Background
Oesophageal cancer (OC) is the eighth most common cancer and the sixth most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide [
1]. Despite developments in treatment modalities, estimated overall five-year survival rate for patients with OC is still poor [
2,
3]. It is evident that surgery alone is not a curative option for all stages of OC and additional adjunctive treatment modalities are needed [
4,
5].
One of the characteristic features of OC, especially oesophageal adenocarcinoma (AC) is a persistence gender bias over several decades, in all races and across the world [
6]. It occurs more frequently in males than in females, with a male to female ratio of 5–10:1, a fact that remains unexplained [
7‐
9]. Besides, most published evidence fails so far to address any significant difference in exposure to known risk factors for the disease [
10]. Instead, it is suggested that the hormonal milieu may play a possible role in this gender bias [
11‐
15]. In support of this, the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study identified that the risk of developing OC is lower in pre- and peri-menopausal women compared to postmenopausal women while early menopause is associated with an increased risk of developing oesophageal AC [
16]. Women who undergo intended curative resection of OC tend to have better overall survival compared with men [
17]. These cumulative observations have led us to hypothesize that oestrogen signalling pathways play a role in the biological behaviour of OC.
In addition to the its roles in a diverse range of body tissues, oestrogens e.g. 17-β oestradiol are implicated in the development and progression of cancers, most obviously in breast cancer [
18]. Recent reports also demonstrate involvement of oestrogen signalling in the carcinogenesis of non-classical oestrogen-sensitive tissues including colon, prostate, lung, skin, and brain [
19‐
23]. The complex biological effects of oestrogens are mediated by two distinct receptor subtypes - ERα and ERβ (ER) and involve crosstalk between many proteins and signalling pathways [
24,
25]. ER expression profiles in cancers of the breast, colon, skin, prostate and lung have been investigated extensively [
26‐
30] and a probable role for ER in OC is suggested in a few studies on the basis of protein expression [
31,
32]. While functional involvement of ER in OC is not well understood, the selective oestrogen modulator (SERM) tamoxifen appears to have an antiproliferative effect and to enhance cytotoxicity of conventional chemotherapy [
32‐
34]. Thus there is a need to further probe mechanisms by which ER contribute to OC progression. This study addresses the notion that ER play a role in the biological behaviour of OC providing evidence for their potential utility as therapeutic targets in this malignancy OC.
Methods
Patient cohort
Joint ethical approval for the research protocol (08/H040/50) was acquired from the Derbyshire Research Ethics Committee and Derbyshire Hospitals Research and Development office. Written, informed consent was obtained from all patients included in this study. OC samples and matched normal tissue taken from adjacent macroscopic mucosa from the same patient were collected from resected OC specimens of 34 patients (adenocarcinoma - n = 28; squamous cell carcinoma - n = 6) who underwent oesophagectomy between January 2011 and January 2013. Normal samples were microscopically examined by a consultant pathologist to confirm normal features.
Cell lines
Two human oesophageal cell lines (OE19 - a male adenocarcinoma and OE33 - a female adenocarcinoma, Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, UK) were used in this study. Cells were routinely cultured at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in the presence of penicillin (10,000 U/ml), and streptomycin (100 μg/ml) using RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). The presence of ERα and ERβ receptors in OE19 and OE33 cell lines was confirmed by immunofluorescence staining using an anti-ERα antibody (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and anti-ERβ antibody (Novacastra, Newcastle, UK).
mRNA analysis by qRT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from tissue samples (30 mg), ground in liquid N
2 with a pestle and mortar and from cell lines (10
4 cells) using the RNeasy Mini kit method (QIAGEN, UK) as per manufacturer’s protocol. 300 ng of total RNA was reverse transcribed with (+RT) or without (−RT) reverse transcriptase (RT) using the high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK). 2 μl of cDNA were amplified by real time PCR with commercially available TaqMan assays (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) for
ESR1 (Hs00174860_m1),
ESR2 (Hs01100353_m1), and the reference genes
GAPDH (Hs02758991_g1),
PGK1 (Hs00943178_g1), and
ACTB (Hs01060665_g1) in a Chromo 4 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories LTD, Hemel Hempstead, UK). Expression of
ESR1 and
ESR2 was quantified relative to the geometric mean of three reference genes and reported as relative to max using the GenEX software Version 5 (MultiD, DE) in accordance with MIQE guidelines [
35] (Additional file
1: Figure S1).
