Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 11/2020

24.04.2020 | Original Article

Selective episiotomy versus no episiotomy for severe perineal trauma: a systematic review with meta-analysis

verfasst von: Gláucia Miranda Varella Pereira, Renato Sugahara Hosoume, Marilene Vale de Castro Monteiro, Cassia Raquel Teatin Juliato, Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 11/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

We hypothesized whether a non-episiotomy protocol or administration of selective episiotomy as an intrapartum intervention would modify the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

Methods

We registered this systematic review with the PROSPERO database (CRD42018111018). Prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included from databases until February 2019. The primary outcome was OASIS, and the secondary outcomes were any perineal trauma, duration of the second stage of labor, instrumental delivery, and post-partum hemorrhage. The risk of bias (Cochrane Handbook) and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria were used to assess the RCTs.

Results

A total of 1,833 results (PubMed 650, SCOPUS 1,144, Cochrane Library 33, LILACS 6) were obtained. However, only 2 studies fulfilled the criteria for quantitative analysis and meta-analysis (n = 574). The non-episiotomy arm included two episiotomies (1.7% of deliveries), whereas the selective episiotomy included 33 episiotomies (21.4%). Performance of selective episiotomy demonstrated no difference compared with that of the non-episiotomy group with regard to OASIS (OR = 0.46 [0.15–1.39]; n = 543; I2 = 0%,p = 0.17), any perineal trauma (OR = 0.90 [0.61–1.33]; I2 = 0%, n = 546, p = 0.59), instrumental delivery (OR = 1.40 [0.80–2.45]; I2 = 0%, n = 545, p = 0.24), duration of the second stage of labor (MD = -3.71 [−21.56, 14.14]; I2 = 72%,n = 546, p = 0.68), perineal pain (MD = 0.59 [0.01–1.17]; I2 = 0%,p = 0.05), and post-partum hemorrhage (OR = 1.75 [0.87–3.54]; I2 = 0%,n = 546,p = 0.12). The evaluated studies displayed a low risk of bias in at least four of the seven categories analyzed. GRADE demonstrated a low certainty for severe perineal tears, postpartum hemorrhage, duration of the second stage of labor, and a moderate certainty for any perineal tear.

