Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Public Health 1/2018

Open Access 01.12.2018 | Research article

Self-reported health behaviors, including sleep, correlate with doctor-informed medical conditions: data from the 2011 Health Related Behaviors Survey of U.S. Active Duty Military Personnel

verfasst von: Adela Hruby, Harris R. Lieberman, Tracey J. Smith

Erschienen in: BMC Public Health | Ausgabe 1/2018

Abstract

Background

Health behaviors and cardiometabolic disease risk factors may differ between military and civilian populations; therefore, in U.S. active duty military personnel, we assessed relationships between demographic characteristics, self-reported health behaviors, and doctor-informed medical conditions.

Methods

Data were self-reported by 27,034 active duty military and Coast Guard personnel who responded to the 2011 Department of Defense Health Related Behaviors Survey. Multivariate linear and logistic regressions were used to estimate cross-sectional associations between (1) demographic characteristics (age, sex, service branch, marital status, children, race/ethnicity, pay grade) and self-reported behaviors (exercise, diet, smoking, alcohol, sleep); (2) demographic characteristics and doctor-informed medical conditions (hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, low high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, hyperglycemia) and overweight/obesity; and (3) behaviors and doctor-informed medical conditions.

Results

Among respondents (age 29.9 ± 0.1 years, 14.7% female), females reported higher intake than men of fruit, vegetables, and dairy; those with higher education reported higher intakes of whole grains; those currently married and/or residing with children reported higher intake of starches. Older age and female sex were associated with higher odds (ORs 1.25 to 12.54 versus the youngest age group) of overweight/obesity. Older age and female sex were also associated with lower odds (ORs 0.29 to 0.65 versus male sex) of doctor-informed medical conditions, except for blood glucose, for which females had higher odds. Those currently married had higher odds of high cholesterol and overweight/obesity, and separated/divorced/widowed respondents had higher odds of high blood pressure and high cholesterol. Short sleep duration (< 5 versus 7–8 h/night) was associated with higher odds (ORs 1.36to 2.22) of any given doctor-informed medical condition. Strength training was associated with lower probability of high cholesterol, high triglycerides, and low HDL, and higher probability of overweight/obesity. Dietary factors were variably associated with doctor-informed medical conditions and overweight/obesity.

Conclusions

This study observed pronounced associations between health behaviors—especially sleep—and medical conditions, thus adding to evidence that sleep is a critical, potentially modifiable behavior within this population. When possible, adequate sleep should continue to be promoted as an important part of overall health and wellness throughout the military community.
Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12889-018-5781-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Abkürzungen
BMI
Body mass index
CI
Confidence interval
d
Day
DOD
Department of Defense
HDL
High-density lipoprotein
HRBS
Health Related Behavior Survey
hrs
Hours
OR
Odds ratio
ser
Servings
TMA
Tricare Management Activity
U.S.
United States
USCG
United States Coast Guard
wk.
Week
y
Years

Background

The U.S. Military maintains extensive records on the health of US Military personnel and their families via its healthcare system. However, information regarding health behaviors is not usually present in these records. Therefore, to systematically assess health behaviors among active duty personnel, the U.S. Department of Defense conducts a triennial Health Related Behaviors Survey (HRBS) of active duty military personnel [1], which assesses a range of self-reported health behaviors and risks, such as physical activity, diet, drug and alcohol use, posttraumatic stress, and doctor-informed medical conditions. The representative survey includes responses from participants in all branches of the Department of Defense [DoD] (Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force), as well as U.S. Coast Guard [USCG] members. The survey is voluntary and anonymous, and is used to guide the health-related policies in the Armed Forces. The HRBS provides data that are otherwise unavailable in this large subset of the U.S. population, approximately 1.3 million service members, since active duty military are excluded from national or state health-related surveys, such as the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) or the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).
HRBS data have been used in a number of ways to study active duty and USCG personnel, for example, to identify whether they meet the Healthy People 2010 objectives [2], to describe mental health patterns and associations [35], and assess changes over time in self-reported overweight/obesity [6, 7]. In depth analysis of demographic characteristics and health-related behaviors, and their association with self-reported health outcomes, may alter the manner in which military personnel are assessed and counseled for potential modifiable and non-modifiable demographic and behavioral risks. Furthermore, associations between health behaviors and disease risk factors may be different in military versus non-military populations due to differences in occupational demands and lifestyle characteristics. For example, deployment absences and frequent moves are sources of family stress that are more common in military than civilian families [8, 9]. Military personnel are required to meet standards of physical fitness and weight (or body composition) [10] and engage in regular physical training [11, 12]. Military personnel are part of a workforce with institutionalized standards and a unique warrior culture and ethos not present in the civilian workforce. [13] The unique occupational demands frequently involve high risk activities (e.g., combat), which are an inherent part of military service [14]. Also in contrast to civilians, and of specific relevance to the present research, military personnel and their dependents are eligible to receive healthcare at little or no cost [9].
Therefore, the aims of this study were to examine relationships between generally unmodifiable sociodemographic factors (e.g., age, sex, race/ethnicity) and self-reported health behaviors (e.g., exercise and diet), as well as relationships between these sociodemographic factors and self-reported, doctor-informed medical conditions (i.e., hypertension, dyslipidemia, and hyperglycemia) and overweight/obesity. We also examined the relationships between these self-reported health behaviors and the medical conditions.

Methods

Survey participants

The 2011 HRBS was conducted by ICF International under contract with the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, Tricare Management Activity (TMA; now Defense Health Agency), and the USCG [15]. Primary data collection was approved by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs/TRICARE Management Activity (OASD (HA)/TMA), Human Research Protection Office. Informed consent was required and obtained at the beginning of the HRBS, and responses were anonymous. For the present secondary data analyses, we obtained a de-identified data file from TMA through a data use agreement. Because the data were previously collected and de-identified, the protocol for the present study was deemed exempt (not human subject research) by both the U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (Natick, MA) and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs/TRICARE Management Activity (OASD (HA)/TMA), Human Research Protection Office.
The sampling strategy, survey administration, and questionnaire format are extensively described in the initial report of the 2011 HRBS [15]. In brief, a stratified random sample was drawn from all non-deployed active duty Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and USCG personnel. A second stratified random sample was drawn within each service branch using a combination of sex and pay grade as stratification variables. The resulting group was randomly divided into a group to whom invitations to take the survey were sent, as well as two other groups to use in case of a low response rate. The USCG used a different sampling method, dividing its population into two groups, one of which was sampled using geographic clustering while the other was sampled using stratification on work setting, sex, and pay grade. The eligible sample of potential respondents was 168,664 (154,011 from the DoD services and 14,653 from the USCG) [15].
Invitations to participate in the survey and reminders to complete it were distributed via email. Participants were allowed to opt out of taking the survey. The survey was available for 5 months after the initial invitations were sent in August 2011 (October 2011 for USCG). Those who did not have listed email addresses were mailed physical invitations. The response rate was 22% from the DoD services, and 37% from the USCG, with a total of 39,877 usable, eligible responses [15]. Individuals who did not respond to questions on the variables of interest were excluded from the present analysis, for a final analytic sample size of 27,034. Characteristics of those included and excluded from the present analyses are provided in Additional file 1: Table S1.
All variables described below are derived from responses to the publicly available 2011 HRBS questionnaire [16].

Sociodemographic variables

Sociodemographic variables included in the present analysis were service branch, sex, age, race/ethnicity, education, pay grade, marital status, and presence of minor children living with the respondent. Specifically, respondents were asked to report service branch (Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, Coast Guard), sex (male, female), age (< 20, 21–25, 26–35, 36–45, 46–65 years), education (up to high school or equivalent, some college without a degree, 2-year college degree, 4-year college degree, graduate education), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, and other/multiple race/ethnicity), pay grade (7 categories), current marital status (never married, married, separated/divorced/widowed), and number of children < 18 years living with the respondent at the duty station (0, ≥1 children).

Health behavior variables

Health behaviors assessed included modifiable lifestyle factors: dietary intake, physical activity, cigarette smoking, alcohol intake, and sleep.
The 2011 HRBS questionnaire [16] asked about food intake during a given week, specifically the frequency of consumption of fruit (including “fresh, frozen, canned, or dried”), starchy vegetables (including “white potatoes, corn, peas”), vegetables (including “fresh, frozen, canned, cooked, or raw [not fried]”), whole grains (including “rye, whole-grain bread, brown or wild rice, whole-wheat pasta, oatmeal, etc.”), dairy (including “milk, yogurt, cheese, etc.”), lean protein (including “baked or broiled lean [low fat] meat, eggs, natural peanut butter, nuts, beans or legumes, tofu”), snack foods (including “potato chips, corn chips, pretzels”), sweets (including “chocolate, candy, cake, pie, breakfast bars, etc.”), sugary drinks (including “juice, regular soda, Kool-Aid, Yoo-hoo, sports drinks, etc.”), caffeinated drinks (including “coffee, tea, or energy drinks [Red Bull, Monster, 5-Hour Energy, Power Shots, etc.]”), and fried foods (including “French fries, fried chicken, donuts, etc.”). Response choices for each food were: rarely/never to ≥3 times per day. Each reported instance of eating a given food was counted as one serving of that food. For example, if a respondent reported they ate fruit twice per day, it was coded as two servings of fruit per day.
Respondents were asked about the frequency (daily to “not at all in the past 30 days”) and duration (≥60 min/day to “never in the past month”) of moderate (“exertion that raises heart rate and breathing, but you should be able to carry on a conversation comfortably during the activity”) and vigorous (“exertion that is high enough that you would find it difficult to carry on a conversation during the activity”) physical activity and strength training. Responses were recoded into minutes per week and summed for total physical activity; moderate and vigorous exercise minutes were also summed for total aerobic physical activity.
Cigarette smoking was classified into never-smoked, former smoker (abstinent for > 6 mo), or current smoker based on responses to questions on lifetime cigarette smoking, last smoking occasion, current smoking, and cigarettes per day.
Alcohol intake (drinks/day in last month) was quantified based on responses to questions on the average frequency and amount of alcohol consumed in the last month.
Sleep (hrs/d) was coded based on reported sleep hours in a typical 24-h period in the previous week. Reported typical sleep hours ≤2 or ≥ 16 h/d over the previous week were considered non-habitual (i.e., rare or due to extenuating circumstances such as periodic training exercise, illness, etc.).

Doctor-informed medical condition and overweight/obesity variables

Medical conditions in the present analysis included overweight/obesity, and 4 doctor-informed health conditions (hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, low HDL cholesterol, hyperglycemia).
Respondents were asked to report their height (feet and inches) and their weight (pounds). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the weight (kg) divided by the square of the height (m). BMI values ≤12 or ≥ 50 kg/m2 were considered implausible.
Respondents were asked whether they had been told by a doctor or other health care professional that they had high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, low HDL cholesterol (“low amounts of good cholesterol”), or high triglycerides (“blood fat”). Response choices were “No”, “Yes, within the past 2 years,” or “Yes, more than 2 years ago”. Either yes response was coded as having the condition.

