nach oben

Erschienen in:

15.05.2020 | Clinical Study

Sensitivity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in screening for cognitive impairment in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma

verfasst von: Monica Ribeiro, Thomas Durand, Martine Roussel, Loïc Feuvret, Julian Jacob, Dimitri Psimaras, Georges Noel, Audrey Keller, Flavie Bompaire, Khê Hoang-Xuan, Marie-Odile Bernier, Olivier Godefroy, Damien Ricard

Erschienen in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Cognitive impairment is frequent in patients with high-grade glioma and requires cognitive follow-up. Cognitive screening tools such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) have been used to assess cognition in these patients. Here we assessed the sensitivity of the MoCA in screening for cognitive impairment in a cohort of 156 patients with newly-diagnosed high-grade glioma, after surgery and before radiochemotherapy.

Methods

We assessed cognitive performance with the MoCA and a neuropsychological battery. Cognitive scores were analyzed in terms of a previously validated framework designed to control false positives and data for 1003 control participants from the GRECOGVASC study. After comparison of performance on the tests, we used stepwise logistic regression to produce a cognitive summary score from the neuropsychological battery. Then we analyzed sensitivity and specificity of the MoCA with receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

Both raw and adjusted MoCA scores showed only moderate sensitivity. The area under the ROC curve was 0.759 (95% CI 0.703–0.815) for the raw score and 0.788 (95% CI 0.734–0.842) for the adjusted score. Optimal discrimination was obtained with a raw score ≤ 25 (sensitivity: 0.526; specificity: 0.832; positive predictive value: 0.2; negative predictive value: 0.96) and an adjusted score − 0.603 (sensitivity: 0.716; specificity: 0.768; positive predictive value: 0.24; negative predictive value: 0.96).

Conclusion

The moderate sensitivity of MoCA indicates that it is not a suitable screening tool for detecting cognitive impairment in patients with newly-diagnosed high-grade glioma.

Bosma I, Vos MJ, Heimans JJ, Taphoorn MJB, Aaronson NK, Postma TJ et al (2007) The course of neurocognitive functioning in high-grade glioma patients1. Neuro-Oncol 9:53–62. https://doi.org/10.1215/15228517-2006-012 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Correa DD (2010) Neurocognitive function in brain tumors. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 10:232–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-010-0108-4 CrossRefPubMed

Gately L, McLachlan S, Dowling A, Philip J (2017) Life beyond a diagnosis of glioblastoma: a systematic review of the literature. J Cancer Surviv 11:447–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-0602-7 CrossRefPubMed

Hilverda K, Bosma I, Heimans JJ, Postma TJ, Peter Vandertop W, Slotman BJ et al (2010) Cognitive functioning in glioblastoma patients during radiotherapy and temozolomide treatment: initial findings. J Neurooncol 97:89–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-009-9993-2 CrossRefPubMed

van Kessel E, Baumfalk AE, van Zandvoort MJE, Robe PA, Snijders TJ (2017) Tumor-related neurocognitive dysfunction in patients with diffuse glioma: a systematic review of neurocognitive functioning prior to anti-tumor treatment. J Neurooncol 134:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2503-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Veretennikoff K, Walker D, Biggs V, Robinson G (2017) Changes in cognition and decision making capacity following brain tumour resection: illustrated with two cases. Brain Sci 7:122. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7100122 CrossRefPubMedCentral

Johnson DR, Wefel JS (2013) Relationship between cognitive function and prognosis in glioblastoma. CNS Oncol 2:195–201. https://doi.org/10.2217/cns.13.5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Meyers CA, Hess KR (2003) Multifaceted end points in brain tumor clinical trials: cognitive deterioration precedes MRI progression. Neuro-Oncol 5:89–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/5.2.89 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Weller M (2011) Neurocognitive function: an emerging surrogate endpoint for neuro-oncology trials. Neuro-Oncol 13:565–565. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nor065 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Meyers CA, Rock EP, Fine HA (2012) Refining endpoints in brain tumor clinical trials. J Neurooncol 108:227–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0813-8 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Giovagnoli AR (2012) Investigation of cognitive impairments in people with brain tumors. J Neurooncol 108:277–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0815-6 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Dehcordi SR, Mariano M, Mazza M, Galzio RJ (2013) Cognitive deficits in patients with low and high grade gliomas. J Neurosurg Sci 57:8

13.