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) slides were prepared in the Histopathology Department at the Royal Derby Hospital. Normal mucosa and OC samples were stained using ERα and ERβ antibodies (NCL-L-ER-6F11 and 6007907, respectively, Novacastra, Newcastle, UK). ERα and ERβ positive breast cancer samples were used as positive controls. The ‘H-score method was used to measure the strength of ER-staining in normal oesophageal mucosa) and matched tumour samples [
36]. Positive staining was defined as an H-score ≥ 10 in this study.
Proliferation and cell death assays
In preparation for cell proliferation assays, cells were cultured at a final cell number of 50,000 cells/ ml in phenol red-free RPMI media (Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, UK) to eliminate the weak oestrogenic effect of this indicator. This media was supplemented with 10% stripped FCS to remove any steroids in the serum. Cells were cultured in the absence or presence of 17β-estradiol (E2), an ERα and ERβ agonist; the highly selective ERα antagonist 1,3-Bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-methyl-5-[4-(2-piperidinylethoxy)phenol]-1H–pyrazole dihydrochloride (MPP), or ERβ antagonist 4-[2-Phenyl-5,7-bis (trifluoromethyl) pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-3-yl]phenol (PHTPP) (Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK). The 5′-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) cell proliferation assay kit (Roche-Applied-Science, Burgess Hill, UK) was used to measure replication of genomic DNA as an indirect parameter of the cell proliferation rate. The Caspase-Glo 3/7 apoptosis assay (Promega, Southampton, UK) and the lactate dehydrogenase activity (LDH) assay (Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, UK) were used to determine the cell proliferation rates in the presence of the MPP or PHTPP.
Statistical analysis
For qRT-PCR on primary tissues, the two-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for matched cases while the two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test was used for non-matched variables. Either the two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test, as appropriate, was used to establish relationships between hormone levels, ER mRNA and clinico-pathological features. Data for proliferation assays of the two cell lines is expressed as mean ± SD of three replicates. Two-tailed Student’s t-test was used for comparison of two groups. Comparison of multiple groups was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s or Bonferroni’s post-hoc test. Statistical differences were calculated using SPSS Statistics® for Windows™ v21 software from IBM SPSS Statistics (Feltham, UK) and GraphPad Prism® v6 (La Jolla, CA, USA). A value of p ≤ 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Discussion
This study describes investigations of ER expression in OC samples versus normal mucosa and potential prognostic implications. It also demonstrates the effect of highly selective ER antagonists on OC cell proliferation in vitro and the possible underlying mechanism behind reduced proliferation rates. Initially, the expression of ER was measured using qRT-PCR in normal mucosa and tumour samples from patients with potentially resectable OC. The measurement of mRNA levels demonstrated that both ER subtypes are expressed in normal mucosa and tumour samples. Additionally, there was a significant upregulation of ERα and ERβ mRNA expression in OC biopsies compared to their matched mucosal samples. It was also demonstrated that ERα and ERβ may have a potential prognostic role on the basis that mRNA levels for both receptors have a significant inverse association with one-year disease-specific survival and certain clinico-pathological features. In vitro experiments performed using oesophageal cell lines OE33 and OE19 demonstrated significant concentration-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation using selective ER antagonists in both cell lines.
ER have an essential role in the proliferation and differentiation of normal tissues and consequently oestrogen signalling may also play a role in the dysregulation of these processes in cancer cells [
37]. In addition, altered expression of ER is considered as an initial step towards the development of certain cancers [
24]. For instance, loss of ERβ increases proliferation of colon cancer cell lines [
38] while increased ERβ expression leads to cell cycle arrest [
39,
40]. In the breast, ERα mediates the proliferative effect of E2 and ERβ has anti-proliferative effects [
41,
42]. In prostate cancer, the expression of ERβ undergoes gradual reduction in the expression from normal tissue to benign prostatic hyperplasia towards invasive prostate cancer [
43]. Furthermore, the re-introduction of ERβ into prostatic cancer cell lines was associated with decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis [
22]. A recent study from Germany investigated the significance of ERα expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) samples from 64 patients who underwent radiotherapy treatment [
44]. It was found that ERα expression in NSCLC inversely associated with disease-free and overall survival [
44]. The number of studies investigating ER status in OC is scarce and the results are rather conflicting and inconclusive. Nevertheless, it was suggested that ERβ is the predominant receptor in oesophageal normal mucosa and OC while ERα is only expressed at very low levels [
31,
45‐
49]. The presence of ER subtypes at the mRNA level in normal mucosa has prompted us to postulate that ER play a role in normal oesophageal function. Moreover, the observation of increased expression of ER subtypes in tumour samples may also indicate a biological role in OC development.