Other covariates

In addition to the above, we included weight history based on whether a respondent reported having had to lose weight to enter service and if so, how much (5-lb categories ranging from 0 to ≥30 lbs). Respondents were also asked whether they were currently enrolled in mandatory weight control program (yes, no). A yes response was considered a marker of history of overweight/obesity, irrespective of current reported (calculated) BMI. We also assessed history of deployment since September 11, 2001 (yes, no).

Statistical analysis

The original survey incorporated sample weights applied post-stratification to compensate for lower response rates and disparate selection probabilities across strata and enable the sample to resemble the active duty population as a whole. Separate weights were applied for USCG members based on the mode of sampling used with the goal to reflect the entire population of the USCG [15]. In the present analysis, we used a restricted sample with complete responses on questions/variables of interest (exclusions noted above). Because responses may be missing at random, or missing completely at random, for systematic reasons (e.g., survey length), or for biased reasons (e.g., undesirable response), and because such reasons are unknown, we did not impute responses of non-completers from completer data. However, to maintain consistency of the restricted sample with the respondent sample, and thus, with the active duty population, we adjusted the original sample weights by multiplying the original weights of respondents within each stratum (service, sex, pay grade) by the number of completers in each stratum. These adjusted sample weights were used in the present analyses.
For binary dependent variables, logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the outcome; for continuous dependent variables, linear regression was used to estimate least square means and standard errors of the dependent variable in categories of the independent variables. Survey procedures available in SAS (v9.3, Cary, North Carolina) designed to deal with complex survey designs and sampling weights were used. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.
The present analyses evaluated the following associations: 1) demographic characteristics with health behaviors; 2) demographic characteristics with doctor-informed medical conditions and overweight/obesity, and 3) health behaviors with medical conditions. Models of demographic characteristics predicting either health behaviors or medical conditions included all demographic characteristics simultaneously, and additionally adjusted for enrollment in weight loss program, weight loss history, and deployment history. There were 3 models of health behavior associations with medical conditions: model 1 included all behaviors simultaneously; model 2 additionally adjusted for all demographic characteristics; model 3 additionally adjusted for enrollment in weight loss program, weight loss history, and deployment history. Results from all models can be found in the Additional file 1; for simplicity we present only the results of the fully adjusted model in the main text.
Given the large number of health behaviors evaluated, we also conducted secondary exploratory factor analysis to assess possible patterns within the 17 behaviors of diet, exercise, sleep, alcohol, smoking, that may predict medical conditions. Four factors (named “Healthy diet,” “Unhealthy diet,” “Exercise,” and “Bad habits”; Additional file 1: Table S2) were derived using a principal components approach, with varimax orthogonal rotation, retaining eigenvalues ≥1. Factors were named based on factor loadings >|0.20| and subsequently included in logistic regression models (models 1–3, as above, where behaviors were replaced with factors) assessing their associations with medical conditions.

Results

Of the 27,034 respondents included in the analysis, 29, 17, 21, 19, and 14%, were in the Air Force, Army, Marines, Navy, and USCG, respectively (Table 1). The weighted mean (SEM) age of respondents was 29.9 (0.1) years; weighted percentages showed 14.7% were female, 69.8% identified as non-Hispanic white, 8.6% as non-Hispanic black, 25.5% had at least a high school education, 37.2% had completed some college, 58.9% were married, and 39.9% had one or more children residing with them. Just over 10% reported having to lose some weight to join a service, but only 3% reported being currently enrolled in a weight control program. A majority of respondents (61.3%) reported having been deployed at some point since September 11, 2001.
Table 1
Characteristics of 27,034 respondents to the 2011 Health Risk Behavior Survey, by service branch
 
Air Force
Army
Marine Corps
Navy
Coast Guard
Total Sample
Characteristics a
N
Mean ± SEM or %
N
Mean ± SEM or %
N
Mean ± SEM or %
N
Mean ± SEM or %
N
Mean ± SEM or %
N
Mean ± SEM or %
Sociodemographic
Age, y
7846
29.87 ± 0.09
4726
31.96 ± 0.15
5608
26.63 ± 0.10
5169
30.61 ± 0.13
3685
31.05 ± 0.13
27,034
29.86 ± 0.06
  < 20 y
513
6.7
121
4.38
466
12.44
107
3.75
74
2.46
1281
6.35
 20–≤25 y
2245
29.3
638
21.49
1619
43.47
911
28.34
761
24.36
6174
30.03
 25–≤30 y
1707
23.9
862
22.96
1195
21.07
1051
24.25
910
26.64
5725
23.58
 30–≤35 y
1169
15.8
851
17.94
875
10.54
977
17.14
759
20.87
4631
16.04
 35–≤40 y
1220
13.6
947
16.54
841
7.69
970
14.39
572
13.29
4550
12.98
  > 40 y
992
10.7
1307
16.70
612
4.78
1153
12.13
609
12.39
4673
11.02
Sex, female
2816
19.8
1647
14.3
1572
7.2
1936
16.6
556
13.17
8527
14.7
Education
 High school or equiv.
1096
15.9
531
19.99
1736
43.78
891
26.61
791
23.42
5045
25.5
 Some college
2620
36.4
1435
37.34
2051
36.38
1553
35.62
1427
41.99
9086
37.2
 2-year college
1608
19.0
656
12.51
420
5.84
757
11.88
391
10.37
3832
12.6
 4-year college
862
9.5
819
15.30
816
9.18
852
12.08
481
12.46
3830
11.3
 Beyond college
1660
19.2
1285
14.86
585
4.83
1116
13.81
595
11.76
5241
13.4
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic white
5736
74.3
3062
66.8
3699
67.0
3325
63.0
2861
77.4
18,683
69.8
 Non-Hispanic black
686
7.6
719
12.0
542
8.1
680
11.4
135
3.4
2762
8.6
 Hispanic
804
10.2
564
13.1
983
17.8
592
13.3
412
12.1
3355
13.1
 Other/multiple
620
7.9
381
8.1
384
7.2
572
12.3
277
7.2
2234
8.5
Marital status
 Never married
2270
29.3
842
23.12
1559
39.75
1323
31.49
942
28.13
6936
30.7
 Currently married
4669
60.4
3126
64.44
3388
51.27
3138
57.27
2365
62.21
16,686
58.9
 Separated/divorced/ widowed
907
10.3
758
12.45
661
8.99
708
11.23
378
9.67
3412
10.5
Children, N
7846
0.81 ± 0.01
4726
0.85 ± 0.02
5608
0.60 ± 0.02
5169
0.75 ± 0.02
3685
0.79 ± 0.02
27,034
0.76 ± 0.01
 None
4537
57.6
2496
57.31
3116
68.02
2769
60.14
2026
57.21
14,944
60.1
 One or more
3309
42.40
2230
42.69
2492
31.98
2400
39.87
1659
42.79
12,090
39.9
Pay gradeb
 E1-E4
2718
35.96
1205
47.48
1850
57.82
957
39.14
993
33.15
7723
42.7
 E5-E6
2186
34.39
1084
24.88
1529
23.46
1572
34.70
1293
37.46
7664
30.9
 E7-E9
1287
9.99
673
10.03
859
7.49
1069
8.89
481
10.79
4369
9.4
 WO1-WO5
517
2.84
312
1.11
228
0.50
163
3.51
1220
1.3
 O1-O3
1052
11.3
485
8.90
564
6.66
763
9.80
400
`
3259
9.3
 O4-O10
603
8.34
762
5.87
494
3.45
580
6.97
355
6.14
2794
6.3
Enrolled in current weight control program
145
1.83
145
3.82
143
2.71
203
3.92
108
3.26
744
3.0
Weight loss to join service
 None
7076
89.87
4232
87.99
5000
87.03
4734
90.84
3387
91.34
24,429
89.3
  < 5 lbs
70
0.80
39
0.92
56
0.74
35
0.58
26
0.66
226
0.8
 5–9 lbs
186
2.22
143
3.03
156
2.38
102
1.93
74
2.22
661
2.3
 10–14 lbs
201
2.75
119
2.50
139
2.93
123
2.21
59
1.67
641
2.5
 15–19 lbs
84
1.13
51
1.30
73
1.89
54
1.35
45
1.41
307
1.4
 20–29 lbs
108
1.45
48
1.23
73
1.76
59
1.27
38
1.05
326
1.4
  ≥ 30 lbs
121
1.78
94
3.04
111
3.26
62
1.82
56
1.65
444
2.3
Deployed since 9/2001
4384
57.25
3587
69.25
3820
57.96
3949
70.22
1980
52.58
17,720
61.26
Health behaviors
Dietary intake (ser/wk)
 Fruit
7846
8.74 ± 0.08
4726
7.81 ± 0.12
5608
7.98 ± 0.11
5169
8.64 ± 0.12
3685
9.11 ± 0.11
27,034
8.45 ± 0.05
 Starch
 
5.94 ± 0.06
 
6.11 ± 0.10
 
6.29 ± 0.10
 
6.04 ± 0.10
 
6.12 ± 0.09
 
6.09 ± 0.04
 Vegetables
 
9.75 ± 0.08
 
9.12 ± 0.12
 
8.68 ± 0.11
 
9.54 ± 0.12
 
10.20 ± 0.11
 
9.44 ± 0.05
 Whole grains
 
9.70 ± 0.08
 
9.24 ± 0.12
 
9.17 ± 0.11
 
9.24 ± 0.12
 
9.69 ± 0.11
 
9.42 ± 0.05
 Dairy
 
9.61 ± 0.07
 
9.25 ± 0.13
 
8.89 ± 0.12
 
9.05 ± 0.12
 
9.97 ± 0.11
 
9.35 ± 0.05
 Lean meat
 
9.81 ± 0.07
 
9.41 ± 0.13
 
9.48 ± 0.12
 
9.40 ± 0.12
 
10.12 ± 0.11
 
9.64 ± 0.05
 Snacks
 
3.66 ± 0.05
 
3.68 ± 0.09
 
4.17 ± 0.09
 
3.89 ± 0.09
 
3.84 ± 0.08
 
3.84 ± 0.04
 Sweets
 
3.61 ± 0.05
 
3.75 ± 0.09
 
3.80 ± 0.09
 
3.85 ± 0.09
 
3.66 ± 0.08
 
3.73 ± 0.04
 Sugary drinks
 
4.68 ± 0.07
 
5.86 ± 0.14
 
6.22 ± 0.12
 
5.05 ± 0.12
 
4.39 ± 0.10
 
5.24 ± 0.05
 Caffeinated drinks
 
7.38 ± 0.08
 
8.47 ± 0.14
 
7.66 ± 0.13
 
8.02 ± 0.13
 
9.25 ± 0.13
 
8.01 ± 0.05
 Fried food
 
2.72 ± 0.04
 
2.85 ± 0.08
 
3.26 ± 0.08
 
3.04 ± 0.08
 
2.66 ± 0.06
 
2.90 ± 0.03
Exercise (min/wk)
 Moderate aerobic
7846
159.9 ± 1.5
4726
203.6 ± 2.7
5608
186.8 ± 2.5
5169
166.3 ± 2.4
3685
162.6 ± 2.3
27,034
174.7 ± 1.0
 Vigorous aerobic
 
