Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 4/2020

12.10.2019 | Original Article

Sedation During Endoscopy in Patients with Cirrhosis: Safety and Predictors of Adverse Events

verfasst von: Jerome Edelson, Alejandro L. Suarez, Jingwen Zhang, Don C. Rockey

Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Sedation during endoscopy in cirrhotic patients is typically via moderate sedation, most commonly using a combination of a benzodiazepine (i.e., midazolam) and narcotic (i.e., fentanyl) or with propofol using monitored anesthesia care (MAC). Here, we examined the safety of moderate sedation and MAC in patients with cirrhosis.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study of cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopy from a large academic medical center between 2010 and 2014 examined extensive clinical data including the following: past history, physical findings, laboratory results, and procedural adverse events. Adverse events were defined a priori and included hypoxia, hypotension, bleeding, and death.

Results

We identified 2618 patients with cirrhosis who underwent endoscopic procedures; the mean age was 56 years, 36% were female, the mean Child–Pugh score was 9.3 (IQR: 8, 11), and Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 3.2 (IQR: 1, 4); 1157 had MAC; and 1461 had moderate sedation. There was no difference in the frequency of adverse events in MAC and moderate sedation groups, with a total of 15 adverse events (7/1157 MAC and 8/1461 moderate sedation). The most common procedure performed was esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD, n = 1667) and was associated with 10 adverse events. Overall, adverse events included bradycardia (1), hypoxia (7), bleeding (5), laryngospasm (1), and perforation (1). The frequency was similar for EGD, ERCP, and colonoscopy—each at a rate of 0.6%.