Miotto EC, Silva Junior A, Silva CC, Cabrera HN, Machado MAR, Benute GRG et al (2011) Cognitive impairments in patients with low grade gliomas and high grade gliomas. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 69:596–601. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2011000500005 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Bompaire F, Lahutte M, Buffat S, Soussain C, Ardisson AE, Terziev R et al (2018) New insights in radiation-induced leukoencephalopathy: a prospective cross-sectional study. Support Care Cancer 26:4217–4226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4296-9 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Froklage FE, Oosterbaan LJ, Sizoo EM, de Groot M, Bosma I, Sanchez E et al (2014) Central neurotoxicity of standard treatment in patients with newly-diagnosed high-grade glioma: a prospective longitudinal study. J Neurooncol 116:387–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1310-4 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Jacob J, Durand T, Feuvret L, Mazeron J-J, Delattre J-Y, Hoang-Xuan K et al (2018) Cognitive impairment and morphological changes after radiation therapy in brain tumors: a review. Radiother Oncol 128:221–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.027 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Soussain C, Ricard D, Fike JR, Mazeron J-J, Psimaras D, Delattre J-Y (2009) CNS complications of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Lancet 374:1639–1651CrossRef

18.

Flechl B, Sax C, Ackerl M, Crevenna R, Woehrer A, Hainfellner J et al (2017) The course of quality of life and neurocognition in newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma. Radiother Oncol 125:228–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2017.07.027 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Stupp R, Weller M, Belanger K, Bogdahn U, Ludwin SK, Lacombe D et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987CrossRef

20.

Durand T, Bernier M-O, Léger I, Taillia H, Noël G, Psimaras D et al (2015) Cognitive outcome after radiotherapy in brain tumor. Curr Opin Oncol 27:510–515. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000000227 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Ricard D, Soussain C, Psimaras D (2011) Neurotoxicity of the CNS: diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Rev Neurol (Paris) 167:737–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurol.2011.08.005 CrossRef

22.

Taphoorn MJ, Klein M (2004) Cognitive deficits in adult patients with brain tumours. Lancet Neurol 3:159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00680-5 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Ali FS, Hussain MR, Gutiérrez C, Demireva P, Ballester LY, Zhu J-J et al (2018) Cognitive disability in adult patients with brain tumors. Cancer Treat Rev 65:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.02.007 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Schagen SB, Klein M, Reijneveld JC, Brain E, Deprez S, Joly F et al (2014) Monitoring and optimising cognitive function in cancer patients: present knowledge and future directions. Eur J Cancer Suppl 12:29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcsup.2014.03.003 CrossRef

25.

Day J, Gillespie DC, Rooney AG, Bulbeck HJ, Zienius K, Boele F et al (2016) Neurocognitive deficits and neurocognitive rehabilitation in adult brain tumors. Curr Treat Options Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-016-0406-5 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Olson RA, Iverson GL, Carolan H, Parkinson M, Brooks BL, McKenzie M (2011) Prospective comparison of two cognitive screening tests: diagnostic accuracy and correlation with community integration and quality of life. J Neurooncol 105:337–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-011-0595-4 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Olson RA, Chhanabhai T, McKenzie M (2008) Feasibility study of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in patients with brain metastases. Support Care Cancer 16:1273–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0431-3 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I et al (2005) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment: MOCA: A BRIEF SCREENING TOOL FOR MCI. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:695–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x CrossRefPubMed

30.