110.8 ± 1.2
 
130.5 ± 2.3
 
130.0 ± 2.2
 
104.1 ± 2.1
 
100.7 ± 1.9
 
115.6 ± 0.8
 Strength training
 
97.8 ± 1.3
 
113.1 ± 2.3
 
124.6 ± 2.4
 
92.0 ± 2.2
 
93.5 ± 1.9
 
104.4 ± 0.9
Smoking
 Current
1221
16.63
945
26.88
1317
30.47
979
24.63
675
19.87
5137
23.24
 Former
1337
17.00
882
18.28
1061
16.07
998
17.22
774
21.12
5052
17.64
 Never
5288
66.38
2899
54.85
3230
53.45
3192
58.15
2236
59.02
16,845
59.11
Alcohol intake, drinks/d
7846
0.20 ± 0.01
4726
0.31 ± 0.01
5608
0.45 ± 0.02
5169
0.32 ± 0.01
3685
0.31 ± 0.01
27,034
0.31 ± 0.00
 Non-drinker
1784
22.57
1072
23.25
1127
19.81
1021
20.47
527
14.76
5531
20.64
  < 1/2 drink/d
4932
62.39
2564
54.06
2941
50.07
2967
55.46
2150
58.44
15,554
56.53
 1/2–1 drink/d
978
12.69
872
16.28
1116
19.47
998
18.73
851
22.22
4815
17.17
 1–< 2 drinks/d
107
1.64
152
4.29
253
6.08
124
3.11
109
3.20
745
3.52
 2–< 4 drinks/d
34
0.52
49
1.66
139
3.69
47
1.74
36
1.06
305
1.68
  ≥ 4 drinks/d
11
0.19
17
0.47
32
0.88
12
0.47
12
0.32
84
0.45
Sleep, hrs/night
7846
6.58 ± 0.02
4726
6.05 ± 0.03
5608
6.14 ± 0.03
5169
6.24 ± 0.03
3685
6.55 ± 0.02
27,034
6.33 ± 0.01
  < 5 h/night
503
6.45
616
15.10
674
13.51
536
12.65
186
4.77
2515
10.36
 5–< 6 h/night
1158
14.49
960
21.71
1190
22.52
1031
20.06
551
14.63
4890
18.48
 6–< 7 h/night
2433
31.56
1599
32.88
1835
31.87
1740
31.74
1278
34.35
8885
32.27
 7–< 8 h/night
2196
28.01
967
18.71
1194
18.97
1186
21.51
1087
29.80
6630
23.54
 8–< 9 h/night
1309
16.57
489
9.79
580
10.82
561
11.49
509
14.23
3448
12.92
 9–< 10 h/night
176
2.11
58
1.03
67
1.05
57
1.20
44
1.27
402
1.42
 ≥ 10 h/night
71
0.81
37
0.76
68
1.26
58
1.34
30
0.94
264
1.01
Medical conditions
High blood pressure
887
11.7
836
16.2
759
12.5
775
13.8
456
11.7
3713
13.0
High cholesterol
965
12.1
858
13.9
659
8.2
989
15.3
627
15.6
4098
12.7
High triglycerides
454
5.9
324
5.2
179
2.1
470
7.4
318
7.7
1745
5.5
Low HDL cholesterol
474
6.1
416
6.7
219
2.7
478
7.7
334
8.1
1921
6.1
High blood glucose
92
1.1
110
1.8
78
1.1
151
2.4
68
1.6
499
1.5
Body mass index, kg/m2
7846
25.74 ± 0.04
4726
26.57 ± 0.07
5608
25.36 ± 0.05
5169
26.42 ± 0.06
3685
26.33 ± 0.06
27,034
26.02 ± 0.03
 Overweight/obese
4309
58.2
3128
67.8
3005
58.2
3358
66.0
2492
67.6
16,292
62.6
Total conditions, N
7846
0.37 ± 0.01
4726
0.44 ± 0.01
5608
0.27 ± 0.01
5169
0.47 ± 0.02
3685
0.45 ± 0.02
27,034
0.39 ± 0.01
 ≥ 1 condition(s)
1749
22.3
1528
27.1
1263
18.5
1607
26.5
1047
26.1
7194
23.7
a Characteristics are weighted to representative populations
b Pay grade E denotes Enlisted, W denotes Warrant Officer, and O denotes Officer
Weighted responses indicated low weekly intake of fried food, sweets, and snacks (~ 3–4 ser/wk), moderate intake of starches and sugary drinks (~ 5–6 ser/wk), and at least daily intake of fruit, vegetables, whole grains, dairy, lean meat, and caffeinated drinks (~ 8–10 ser/wk). Respondents reported 175, 116, and 104 min/wk. of moderate exercise, vigorous exercise, and strength training, respectively. Nearly 60% of the weighted sample reported never smoking. Average intake of alcohol in the prior month was a third of drink per day, with > 20% of the weighted sample reporting no alcohol intake. Average sleep duration was 6.3 h/night, with 32% reporting 6–7 h/night—the largest sleep category.
Nearly 24% of the sample reported having at least one medical condition of five possible doctor-informed conditions: 13.0% reported high blood pressure; 12.7% high cholesterol; 5.5% high triglycerides; 6.1% low HDL cholesterol; and 1.5% high blood glucose. Nearly 63% of the sample categorized themselves as overweight or obese, and mean BMI was 26 kg/m2.

Associations of sociodemographic variables and health behaviors

In fully-adjusted models, several sociodemographic characteristics were associated with health behaviors. Exercise (both aerobic and strength training) duration was longer in younger age groups, males, those in the Army or Marine Corps, service members with higher educational attainment, separated/divorced/widowed, or individuals without children present (Table 2). Alcohol intake was highest in those age 21–25 y, and lower in higher age groups, was highest in those in the Marine Corps, males, in those with lower educational attainment, non-Hispanic whites, and was lowest among those currently married and those with children present. Average sleep time was longest in the youngest age category and in those in the Air Force or Coast Guard. Current smoking was less likely in the older age categories, among those in the Army or Marine Corps, in the currently or previously married, and was more likely in males, in those with higher educational attainment, and in non-Hispanic blacks.
Table 2
Associations between sociodemographic characteristics and health behaviors (i.e., exercise, alcohol, sleep, and smoking)a
 
Mean ± SE
OR (95% CI)
Demographic Characteristic
Categories
Moderate exercise (min/wk)
Vigorous exercise (min/wk)
Strength training (min/wk)
Alcohol (drinks/d)
Sleep (hrs/night)
Current smoking
Age
≤20 yrs. (ref.)
171.9 ± 8.33
122.5 ± 8.28
104.3 ± 7.71
0.05 ± 0.03
6.5 ± 0.08
1
21–25 yrs
155.1 ± 6.84
111.7 ± 7.24
101.7 ± 6.33
0.31 ± 0.02
6.3 ± 0.06
0.68 (0.57–0.80)
26–35 yrs
150.7 ± 6.46
104.2 ± 7.00
88.8 ± 6.00
0.27 ± 0.02
6.2 ± 0.05
0.50 (0.41–0.60)
36–45 yrs
137.4 ± 6.47
89.6 ± 7.02
70.4 ± 6.00
0.22 ± 0.02
6.1 ± 0.05
0.52 (0.42–0.64)
46+ yrs
133.3 ± 7.41
81.3 ± 7.57
62.1 ± 6.51
0.20 ± 0.02
6.1 ± 0.06
0.46 (0.36–0.59)
Service
Army (ref.)
178.0 ± 6.78
119.1 ± 7.24
96.6 ± 6.28
0.22 ± 0.02
6.0 ± 0.06
1
Air Force
135.0 ± 6.45
97.6 ± 7.00
81.9 ± 5.99
0.11 ± 0.02
6.5 ± 0.05
1.66 (1.50–1.83)
Coast Guard
137.4 ± 6.79
88.3 ± 7.20
77.6 ± 6.23
0.20 ± 0.02
6.5 ± 0.06
1.46 (1.30–1.63)
Marine Corps
155.5 ± 6.74
112.1 ± 7.20
97.0 ± 6.28
0.32 ± 0.02
6.0 ± 0.06
1.04 (0.92–1.17)
Navy
142.5 ± 6.70
92.2 ± 7.14
74.3 ± 6.19
0.22 ± 0.02
6.2 ± 0.06
1.18 (1.05–1.32)
Sex
Female (ref.)
141.6 ± 6.45
89.6 ± 6.99
66.1 ± 5.96
0.14 ± 0.02
6.3 ± 0.05
1
Male
157.7 ± 6.42
114.1 ± 6.98
104.8 ± 5.98
0.29 ± 0.02
6.2 ± 0.05
1.24 (1.16–1.33)
Education
High school or equiv. (ref.)
139.6 ± 6.82
91.5 ± 7.26
79.3 ± 6.33
0.27 ± 0.02
6.2 ± 0.06
1
Some college
149.4 ± 6.62
99.9 ± 7.12
84.7 ± 6.12
0.22 ± 0.02
6.1 ± 0.06
1.26 (1.15–1.38)
2-year college
145.6 ± 6.88
101.4 ± 7.31
87.4 ± 6.36
0.20 ± 0.02
6.2 ± 0.06
1.65 (1.47–1.85)
4-year college
160.0 ± 6.87
106.5 ± 7.26
89.8 ± 6.31
0.18 ± 0.02
6.3 ± 0.06
2.73 (2.38–3.13)
Beyond college
153.8 ± 6.93
110.0 ± 7.32
86.0 ± 6.34
0.18 ± 0.02
6.4 ± 0.06
3.28 (2.79–3.84)
Race/ethnicity
Non-Hispanic white (ref.)
155.0 ± 6.36
101.4 ± 6.93
74.8 ± 5.91
0.27 ± 0.02
6.3 ± 0.05
1
Non-Hispanic black
144.3 ± 6.89
95.7 ± 7.34
90.0 ± 6.39
0.16 ± 0.02
6.2 ± 0.06
3.57 (3.11–4.09)
Hispanic
151.6 ± 6.86
108.8 ± 7.30
91.4 ± 6.39
0.22 ± 0.02
6.3 ± 0.06
1.73 (1.56–1.92)
Other/multiple
147.9 ± 7.12
101.5 ± 7.47
85.6 ± 6.58
0.18 ± 0.02
6.1 ± 0.06
1.17 (1.04–1.32)
Marital status
Never married (ref.)
144.6 ± 6.62
101.8 ± 7.11
83.4 ± 6.14
0.23 ± 0.02
6.3 ± 0.06
1
Currently married
150.3 ± 6.36
99.4 ± 6.94
80.6 ± 5.93
0.15 ± 0.02
6.4 ± 0.05
0.85 (0.77–0.93)
Separated/divorced/ widowed
154.1 ± 6.98
104.4 ± 7.32
92.4 ± 6.44
0.25 ± 0.02
6.0 ± 0.06
0.59 (0.52–0.67)
Children
0 children (ref.)
154.0 ± 6.37
105.2 ± 6.94
89.3 ± 5.93
0.24 ± 0.02
6.3 ± 0.05
1
1+ children
145.3 ± 6.56
98.5 ± 7.07
81.5 ± 6.08
0.18 ± 0.02
6.2 ± 0.05
0.89 (0.83–0.96)
Pay grade
E1-E4 (ref.)
176.1 ± 2.82
107.1 ± 2.36
99.5 ± 2.40
0.16 ± 0.01
6.3 ± 0.03
1
E5-E6
167.7 ± 2.73
108.4 ± 2.30
97.9 ± 2.33
0.18 ± 0.01
6.2 ± 0.03
0.82 (0.75–0.91)
E7-E9
165.3 ± 3.14
111.0 ± 2.61
97.3 ± 2.66
0.24 ± 0.01
6.3 ± 0.03
0.93 (0.82–1.06)
WO1-WO5
161.5 ± 5.60
102.3 ± 4.35
87.9 ± 4.30
0.24 ± 0.02
6.5 ± 0.05
1.12 (0.91–1.37)
O1-O3
150.3 ± 3.64
102.7 ± 3.06
87.0 ± 3.10
0.22 ± 0.01
6.5 ± 0.03
1.72 (1.48–2.00)
O4-O10
143.3 ± 4.28
101.9 ± 3.57
82.3 ± 3.42
0.30 ± 0.01
6.4 ± 0.04
2.24 (1.84–2.73)
a Reference categories are indicated for tests of differences between means or for odds ratios. All differences from the reference category are statistically significant (P < 0.05), except for means or odds ratios in bold. Linear regressions to estimate least square means, and logistic regressions to estimate odds ratios were adjusted for sample weights. Multivariate analyses included all demographic characteristics simultaneously
Dietary intake of all food groups except vegetables was highest in the youngest age category, and was lower in progressively older age categories (Table 3). Differences in food intake (e.g., starch and fried food) between service branches were small (< 2 ser/wk) or statistically the same across all sociodemographic characteristics. Females reported higher intake than males of fruit, vegetables, and dairy, and lower intake of sugary drinks and fried foods. Those with higher education reported higher intakes of fruit, vegetables, whole grains, and dairy than those with lower education. Those who reported being currently married or having children present reported higher intake of fruit, starches, vegetables, whole grains, and dairy relative to their not married or childless counterparts.
Table 3
Means of dietary intake by sociodemographic characteristicsa
 
