycoranine C, crisarnine and acetyl-nerbowdine were not reported yet having any biological activity. The others, as pseudolycorine [76], pancratine and pancracine have already been shown to contain antiproliferative activities [77, 78]. Several studies indicate that alkaloids trigger a range of biological activities. Kalbreclasine, for example, exhibited a potent mitogenic action on splenic lymphocytes in healthy adult mice, stimulating their extensive proliferation [79, 80]. Nangustine has shown weak activities against trypanosome, leishmania, and plasmodium parasites [81]. Incartine [82‐84] has shown significant neuroprotective effects against cell injury models in dopaminergic neuroblastoma SHSY5Y cells [85]. Lycoramine is a reversible cholinesterase inhibitor [86] and a modulator of nicotinic receptors, an important property in treating Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease or neuroprotection against neurodegenerative disorders [87]. Nonetheless, these metabolites are isolated only in low amounts and therefore are not commercially available, representing an issue for thorough biological investigation.

Thankfully, in silico techniques have been introduced to drug discovery and development as tools to predict and optimize the ADMET properties of candidates at early stages [88]. These use physicochemical properties of compounds and advanced computational modelling to generate predicted models. Computational approaches may help minimize risks in following studies or taken important information for the decision to advance, hold or terminate a drug candidate [89]. Here, we used the pkCSM platform, which uses graph-based signatures to develop predictive models of central ADMET properties, [36] to analyse the compounds lycorine, pretazettine, narciclasine, NXP that exhibited some antiviral against DENV and ZIKV. ADMET properties of kalbreclasine were also analysed. The results supported these molecules as candidates for in vivo studies. Hopefully, chemical modifications studies can bring new derivatives that could be well optimized to present better bioavailability, oral absorption, clearance, volume of distribution, less toxicity, increased antiviral activity, and penetration into the central nervous system. Our findings corroborate the potential of plants to produce antiviral compounds. Indeed, there is still a lot of work to be done since we identified many other compounds, not tested yet, in the active extracts reported by this study. A natural progression of this work is to assess the potential antiviral properties of all these compounds against ZIKV, DENV, and other viruses. Surely, innovative strategies are required to reveal and contribute the full range of chemical diversity of these valuable natural products to the antiviral drugs discovery process.

Conclusions

The laborious screening of 7,000 plant extracts for antiviral activity led to the identification of extracts from the Amaryllidaceae family, which allowed the identification of several antiviral drug candidates. Our study supports the importance of exploring random crude extracts of plants to unveil new antiviral agents. We demonstrated the anti-ZIKV activity of pretazettine, narciclasine, and narciclasine-4-O-β-D-xylopyranoside. Finally, our findings indicate that plant species mainly of the genus Hippeastrum are a useful source of antiviral compounds against DENV-2 and ZIKV.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Carlos Alberto Ferreira Junior from Fundação Zoobotânica—Belo Horizonte-MG for the Hippeastrum collection. We are also grateful to the technologists and resources of the Fiocruz Bioprospection and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance technological platforms.

Declarations

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1. Map of the plates used for the validation assays of antiviral activity against DENV-2 and ZIKV using the MTT method. The validation was performed as per the High Throughput Screening (HTS) protocol described by Iversen et al., 2012 [24]. The model shows a combination of wells that produce the different intercalated signals, namely: uninfected cells (H), infected cells (L) and infected and treated cells (M), suitable for statistical analysis of absorbance readings of the product of the reduction of MTT by the cells. Figure S2. Validation of the antiviral HTS assay against DENV-2 and ZIKV using the MTT method. The validation was performed as per the High Throughput Screening (HTS) protocol described by Iversen et al., 2012 [24]. Raw data values of the plates on the day 3 (endpoint) of plate uniformity study with interleaved distribution of MIN (infected cells), MED (treated and infected cells) and MAX (cell control) signals analyzed by row (A and C) and by column (B and D). Figure S3. CC₅₀ and EC₅₀ titration curves of pretazettine (PTZ),lycorine (LYC), narciclasine (NCL), and narciclasine-4-O-β-D-xylopiranoside (NXP) against DENV-2 and ZIKV. The values were determined by regression curve using GraphPad Prism 5 based on nonlinear logistic regression of the dose-response curves. The values correspond to the average and standard deviation of three independent assays with at least 8 concentrations of the substance. The red dots correspond to the concentration at which the substance has reached host cell toxicity in antiviral assays.