It has been suggested that oestrogens confer protective effects on the development of OC. In this study, the effect of E2 on OC proliferation in vitro demonstrated no significant changes in proliferation rates of the OE33 and OE19 cell lines when cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of E2. However, there was significant inhibition of OE33 and OE19 cell lines by increasing the concentrations of a highly selective ERα antagonist (MMP) and an ERβ antagonist (PHTPP). In addition, it was also demonstrated that the mechanism behind this reduction in cell growth rate is the initiation of a programmed cell death rather than a direct cytotoxic effect. These findings support our hypothesis that oestrogen signalling pathways may have a role in the biological behaviour of OC. However, further studies of cell-cycle analysis are necessary to distinguish the molecular mechanisms behind these findings [
50,
51].
The effect of E2 via ER is influenced by several factors. Hence, the finding of no altered proliferation rate in response to E2 may be due to the fact that OC cell lines express ERα and ERβ at similar levels and activation of one receptor could have antagonised the function of the other receptor [
18,
24] especially if the ER subtypes have opposing actions. On binding of E2 with ER, the end result is also affected by the type of co-regulators recruited into action. For instance, if a co-suppresser like
Repressor of oestrogen receptor Activity (REA) is bound to the E2/ER complex, it will lead to inhibition of activation of ERE and gene transcription [
24,
51,
52]. Lastly, the absence of an E2 effect can also be explained by post-translational modifications where the E2/ER complex is promptly metabolised by ubiquitination or phosphorylation [
24,
53].
In this study, the reason for the lack of the expression of ERα protein is unclear and may be theoretically explained by stating that ERα (
ESR1) gene is simply a non-functional gene. However, this explanation seems rather naïve given that all normal mucosal and tumour samples used in this study demonstrated variable levels of ERα mRNA. Moreover, there was altered expression of ERα mRNA between normal mucosa and tumour samples. In addition, both OC cell lines (OE33 and OE19) demonstrated moderate expression of ERα at the protein level. Hence, other factors might have contributed to the ERα negative status in tissue samples. For example, previous studies have suggested that monoclonal antibodies can be species and tissue-specific [
54,
55]. In this study, we used mouse monoclonal antibodies for the quantification of ERα status. These antibodies were developed using a prokaryotic recombinant protein as an immunogen which corresponds to the full-length human ERα molecule. Interestingly, there was strong ERα staining in breast cancer tissue used as a positive control. Using the same antibodies, Kalayarasan et al. found no ERα expression in 45 OC specimens (SSC = 30, AC = 15) [
49]. Moreover, Kawai et al. found that using monoclonal antibodies (against NH2 terminus of ERα) for quantification of ERα in NSCLC produced negative results whereas the use of polyclonal antibodies (against COOH terminus of ERα) gave positive ERα staining [
28]. This may suggest that ERα isoforms localised in oesophageal tissue may lack an epitope which is specific to monoclonal antibodies [
55]. This could have contributed to the lack of ERα staining in our cohort [
28].
To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the ER status in patients with OC, mainly oesophageal AC from a UK population. It also builds on other studies by Sukocheva et al. [
32] and Due et al. [
34] where in vitro effects using a selective ER modulator on OC cell lines confirmed anti-proliferative effects observed with Tamoxifen. However, we opted to use only MPP and PHTPP rather than Tamoxifen for an important experimental reason. The agonist/antagonist property of Tamoxifen varies among tissues [
56]. For instance, Tamoxifen acts as an ER antagonist on breast tissue and inhibits breast cells proliferation, however it acts as an ER agonist (i.e., mimicking the effects of oestrogen) in bone and uterine cells [
56]. Its action on oesophageal cancer cells used in Sukocheva et al. [
32] and Due et al. [
34] is not clearly explained whether based on its antagonist or agonist property. In comparison, MPP and PTHPP are highly selective ER antagonists and blocking them allows one to suggest that any experimental effects are likely due to the involvement of these receptors.
There are a few limitations in this study. Firstly, in vitro experiments carried out to investigate the potential role of E2 and ER do not often mimic effects in vivo. For this reason, the findings may not necessarily produce similar biological effects if experiments are run in vivo
. Secondly, the cancer cell lines used in this study might have undergone epigenetic modifications and so this could somewhat affect the results generated [
57]. Thirdly, the work conducted in this study to address the change of ER status was performed on samples obtained from patients with only potentially resectable OC. Hence, it is not known whether comparable results are still possibly obtainable if samples are collected from patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Finally, neither the effect of E2 or ER modulators on normal oesophageal epithelial physiology nor ER status in normal oesophageal mucosa samples obtained from patients with non-malignant oesophageal pathologies were investigated.