Servings/week (mean ± SE)
Characteristic
Categories
Fruit
Starch
Vegetables
Whole grains
Dairy
Sweets
Sugary drinks
Caffeinated drinks
Fried food
Age
≤20 yrs. (ref.)
9.5 ± 0.41
6.3 ± 0.35
10.7 ± 0.40
10.9 ± 0.46
10.5 ± 0.67
4.7 ± 0.26
4.9 ± 0.36
5.7 ± 0.33
3.3 ± 0.23
21–25 yrs
9.0 ± 0.34
5.7 ± 0.29
10.6 ± 0.33
10.3 ± 0.40
10.0 ± 0.63
4.0 ± 0.18
4.2 ± 0.26
6.0 ± 0.24
2.7 ± 0.14
26–35 yrs
8.9 ± 0.32
5.5 ± 0.27
10.9 ± 0.31
9.8 ± 0.39
9.3 ± 0.62
3.8 ± 0.16
3.7 ± 0.24
7.0 ± 0.21
2.4 ± 0.12
36–45 yrs
8.3 ± 0.33
5.0 ± 0.27
10.4 ± 0.32
8.8 ± 0.39
8.2 ± 0.62
3.3 ± 0.16
3.3 ± 0.24
8.1 ± 0.21
2.1 ± 0.12
46+ yrs
8.3 ± 0.37
4.4 ± 0.30
10.4 ± 0.36
8.2 ± 0.42
7.7 ± 0.64
3.1 ± 0.20
2.8 ± 0.28
9.0 ± 0.31
1.8 ± 0.14
Service
Army (ref.)
8.1 ± 0.34
5.5 ± 0.28
10.2 ± 0.33
9.5 ± 0.40
9.2 ± 0.63
3.9 ± 0.18
4.6 ± 0.26
7.4 ± 0.23
2.5 ± 0.14
Air Force
8.8 ± 0.33
5.2 ± 0.27
10.6 ± 0.31
9.7 ± 0.39
9.2 ± 0.62
3.6 ± 0.16
3.5 ± 0.24
6.3 ± 0.21
2.4 ± 0.12
Coast Guard
9.5 ± 0.34
5.4 ± 0.28
11.2 ± 0.33
9.9 ± 0.40
9.7 ± 0.63
3.8 ± 0.17
3.1 ± 0.25
7.7 ± 0.24
2.4 ± 0.13
Marine Corps
8.6 ± 0.34
5.4 ± 0.28
10.2 ± 0.33
9.3 ± 0.40
8.6 ± 0.63
3.7 ± 0.17
4.0 ± 0.26
7.2 ± 0.23
2.5 ± 0.14
Navy
9.0 ± 0.34
5.4 ± 0.28
10.7 ± 0.33
9.5 ± 0.40
9.0 ± 0.63
3.9 ± 0.17
3.7 ± 0.25
7.1 ± 0.23
2.6 ± 0.14
Sex
Female (ref.)
9.3 ± 0.33
4.8 ± 0.27
11.0 ± 0.31
9.4 ± 0.39
9.3 ± 0.62
3.8 ± 0.16
2.9 ± 0.24
6.7 ± 0.21
2.0 ± 0.12
Male
8.3 ± 0.32
6.0 ± 0.27
10.2 ± 0.31
9.8 ± 0.39
8.9 ± 0.62
3.7 ± 0.16
4.6 ± 0.24
7.6 ± 0.20
3.0 ± 0.12
Education
High school or equiv. (ref.)
8.0 ± 0.34
5.2 ± 0.29
9.8 ± 0.33
8.7 ± 0.40
8.8 ± 0.63
3.9 ± 0.18
5.0 ± 0.26
7.6 ± 0.24
2.8 ± 0.14
Some college
8.5 ± 0.33
5.4 ± 0.28
10.4 ± 0.32
9.3 ± 0.39
9.1 ± 0.62
3.5 ± 0.16
4.0 ± 0.24
7.2 ± 0.22
2.6 ± 0.13
2-year college
8.9 ± 0.35
5.6 ± 0.29
10.6 ± 0.34
9.7 ± 0.40
9.1 ± 0.63
3.7 ± 0.18
3.4 ± 0.26
7.3 ± 0.25
2.4 ± 0.14
4-year college
9.2 ± 0.34
5.3 ± 0.29
10.8 ± 0.33
10.0 ± 0.40
9.3 ± 0.63
4.0 ± 0.18
3.4 ± 0.26
6.8 ± 0.24
2.4 ± 0.14
Beyond college
9.5 ± 0.35
5.4 ± 0.29
11.4 ± 0.34
10.3 ± 0.40
9.4 ± 0.63
3.9 ± 0.18
3.1 ± 0.26
7.0 ± 0.25
2.2 ± 0.14
Race/ethnicity
Non-Hispanic white (ref.)
9.0 ± 0.32
5.6 ± 0.27
11.3 ± 0.31
10.2 ± 0.38
10.4 ± 0.62
3.7 ± 0.15
3.7 ± 0.23
9.3 ± 0.20
2.2 ± 0.12
Non-Hispanic black
8.5 ± 0.35
5.3 ± 0.29
10.0 ± 0.34
8.9 ± 0.41
8.1 ± 0.63
4.1 ± 0.19
4.8 ± 0.27
4.6 ± 0.23
3.0 ± 0.16
Hispanic
8.6 ± 0.34
5.0 ± 0.29
10.0 ± 0.33
9.2 ± 0.40
9.1 ± 0.63
3.4 ± 0.18
3.2 ± 0.26
6.8 ± 0.23
2.1 ± 0.14
Other/multiple
9.1 ± 0.36
5.7 ± 0.30
11.2 ± 0.35
10.1 ± 0.41
8.9 ± 0.64
3.8 ± 0.19
3.4 ± 0.27
7.9 ± 0.26
2.5 ± 0.15
Marital status
Never married (ref.)
8.6 ± 0.33
5.4 ± 0.28
10.3 ± 0.32
9.5 ± 0.39
8.8 ± 0.62
3.9 ± 0.17
3.8 ± 0.25
6.9 ± 0.22
2.7 ± 0.13
Currently married
9.0 ± 0.32
5.5 ± 0.27
11.0 ± 0.31
10.0 ± 0.38
9.6 ± 0.62
3.8 ± 0.15
3.6 ± 0.23
7.0 ± 0.20
2.2 ± 0.12
Separated/divorced/ widowed
8.8 ± 0.35
5.2 ± 0.29
10.4 ± 0.34
9.4 ± 0.40
9.0 ± 0.63
3.7 ± 0.18
3.9 ± 0.27
7.5 ± 0.25
2.5 ± 0.15
Children
0 children (ref.)
8.5 ± 0.32
5.2 ± 0.27
10.3 ± 0.31
9.4 ± 0.38
8.7 ± 0.62
3.8 ± 0.15
3.8 ± 0.23
7.0 ± 0.20
2.6 ± 0.12
1+ children
9.1 ± 0.33
5.6 ± 0.28
10.9 ± 0.32
9.8 ± 0.39
9.6 ± 0.62
3.8 ± 0.16
3.7 ± 0.24
7.3 ± 0.22
2.4 ± 0.13
Pay grade
E1-E4 (ref.)
8.9 ± 0.14
5.7 ± 0.12
9.3 ± 0.13
9.0 ± 0.13
8.7 ± 0.13
3.7 ± 0.10
4.8 ± 0.13
6.0 ± 0.15
2.8 ± 0.08
E5-E6
8.7 ± 0.13
5.5 ± 0.11
9.4 ± 0.13
8.7 ± 0.13
8.5 ± 0.13
3.8 ± 0.10
4.6 ± 0.13
7.2 ± 0.14
2.6 ± 0.08
E7-E9
8.5 ± 0.15
5.2 ± 0.12
9.3 ± 0.15
8.4 ± 0.15
8.2 ± 0.15
3.8 ± 0.11
4.0 ± 0.15
8.1 ± 0.18
2.6 ± 0.09
WO1-WO5
8.7 ± 0.27
5.1 ± 0.19
8.9 ± 0.25
8.1 ± 0.25
8.2 ± 0.25
3.9 ± 0.18
3.5 ± 0.21
8.5 ± 0.31
2.7 ± 0.14
O1-O3
9.3 ± 0.18
5.1 ± 0.14
9.5 ± 0.18
9.0 ± 0.18
9.0 ± 0.17
4.1 ± 0.13
3.8 ± 0.16
7.2 ± 0.20
2.5 ± 0.10
O4-O10
9.3 ± 0.21
5.2 ± 0.16
9.2 ± 0.21
8.6 ± 0.21
8.8 ± 0.20
4.7 ± 0.15
3.6 ± 0.18
8.4 ± 0.25
2.7 ± 0.11
a Reference categories are indicated for tests of differences between means. All differences from the reference category are statistically significant (P < 0.05), except for means in bold. Linear regressions to estimate least square means were adjusted for sample weights. Multivariate analyses included all demographic characteristics simultaneously