Aliota MT, et al. Zika in the Americas, year 2: What have we learned? What gaps remain? A report from the Global Virus Network. Antiviral Res. 2017;144:223–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.06.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Baud D, et al. An update on Zika virus infection. Lancet. 2017;390(10107):2099–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31450-2.CrossRefPubMed

Dos Santos T, et al. Zika virus and the Guillain-Barre syndrome - case series from seven countries. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(16):1598–601. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1609015.CrossRefPubMed

FDA. Zika Virus Response Updates from FDA|FDA. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-issues/zika-virus-response-updates-fda Accessed on 03 March 2021.

WHO. Dengue and Severe Dengue. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/dengue-and-severe-dengue#tab=tab_1 Accessed on 03 March 2021.

Thomas SJ, Yoon IK. A Review of Dengvaxia®: development to deployment. Hum Vaccine Immunother. 2019;15(10):2295–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2019.1658503.CrossRef

Ong A, et al. Fatal dengue hemorrhagic fever in adults during a dengue epidemic in Singapore. Int Infect Dis. 2007;11(3):263–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2006.02.012.CrossRef

Guo C, et al. Global epidemiology of dengue outbreaks in 1990–2015: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00317.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Musso D, Gubler DJ. Zika Virus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016;29(3):487–524. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00072-15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

CDC. Treatment Zika Virus CDC. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/zika/symptoms/treatment.html Accessed on 3 Mar 2021.

11.

Baz M, Boivin G. Antiviral agents in development for Zika virus infections. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland). 2019;12(3):101. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph12030101.CrossRef

12.

Barrows NJ, et al. A screen of FDA-approved drugs for inhibitors of Zika virus infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;20:259–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2016.07.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Boldescu V, et al. Broad-spectrum agents for flaviviral infections: dengue, Zika and beyond. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16(8):565–86. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2017.33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Saiz JC, Martín-Acebes MA. The race to find antivirals for Zika virus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61(6):e00411–7. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00411-17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Teixeira AH, et al. Conhecimento popular sobre o uso de plantas medicinais no município de Sobral-Ceará, Brasil. SANARE. 2014;13(1):23–8.

16.

Atanasov AG, et al. Discovery and resupply of pharmacologically active plant-derived natural products: a review. Biotechnol Adv. 2015;33(8):1582–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.08.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

DeCorte BL. Underexplored opportunities for natural products in drug discovery. J Med Chem. 2016;59(20):9295–304. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00473.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Chaudhuri J. The role of advanced glycation end products in aging and metabolic diseases: bridging association and causality. Cell Metab. 2018;28(3):337–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.08.014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J Nat Prod. 2020;83:770–803. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b01285.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Palombo EA. Phytochemicals from traditional medicinal plants used in the treatment of diarrhoea: modes of action and effects on intestinal function. Phytother Res. 2006;20(9):717–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.1907.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65(1–2):55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Betancur-Galvis L, et al. Antitumor and antiviral activity of Colombian medicinal plant extracts. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1999;94(4):531–5. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0074-02761999000400019.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Kudi AC, Myint MS. Antiviral activity of some Nigerian medicinal plant extracts. J Ethnopharmocol. 1999;68:289–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(99)00049-5.CrossRef

24.

Iversen PW, Beck B, Chen YF, et al., HTS Assay Validation. 2012 May In: Markossian S, Grossman A, Brimacombe K, et al., editors. Assay Guidance Manual [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): Eli Lilly & Company and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; 2004-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK83783/

25.