Meyers CA, Wefel JS (2003) The use of the mini-mental state examination to assess cognitive functioning in cancer trials: no ifs, ands, buts, or sensitivity. J Clin Oncol 21:3557–3558. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.07.080 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Robinson GA, Biggs V, Walker DG (2015) Cognitive screening in brain tumors: short but sensitive enough? Front Oncol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00060 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Boone M, Roussel M, Chauffert B, Le Gars D, Godefroy O (2016) Prevalence and profile of cognitive impairment in adult glioma: a sensitivity analysis. J Neurooncol 129:123–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2152-7 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Smith T, Gildeh N, Holmes C (2007) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: validity and utility in a memory clinic setting. Can J Psychiatry 52:329–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370705200508 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Olson R, Tyldesley S, Carolan H, Parkinson M, Chhanabhai T, McKenzie M (2011) Prospective comparison of the prognostic utility of the Mini Mental State Examination and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in patients with brain metastases. Support Care Cancer 19:1849–1855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-1028-1 CrossRefPubMed

35.

Wefel JS, Vardy J, Ahles T, Schagen SB (2011) International Cognition and Cancer Task Force recommendations to harmonise studies of cognitive function in patients with cancer. Lancet Oncol 12:703–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70294-1 CrossRefPubMed

36.

Zvi Ram on behalf of the EF-14 Trial Investigators, Zhu J-J, Demireva P, Kanner AA, Pannullo S, Mehdorn M et al (2017) Health-related quality of life, cognitive screening, and functional status in a randomized phase III trial (EF-14) of tumor treating fields with temozolomide compared to temozolomide alone in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 135:545–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2601-y CrossRefPubMedCentral

37.

Wang Q, Xiao F, Song X, Yu Y (2019) Risk factors for cognitive impairment in high grade glioma patients treated with postoperative radiochemotherapy. Cancer Res Treat. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.242 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Durand T, Jacob S, Lebouil L, Douzane H, Lestaevel P, Rahimian A et al (2015) EpiBrainRad: an epidemiologic study of the neurotoxicity induced by radiotherapy in high grade glioma patients. BMC Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-015-0519-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Taillia H, Léger I, Moroni C, Boone M, Belin C, Maillet D, et al (2015) La batterie du Grec-Onco (Groupe de Réflexion sur les Evaluations Cognitives en Oncologie). Grémoire 2 - Tests Echelles Mal. Neurol. Avec Symptomatologie Cogn. 1st ed., Paris: De Boeck Solal, pp 33–7

40.

Lange M, Castel H, Le Fel J, Tron L, Maillet D, Bernaudin M et al (2019) How to assess and manage cognitive impairment induced by treatments of non-central nervous system cancer. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 107:602–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.028 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Colombo F, Assal G (1992) Le test de dénomination de Boston: adaptation française et versions abrégées. Rev Eur Psychol Appliquée 1:67–73

42.

Le Osterrieth PA (1944) test de copie d’une figure complexe. Arch Psychol 30:206–356

43.

Buschke H (1984) Cued recall in amnesia. Clin Exp Neuropsychol 6:433–440CrossRef

44.

Meulemans T (2008) La batterie GREFEX: présentation générale. Fonct. Exéc. Pathol. Neurol. Psychiatr. 1st ed., Marseille: Solal, pp 217–29

45.

Fuhrer R, Rouillon FL (1989) version française de l’échelle CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale). Description et traduction de l’échelle d’autoévaluation [The French version of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale). Psychiatr Psychobiol 4:163–166CrossRef

46.

Goldberg D, Bridges K, Duncan-Jones P, Grayson D (1988) Detecting anxiety and depression in general medical settings. BMJ 297:897–899CrossRef

47.

Godefroy O, Gibbons L, Diouf M, Nyenhuis D, Roussel M, Black S et al (2014) Validation of an integrated method for determining cognitive ability: implications for routine assessments and clinical trials. Cortex 54:51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.01.016 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Roussel M, Godefroy O (2017) La batterie GRECOGVASC: evaluation et diagnostic des troubles neurocognitifs vasculaires avec ou sans contexte d’accident vasculaire cérébral

49.

Barbay M, Taillia H, Nédélec-Ciceri C, Bompaire F, Bonnin C, Varvat J et al (2018) Prevalence of poststroke neurocognitive disorders using National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network, VASCOG Criteria (vascular behavioral and cognitive disorders), and optimized criteria of cognitive deficit. Stroke 49:1141–1147. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018889 CrossRefPubMed

50.

Hubley AM, Tremblay D (2002) Comparability of total score performance on the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure and a modified Taylor complex figure. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 24:370–382. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.24.3.370.984 CrossRefPubMed

51.