Demographic variables associated with medical conditions

In the fully-adjusted models, specific sociodemographic characteristics were associated with doctor-informed medical conditions and overweight/obesity (Table 4; Additional file 1: Table S3). Odds of all conditions were higher amongst older age compared to the youngest age category, and in males compared to females, except for high blood glucose for which females had higher odds than males.
Table 4
Odds ratios (95%CI) of medical conditions by sociodemographic characteristics a
Characteristic
Categories
High blood pressure
High cholesterol
High triglycerides
Low HDL cholesterol
High blood glucose
Overweight/ obesity
Cases (N)
 
3713
4098
1745
1921
499
16,292
Age
21–25 yrs
1.69 (1.13–2.53)
1.27 (0.67–2.38)
1.25 (0.41–3.83)
1.21 (0.45–3.25)
1.13 (0.34–3.79)
1.54 (1.28–1.84)
(vs. ≤20 yrs)
26–35 yrs
2.30 (1.51–3.50)
2.94 (1.57–5.50)
2.59 (0.87–7.74)
2.79 (1.05–7.38)
1.34 (0.40–4.54)
2.21 (1.80–2.70)
36–45 yrs
3.77 (2.43–5.83)
8.12 (4.28–15.38)
7.94 (2.63–23.93)
6.86 (2.57–18.32)
3.54 (1.04–12.06)
3.82 (3.05–4.78)
46+ yrs
6.33 (4.01–10.01)
12.54 (6.54–24.06)
11.81 (3.88–36.00)
11.80 (4.37–31.88)
10.06 (2.85–35.52)
4.19 (3.22–5.45)
Service Branch
Air Force
0.80 (0.70–0.91)
0.98 (0.86–1.11)
1.26 (1.05–1.52)
0.97 (0.82–1.15)
0.73 (0.52–1.02)
0.79 (0.71–0.88)
(vs. Army)
Coast Guard
0.72 (0.62–0.85)
1.24 (1.07–1.44)
1.59 (1.29–1.95)
1.27 (1.04–1.54)
1.01 (0.68–1.50)
1.05 (0.93–1.19)
Marine Corps
0.98 (0.84–1.15)
0.95 (0.81–1.11)
0.68 (0.52–0.88)
0.66 (0.53–0.83)
1.01 (0.69–1.50)
0.78 (0.69–0.88)
Navy
0.85 (0.73–0.99)
1.24 (1.07–1.43)
1.57 (1.28–1.91)
1.25 (1.04–1.51)
1.45 (1.05–2.02)
1.04 (0.91–1.18)
Sex (vs. male)
Female
0.54 (0.49–0.60)
0.65 (0.58–0.72)
0.56 (0.47–0.66)
0.47 (0.40–0.55)
1.35 (1.03–1.77)
0.29 (0.27–0.31)
Education
Some college
0.99 (0.87–1.14)
1.15 (0.98–1.34)
1.18 (0.94–1.48)
1.25 (1.00–1.56)
0.95 (0.66–1.36)
1.03 (0.93–1.14)
(vs. high school or equiv.)
2-year college
0.84 (0.71–0.99)
1.13 (0.95–1.34)
1.33 (1.03–1.70)
1.50 (1.18–1.91)
1.01 (0.67–1.51)
0.88 (0.77–1.00)
4-year college
0.84 (0.69–1.00)
1.19 (0.98–1.43)
1.59 (1.22–2.08)
1.52 (1.18–1.96)
0.62 (0.40–0.98)
0.94 (0.81–1.09)
Beyond college
0.89 (0.72–1.08)
1.39 (1.13–1.71)
1.73 (1.30–2.30)
1.92 (1.45–2.56)
1.11 (0.67–1.82)
0.83 (0.70–0.98)
Race/ethnicity
Hispanic
0.89 (0.77–1.03)
1.06 (0.91–1.22)
1.04 (0.84–1.27)
0.90 (0.73–1.10)
1.39 (1.00–1.95)
1.43 (1.28–1.59)
(vs. non-Hispanic white)
Non-Hispanic black
1.68 (1.46–1.93)
1.11 (0.96–1.30)
0.58 (0.44–0.75)
0.78 (0.62–0.98)
1.42 (0.99–2.05)
1.36 (1.20–1.55)
Other/multiple
1.43 (1.23–1.67)
1.44 (1.23–1.67)
1.37 (1.12–1.67)
1.20 (0.98–1.47)
1.90 (1.36–2.66)
0.91 (0.80–1.03)
Marital status
Currently married
1.12 (0.97–1.31)
1.26 (1.08–1.48)
1.03 (0.81–1.30)
0.96 (0.76–1.20)
1.11 (0.72–1.72)
1.25 (1.14–1.38)
(vs. never married)
Separated/divorced/ widowed
1.31 (1.10–1.57)
1.18 (0.98–1.42)
0.93 (0.71–1.23)
0.96 (0.74–1.25)
1.42 (0.89–2.26)
1.07 (0.94–1.21)
Children (vs. none)
1+ children
1.06 (0.96–1.18)
1.08 (0.98–1.20)
1.24 (1.08–1.43)
1.32 (1.16–1.52)
1.64 (1.27–2.11)
1.23 (1.13–1.34)
Pay grade
E5-E6
1.57 (1.34–1.85)
1.90 (1.58–2.28)
2.10 (1.60–2.76)
1.86 (1.41–2.46)
1.63 (1.09–2.45)
1.54 (1.39–1.72)
(vs. E1-E4)
E7-E9
1.68 (1.39–2.03)
2.07 (1.68–2.55)
2.22 (1.64–3.00)
2.13 (1.57–2.89)
1.41 (0.90–2.21)
1.73 (1.50–2.01)
WO1-WO5
1.41 (1.10–1.82)
2.28 (1.76–2.95)
2.23 (1.53–3.24)
2.25 (1.55–3.26)
1.00 (0.55–1.81)
1.87 (1.49–2.35)
O1-O3
1.12 (0.90–1.39)
1.41 (1.13–1.77)
1.42 (1.03–1.97)
1.34 (0.96–1.86)
1.05 (0.61–1.80)
1.18 (1.01–1.37)
O4-O10
1.15 (0.90–1.47)
1.63 (1.27–2.09)
1.49 (1.05–2.12)
1.58 (1.11–2.27)
0.86 (0.48–1.54)
1.27 (1.04–1.55)
a Logistic regressions were weighted by sample weights. Fully-adjusted models included all sociodemographic characteristics simultaneously, current enrollment in a weight-loss program, history of weight loss, and history of deployment. In bold text are odds ratios that are significantly different from the reference category. For simpler (less adjusted) models, see Additional file 1: Table S3
There were no discernible patterns in reported doctor-informed medical conditions and overweight/obesity between the service branches. However, those in the Navy had markedly higher odds of high blood glucose (~ 45% higher odds compared with the Army) and those in the Coast Guard or Navy had markedly higher odds of high triglycerides (~ 54–59% higher odds compared with the Army) (Table 4).
Higher educational attainment tended to be associated with incrementally higher odds of high cholesterol, low HDL cholesterol, high triglycerides, and with lower odds of overweight/obesity, associations which were not accounted for by simultaneously adjusting for age. For example, relative to those with a high school education or equivalent, those with some college, 2 years of college, 4 years of college, and those with education beyond college, had 1.25, 1.50, 1.52, and 1.92 times the odds, respectively, of having low HDL cholesterol (Table 4).
Compared to non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks had 68% higher odds of high blood pressure, 36% higher odds of overweight/obesity, 42% lower odds of high triglycerides, and 22% lower odds of HDL. Hispanic personnel had 39% higher odds of high blood glucose, and 43% higher odds of overweight/obesity relative to non-Hispanic whites (Table 4).
Currently married respondents, compared to those who were never married, had significantly higher odds of high cholesterol and overweight/obesity, while those who were separated/divorced/widowed had significantly higher odds of high blood pressure. Having children present in the home was also associated with having a medical condition: compared to those without children living with them, those with children had 24, 32, 64, and 23% higher odds of high triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol, high blood glucose, and overweight/obesity, respectively (Table 4).

Behaviors associated doctor-informed medical conditions and overweight/obesity

Of the 17 health behaviors assessed, the health behavior most consistently associated with every doctor-informed medical condition and overweight/obesity was shorter duration of sleep. In fully adjusted models, compared to sleeping 7–8 h/night, sleeping < 5 h/night was associated with 1.36 (95% CI 1.18–1.57, for overweight/obesity) to up to 2.22 (95% CI 1.89–2.61, for hypertension) times the odds of having a medical condition (Fig. 1af; Additional file 1: Table S4). Odds of most conditions also tended to be higher at sleep durations < 6 h/night, relative to 7–8 h/night. Sleep durations of 8 h/night or longer were not statistically different from 7 to 8 h/night.
In addition, in fully adjusted models, strength training was associated with 2–5% lower odds of lipid-related conditions (i.e., high cholesterol, high triglycerides, and low HDL) per 30 min/wk. increment, as well as high blood pressure, but slightly higher odds of overweight/obesity (4% per 30 min/wk. increment). Neither vigorous nor moderate exercise was consistently associated with medical conditions. Compared with never-smoking, current smoking, in fully adjusted models, was associated with higher odds of high blood pressure, low HDL cholesterol, and high triglycerides; only former smoking was associated with higher odds of overweight/obesity. Alcohol intake was also associated with higher odds of high blood pressure and blood glucose (Fig. 1af; Additional file 1: Table S4).
Among the 11 dietary factors, across models, lean meats and sweets were associated with lower odds of high blood pressure, dairy with lower odds of high cholesterol, starch with lower odds of high triglycerides, and dairy and lean meat with lower odds of low HDL cholesterol. Intake of whole grains, snacks, sweets, and sugary drinks were associated with significantly lower odds of overweight/obesity, while caffeinated drinks were associated with higher odds (Fig. 1af; Additional file 1: Table S4).