Dulbecco R, Vogt M. Some problems of animal virology as studied by the plaque technique. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1953;18:273–9. https://doi.org/10.1101/sqb.1953.018.01.039.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Faral-Tello P, et al. Cytotoxic, virucidal, and antiviral activity of South American plant and algae extracts. Sci World J. 2012;1(5):174837–42. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/174837.CrossRef

27.

Zandi K, et al. Novel antiviral activity of baicalein against dengue virus. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012;12(214):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-214.CrossRef

28.

Horai H, et al. Massbank: a public repository for sharing mass spectral data for life sciences. J Mass Spectrom. 2010;45(7):703–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.1777.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Allard PM, et al. Integration of molecular networking and in-silico Ms/Ms fragmentation for natural products dereplication. Anal Chem. 2016;88(6):3317–23. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04804.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Wang P, et al. Anti-dengue virus activity and structure-activity relationship studies of lycorine derivatives. ChemMedChem. 2014;9(7):1522–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201300505.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Fivelman QL, Adagu IS, Warhurst DC. Modified fixed-ratio isobologram method for studying in vitro interactions between atovaquone and proguanil or dihydroartemisinin against drug-resistant strains of Plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(11):4097–102. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.48.11.4097-4102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Seifert K, Croft SL. In vitro and in vivo interactions between miltefosine and other antileishmanial drugs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(1):73–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.50.1.73-79.2006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Odds FC. Synergy, antagonism, and what the chequerboard puts between them. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;52(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkg301.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Tallarida RJ. Drug synergism: its detection and applications. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001;298(3):865–72.PubMed

35.

Tallarida RJ. Revisiting the isobole and related quantitative methods for assessing drug synergism. J Pharm Exp Ther. 2012;342(1):2–8. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.112.193474.CrossRef

36.

Pires DEV, Blundell TL, Ascher DB. pkCSM: Predicting small-molecule pharmacokinetic and toxicity properties using graph-based signatures. J Med Chem. 2015;58(9):4066–72. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Pires DEV, et al. Cutoff Scanning Matrix (CSM): structural classification and function prediction by protein inter-residue distance patterns. BMC Genomics. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-S4-S12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Pires DEV, et al. aCSM: noise-free graph-based signatures to large-scale receptor-based ligand prediction. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(7):855–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt058.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Pires DEV, Ascher DB. mycoCSM: using graph-based signatures to identify safe potent hits against Mycobacteria. J Chem Inf Model. 2020;60(7):3450–6. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00362.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Moraes CT. Estudo fitoquímico das aéreas de Worsleya procesra (Lem.) Traub (Amaryllidaceae). 2016. Dissertação (Mestrado em Química) Centro de Ciências Exatas da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Espírito Santo. https://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstream/10/7319/1/tese_10338_Disserta%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20FINAL%20Carolina%20PDF%20%281%29.pdf

41.

Katoch D. Narciclasine-4-O-β-D-xylopyranoside, a new narciclasine glycoside from Zephyranthes minuta. Nat Prod Res. 2019;34(2):233–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2018.1527836.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Schuhmacher A, Reichling J, Schnitzler P. Virucidal effect of peppermint oil on the enveloped viruses Herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 in vitro. Phytomedicine. 2003;10(6–7):504–10. https://doi.org/10.1078/094471103322331467.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Gao F, et al. Novel binding between pre-membrane protein and claudin-1 is required for efficient dengue virus entry. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;391(1):952–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.11.172.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Zhang Q, et al. The stem region of premembrane protein plays an important role in the virus surface protein rearrangement during dengue maturation. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(48):40525–34. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.384446.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Guo M, et al. ZIKV viral proteins and their roles in virus-host interactions. Sci China Life Sci. 2020;14:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-020-1818-4.CrossRef

46.

