Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 4/2021

30.01.2021 | Original Contributions

Self-Pay Payer Status Predicts Long-Term Loss to Follow-Up After Bariatric Surgery

verfasst von: Paige L. Martinez, Larissa A. McGarrity, Natalie A. Turner, Eric T. Volckmann, Rebecca M. Kohler, Ellen H. Morrow, Anna R. Ibele

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

In spite of widespread recommendations for lifelong patient follow-up with a bariatric provider after bariatric surgery, attrition to follow-up is common. Over the past two decades, many programs have sought to expand access to care for patients lacking insurance coverage for bariatric surgery by offering “self-pay” packages; however, the impact of this financing on long-term follow-up is unclear. We sought to determine whether payer status impacts loss to follow-up within 1 year after bariatric surgery.

Materials and Methods

Records of 554 consecutive patients undergoing bariatric surgery who were eligible for 1-year post-surgical follow-up between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Multiple logistic regression examined the relationship between demographics, psychological variables, payer status, and loss to follow-up.

Results

Self-pay status more than tripled the odds of loss to follow-up (OR = 3.44, p < 0.01) at 1 year following surgery. Males had more than double the odds of attrition (OR = 2.43, p < 0.01), and members of racial and ethnic minority groups (OR = 2.51, p < 0.05) were more likely to experience loss.