Loring M (2003) The Medical College of Georgia (MCG) complex figures: four forms for follow-up. Handb. Rey-Osterrieth Complex Fig. Usage Clin. Res. Appl. Psychological Assessment Resources, Lutz

52.

Habets EJJ, Kloet A, Walchenbach R, Vecht CJ, Klein M, Taphoorn MJB (2014) Tumour and surgery effects on cognitive functioning in high-grade glioma patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156:1451–1459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2115-8 CrossRef

53.

Johnson DR, Sawyer AM, Meyers CA, O’Neill BP, Wefel JS (2012) Early measures of cognitive function predict survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncol 14:808–816. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nos082 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Klein M, Taphoorn MJB, Heimans JJ, van der Ploeg HM, Vandertop WP, Smit EF et al (2001) Neurobehavioral status and health-related quality of life in newly diagnosed high-grade glioma patients. J Clin Oncol 19:4037–4047. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2001.19.20.4037 CrossRefPubMed

55.

Talacchi A, Santini B, Savazzi S, Gerosa M (2011) Cognitive effects of tumour and surgical treatment in glioma patients. J Neurooncol 103:541–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0417-0 CrossRefPubMed

56.

Shallice T, Mussoni A, D’Agostino S, Skrap M (2010) Right posterior cortical functions in a tumour patient series. Cortex 46:1178–1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2010.04.005 CrossRefPubMed

57.

Castaneda AE, Tuulio-Henriksson A, Marttunen M, Suvisaari J, Lönnqvist J (2008) A review on cognitive impairments in depressive and anxiety disorders with a focus on young adults. J Affect Disord 106:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2007.06.006 CrossRefPubMed

58.

Rock PL, Roiser JP, Riedel WJ, Blackwell AD (2014) Cognitive impairment in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med 44:2029–2040. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713002535 CrossRefPubMed

59.

Hassler MR, Elandt K, Preusser M, Lehrner J, Binder P, Dieckmann K et al (2010) Neurocognitive training in patients with high-grade glioma: a pilot study. J Neurooncol 97:109–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-009-0006-2 CrossRefPubMed

60.

Flechl B, Ackerl M, Sax C, Dieckmann K, Crevenna R, Gaiger A et al (2012) Neurocognitive and sociodemographic functioning of glioblastoma long-term survivors. J Neurooncol 109:331–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0897-1 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Sensitivity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in screening for cognitive impairment in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma
verfasst von: Monica Ribeiro
Thomas Durand
Martine Roussel
Loïc Feuvret
Julian Jacob
Dimitri Psimaras
Georges Noel
Audrey Keller
Flavie Bompaire
Khê Hoang-Xuan
Marie-Odile Bernier
Olivier Godefroy
Damien Ricard
Publikationsdatum: 15.05.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03524-6

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

18.04.2024 | Arterielle Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Sensitivity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in screening for cognitive impairment in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Antihypertensiva schützen auch alte Menschen noch vor Demenz

Spinale Muskelatrophie: Neugeborenen-Screening lohnt sich

Manche Gestagene können das Risiko für Meningeome erhöhen

Parkinson: Größere Studie bestätigt Genauigkeit von Hauttest

Update Neurologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

Use of FDG-PET/CT for systemic assessment of suspected primary central nervous system lymphoma: a LOC study

Letter to editor: the burden of covid-19 in neuro-oncological patients

Awake craniotomy for gliomas involving motor-related areas: classification and function recovery

Randomized prospective trial of fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for bevacizumab-resistant high-grade glioma

Assessment of unintended shifts during frame-based stereotactic radiosurgery using cone beam computed tomography image guidance

Repeated gamma knife radiosurgery enables longer tumor control in cases of highly-recurrent intracranial ependymoma

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Antihypertensiva schützen auch alte Menschen noch vor Demenz

Spinale Muskelatrophie: Neugeborenen-Screening lohnt sich

Manche Gestagene können das Risiko für Meningeome erhöhen

Parkinson: Größere Studie bestätigt Genauigkeit von Hauttest

Update Neurologie