Chen H, et al. Antiviral activity of lycorine against Zika virus in vivo and in vitro. Virology. 2020;546:88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2020.04.009.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Hwang YC, et al. Rapid identification of inhibitors that interfere with poliovirus replication using a cell-based assay. Antiviral Res. 2008;77(3):232–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2007.12.009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Li S, et al. Identification of natural compounds with antiviral activities against SARS-associated coronavirus. Antiviral Res. 2005;67(1):18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2005.02.007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Renard-Nozaki J, et al. effect of alkaloids isolated from Amaryllidaceae on Herpes simplex virus. Res Virol. 1989;140:115–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0923-2516(89)80089-5.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Gabrielsen B, et al. Antiviral (RNA) activity of selected Amaryllidaceae isoquinoline constituents and synthesis of related substances. J Nat Prod. 1992;55(11):1569–81. https://doi.org/10.1021/np50089a003.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Cedrón JC, et al. Synthesis and antiplasmodial activity of lycorine derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem. 2010;18(13):4694–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2010.05.023.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Chen D, et al. Design, synthesis and structure-activity relationship optimization of lycorine derivatives for HCV inhibition. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):14972. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14972.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Guo Y, et al. A conserved inhibitory mechanism of a lycorine derivative against enterovirus and Hepatitis C virus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;60(2):913–24. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.02274-15.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Furusawa E. Isolation of pretazettine from Narciussus tazetta L. Chem Pharm Bull. 1976;24(2):336–8. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.24.336.CrossRef

55.

Papas TS, et al. Inhibition of DNA polymerase of avian myeloblastosis virus by an alkaloid extract from Narcissus tazetta L. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1973;52(1):88–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-291x(73)90957-1.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Suzuki N, et al. Therapeutic activity of Narcissus alkaloids on Rauscher leukemia: antiviral effect in vitro and rational drug combination in vivo. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1974;145(3):771–7. https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-145-37892.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Jimenez A, et al. Inhibitors of protein synthesis in eukaryotic cells: comparative effects of some Amaryllidaceae alkaloids. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976;425(3):342–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2787(76)90261-6.CrossRefPubMed

58.

Martin SF. The Amaryllidaceae alkaloids. Chapter 3. In: Brossi A, editor. The alkaloids: chemistry and pharmacology, vol. 30. New York: Academic Press; 1987. p. 251–376.

59.

Furusawa E, et al. Therapeutic activity of pretazettine on Rauscher leukemia: combination of antiviral activity and cellular protein inhibition. Chemotherapy. 1978;24(4):259–66. https://doi.org/10.1159/000237790.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Furusawa E, et al. Therapeutic activity of pretazettine on Rauscher leukemia: comparison with the related Amaryllidaceae alkaloids. Chemotherapy. 1980;26(1):36–45. https://doi.org/10.1159/000237881.CrossRefPubMed

61.

Scott LJ, Perry CM. Interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin. Drugs. 2002;62(3):507–56. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200262030-00009.CrossRefPubMed

62.

Whegang SY, Tahar R, Foumane VN, et al. Efficacy of non-artemisinin- and artemisinin-based combination therapies for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Cameroon. Malaria J. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-56.CrossRef

63.

Costa-Gouveia J, et al. Combination therapy for tuberculosis treatment: pulmonary administration of ethionamide and booster co-loaded nanoparticles. Sci Rep. 2017;7:5390. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05453-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Diro E, et al. A randomized trial of Am Bisome monotherapy and Am Bisome and miltefosine combination to treat visceral leishmaniasis in HIV co-infected patients in Ethiopia. PLOS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(1):e0006988. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006988.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

65.

Gonçalves-Oliveira LF, et al. The combination therapy of meglumine antimoniate and oxiranes (epoxy-α-lapachone and epoxymethyl-lawsone) enhance the leishmanicidal effect in mice infected by Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2019;10:101–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2019.08.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

66.

Moreno S, et al. Two-drug vs. three-drug combinations for HIV-1: Do we have enough data to make the switch? HIV Med. 2019;4:2–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12716.CrossRef

67.