Conclusions

Adverse events in cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopy appeared to be similar with moderate sedation or MAC, and the frequency was the same for different types of procedures.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen LB, Delegge MH, Aisenberg J, et al. AGA Institute review of endoscopic sedation. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:675–701.CrossRef Cohen LB, Delegge MH, Aisenberg J, et al. AGA Institute review of endoscopic sedation. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:675–701.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen LB, Wecsler JS, Gaetano JN, et al. Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:967–974.CrossRef Cohen LB, Wecsler JS, Gaetano JN, et al. Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:967–974.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu H, Waxman DA, Main R, Mattke S. Utilization of anesthesia services during outpatient endoscopies and colonoscopies and associated spending in 2003–2009. JAMA. 2012;307:1178–1184.CrossRef Liu H, Waxman DA, Main R, Mattke S. Utilization of anesthesia services during outpatient endoscopies and colonoscopies and associated spending in 2003–2009. JAMA. 2012;307:1178–1184.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Predmore Z, Nie X, Main R, Mattke S, Liu H. Anesthesia service use during outpatient gastroenterology procedures continued to increase from 2010 to 2013 and potentially discretionary spending remained high. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112:297–302.CrossRef Predmore Z, Nie X, Main R, Mattke S, Liu H. Anesthesia service use during outpatient gastroenterology procedures continued to increase from 2010 to 2013 and potentially discretionary spending remained high. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112:297–302.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Inadomi JM, Gunnarsson CL, Rizzo JA, Fang H. Projected increased growth rate of anesthesia professional-delivered sedation for colonoscopy and EGD in the United States: 2009 to 2015. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:580–586.CrossRef Inadomi JM, Gunnarsson CL, Rizzo JA, Fang H. Projected increased growth rate of anesthesia professional-delivered sedation for colonoscopy and EGD in the United States: 2009 to 2015. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:580–586.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Khiani VS, Soulos P, Gancayco J, Gross CP. Anesthesiologist involvement in screening colonoscopy: temporal trends and cost implications in the Medicare population. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:58–64.CrossRef Khiani VS, Soulos P, Gancayco J, Gross CP. Anesthesiologist involvement in screening colonoscopy: temporal trends and cost implications in the Medicare population. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:58–64.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin OS. Sedation for routine gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a review on efficacy, safety, efficiency, cost and satisfaction. Intest Res. 2017;15:456–466.CrossRef Lin OS. Sedation for routine gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a review on efficacy, safety, efficiency, cost and satisfaction. Intest Res. 2017;15:456–466.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Inadomi JM. Editorial: endoscopic sedation: who, which, when? Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112:303–305.CrossRef Inadomi JM. Editorial: endoscopic sedation: who, which, when? Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112:303–305.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hassan C, Rex DK, Cooper GS, Benamouzig R. Endoscopist-directed propofol administration versus anesthesiologist assistance for colorectal cancer screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Endoscopy. 2012;44:456–464.CrossRef Hassan C, Rex DK, Cooper GS, Benamouzig R. Endoscopist-directed propofol administration versus anesthesiologist assistance for colorectal cancer screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Endoscopy. 2012;44:456–464.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dominitz JA, Baldwin LM, Green P, Kreuter WI, Ko CW. Regional variation in anesthesia assistance during outpatient colonoscopy is not associated with differences in polyp detection or complication rates. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:298–306.CrossRef Dominitz JA, Baldwin LM, Green P, Kreuter WI, Ko CW. Regional variation in anesthesia assistance during outpatient colonoscopy is not associated with differences in polyp detection or complication rates. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:298–306.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wernli KJ, Brenner AT, Rutter CM, Inadomi JM. Risks associated with anesthesia services during colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:888–894.CrossRef Wernli KJ, Brenner AT, Rutter CM, Inadomi JM. Risks associated with anesthesia services during colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:888–894.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lubarsky DA, Guercio JR, Hanna JW, et al. The impact of anesthesia providers on major morbidity following screening colonoscopies. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015;8:255–270.PubMedPubMedCentral Lubarsky DA, Guercio JR, Hanna JW, et al. The impact of anesthesia providers on major morbidity following screening colonoscopies. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015;8:255–270.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper GS, Kou TD, Rex DK. Complications following colonoscopy with anesthesia assistance: a population-based analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:551–556.CrossRef Cooper GS, Kou TD, Rex DK. Complications following colonoscopy with anesthesia assistance: a population-based analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:551–556.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vargo JJ, Niklewski PJ, Williams JL, Martin JF, Faigel DO. Patient safety during sedation by anesthesia professionals during routine upper endoscopy and colonoscopy: an analysis of 1.38 million procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:101–108.CrossRef Vargo JJ, Niklewski PJ, Williams JL, Martin JF, Faigel DO. Patient safety during sedation by anesthesia professionals during routine upper endoscopy and colonoscopy: an analysis of 1.38 million procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:101–108.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK, Vargo JJ. Anesthetist-directed sedation for colonoscopy: a safe haven or Siren’s song? Gastroenterology. 2016;150:801–803.CrossRef Rex DK, Vargo JJ. Anesthetist-directed sedation for colonoscopy: a safe haven or Siren’s song? Gastroenterology. 2016;150:801–803.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Repici A, Hassan C. The endoscopist, the anesthesiologists, and safety in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:109–111.CrossRef Repici A, Hassan C. The endoscopist, the anesthesiologists, and safety in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:109–111.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Volk ML, Hernandez JC, Lok AS, Marrero JA. Modified Charlson comorbidity index for predicting survival after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2007;13:1515–1520.CrossRef Volk ML, Hernandez JC, Lok AS, Marrero JA. Modified Charlson comorbidity index for predicting survival after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2007;13:1515–1520.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Saklad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiol. 1941;2:281–284.CrossRef Saklad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiol. 1941;2:281–284.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:446–454.CrossRef Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:446–454.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15:361–387.CrossRef Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15:361–387.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Correia LM, Bonilha DQ, Gomes GF, et al. Sedation during upper GI endoscopy in cirrhotic outpatients: a randomized, controlled trial comparing propofol and fentanyl with midazolam and fentanyl. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:45–51.CrossRef Correia LM, Bonilha DQ, Gomes GF, et al. Sedation during upper GI endoscopy in cirrhotic outpatients: a randomized, controlled trial comparing propofol and fentanyl with midazolam and fentanyl. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:45–51.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Khamaysi I, William N, Olga A, et al. Sub-clinical hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhotic patients is not aggravated by sedation with propofol compared to midazolam: a randomized controlled study. J Hepatol. 2011;54:72–77.CrossRef Khamaysi I, William N, Olga A, et al. Sub-clinical hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhotic patients is not aggravated by sedation with propofol compared to midazolam: a randomized controlled study. J Hepatol. 2011;54:72–77.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai HC, Lin YC, Ko CL, et al. Propofol versus midazolam for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in cirrhotic patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0117585.CrossRef Tsai HC, Lin YC, Ko CL, et al. Propofol versus midazolam for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in cirrhotic patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0117585.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Weston BR, Chadalawada V, Chalasani N, et al. Nurse-administered propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for upper endoscopy in cirrhotic patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:2440–2447.CrossRef Weston BR, Chadalawada V, Chalasani N, et al. Nurse-administered propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for upper endoscopy in cirrhotic patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:2440–2447.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Agrawal A, Sharma BC, Sharma P, Uppal R, Sarin SK. Randomized controlled trial for endoscopy with propofol versus midazolam on psychometric tests and critical flicker frequency in people with cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27:1726–1732.CrossRef Agrawal A, Sharma BC, Sharma P, Uppal R, Sarin SK. Randomized controlled trial for endoscopy with propofol versus midazolam on psychometric tests and critical flicker frequency in people with cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27:1726–1732.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Riphaus A, Lechowicz I, Frenz MB, Wehrmann T. Propofol sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with liver cirrhosis as an alternative to midazolam to avoid acute deterioration of minimal encephalopathy: a randomized, controlled study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:1244–1251.CrossRef Riphaus A, Lechowicz I, Frenz MB, Wehrmann T. Propofol sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with liver cirrhosis as an alternative to midazolam to avoid acute deterioration of minimal encephalopathy: a randomized, controlled study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:1244–1251.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Agrawal D, Rockey DC. Propofol for screening colonoscopy in low-risk patients: Are we paying too much? JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:1836–1838.CrossRef Agrawal D, Rockey DC. Propofol for screening colonoscopy in low-risk patients: Are we paying too much? JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:1836–1838.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK. The science and politics of propofol. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:2080–2083.CrossRef Rex DK. The science and politics of propofol. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:2080–2083.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Sedation During Endoscopy in Patients with Cirrhosis: Safety and Predictors of Adverse Events
verfasst von
Jerome Edelson
Alejandro L. Suarez
Jingwen Zhang
Don C. Rockey
Publikationsdatum
12.10.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05845-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 4/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.