Conclusions

There was no significant difference between non-episiotomy and selective episiotomy regarding OASIS. No RCT was able to confirm a benefit of the non-performance of episiotomies in the non-episiotomy arm.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sioutis D, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Overdiagnosis and rising rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): time for reappraisal. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(5):642–7. Sioutis D, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Overdiagnosis and rising rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): time for reappraisal. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(5):642–7.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietz HP, Pardey J, Murray H. Pelvic floor and anal sphincter trauma should be key performance indicators of maternity services. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(1):29–32. Dietz HP, Pardey J, Murray H. Pelvic floor and anal sphincter trauma should be key performance indicators of maternity services. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(1):29–32.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartmann K, Viswanathan M, Palmieri R, Gartlehner G, Thorp J Jr, Lohr KN. Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293(17):2141–8. Hartmann K, Viswanathan M, Palmieri R, Gartlehner G, Thorp J Jr, Lohr KN. Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293(17):2141–8.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Verghese TS, Champaneria R, Kapoor DS, Latthe PM. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(10):1459–67. Verghese TS, Champaneria R, Kapoor DS, Latthe PM. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(10):1459–67.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lund NS, Persson LK, Jango H, Gommesen D, Westergaard HB. Episiotomy in vacuum-assisted delivery affects the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;207:193–9. Lund NS, Persson LK, Jango H, Gommesen D, Westergaard HB. Episiotomy in vacuum-assisted delivery affects the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;207:193–9.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez-Diaz E, Fernandez Fernandez C, Gonzalo Orden JM, Fernandez CA. Which characteristics of the episiotomy and perineum are associated with a lower risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in instrumental deliveries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;233:127–33. Gonzalez-Diaz E, Fernandez Fernandez C, Gonzalo Orden JM, Fernandez CA. Which characteristics of the episiotomy and perineum are associated with a lower risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in instrumental deliveries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;233:127–33.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lins VML, Katz L, Vasconcelos FBL, Coutinho I, Amorim MM. Factors associated with spontaneous perineal lacerations in deliveries without episiotomy in a university maternity hospital in the city of Recife, Brazil: a cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(18):3062–7. Lins VML, Katz L, Vasconcelos FBL, Coutinho I, Amorim MM. Factors associated with spontaneous perineal lacerations in deliveries without episiotomy in a university maternity hospital in the city of Recife, Brazil: a cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(18):3062–7.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Shmueli A, Gabbay Benziv R, Hiersch L, et al. Episiotomy—risk factors and outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(3):251–6. Shmueli A, Gabbay Benziv R, Hiersch L, et al. Episiotomy—risk factors and outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(3):251–6.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat McDonald EA, Gartland D, Small R, Brown SJ. Dyspareunia and childbirth: a prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2015;122(5):672–9. McDonald EA, Gartland D, Small R, Brown SJ. Dyspareunia and childbirth: a prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2015;122(5):672–9.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Panic N, Leoncini E, De Belvis G, Ricciardi W, Boccia S. Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83138. Panic N, Leoncini E, De Belvis G, Ricciardi W, Boccia S. Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83138.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Booth A, Moher D, Ghersi D, et al. The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2012;1(1):2. Booth A, Moher D, Ghersi D, et al. The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2012;1(1):2.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, vol 4. Wiley, New York; 2011. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, vol 4. Wiley, New York; 2011.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):407–15. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):407–15.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sagi-Dain L, Bahous R, Caspin O, Kreinin-Bleicher I, Gonen R, Sagi S. No episiotomy versus selective lateral/mediolateral episiotomy (EPITRIAL): an interim analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(3):415–23. Sagi-Dain L, Bahous R, Caspin O, Kreinin-Bleicher I, Gonen R, Sagi S. No episiotomy versus selective lateral/mediolateral episiotomy (EPITRIAL): an interim analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(3):415–23.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Amorim MM, Coutinho IC, Melo I, Katz L. Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non-episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):55. Amorim MM, Coutinho IC, Melo I, Katz L. Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non-episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):55.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gachon B, Fradet Menard C, Pierre F, Fritel X. Does the implementation of a restrictive episiotomy policy for operative deliveries increase the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300(1):87–94. Gachon B, Fradet Menard C, Pierre F, Fritel X. Does the implementation of a restrictive episiotomy policy for operative deliveries increase the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300(1):87–94.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith LA, Price N, Simonite V, Burns EE. Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:59. Smith LA, Price N, Simonite V, Burns EE. Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:59.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat LaCross A, Groff M, Smaldone A. Obstetric anal sphincter injury and anal incontinence following vaginal birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015;60(1):37–47. LaCross A, Groff M, Smaldone A. Obstetric anal sphincter injury and anal incontinence following vaginal birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015;60(1):37–47.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Oliveira LS, Brito LG, Quintana SM, Duarte G, Marcolin AC. Perineal trauma after vaginal delivery in healthy pregnant women. Sao Paulo Med J. 2014;132(4):231–8. Oliveira LS, Brito LG, Quintana SM, Duarte G, Marcolin AC. Perineal trauma after vaginal delivery in healthy pregnant women. Sao Paulo Med J. 2014;132(4):231–8.