Factor analyses of behaviors and risks

Exploratory factor analyses conducted found that 4 factors explained 9% of the variance in the original behavioral variables (Additional file 1: Table S2). They were characterized as “Healthy diet” (based on high loadings of fruit, starch, vegetable, whole grain, dairy, and lean meat intake), “Unhealthy diet” (based on high loadings of starch, snacks, sweets, sugary drinks, fried food, and caffeinated drinks), “Exercise” (based on high loadings of moderate and vigorous aerobic exercise and strength training), and “Bad habits” (based on high loadings of alcohol, smoking, and caffeinated drinks, and inverse loading of sleep). The factors were associated with medical conditions in generally expected ways: higher “Healthy diet” was consistently inversely associated with odds of high blood pressure, high cholesterol, high triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol, and overweight/obesity (Table 5). Higher “Unhealthy diet” was only consistently associated with lower odds of overweight/obesity. “Exercise” was consistently associated with lower odds of high cholesterol, high triglycerides, high blood glucose, and low HDL cholesterol, and was associated with higher odds overweight/obesity. Finally, “Bad habits” was strongly associated with higher odds of high blood pressure, high cholesterol, high triglycerides, high blood glucose, low HDL cholesterol, and overweight/obesity.
Table 5
Odds ratios (95% CI) of medical conditions by derived behavioral factors a
Factor
Name
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
  
Odds of high blood pressure (N cases = 3713)
1
“Healthy diet”
0.86 (0.81–0.90)
0.88 (0.83–0.93)
0.87 (0.83–0.93)
2
“Unhealthy diet”
0.89 (0.83–0.94)
0.96 (0.90–1.02)
0.97 (0.91–1.03)
3
“Exercise”
0.89 (0.84–0.94)
0.95 (0.90–1.01)
0.95 (0.89–1.01)
4
“Bad habits”
1.40 (1.34–1.48)
1.41 (1.33–1.49)
1.39 (1.31–1.48)
  
Odds of high cholesterol (N cases = 4098)
1
“Healthy diet”
0.87 (0.82–0.91)
0.83 (0.79–0.88)
0.83 (0.79–0.88)
2
“Unhealthy diet”
0.83 (0.78–0.88)
1.00 (0.93–1.06)
1.00 (0.94–1.07)
3
“Exercise”
0.70 (0.66–0.74)
0.85 (0.80–0.90)
0.85 (0.80–0.90)
4
“Bad habits”
1.08 (1.03–1.13)
1.10 (1.04–1.17)
1.10 (1.03–1.17)
  
Odds of high triglycerides (N cases = 1745)
1
“Healthy diet”
0.89 (0.83–0.96)
0.83 (0.77–0.90)
0.83 (0.77–0.90)
2
“Unhealthy diet”
0.77 (0.71–0.84)
0.93 (0.85–1.02)
0.94 (0.85–1.03)
3
“Exercise”
0.61 (0.56–0.67)
0.79 (0.72–0.86)
0.78 (0.71–0.85)
4
“Bad habits”
1.11 (1.04–1.18)
1.16 (1.07–1.26)
1.15 (1.06–1.26)
  
High blood glucose (N cases = 499)
1
“Healthy diet”
0.85 (0.73–0.99)
0.87 (0.76–1.01)
0.87 (0.75–1.00)
2
“Unhealthy diet”
0.72 (0.61–0.86)
0.85 (0.72–1.00)
0.87 (0.74–1.03)
3
“Exercise”
0.64 (0.52–0.77)
0.75 (0.62–0.91)
0.74 (0.61–0.90)
4
“Bad habits”
1.21 (1.08–1.36)
1.25 (1.09–1.44)
1.25 (1.08–1.44)
  
Low HDL cholesterol (N cases = 1921)
1
“Healthy diet”
0.91 (0.85–0.98)
0.86 (0.80–0.93)
0.86 (0.80–0.93)
2
“Unhealthy diet”
0.81 (0.75–0.88)
0.97 (0.89–1.06)
0.98 (0.90–1.07)
3
“Exercise”
0.63 (0.58–0.69)
0.79 (0.72–0.87)
0.79 (0.72–0.86)
4
“Bad habits”
1.11 (1.04–1.19)
1.16 (1.07–1.27)
1.16 (1.06–1.26)
  
Odds of overweight/obesity (N cases = 16,292)
1
“Healthy diet”
0.94 (0.91–0.98)
0.94 (0.91–0.99)
0.95 (0.91–0.99)
2
“Unhealthy diet”
0.75 (0.72–0.78)
0.78 (0.74–0.81)
0.80 (0.76–0.83)
3
“Exercise”
1.05 (1.01–1.09)
1.11 (1.06–1.16)
1.12 (1.07–1.18)
4
“Bad habits”
1.20 (1.15–1.25)
1.10 (1.05–1.16)
1.09 (1.04–1.15)
a Logistic regressions were weighted by sample weights and can be interpreted as odds of the outcome per unit increase in the factor score. Model 1 was adjusted for all factors simultaneously. Model 2 was additionally adjusted for all sociodemographic characteristics (see Table 1). Model 3 was additionally adjusted for current enrollment in a weight-loss program, history of weight loss, and history of deployment. For additional details on the derived factors, see Additional file 1: Table S2. In bold text are odds ratios that are significantly different from the reference category

Discussion

We used a large anonymous self-reported survey of the Armed Forces to assess relationships between sociodemographic characteristics, health behaviors, and doctor-informed medical conditions and overweight/obesity. When we examined individual health behaviors and medical conditions, by far the most consistent and largest relationship was between low sleep duration and higher odds of every medical condition. Otherwise, other behaviors, including dietary and exercise behaviors, were inconsistently associated with medical conditions. Age, sex, marital status, and presence of children appeared to be the only relatively consistent sociodemographic factors related to health behaviors. Older individuals, females, and those residing with children tended to exercise less, but eat healthier foods and not smoke. Older individuals also slept less, as did those with children present. Those who were married appeared to have consumed a better diet, exercised more, and slept more than their non-married counterparts. In terms of medical conditions, older age and female sex appeared to be the only consistent drivers of higher and lower odds, respectively, of the presence of a given medical condition. Relationships of race/ethnicity, education, service branch, and marital status with medical conditions were inconsistent. Finally, in exploratory factor analyses of health behaviors, associations of behavioral patterns—two patterns in particular—with medical conditions were associated with medical conditions as expected: the pattern characterized by a “healthy” diet was associated with lower odds of all medical conditions except high blood pressure, while the pattern characterized by “bad” habits (including lack of sleep) was associated with higher odds of every medical condition.
We observed robust associations between short sleep and each medical condition in the present study, ranging from 36% higher odds of overweight/obesity to over double the odds of hypertension, in contrast to inconsistent findings for diet and exercise, and smoking. There is increasing evidence of the importance of sleep to health [1723], for example, a 2015 meta-analysis of 10 prospective cohort studies investigating sleep in relation to type 2 diabetes risk reported a U-shaped, dose-response relationship between sleep duration and diabetes risk [22]. The lowest risk was observed at sleep durations of 7–8 h/day, with incrementally higher risk of diabetes below or above that duration. Several reports have linked short sleep durations with higher risk of overweight/obesity [17, 20, 21], including an analysis of the representative U.S. population, in which authors reported that, relative to those who slept 7–8 h/day, very short sleepers (< 5 h) had 30% higher odds of being overweight and were twice as likely to be obese, while (5–6 h) short sleepers had 20% higher odds of being overweight and 57% higher odds of being obese [20]. In addition, a 2013 meta-analysis of 17 cohorts investigating the relationship between sleep duration and incident hypertension reported that short sleep duration conferred 21% higher risk of developing the condition [18]. Because recommendations to change diet, exercise, and smoking behaviors, but not sleep behaviors, are a part of many primary and secondary prevention recommendations [2426], it is possible that individuals are more likely to make changes to these behaviors, rather than sleep, in an effort to prevent or as a result of receiving a diagnosis. In fact, sleep is not mentioned as a modifiable risk factor in disease prevention/management guidelines from the American Diabetes Association or from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association [2426], and thus may not be a part of lifestyle changes individuals undertake to modify their perceived disease risk.
In military populations, the critical importance of sleep has only recently become part of the “Performance Triad”, an educational initiative introduced in 2013 on health readiness and wellness including 1) physical activity; 2) nutrition; and 3) sleep [27, 28]. Our data therefore confirm the importance of the inclusion of sleep in the “Triad” initiative. In our study, poor sleep may also be a complex product of poor health, and occupational or personal stress [29, 30]. Other studies have indicated that sleep disorders, including insomnia and sleep apnea, appear to be more common in service members than in civilians [3133]. Our observations using self-reported survey data, on the strong relationship between poor sleep and behaviors and medical conditions, agree with other studies usingself-reported surveys of military personnel [34].
Our observations regarding select sociodemographic characteristics, notably age, sex, and marital status, as being associated with select health behaviors generally agree with existing evidence [2, 7]. With the exception of odds of high blood glucose, which was higher in females versus males, other associations of age and sex—well-known biological drivers of health risks—were as generally expected. Married individuals reported better health behaviors than never- or previously married individuals; however this did not necessarily translate into lower odds of having medical conditions for married individuals. Given the cross-sectional nature of the study design, we can only speculate as to why: first, married individuals may be more likely to seek routine medical care at the urging of their spouse [3537], and thus have been told by a physician of a prevalent condition that would have otherwise gone undetected. Second, cross-sectional analyses preclude assessment of sequential behaviors; the reported behaviors may be in response to a diagnosis, a form of reverse causality. In addition, although analyses were adjusted for age and presence of children, as well as other sociodemographic characteristics, relationships between marital status and medical conditions are nuanced and complicated by time-related factors, including secular trends [3739]. For example, a recent study using data from a panel of nationally representative households observed that while a protective association of long marriage on women’s self-reported health was evident in the earlier birth cohort (born 1955–1964), it had reversed in the most recent birth cohort (born 1975–1984) [39].
There were other unexpected associations. For example, we observed intake of snacks, sweets, and sugary drinks (in addition to the “Unhealthy diet” factor which included these foods) were associated with lower odds of overweight/obesity, which is generally the opposite of what would be expected given evidence regarding the long-term negative consequences of consuming these foods on health [4043]. These associations held despite adjusting for history of weight loss and current enrollment in a weight control program. It is possible this finding reflects the generally young age of the respondents in this military population, or that some respondents were simply not at risk of overweight. This observation, in fact, appears to be consistent with cross-sectional nationally representative NHANES data on snacking and sugary beverages in both adolescents [44] and adults [45] which have shown no clearly discernible associations with overweight or obesity. In addition, state-based BRFSS 2013 data indicate that sugar-sweetened beverage intake declines with higher age. Intake was most prevalent among younger adults (age 18–24 y), at 43% reporting consuming these beverages one or more times per day, while those in older age groups reported less consumption (38% of those age 25–34 y, 30% in those age 35–54 y, and 19% in those age ≥ 55 y) [46]. On the other hand, our exploratory observations regarding the “healthy diet” pattern and favorable odds of medical conditions were consistent with dietary pattern literature [4750].
As noted above, our analyses are limited by the cross-sectional nature of the survey, which precludes causal inferences. Particularly when assessing health behaviors and medical conditions concurrently, a behavioral pattern may reflect a subset of respondents who have changed their behaviors as result of having been alerted to a health risk [5156]. Furthermore, we were limited to gross rather than granular assessments of dietary components. We were also likely limited in the validity of our inferences by social desirability response bias of self-reported data. In addition, non-response bias, length of the survey, and fear of loss of anonymity among either non-respondents or due to selective non-responses in those excluded from the present analysis may also limit our ability to make inferences or generalize our findings to the broader Armed Services, despite using revised sampling weights to accommodate exclusions.

