Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Epidemiology 2/2015

01.02.2015 | Letter to the Editor

Self-reported skin cancer is unreliable

verfasst von: Ann-Sofie Sonne Holm, Hans Christian Wulf

Erschienen in: European Journal of Epidemiology | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Self-reported information is a tool commonly used in both clinical and epidemiological studies and is in many cases the only available source of information. And although some studies use medical records or registers, the majority of studies use self-reported information [1]. However, if the validity of this information is erroneous, the scientific results generated will in consequence be correspondingly erroneous. The validity of self-reported information has been widely discussed for many years, but there are very few studies examining the validity of self-reported skin cancer [25]. The incidence of skin cancer may be difficult to assess, as in most countries non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) incidence is not routinely registered. Epidemiological data on NMSC incidence are consequently sparse [6]. However, Denmark has extensive registration of NMSC in the nationwide pathology database (Patobank). Against this background, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the validity of self-reports regarding having had cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM), NMSC, and precursors to skin cancer (PSC) and subsequently to explore possible explanations for potential discrepancies between self-reports and Patobank. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts RO, Bergstralh EJ, Schmidt L, Jacobsen SJ. Comparison of self-reported and medical record health care utilization measures. J Clin Epidemol. 1996;49(9):989–95.CrossRef Roberts RO, Bergstralh EJ, Schmidt L, Jacobsen SJ. Comparison of self-reported and medical record health care utilization measures. J Clin Epidemol. 1996;49(9):989–95.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergmann MM, Calle EE, Mervis CA, Miracle-McMahill HL, Thun MJ, Health CW. Validity of self-reported cancers in a Propsective Cohort Study in comparison with data from state cancer registries. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147(6):556–62.CrossRefPubMed Bergmann MM, Calle EE, Mervis CA, Miracle-McMahill HL, Thun MJ, Health CW. Validity of self-reported cancers in a Propsective Cohort Study in comparison with data from state cancer registries. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147(6):556–62.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Desai MM, Bruce ML, Desai RA, Druss BG. Validity of self-reported cancer history: a comparison of health interview data and cancer registry records. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153(3):299–306.CrossRefPubMed Desai MM, Bruce ML, Desai RA, Druss BG. Validity of self-reported cancer history: a comparison of health interview data and cancer registry records. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153(3):299–306.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ming ME, Levy RM, Hoffstad OJ, Filip J, Gimotty PA, Ming ME. Validity of patient self-reported history of skin cancer. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(6):730–5.CrossRefPubMed Ming ME, Levy RM, Hoffstad OJ, Filip J, Gimotty PA, Ming ME. Validity of patient self-reported history of skin cancer. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(6):730–5.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Parikh-Patel A, Allen M. Wright WE, the California Teachers Study Steering Committee. Validation of self-reported cancers in the California Teachers Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(6):539–45.CrossRefPubMed Parikh-Patel A, Allen M. Wright WE, the California Teachers Study Steering Committee. Validation of self-reported cancers in the California Teachers Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(6):539–45.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Birch-Johansen F, Jensen A, Mortensen L, Olesen AB, Kjær SK. Trends in the incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer in Denmark 1978–2007: rapid incidence increase among young Danish women. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(9):2190–8.CrossRefPubMed Birch-Johansen F, Jensen A, Mortensen L, Olesen AB, Kjær SK. Trends in the incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer in Denmark 1978–2007: rapid incidence increase among young Danish women. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(9):2190–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bjerregaard B, Larsen OB. The Danish pathology register. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7 suppl):72–4.CrossRefPubMed Bjerregaard B, Larsen OB. The Danish pathology register. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7 suppl):72–4.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Manjer J, Merlo J, Berglund G. Validity of self-reported information on cancer: determinants of under- and over-reporting. Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(3):239–47.CrossRefPubMed Manjer J, Merlo J, Berglund G. Validity of self-reported information on cancer: determinants of under- and over-reporting. Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(3):239–47.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Navarro C, Chirlaque MD, Tormo MJ, Pérez-Flores D, Rodríquez-Barranco M, Sánchez-Villegas A, et al. Validity of self reported diagnoses of cancer in a major Spanish prospective cohort study. J Epidmiol Commun H. 2006;60(7):593–9.CrossRef Navarro C, Chirlaque MD, Tormo MJ, Pérez-Flores D, Rodríquez-Barranco M, Sánchez-Villegas A, et al. Validity of self reported diagnoses of cancer in a major Spanish prospective cohort study. J Epidmiol Commun H. 2006;60(7):593–9.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Self-reported skin cancer is unreliable
verfasst von
Ann-Sofie Sonne Holm
Hans Christian Wulf
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
European Journal of Epidemiology / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0393-2990
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7284
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-015-9992-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

European Journal of Epidemiology 2/2015 Zur Ausgabe