Alven S, Aderibigbe B. Combination therapy strategies for the treatment of malaria. Molecules. 2019;24(19):3601. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24193601.CrossRefPubMedCentral

68.

Ceriotti G. Narciclasine: an antimitotic substance from Narcissus bulbs. Nature. 1967;213:595–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/213595a0.CrossRefPubMed

69.

Pettit GR, et al. Antineoplastic agents, 256. Cell growth inhibitory isocarbostyrils from Hymenocallis. J Nat Prod. 1993;56(10):1682–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/np50100a004.CrossRefPubMed

70.

Van Goietsenoven G, et al. Narciclasine as well as other Amaryllidaceae isocarbostyrils are promising GTP-ase targeting agents against brain cancers. Med Res Rev. 2013;33(2):439–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.21253.CrossRefPubMed

71.

Dumont P, et al. The Amaryllidaceae isocarbostyril narciclasine induces apoptosis by activation of the death receptor and/or mitochondrial pathways in cancer cells but not in normal fibroblasts. Neoplasia. 2007;9(9):766–76. https://doi.org/10.1593/neo.07535.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

72.

Ingrassia L, et al. Structure-activity relationship analysis of novel derivatives of narciclasine (an Amaryllidaceae isocarbostyril derivative) as potential anticancer agents. J Med Chem. 2009;52(4):1100–14. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm8013585.CrossRefPubMed

73.

Mikami M, et al. Suppressive activity of lycoricidinol (narciclasine) against cytotoxicity of neutrophil-derived calprotectin, and its suppressive effect on rat adjuvant arthritis model. Biol Pharm Bull. 1999;22(7):674–8. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.22.674.CrossRefPubMed

74.

Kim J, et al. Effect of Lycoris chejuensis and its active components on experimental models of Alzheimer’s Disease. J Agricult Food Chem. 2015;63(31):6979–88. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b00889.CrossRef

75.

Fürst R. Narciclasine – an Amaryllidaceae alkaloid with potent antitumor and anti-inflammatory properties. Planta Med. 2016;82(16):1389–94. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-115034.CrossRefPubMed

76.

Llabres JM, et al. Two alkaloids from Narcissus requienii. Phytochemistry. 1986;25(6):1453–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)81308-4.CrossRef

77.

Cedrón JC, et al. Antiproliferative and structure activity relationships of Amaryllidaceae alkaloids. Molecules. 2015;20(8):13854–63. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200813854.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

78.

Katoch D, et al. Pseudolycorine N-oxide, a new N-oxide from Narcissus tazetta. Nat Prod Res. 2019;34(14):2051–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2019.1574785.CrossRefPubMed

79.

Ghosal S, et al. Alkaloids of Haemanthus kalbreyeri. Phytochemistry. 1985;24(8):1825–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)82560-1.CrossRef

80.

Ghosal S, Singh SK, Srivastava RS. Alkaloids of Zephyranthes flava. Phytochemistry. 1986;25(8):1975–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)81187-5.CrossRef

81.

Labraña J, et al. Alkaloids from Narcissus angustifolius subsp. transcarpathicus (Amaryllidaceae). Phytochemistry. 2002;60(8):847–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9422(02)00154-1.CrossRefPubMed

82.

Kihara M, et al. Incartine, a biosynthetic intermediate, from the flowers of Lycoris incarnata. Heterocycles. 1992;34(7):1299–301. https://doi.org/10.3987/COM-92-6068.CrossRef

83.

Kihara M, et al. Isolation and structure elucidation of a novel alkaloid, incartine, a supposed biosynthetic intermediate, from flowers of Lycoris incarnata. Chem Pharm Bull. 1994;42(2):289–92. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.42.289.CrossRef

84.

Kihara M, Ozaki T, Kobayashi S, Shingu T. Alkaloidal constituents of Leucojum autumnale L. (Amaryllidaceae). Chem Pharm Bull. 1995;43(2):318–20. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.43.318.CrossRef

85.