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Peppe MV, Stefanello J, Infante BF, Kobayashi MT, Baraldi CO, Brito LGO. Perineal trauma in a low-risk maternity with high prevalence of upright position during the second stage of labor. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018;40(7):379–83. Peppe MV, Stefanello J, Infante BF, Kobayashi MT, Baraldi CO, Brito LGO. Perineal trauma in a low-risk maternity with high prevalence of upright position during the second stage of labor. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018;40(7):379–83.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Monteiro MVD, Pereira GMV, Aguiar RAP, Azevedo RL, Correia MD, Reis ZSN. Risk factors for severe obstetric perineal lacerations. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(1):61–7. Monteiro MVD, Pereira GMV, Aguiar RAP, Azevedo RL, Correia MD, Reis ZSN. Risk factors for severe obstetric perineal lacerations. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(1):61–7.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Evers EC, Blomquist JL, McDermott KC, Handa VL. Obstetrical anal sphincter laceration and anal incontinence 5–10 years after childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(5):425.e1–6. Evers EC, Blomquist JL, McDermott KC, Handa VL. Obstetrical anal sphincter laceration and anal incontinence 5–10 years after childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(5):425.e1–6.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 154: operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(5):e56–65. Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 154: operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(5):e56–65.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat RCOG. Operative vaginal delivery. Green-top guideline 26. London: RCOG; 2011. RCOG. Operative vaginal delivery. Green-top guideline 26. London: RCOG; 2011.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: final data for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64(1):1–65. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: final data for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64(1):1–65.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Frankman EA, Wang L, Bunker CH, Lowder JL. Episiotomy in the United States: has anything changed? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(5):573.e1–7. Frankman EA, Wang L, Bunker CH, Lowder JL. Episiotomy in the United States: has anything changed? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(5):573.e1–7.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Simic M, Cnattingius S, Petersson G, Sandstrom A, Stephansson O. Duration of second stage of labor and instrumental delivery as risk factors for severe perineal lacerations: population-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):72. Simic M, Cnattingius S, Petersson G, Sandstrom A, Stephansson O. Duration of second stage of labor and instrumental delivery as risk factors for severe perineal lacerations: population-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):72.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120(12):1516–25. Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120(12):1516–25.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Rouse DJ, Weiner SJ, Bloom SL, et al. Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(4):357.e1–7. Rouse DJ, Weiner SJ, Bloom SL, et al. Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(4):357.e1–7.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Gimovsky AC, Berghella V. Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(3):361.e1–6. Gimovsky AC, Berghella V. Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(3):361.e1–6.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Sveinsdottir E, Gottfredsdottir H, Vernhardsdottir AS, Tryggvadottir GB, Geirsson RT. Effects of an intervention program for reducing severe perineal trauma during the second stage of labor. Birth. 2019;46(2):371–8. Sveinsdottir E, Gottfredsdottir H, Vernhardsdottir AS, Tryggvadottir GB, Geirsson RT. Effects of an intervention program for reducing severe perineal trauma during the second stage of labor. Birth. 2019;46(2):371–8.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat ACOG. Practice bulletin: clinical management guidelines for obstetrician–Gynecologists number 76, October 2006: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(4):1039–47. ACOG. Practice bulletin: clinical management guidelines for obstetrician–Gynecologists number 76, October 2006: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(4):1039–47.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Tuncalp O, Souza JP, Gulmezoglu M. New WHO recommendations on prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;123(3):254–6. Tuncalp O, Souza JP, Gulmezoglu M. New WHO recommendations on prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;123(3):254–6.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for the prevention and treatment or postpartum haemorrhage: evidence base. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2012. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for the prevention and treatment or postpartum haemorrhage: evidence base. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2012.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahlke JD, Mendez-Figueroa H, Maggio L, et al. Prevention and management of postpartum hemorrhage: a comparison of 4 national guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(1):76.e1–10. Dahlke JD, Mendez-Figueroa H, Maggio L, et al. Prevention and management of postpartum hemorrhage: a comparison of 4 national guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(1):76.e1–10.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:CD000081. Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:CD000081.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat De Jonge A, van Diem MT, Scheepers PL, van der Pal-de Bruin KM, Lagro-Janssen AL. Increased blood loss in upright birthing positions originates from perineal damage. BJOG. 2007;114(3):349–55. De Jonge A, van Diem MT, Scheepers PL, van der Pal-de Bruin KM, Lagro-Janssen AL. Increased blood loss in upright birthing positions originates from perineal damage. BJOG. 2007;114(3):349–55.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta JK, Sood A, Hofmeyr GJ, Vogel JP. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;5:CD002006. Gupta JK, Sood A, Hofmeyr GJ, Vogel JP. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;5:CD002006.
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker KF, Kibuka M, Thornton JG, Jones NW. Maternal position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;11:CD008070. Walker KF, Kibuka M, Thornton JG, Jones NW. Maternal position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;11:CD008070.
Metadaten
Titel
Selective episiotomy versus no episiotomy for severe perineal trauma: a systematic review with meta-analysis
verfasst von
Gláucia Miranda Varella Pereira
Renato Sugahara Hosoume
Marilene Vale de Castro Monteiro
Cassia Raquel Teatin Juliato
Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito
Publikationsdatum
24.04.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04308-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2020

International Urogynecology Journal 11/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.