Conclusions

This study presents relationships between sociodemographic characteristics, health behaviors, and doctor-informed medical conditions and overweight/obesity in the U.S. Armed Forces, which are typically not included, or not separately reported, in national or state health surveys.
Despite aforementioned limitations and our inability to deduce causal relationships, we observed pronounced associations between health behaviors—especially sleep duration—and medical conditions, thus adding to evidence that sleep is a critical, potentially modifiable behavior within this population. It is recognized that there are times when sleep restriction is unavoidable in this population (e.g., during periodic training and mission scenarios), however, adequate sleep should continue to be promoted as an important part of overall health and wellness throughout the military community.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank members of the US Armed Forces and US Coast Guard who responded to the 2011 HRBS. The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the US Department of Defense or US Coast Guard. Any citations of commercial organizations and trade names in this report do not constitute an official endorsement of approval of the products or services of these organizations. Dr. Hruby’s contribution to this research was supported by an appointment to the Postgraduate Research Participation Program at the US Army Medical Research Institute of Environmental Medicine administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the US Department of Energy and USAMRMC.

Funding

This work was supported by the US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command.

Availability of data and materials

Authors obtained the HRBS dataset supporting the conclusions of this article via a data use agreement with Tricare Management Activity. The data that support the findings of this study are available from Tricare Management Activity but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and are therefore not publicly available. However, data are available to interested parties upon reasonable request and with permission of Tricare Management Activity.
The 2011 HRBS was conducted by ICF International under advisement of the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, Tricare Management Activity (TMA; now Defense Health Agency), and the USCG [15]. Primary data collection was approved by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs/TRICARE Management Activity (OASD(HA)/TMA), Human Research Protection Office. Informed consent was required and obtained at the beginning of the HRBS, and responses were anonymous. For the present secondary data analyses, we obtained a de-identified data file from TMA through a data use agreement. Because the data were previously collected and de-identified, the protocol for the present study was deemed exempt (not human subject research) by both the US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (Natick, MA) and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs/TRICARE Management Activity (OASD(HA)/TMA), Human Research Protection Office.
Not applicable (no individual-level data included).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith TJ, Dotson LE, Young AJ, White A, Hadden L, Bathalon GP, Funderburk L, Marriott BP. Eating patterns and leisure-time exercise among active duty military personnel: comparison to the healthy people objectives. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113(7):907–19.CrossRefPubMed Smith TJ, Dotson LE, Young AJ, White A, Hadden L, Bathalon GP, Funderburk L, Marriott BP. Eating patterns and leisure-time exercise among active duty military personnel: comparison to the healthy people objectives. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113(7):907–19.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramsawh HJ, Fullerton CS, Mash HBH, Ng THH, Kessler RC, Stein MB, Ursano RJ. Risk for suicidal behaviors associated with PTSD, depression, and their comorbidity in the U.S. Army. J Affect Disord. 2014;161:116–22.CrossRefPubMed Ramsawh HJ, Fullerton CS, Mash HBH, Ng THH, Kessler RC, Stein MB, Ursano RJ. Risk for suicidal behaviors associated with PTSD, depression, and their comorbidity in the U.S. Army. J Affect Disord. 2014;161:116–22.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lane ME, Hourani LL, Bray RM, Williams J. Prevalence of perceived stress and mental health indicators among reserve-component and active-duty military personnel. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(6):1213–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lane ME, Hourani LL, Bray RM, Williams J. Prevalence of perceived stress and mental health indicators among reserve-component and active-duty military personnel. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(6):1213–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith TJ, White A, Hadden L, Young AJ, Marriott BP. Associations between mental health disorders and body mass index among military personnel. Am J Health Behav. 2014;38(4):529–40.CrossRefPubMed Smith TJ, White A, Hadden L, Young AJ, Marriott BP. Associations between mental health disorders and body mass index among military personnel. Am J Health Behav. 2014;38(4):529–40.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Reyes-Guzman CM, Bray RM, Forman-Hoffman VL, Williams J. Overweight and Obesity trends among active duty military personnel: a 13-year perspective. Am J Prev Med. 2015;48(2):145–53.CrossRefPubMed Reyes-Guzman CM, Bray RM, Forman-Hoffman VL, Williams J. Overweight and Obesity trends among active duty military personnel: a 13-year perspective. Am J Prev Med. 2015;48(2):145–53.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith TJ, Marriott BP, Dotson L, Bathalon GP, Funderburk L, White A, Hadden L, Young AJ. Overweight and obesity in military personnel: sociodemographic predictors. Obes Silver Spring Md. 2012;20(7):1534–8.CrossRef Smith TJ, Marriott BP, Dotson L, Bathalon GP, Funderburk L, White A, Hadden L, Young AJ. Overweight and obesity in military personnel: sociodemographic predictors. Obes Silver Spring Md. 2012;20(7):1534–8.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Nola GM. Stressors afflicting families during military deployment. Mil Med. 2008;173(5):v–vii.PubMed Di Nola GM. Stressors afflicting families during military deployment. Mil Med. 2008;173(5):v–vii.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hosek J, MacDermid Wadsworth S. Economic conditions of military families. Futur Child. 2013;23(2):41–59.CrossRef Hosek J, MacDermid Wadsworth S. Economic conditions of military families. Futur Child. 2013;23(2):41–59.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Redmond S, Wilcox S, Campbell S, Kim A, Finney K, Barr K, Hassan A. A brief introduction to the military workplace culture. Work. 2015;1:9–20. Redmond S, Wilcox S, Campbell S, Kim A, Finney K, Barr K, Hassan A. A brief introduction to the military workplace culture. Work. 2015;1:9–20.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Adler AB, Castro CA. An occupational mental health model for the military. Mil Behav Health. 2013;1(1):41–5.CrossRef Adler AB, Castro CA. An occupational mental health model for the military. Mil Behav Health. 2013;1(1):41–5.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyytikäinen P, Rahkonen O, Lahelma E, Lallukka T. Association of sleep duration with weight and weight gain: a prospective follow-up study. J Sleep Res. 2011;20(2):298–302.CrossRefPubMed Lyytikäinen P, Rahkonen O, Lahelma E, Lallukka T. Association of sleep duration with weight and weight gain: a prospective follow-up study. J Sleep Res. 2011;20(2):298–302.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Meng L, Zheng Y, Hui R. The relationship of sleep duration and insomnia to risk of hypertension incidence: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Hypertens res off J Jpn Soc. Hypertens. 2013;36(11):985–95. Meng L, Zheng Y, Hui R. The relationship of sleep duration and insomnia to risk of hypertension incidence: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Hypertens res off J Jpn Soc. Hypertens. 2013;36(11):985–95.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nedeltcheva AV, Scheer FAJL. Metabolic effects of sleep disruption, links to obesity and diabetes. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2014;21(4):293–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nedeltcheva AV, Scheer FAJL. Metabolic effects of sleep disruption, links to obesity and diabetes. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2014;21(4):293–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jean-Louis G, Williams NJ, Sarpong D, Pandey A, Youngstedt S, Zizi F, Ogedegbe G. Associations between inadequate sleep and obesity in the US adult population: analysis of the national health interview survey (1977-2009). BMC Public Health. 2014;14:290.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jean-Louis G, Williams NJ, Sarpong D, Pandey A, Youngstedt S, Zizi F, Ogedegbe G. Associations between inadequate sleep and obesity in the US adult population: analysis of the national health interview survey (1977-2009). BMC Public Health. 2014;14:290.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ford ES, Li C, Wheaton AG, Chapman DP, Perry GS, Croft JB. Sleep duration and body mass index and waist circumference among U.S. adults. Obes Silver Spring Md. 2014;22(2):598–607.CrossRef Ford ES, Li C, Wheaton AG, Chapman DP, Perry GS, Croft JB. Sleep duration and body mass index and waist circumference among U.S. adults. Obes Silver Spring Md. 2014;22(2):598–607.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Shan Z, Ma H, Xie M, Yan P, Guo Y, Bao W, Rong Y, Jackson CL, Hu FB, Liu L. Sleep duration and risk of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(3):529–37.CrossRefPubMed Shan Z, Ma H, Xie M, Yan P, Guo Y, Bao W, Rong Y, Jackson CL, Hu FB, Liu L. Sleep duration and risk of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(3):529–37.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat McHill AW, Wright KP. Role of sleep and circadian disruption on energy expenditure and in metabolic predisposition to human obesity and metabolic disease. Obes Rev Off J Int Assoc Study Obes. 2017;18(Suppl 1):15–24.CrossRef McHill AW, Wright KP. Role of sleep and circadian disruption on energy expenditure and in metabolic predisposition to human obesity and metabolic disease. Obes Rev Off J Int Assoc Study Obes. 2017;18(Suppl 1):15–24.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes— 2016. 4. Prevention or Delay of Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(Supplement 1):S36–8.CrossRef American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes— 2016. 4. Prevention or Delay of Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(Supplement 1):S36–8.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat American Diabetes Association. 4. Foundations of care: education, nutrition, physical activity, smoking cessation, psychosocial care, and immunization. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(Supplement_1):S20–30.CrossRef American Diabetes Association. 4. Foundations of care: education, nutrition, physical activity, smoking cessation, psychosocial care, and immunization. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(Supplement_1):S20–30.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Eckel RH, Jakicic JM, Ard JD, de Jesus JM, Miller NH, Hubbard VS, Lee I-M, Lichtenstein AH, Loria CM, Millen BE, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circ. 2014;129(25 suppl 2):S76–99.CrossRef Eckel RH, Jakicic JM, Ard JD, de Jesus JM, Miller NH, Hubbard VS, Lee I-M, Lichtenstein AH, Loria CM, Millen BE, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circ. 2014;129(25 suppl 2):S76–99.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Pruiksma KE, Taylor DJ, Wachen JS, Mintz J, Young-McCaughan S, Peterson AL, Yarvis JS, Borah EV, Dondanville KA, Litz BT, et al. Residual sleep disturbances following PTSD treatment in active duty military personnel. Psychol Trauma Theory Res Pract Policy. 2016;8(6):697–701.CrossRef Pruiksma KE, Taylor DJ, Wachen JS, Mintz J, Young-McCaughan S, Peterson AL, Yarvis JS, Borah EV, Dondanville KA, Litz BT, et al. Residual sleep disturbances following PTSD treatment in active duty military personnel. Psychol Trauma Theory Res Pract Policy. 2016;8(6):697–701.