Zhu YY, Li X, Yu HY, et al. Alkaloids from the bulbs of Lycoris longituba and their neuroprotective and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activities. Arch Pharm Research. 2015;38(5):604–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-014-0397-2.CrossRef

86.

Stephenson GR, Roe C, Sandoe EJ. Electrophilic C12 Building Blocks for Alkaloids: 1,1 Iterative Organoiron-Mediated Routes to (±)-Lycoramine and (±)-Maritidine. Eur J Org Chem. 2011;9:1664–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201001394.CrossRef

87.

European Patent Office (EP2311463A1). Analogues of galanthamine and lycoramine have activity as modulators of nicotinic receptors, see: a) B. Davis, US patent US 148253, 2002; b) B. Davis, PCT Int. Appl. WO 2001043697, 2001.

88.

Boobis A, Gundert-Remy U, Kremers P, et al. In silico prediction of ADME and pharmacokinetics. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2002;17(4–5):183–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0928-0987(02)00185-9.CrossRefPubMed

89.

Zhang D, Luo G, Ding X, et al. Preclinical experimental models of drug metabolism and disposition in drug discovery and development. Acta Pharm Sinica B. 2012;2(6):549–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2012.10.004.CrossRef

Titel: Searching for plant-derived antivirals against dengue virus and Zika virus
verfasst von: Emerson de Castro Barbosa
Tânia Maria Almeida Alves
Markus Kohlhoff
Soraya Torres Gaze Jangola
Douglas Eduardo Valente Pires
Anna Carolina Cançado Figueiredo
Érica Alessandra Rocha Alves
Carlos Eduardo Calzavara-Silva
Marcos Sobral
Erna Geessien Kroon
Luiz Henrique Rosa
Carlos Leomar Zani
Jaquelline Germano de Oliveira
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2022
Verlag: BioMed Central
Erschienen in: Virology Journal / Ausgabe 1/2022
Elektronische ISSN: 1743-422X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-022-01751-z

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Supplementary Information

Publisher's Note

Introduction

Methods

Reagents

Cells, viruses, and Interferon-α 2B

Plant material

Preparation of extracts

Validation of the MTT method for antiviral screening against ZIKV and DENV-2

Screening of antiviral activity by cytopathic effect reduction and by the MTT method

Determination of CC50

Determination of EC50

Virucidal mechanism of action

Bioassay-guided chromatographic fractionation

Nuclear magnetic resonance analysis

Synthesis of Lycorine mono and di-acetylated derivatives

Investigation of pretazettine and lycorine synergism against DENV-2 and ZIKV

ADMET prediction

Data analysis and selectivity index

Results

The MTT method is a reliable tool for antiviral high-throughput screening (HTS) against DENV and ZIKV

Antiviral, EC50, CC50 , and virucidal activities of crude plant extracts

Bioassay-guided fractionation

Anti-DENV-2 and anti-ZIKV activity of rutine, lycorine and its derivatives, pretazettine, narciclasine and NXP

Pretazettine and lycorine association against DENV-2 and ZIKV

Predicted pharmacokinetic and toxicity profiles

Discussion

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent for publication

Competing interests

Publisher's Note

Supplementary Information

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

A Δ42PD1 fusion-expressing DNA vaccine elicits enhanced adaptive immune response to HIV-1: the key role of TLR4

Suppression of porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus replication by resveratrol

A UV-LED module that is highly effective at inactivating human coronaviruses and HIV-1

First description of a multisystemic and lethal SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern P.1 (Gamma) infection in a FeLV-positive cat

SNPs of ACE1 (rs4343) and ACE2 (rs2285666) genes are linked to SARS-CoV-2 infection but not with the severity of disease

Genetic characterization and pathogenicity of a Eurasian avian-like H1N1 swine influenza reassortant virus

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

Europäische Ernährungsgewohnheiten: Das sind die häufigsten Fehler

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

Update Innere Medizin

Determination of CC₅₀

Determination of EC₅₀

Antiviral, EC₅₀, CC₅₀ , and virucidal activities of crude plant extracts