There is variation in how services to prevent secondary fractures after hip fracture are delivered and no consensus on best models of care. This study identifies healthcare professionals’ views on effective care for the prevention of these fractures. It is hoped this will provide information on how to develop services.
Hip fracture patients are at high risk of subsequent osteoporotic fractures. Whilst fracture prevention services are recommended, there is variation in delivery and no consensus on best models of care. This study aims to identify healthcare professionals’ views on effective care for prevention of secondary fracture after hip fracture.
Forty-three semi-structured interviews were undertaken with healthcare professionals involved in delivering fracture prevention across 11 hospitals in one English region. Interviews explored views on four components of care: (1) case finding, (2) osteoporosis assessment, (3) treatment initiation, and (4) monitoring and coordination. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, anonymised and coded using NVivo software.
Case finding: a number of approaches were discussed. Multiple methods ensured there was a ‘backstop’ if patients were overlooked. Osteoporosis assessment: there was no consensus on who should conduct this. The location of the dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner influenced the likelihood of patients receiving a scan. Treatment initiation: it was felt this was best done in inpatients rather request initiation in the post-discharge/outpatients period. Monitoring (adherence): adherence was a major concern, and participants felt more monitoring could be conducted by secondary care. Coordination of care: participants advocated using dedicated coordinators and formal and informal methods of communication. A gap between primary and secondary care was identified and strategies suggested for addressing this.
A number of ways of organising effective fracture prevention services after hip fracture were identified. It is hoped that this will help professionals identify gaps in care and provide information on how to develop services.
British Orthopaedic Association (2007) The care of patients with fragility fractures
Dennison E, Mohamed MA, Cooper C (2006) Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Rheum Dis Clin N Am 32(4):617–629 CrossRef
NICE (2008) Technology appraisal (TA) 161. Osteoporosis—secondary prevention including strontium ranelate
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (2009) Management of hip fracture in older patients. A National Clinical Guideline 111
NICE (2004) Clinical guideline 21. Clinical practice guideline for the assessment and prevention of falls in older people
Drew S et al (2014) Describing variation in the delivery of secondary fracture prevention after hip fracture: an overview of 11 hospitals within one regional area in England. Osteoporos Int
Sumner M (2006) Qualitative research. The SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods. SAGE Publications, Ltd. London, England: SAGE Publications, Ltd. 249–251
Ayres L (2008) The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. SAGE publications, Inc. SAGE Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 811–812
Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–101 CrossRef
ATKINSON R, Flint J (2003) Sampling, snowball: accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations, The A-Z of Social Research. SAGE Publications, Ltd, London, England, pp 275–281
Ritchie J, Lewis J (eds) (2003) Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. Sage, London
NICE (2005) NICE Technology Appraisal 87: Bisphosphonates (alendronate, etidonate or risedronate), selective oestrogen receptor modulators (raloxifene) and parathyroid hormone (teriparatide) for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in post menopausal women
NICE (2010) NICE technology appraisal guidelines 204: Denosumab for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women
Directorate, H.a.S.C. (2014) Indicators process guide. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Department of Health (2006) The musculoskeletal services framework
Lee S, Glendenning P, Inderjeeth CA (2011) Efficacy, side effects and route of administration are more important than frequency of dosing of anti-osteoporosis treatments in determining patient adherence: a critical review of published articles from 1970 to 2009. Osteoporos Int 22(3):741–753 CrossRefPubMed
Baker S.E, Edwards R (2012) How many qualitative interviews is enough? Nat Centre Rese Methods
- Secondary prevention of fractures after hip fracture: a qualitative study of effective service delivery
M. K. Javaid
- Springer London
Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Mail Icon II