Conclusions

Self-pay patients, males and members of racial and ethnic minority groups, may face additional barriers to long-term access to postoperative bariatric care. Further investigation is greatly needed to develop strategies to overcome barriers to and disparities in long-term post-surgical care for more frequently lost groups.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Harper J, Madan AK, Ternovits CA, et al. What happens to patients who do not follow-up after bariatric surgery? Am Surg. 2007;73(2):181–4.CrossRef Harper J, Madan AK, Ternovits CA, et al. What happens to patients who do not follow-up after bariatric surgery? Am Surg. 2007;73(2):181–4.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Grossi E, Dalle Grave R, Mannucci E, et al. Complexity of attrition in the treatment of obesity: clues from a structured telephone interview. Int J Obes. 2002;30(7):1132.CrossRef Grossi E, Dalle Grave R, Mannucci E, et al. Complexity of attrition in the treatment of obesity: clues from a structured telephone interview. Int J Obes. 2002;30(7):1132.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Moroshko I, Brennan L, O’Brien P. Predictors of attrition in bariatric aftercare: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Surg. 2012;22(10):1640–7.CrossRef Moroshko I, Brennan L, O’Brien P. Predictors of attrition in bariatric aftercare: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Surg. 2012;22(10):1640–7.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sockalingam S, Cassin S, Hawa R, et al. Predictors of post-bariatric surgery appointment attendance: the role of relationship style. Obes Surg. 2013;23(12):2026–32.CrossRef Sockalingam S, Cassin S, Hawa R, et al. Predictors of post-bariatric surgery appointment attendance: the role of relationship style. Obes Surg. 2013;23(12):2026–32.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen R, Dugay G, Rajaram K, et al. Impact of patient follow-up on weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2004;14(4):514–9.CrossRef Shen R, Dugay G, Rajaram K, et al. Impact of patient follow-up on weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2004;14(4):514–9.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat O'Brien PE, MacDonald L, Anderson M, et al. Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: fifteen-year follow-up of adjustable gastric banding and a systematic review of the bariatric surgical literature. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):87–94.CrossRef O'Brien PE, MacDonald L, Anderson M, et al. Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: fifteen-year follow-up of adjustable gastric banding and a systematic review of the bariatric surgical literature. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):87–94.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Higa K, Ho T, Tercero F, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(4):516–25.CrossRef Higa K, Ho T, Tercero F, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(4):516–25.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wheeler E, Prettyman A, Lenhard MJ, et al. Adherence to outpatient program postoperative appointments after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(4):515–20.CrossRef Wheeler E, Prettyman A, Lenhard MJ, et al. Adherence to outpatient program postoperative appointments after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(4):515–20.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD. Psychometric evaluation of the impact of weight on quality of life-lite questionnaire (IWQOL-lite) in a community sample. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(2):157–71.CrossRef Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD. Psychometric evaluation of the impact of weight on quality of life-lite questionnaire (IWQOL-lite) in a community sample. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(2):157–71.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Moos RH. Coping responses inventory: an update on research applications and validity. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2004. Moos RH. Coping responses inventory: an update on research applications and validity. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2004.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Parkerson Jr GR, Broadhead WE, Tse CK. Validation of the Duke Social Support and Stress Scale. Fam Med. 1991;23(5):357–60.PubMed Parkerson Jr GR, Broadhead WE, Tse CK. Validation of the Duke Social Support and Stress Scale. Fam Med. 1991;23(5):357–60.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarason I, Sarason BR, Shearin EN, et al. A brief measure of social support: practical and theoretical implications. J Soc Pers Relat. 1987; Sarason I, Sarason BR, Shearin EN, et al. A brief measure of social support: practical and theoretical implications. J Soc Pers Relat. 1987;
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Spaniolas K, Kasten KR, Celio A, et al. Postoperative follow-up after bariatric surgery: effect on weight loss. Obes Surg. 2016;26(4):900–3.CrossRef Spaniolas K, Kasten KR, Celio A, et al. Postoperative follow-up after bariatric surgery: effect on weight loss. Obes Surg. 2016;26(4):900–3.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Welbourn R, Pournaras D. Bariatric surgery: a cost-effective intervention for morbid obesity; functional and nutritional outcomes. Proc Nutr Soc. 2010;69(4):528–35.CrossRef Welbourn R, Pournaras D. Bariatric surgery: a cost-effective intervention for morbid obesity; functional and nutritional outcomes. Proc Nutr Soc. 2010;69(4):528–35.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Crémieux PY, Buchwald H, Shikora SA. A study on the economic impact of bariatric surgery. Am J Manag Care. 2008;14(9):589–96.PubMed Crémieux PY, Buchwald H, Shikora SA. A study on the economic impact of bariatric surgery. Am J Manag Care. 2008;14(9):589–96.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Powers KA, Rehrig ST, Jones DB. Financial impact of obesity and bariatric surgery. Med Clin N Am. 2007;91(3):321–38.CrossRef Powers KA, Rehrig ST, Jones DB. Financial impact of obesity and bariatric surgery. Med Clin N Am. 2007;91(3):321–38.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams TD, Gress RE, Smith SC, et al. Long-term mortality after gastric bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):753–61.CrossRef Adams TD, Gress RE, Smith SC, et al. Long-term mortality after gastric bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):753–61.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams TD, Davidson LE, Litwin SE, et al. Weight and metabolic outcomes 12 years after gastric bypass. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1143–55.CrossRef Adams TD, Davidson LE, Litwin SE, et al. Weight and metabolic outcomes 12 years after gastric bypass. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1143–55.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Goode RW, Ye L, Sereika SM, et al. Socio-demographic, anthropometric, and psychosocial predictors of attrition across behavioral weight-loss trials. Eat Behav. 2016;20:27–33.CrossRef Goode RW, Ye L, Sereika SM, et al. Socio-demographic, anthropometric, and psychosocial predictors of attrition across behavioral weight-loss trials. Eat Behav. 2016;20:27–33.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ard JD, Emery M, Cook M, et al. Skin in the game: does paying for obesity treatment out of pocket lead to better outcomes compared to insurance coverage? Obesity. 2017;25(6):993–6.CrossRef Ard JD, Emery M, Cook M, et al. Skin in the game: does paying for obesity treatment out of pocket lead to better outcomes compared to insurance coverage? Obesity. 2017;25(6):993–6.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Piette JD, Wagner TH, Potter MB, et al. Health insurance status, cost-related medication underuse, and outcomes among diabetes patients in three systems of care. Med Care. 2004;42(2):102–9. www.jstor.org/stable/4640706. Accessed 5 July 2020CrossRef Piette JD, Wagner TH, Potter MB, et al. Health insurance status, cost-related medication underuse, and outcomes among diabetes patients in three systems of care. Med Care. 2004;42(2):102–9. www.​jstor.​org/​stable/​4640706. Accessed 5 July 2020CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Boddiger D. Lack of insurance hinders Americans’ diabetes care. Lancet. 2006;368(9529):15–6.CrossRef Boddiger D. Lack of insurance hinders Americans’ diabetes care. Lancet. 2006;368(9529):15–6.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayes S, Napolitano MA, Lent MR, et al. The effect of insurance status on pre- and post-operative bariatric surgery outcomes. Obes Surg. 2015;25:191–4.CrossRef Hayes S, Napolitano MA, Lent MR, et al. The effect of insurance status on pre- and post-operative bariatric surgery outcomes. Obes Surg. 2015;25:191–4.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Takemoto E, Wolfe BM, Nagel CL, et al. Insurance status differences in weight loss and regain over 5 years following bariatric surgery. Int J Obes. 2018;42:1211–20.CrossRef Takemoto E, Wolfe BM, Nagel CL, et al. Insurance status differences in weight loss and regain over 5 years following bariatric surgery. Int J Obes. 2018;42:1211–20.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Self-Pay Payer Status Predicts Long-Term Loss to Follow-Up After Bariatric Surgery
verfasst von
Paige L. Martinez
Larissa A. McGarrity
Natalie A. Turner
Eric T. Volckmann
Rebecca M. Kohler
Ellen H. Morrow
Anna R. Ibele
Publikationsdatum
30.01.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05161-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Obesity Surgery 4/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.