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunt EJF, Greenberg N, Jones N. Poor sleep after military deployment: associations with mental health difficulties. Occup Med. 2016;8(66):669–75. Hunt EJF, Greenberg N, Jones N. Poor sleep after military deployment: associations with mental health difficulties. Occup Med. 2016;8(66):669–75.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoge CW, McGurk D, Thomas JL, Cox AL, Engel CC, Castro CA. Mild traumatic brain injury in U.S. soldiers returning from Iraq. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(5):453–63.CrossRefPubMed Hoge CW, McGurk D, Thomas JL, Cox AL, Engel CC, Castro CA. Mild traumatic brain injury in U.S. soldiers returning from Iraq. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(5):453–63.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Roth T, Coulouvrat C, Hajak G, Lakoma MD, Sampson NA, Shahly V, Shillington AC, Stephenson JJ, Walsh JK, Kessler RC. Prevalence and Perceived health associated with insomnia based on DSM-IV-TR; international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, tenth revision; and research diagnostic criteria/international classification of sleep disorders, second edition criteria: results from the America insomnia survey. Biol Psychiatry. 2011;69(6):592–600.CrossRefPubMed Roth T, Coulouvrat C, Hajak G, Lakoma MD, Sampson NA, Shahly V, Shillington AC, Stephenson JJ, Walsh JK, Kessler RC. Prevalence and Perceived health associated with insomnia based on DSM-IV-TR; international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, tenth revision; and research diagnostic criteria/international classification of sleep disorders, second edition criteria: results from the America insomnia survey. Biol Psychiatry. 2011;69(6):592–600.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Mysliwiec V, Gill J, Lee H, Baxter T, Pierce R, Barr TL, Krakow B, Roth BJ. Sleep disorders in US military personnel: a high rate of comorbid insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea. Chest. 2013;144(2):549–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mysliwiec V, Gill J, Lee H, Baxter T, Pierce R, Barr TL, Krakow B, Roth BJ. Sleep disorders in US military personnel: a high rate of comorbid insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea. Chest. 2013;144(2):549–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanske J, Meyer CP, Sammon JD, Choueiri TK, Menon M, Lipsitz SR, Noldus J, Nguyen PL, Sun M, Trinh Q-D. The influence of marital status on the use of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med. 2016;89:140–5.CrossRefPubMed Hanske J, Meyer CP, Sammon JD, Choueiri TK, Menon M, Lipsitz SR, Noldus J, Nguyen PL, Sun M, Trinh Q-D. The influence of marital status on the use of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med. 2016;89:140–5.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Cornelis MC, Chiuve SE, Glymour MM, Chang S-C, Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ, Liang L, Koenen KC, Rimm EB, Kawachi I, Kubzansky LD. Bachelors, divorcees, and widowers: does marriage protect men from type 2 diabetes? PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e106720.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cornelis MC, Chiuve SE, Glymour MM, Chang S-C, Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ, Liang L, Koenen KC, Rimm EB, Kawachi I, Kubzansky LD. Bachelors, divorcees, and widowers: does marriage protect men from type 2 diabetes? PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e106720.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Dupre ME, Beck AN, Meadows SO. Marital trajectories and mortality among US adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(5):546–55. Dupre ME, Beck AN, Meadows SO. Marital trajectories and mortality among US adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(5):546–55. 
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Zheng H, Thomas PA. Marital status, self-rated health, and mortality: overestimation of health or diminishing protection of marriage? J Health Soc Behav. 2013;54(1):128–43.CrossRefPubMed Zheng H, Thomas PA. Marital status, self-rated health, and mortality: overestimation of health or diminishing protection of marriage? J Health Soc Behav. 2013;54(1):128–43.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Tumin D. Does marriage protect health? A birth cohort comparison*: does marriage protect health? Soc Sci Q. 2018;99(2):626–43.CrossRef Tumin D. Does marriage protect health? A birth cohort comparison*: does marriage protect health? Soc Sci Q. 2018;99(2):626–43.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat de Koning L, Malik VS, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened beverage consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes in men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93(6):1321–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Koning L, Malik VS, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened beverage consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes in men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93(6):1321–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Malik VS, Pan A, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(4):1084–102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Malik VS, Pan A, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(4):1084–102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Mozaffarian D, Hao T, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Hu FB. Changes in diet and lifestyle and long-term weight gain in women and men. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(25):2392–404.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mozaffarian D, Hao T, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Hu FB. Changes in diet and lifestyle and long-term weight gain in women and men. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(25):2392–404.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma J, Jacques PF, Meigs JB, Fox CS, Rogers GT, Smith CE, Hruby A, Saltzman E, McKeown NM. Sugar-sweetened beverage but not diet soda consumption is positively associated with progression of insulin resistance and prediabetes. J Nutr. 2016;146(12):2544–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ma J, Jacques PF, Meigs JB, Fox CS, Rogers GT, Smith CE, Hruby A, Saltzman E, McKeown NM. Sugar-sweetened beverage but not diet soda consumption is positively associated with progression of insulin resistance and prediabetes. J Nutr. 2016;146(12):2544–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Bleich SN, Wolfson JA. Trends in SSBs and snack consumption among children by age, body weight, and race/ethnicity: snacking among SSB and non-SSB drinkers. Obesity. 2015;23(5):1039–46.CrossRefPubMed Bleich SN, Wolfson JA. Trends in SSBs and snack consumption among children by age, body weight, and race/ethnicity: snacking among SSB and non-SSB drinkers. Obesity. 2015;23(5):1039–46.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Park S, Xu F, Town M, Blanck HM. Prevalence of sugar-sweetened beverage intake among adults — 23 states and the District of Columbia, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(7):169–74.CrossRefPubMed Park S, Xu F, Town M, Blanck HM. Prevalence of sugar-sweetened beverage intake among adults — 23 states and the District of Columbia, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(7):169–74.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Ley SH, Pan A, Li Y, Manson JE, Willett WC, Sun Q, Hu FB. Changes in overall diet quality and subsequent type 2 diabetes risk: three U.S. prospective cohorts. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(11):2011–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ley SH, Pan A, Li Y, Manson JE, Willett WC, Sun Q, Hu FB. Changes in overall diet quality and subsequent type 2 diabetes risk: three U.S. prospective cohorts. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(11):2011–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Zurück zum Zitat McEvoy CT, Cardwell CR, Woodside JV, Young IS, Hunter SJ, McKinley MC. A posteriori dietary patterns are related to risk of type 2 diabetes: findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114(11):1759–1775.e4.CrossRefPubMed McEvoy CT, Cardwell CR, Woodside JV, Young IS, Hunter SJ, McKinley MC. A posteriori dietary patterns are related to risk of type 2 diabetes: findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114(11):1759–1775.e4.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Nettleton JA, Steffen LM, Schulze MB, Jenny NS, Barr RG, Bertoni AG, Jacobs DR. Associations between markers of subclinical atherosclerosis and dietary patterns derived by principal components analysis and reduced rank regression in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85(6):1615–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nettleton JA, Steffen LM, Schulze MB, Jenny NS, Barr RG, Bertoni AG, Jacobs DR. Associations between markers of subclinical atherosclerosis and dietary patterns derived by principal components analysis and reduced rank regression in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85(6):1615–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Hawkes AL, Lynch BM, Youlden DR, Owen N, Aitken JF. Health behaviors of Australian colorectal cancer survivors, compared with noncancer population controls. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16(10):1097–104.CrossRefPubMed Hawkes AL, Lynch BM, Youlden DR, Owen N, Aitken JF. Health behaviors of Australian colorectal cancer survivors, compared with noncancer population controls. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16(10):1097–104.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Patterson RE, Neuhouser ML, Hedderson MM, Schwartz SM, Standish LJ, Bowen DJ. Changes in diet, physical activity, and supplement use among adults diagnosed with cancer. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103(3):323–8.PubMed Patterson RE, Neuhouser ML, Hedderson MM, Schwartz SM, Standish LJ, Bowen DJ. Changes in diet, physical activity, and supplement use among adults diagnosed with cancer. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103(3):323–8.PubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Satia JA, Campbell MK, Galanko JA, James A, Carr C, Sandler RS. Longitudinal changes in lifestyle behaviors and health status in colon cancer survivors. Cancer Epidemiol biomark Prev Publ am Assoc Cancer res cosponsored am Soc Prev. Oncologia. 2004;13(6):1022–31. Satia JA, Campbell MK, Galanko JA, James A, Carr C, Sandler RS. Longitudinal changes in lifestyle behaviors and health status in colon cancer survivors. Cancer Epidemiol biomark Prev Publ am Assoc Cancer res cosponsored am Soc Prev. Oncologia. 2004;13(6):1022–31.
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Twardella D, Loew M, Rothenbacher D, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H, Brenner H. The diagnosis of a smoking-related disease is a prominent trigger for smoking cessation in a retrospective cohort study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(1):82–9.CrossRefPubMed Twardella D, Loew M, Rothenbacher D, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H, Brenner H. The diagnosis of a smoking-related disease is a prominent trigger for smoking cessation in a retrospective cohort study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(1):82–9.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Zurück zum Zitat van Gool CH, Kempen GIJM, Penninx BWJH, Deeg DJH, van Eijk JTM. Chronic disease and lifestyle transitions: results from the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam. J Aging Health. 2007;19(3):416–38.CrossRefPubMed van Gool CH, Kempen GIJM, Penninx BWJH, Deeg DJH, van Eijk JTM. Chronic disease and lifestyle transitions: results from the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam. J Aging Health. 2007;19(3):416–38.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Self-reported health behaviors, including sleep, correlate with doctor-informed medical conditions: data from the 2011 Health Related Behaviors Survey of U.S. Active Duty Military Personnel
verfasst von
Adela Hruby
Harris R. Lieberman
Tracey J. Smith
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2018
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Public Health / Ausgabe 1/2018
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5781-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

BMC Public Health 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe